Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3569009.3572801acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

FloraWear: Wearable Living Interface

Published: 26 February 2023 Publication History

Abstract

While nature can benefit people both mentally and physically, contemporary society has become increasingly disconnected from nature. To rebuild a stronger connection with nature in our everyday life, we introduce FloraWear, a do-it-yourself, wearable living interface, that enables people to easily and closely connect with plants. This pictorial introduces how knowledge is built and shared with others using hybrid craft and fabrication, illustrates the material experiments and design development for FloraWear, and discusses how it affects wearers. Then we summarize how FloraWear can help catalyze a shift in people's perspectives towards nature. By developing emotional ties to their wearable plants, FloraWear wearers begin to understand that both they and their plants are part of an ecosystem.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (FloreWear.mp4)
Video Documentation

References

[1]
Sara Adhitya, Beck Davis, Raune Frankjaer, Patricia Flanagan, and Zoe Mahony. 2016. The BIOdress: A Body-Worn Interface for Environmental Embodiment. In Proceedings of the TEI ’16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Eindhoven, Netherlands) (TEI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 627–634. https://doi.org/10.1145/2839462.2856345
[2]
Glenn Blauvelt, Tom Wrensch, and Michael Eisenberg. 2000. Integrating craft materials and computation. Knowledge-Based Systems 13, 7 (2000), 471–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-7051(00)00063-0
[3]
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2012. Thematic analysis. In APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological. American Psychological Association, 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004
[4]
Chen-Yen Chang and Ping-Kun Chen. 2005. Human Response to Window Views and Indoor Plants in the Workplace. HortScience HortSci 40, 5 (2005), 1354 – 1359. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.40.5.1354
[5]
Laura Devendorf, Abigail De Kosnik, Kate Mattingly, and Kimiko Ryokai. 2016. Probing the potential of post-anthropocentric 3D printing. In DIS 2016 - Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Fuse. Association for Computing Machinery, Inc, 170–181. https://doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901879
[6]
Laura Devendorf and Daniela K. Rosner. 2017. Beyond Hybrids: Metaphors and Margins in Design. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (Edinburgh, United Kingdom) (DIS ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 995–1000. https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064705
[7]
Paul Dourish. 2001. Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7221.001.0001
[8]
Robert Faludi, Kate Hartman, Kati London, and Rebecca Bray. 2006. Botanicalls. https://www.botanicalls.com.
[9]
Jan Fell, Pei-Yi Kuo, Travis Greene, and Jyun-Cheng Wang. 2022. A Biocentric Perspective on HCI Design Research Involving Plants. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 29, 5, Article 46 (oct 2022), 37 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3512887
[10]
Raune Frankjær and Peter Dalsgaard. 2018. Understanding Craft-Based Inquiry in HCI. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Hong Kong, China) (DIS ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 473–484. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196750
[11]
Raune Frankjær and Peter Dalsgaard. 2020. Knowledge-Creation Processes in Crafts-Based HCI Research: Introducing a Sympoietic Framework. In Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 49, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3419249.3420114
[12]
Alastair Fuad-Luke. 2008. Slow Design. In Wörterbuch Design: Begriffliche Perspektiven des Design, Michael Erlhoff and Tim Marshall (Eds.). Birkhäuser Basel, Basel, 368–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-8142-4_344
[13]
William W. Gaver, Jacob Beaver, and Steve Benford. 2003. Ambiguity as a Resource for Design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA) (CHI ’03). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1145/642611.642653
[14]
Elisa Giaccardi and Elvin Karana. 2015. Foundations of Materials Experience: An Approach for HCI. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (CHI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2447–2456. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702337
[15]
Connie Golsteijn, Elise van den Hoven, David Frohlich, and Abigail Sellen. 2014. Hybrid crafting: towards an integrated practice of crafting with physical and digital components. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 18, 3 (01 Mar 2014), 593–611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-013-0684-9
[16]
Phillip Gough, Soojeong Yoo, Martin Tomitsch, and Naseem Ahmadpour. 2021. Applying Bioaffordances through an Inquiry-Based Model: A Literature Review of Interactive Biodesign. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 37, 17 (2021), 1583–1597. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.1898846
[17]
Junyi Heo. 2008. Growing Plants. https://www.yankodesign.com/index.php/2008/05/28/plants-tell-you-what-they-want/.
[18]
Stephen Kaplan and Rachel Kaplan. 1989. The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press.
[19]
Raphael Kim, Pat Pataranutaporn, Jack Forman, Seung Ah Lee, Ingmar H. Riedel-Kruse, Mirela Alistar, Eldy S. Lazaro Vasquez, Katia Vega, Roland Van Dierendonck, Gilad Gome, Oren Zuckerman, Angela Vujic, David S. Kong, Pattie Maes, Hiroshi Ishii, Misha Sra, and Stefan Poslad. 2021. Microbe-HCI: Introduction and Directions for Growth. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3450408
[20]
Eric Klarenbeek. 2011. Mycelium Chair. https://www.ericklarenbeek.com.
[21]
Lara Campos. 2019. beGROUNDED. https://class.textile-academy.org/2019/lara.campos/projects/Documentation/
[22]
Kyungwon Lee, Jaewoo Jung, and Seung Ah Lee. 2020. MicroAquarium: An Immersive and Interactive Installation with Living Microorganisms. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI EA ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3383164
[23]
Jen Liu, Daragh Byrne, and Laura Devendorf. 2018. Design for Collaborative Survival: An Inquiry into Human-Fungi Relationships. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173614
[24]
