Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3565995.3566025acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster
Public Access

Comparing Accelerometry and Depth Sensing-Based Computer Vision for Canine Tail Wagging Interpretation

Published: 29 March 2023 Publication History

Abstract

This paper presents a preliminary effort to evaluate alternative sensing modalities for automated, high-resolution tracking of dog tail position and movement as a behavioral communication tool. We compare two different methods: (1) inertial measurement devices placed on dog outfits, and (2) remotely positioned cameras supported with custom vision-based tail wag detection algorithms. The small size and non-invasiveness of the inertial sensors and the non-contact and remote nature of the camera system both promote subject comfort and continuous signal acquisition while not affecting the mechanics of dog tail movement. The preliminary findings support that the higher-resolution and continuous interpretations on the dog tail movements and positions can pave the way for assessing their emotional states and designing more appropriate training and play environments.

References

[1]
S. Aich, S. Chakraborty, J. S. Sim, D. J. Jang, and H. C. Kim. 2019. The Design of an Automated System for the Analysis of the Activity and Emotional Patterns of Dogs with Wearable Sensors Using Machine Learning. Appl. Sci. 9, 4938 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/app9224938
[2]
K. A. Artelle, L. K. Dumoulin, and T. E. Reimchen. 2011. Behavioural responses of dogs to asymmetrical tail wagging of a robotic dog replica. LATERALITY 16, 2 (2011), 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576500903386700
[3]
Alexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn, Xiaohua Zhai, Thomas Unterthiner, Mostafa Dehghani, Matthias Minderer, Georg Heigold, Sylvain Gelly, Jakob Uszkoreit, and Neil Houlsby. 2021. An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale. arxiv:2010.11929 [cs.CV]
[4]
Kaiming He, Georgia Gkioxari, Piotr Dollár, and Ross Girshick. 2017. Mask R-CNN. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). 2980–2988. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.2017.322
[5]
M. Kiley-Worthington. 1976. The Tail Movements of Ungulates, Canids and Felids with Particular Reference to Their Causation and Function as Displays. Brill 56, 1/2 (1976), 69–115. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4533714
[6]
Jessy Lauer, Mu Zhou, Shaokai Ye, William Menegas, Steffen Schneider, Tanmay Nath, Mohammed Mostafizur Rahman, Valentina Di Santo, Daniel Soberanes, Guoping Feng, Venkatesh N. Murthy, George Lauder, Catherine Dulac, Mackenzie Weygandt Mathis, and Alexander Mathis. 2022. Multi-animal pose estimation, identification and tracking with DeepLabCut. Nature Methods 19, 4 (April 2022), 496–504. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-022-01443-0 Number: 4 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group.
[7]
Clara Mancini. 2011. Animal-computer interaction: a manifesto. interactions 18, 4 (2011), 69–73.
[8]
Hédi Nabli. 2009. An overview on the simplex algorithm. Appl. Math. Comput. 210, 2 (2009), 479–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2009.01.013
[9]
Wilfredo Palma. 2016. Time Series Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ncsu/detail.action?docID=4517503
[10]
Warangkhana Phanwanich, Orrawan Kumdee, Panrasee Ritthipravat, and Yodchanan Wongsawat. 2011. Animal-assisted therapy for persons with disabilities based on canine tail language interpretation via fuzzy emotional behavior model. In 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 1133–1136. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6090265
[11]
Patricia Pons, Javier Jaen, and Alejandro Catala. 2015. Developing a depth-based tracking system for interactive playful environments with animals. ACE ’15: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology 59 (2015), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/2832932.2837007
[12]
James Reynolds, Parvez Ahmmed, and Alper Bozkurt. 2019. An Injectable System for Subcutaneous Photoplethysmography, Accelerometry, and Thermometry in Animals. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems 13, 5 (2019), 825–834. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBCAS.2019.2923153
[13]
David L. Roberts, Jeremy Park, Anthony Pappas, Margaret Gruen, and Megan Carson. 2019. Automated Tail Position Tracking with Millimeter Accuracy using Depth Sensing and Mask R-CNN. Print. ACI’19, Sixth International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction (Nov. 2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3371049.3371050
[14]
Luisa Ruge, Elizabeth Cox, Clara Mancini, and Rachael Luck. 2018. User Centered Design Approaches to Measuring Canine Behavior: Tail Wagging as a Measure of User Experience. Proceedings Of The Fifth International Conference On Animal Computer Interaction (Dec. 2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3295598.3295599
[15]
Enze Xie, Wenhai Wang, Zhiding Yu, Anima Anandkumar, Jose M Alvarez, and Ping Luo. 2021. SegFormer: Simple and Efficient Design for Semantic Segmentation with Transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.15203(2021).

Index Terms

  1. Comparing Accelerometry and Depth Sensing-Based Computer Vision for Canine Tail Wagging Interpretation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ACI '22: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction
    December 2022
    226 pages
    ISBN:9781450398305
    DOI:10.1145/3565995
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 29 March 2023

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Animal-Computer Interaction
    2. Computer Vision
    3. IMU
    4. Interpretability

    Qualifiers

    • Poster
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    ACI'22
    ACI'22: Ninth International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction
    December 5 - 8, 2022
    Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 204
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)168
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)16
    Reflects downloads up to 10 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Get Access

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media