Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3565967.3571765acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgroupConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Articulating Institutionalization: How U.S. Academic Faculty Organize Work to Deposit Data and the Impacts on Long-Term Research Data Sustainability

Published: 08 January 2023 Publication History

Abstract

With the ‘data deluge’ leading to an institutionalized research environment for data management, U.S. academic faculty have increasingly faced pressure to make data suitable for deposit into research data repositories, which, in turn, is engendering a new set of practices to adapt federal policy to local circumstances. When these practices involve reorganizing workflows to align the goals of local and institutional stakeholders, we might call them ‘data articulations.’ This dissertation uses interviews to establish a grounded understanding of the data articulations behind deposit in 3 essays: (1) a phenomenological study of genomics faculty data management practices; (2) a grounded theory study developing a theory of data deposit as articulation work; (3) a comparative case study identifying the factors associated with ‘articulating institutionalization’ in high-institutionalization and low-institutionalization of data deposit contexts. Expected findings include a framework of datarticulations and empirical insight into how faculty organize data management work.

References

[1]
Akers, K. G., & Doty, J. (2013). Disciplinary differences in faculty research data management practices and perspectives.
[2]
Atkins, D. (2003). Revolutionizing science and engineering through cyberinfrastructure: Report of the National Science Foundation blue-ribbon advisory panel on cyberinfrastructure.
[3]
Crowston, K., & Qin, J. (2011). A capability maturity model for scientific data management: Evidence from the literature. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 48(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.2011.14504801036
[4]
Darch, P. T., Borgman, C. L., Traweek, S., Cummings, R. L., Wallis, J. C., & Sands, A. E. (2015). What lies beneath?: Knowledge infrastructures in the subseafloor biosphere and beyond. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 16(1), 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-015-0137-3
[5]
Edwards, P. N., Jackson, S. J., Bowker, G. C., & Knobel, C. P. (2007). Understanding infrastructure: Dynamics, tensions, and design.
[6]
Hey, T., & Trefethen, A. E. (2005). Cyberinfrastructure for e-Science. Science, 308(5723), 817–821.
[7]
Hine, C. (2006). New infrastructures for knowledge production: Understanding e-science. IGI Global.
[8]
Kim, Y. (2013). Institutional and Individual Influences on Scientists’ Data Sharing Behaviors. School of Information Studies - Dissertations. https://surface.syr.edu/it_etd/85
[9]
Lee, C. P., Dourish, P., & Mark, G. (2006). The human infrastructure of cyberinfrastructure. Proceedings of the 2006 20th Anniversary Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 483–492. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1180950
[10]
Neang, A., Sutherland, W., Beach, M., & Lee, C. (2020). Data Integration as Coordination: The Articulation of Data Work in an Ocean Science Collaboration.
[11]
Sands, A. E. (2017). Managing Astronomy Research Data: Data Practices in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey and Large Synoptic Survey Telescope Projects [UCLA]. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/80p1w0pm
[12]
Tenopir, C., Allard, S., Douglass, K., Aydinoglu, A. U., Wu, L., Read, E., Manoff, M., & Frame, M. (2011). Data Sharing by Scientists: Practices and Perceptions. PLoS ONE, 6(6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021101
[13]
Widmalm, S. (2016). The Practice Turn in Science Studies: Past and Present: Léna Soler, Sjoerd Zwart, Michael Lynch, and Vincent Israel-Jost (eds) (2014) Science After the Practice turn in the Philosophy, History, and Social Studies of Science. Routledge, New York and London, ISBN: 978-0-415-72295-7, 346 pp, $145 (Hardback). Science & Education, 25(7–8), 943–946. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-016-9854-2
[14]
Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, Ij. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N., Boiten, J.-W., da Silva Santos, L. B., & Bourne, P. E. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023) ‘Routine Infrastructuring’: How Social Scientists Appropriate Resources to Deposit Qualitative Data to ICPSR and Implications for FAIR and CARE Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology10.1002/pra2.76960:1(61-72)Online publication date: 22-Oct-2023

Index Terms

  1. Articulating Institutionalization: How U.S. Academic Faculty Organize Work to Deposit Data and the Impacts on Long-Term Research Data Sustainability
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image ACM Conferences
        GROUP '23: Companion Proceedings of the 2023 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work
        January 2023
        98 pages
        ISBN:9781450399456
        DOI:10.1145/3565967
        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Sponsors

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        Published: 08 January 2023

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Extended-abstract
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Conference

        GROUP '23
        Sponsor:

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate 125 of 405 submissions, 31%

        Upcoming Conference

        GROUP '25
        The 2025 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work
        January 12 - 15, 2025
        Hilton Head , SC , USA

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)23
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
        Reflects downloads up to 17 Oct 2024

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        Cited By

        View all
        • (2023) ‘Routine Infrastructuring’: How Social Scientists Appropriate Resources to Deposit Qualitative Data to ICPSR and Implications for FAIR and CARE Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology10.1002/pra2.76960:1(61-72)Online publication date: 22-Oct-2023

        View Options

        Get Access

        Login options

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format.

        HTML Format

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media