Virginia I. Lohr, Caroline H. Pearson-Mims, and Georgia K. Goodwin. 1996. Interior Plants May Improve Worker Productivity and Reduce Stress in a Windowless Environment. Journal of Environmental Horticulture 14, 2 (06 1996), 97–100. https://doi.org/10.24266/0738-2898-14.2.97
[25]
Anna Loparev, Lauren Westendorf, Margaret Flemings, Jennifer Cho, Romie Littrell, Anja Scholze, and Orit Shaer. 2017. BacPack: Exploring the Role of Tangibles in a Museum Exhibit for Bio-Design. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Yokohama, Japan) (TEI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1145/3024969.3025000
[26]
William Odom, Siân Lindley, Larissa Pschetz, Vasiliki Tsaknaki, Anna Vallgårda, Mikael Wiberg, and Daisy Yoo. 2018. Time, Temporality, and Slowness: Future Directions for Design Research. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems (Hong Kong, China) (DIS ’18 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 383–386. https://doi.org/10.1145/3197391.3197392
[27]
Johanna Okerlund, Evan Segreto, Casey Grote, Lauren Westendorf, Anja Scholze, Romie Littrell, and Orit Shaer. 2016. SynFlo: A Tangible Museum Exhibit for Exploring Bio-Design. In Proceedings of the TEI ’16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Eindhoven, Netherlands) (TEI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 141–149. https://doi.org/10.1145/2839462.2839488
[28]
Ivan Poupyrev, Philipp Schoessler, Jonas Loh, and Munehiko Sato. 2012. Botanicus Interacticus: Interactive Plants Technology. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2012 Emerging Technologies (Los Angeles, California) (SIGGRAPH ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 4, 1 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2343456.2343460
[29]
Jules Pretty. 2004. How nature contributes to mental and physical health. Spirituality and Health International 5, 2 (2004), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/shi.220
[30]
Jules Pretty, Jo Peacock, Martin Sellens, and Murray Griffin. 2005. The mental and physical health outcomes of green exercise. International Journal of Environmental Health Research 15, 5 (2005), 319–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603120500155963
[31]
Harpreet Sareen and Pattie Maes. 2019. Cyborg botany: Exploring in-planta cybernetic systems for interaction. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3313091
[32]
Donald A Schön. 1984. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think In Action. Vol. 5126. Basic Books. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315237473
[33]
Richard Sennett. 2008. The craftsman. Yale University Press.
[34]
Jinsil Hwaryoung Seo, Annie Sungkajun, Tiffany Sanchez, and Jinkyo Suh. 2015. Touchology: Peripheral Interactive Plant Design for Well-being. Interaction Design and Architecture(s) Journal-IxD&A, N 27 (2015), 175–187.
[35]
Richard Shusterman. 1999. Somaesthetics: A disciplinary proposal. The journal of aesthetics and art criticism 57, 3 (1999), 299–313. https://doi.org/10.2307/432196
[36]
Nancy Smith, Shaowen Bardzell, and Jeffrey Bardzell. 2017. Designing for Cohabitation: Naturecultures, Hybrids, and Decentering the Human in Design. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1714–1725. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025948
[37]
Christa Sommerer and Laurent Mignonneau. 1992. Interactive Plant Growing. http://www.interface.ufg.ac.at/christa-laurent/WORKS/FRAMES/FrameSet.html.
[38]
Roger S. Ulrich. 1984. View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science 224, 4647 (1984), 420–421. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.6143402
[39]
Roger S. Ulrich, Robert F. Simons, Barbara D. Losito, Evelyn Fiorito, Mark A. Miles, and Michael Zelson. 1991. Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology 11, 3 (1991), 201–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80184-7
[40]
Eldy S. Lazaro Vasquez and Katia Vega. 2019. Myco-Accessories: Sustainable Wearables with Biodegradable Materials. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Symposium on Wearable Computers (London, United Kingdom) (ISWC ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 306–311. https://doi.org/10.1145/3341163.3346938
[41]
Edward O. Wilson. 1984. Biophilia. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvk12s6h
[42]
Jiwei Zhou, Bahareh Barati, Jun Wu, Diana Scherer, and Elvin Karana. 2021. Digital biofabrication to realize the potentials of plant roots for productdesign. Bio-Design and Manufacturing 4, 1 (01 Mar 2021), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42242-020-00088-2

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)"The Words We Do Not Yet Have." A Creative Inquiry Into Human-Plant RelationshipsProceedings of the 27th International Academic Mindtrek Conference10.1145/3681716.3681729(95-108)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Designing Plant-Driven Actuators for Robots to Grow, Age, and DecayProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661519(2481-2496)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Crip Reflections on Designing with Plants: Intersecting Disability Theory, Chronic Illness, and More-than-Human Design✱Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661509(1044-1058)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024

Index Terms

  1. FloraWear: Wearable Living Interface
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    TEI '23: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction
    February 2023
    709 pages
    ISBN:9781450399777
    DOI:10.1145/3569009
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 26 February 2023

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    TEI '23
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 393 of 1,367 submissions, 29%

    Upcoming Conference

    TEI '25

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)250
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)39
    Reflects downloads up to 10 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)"The Words We Do Not Yet Have." A Creative Inquiry Into Human-Plant RelationshipsProceedings of the 27th International Academic Mindtrek Conference10.1145/3681716.3681729(95-108)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2024
    • (2024)Designing Plant-Driven Actuators for Robots to Grow, Age, and DecayProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661519(2481-2496)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
    • (2024)Crip Reflections on Designing with Plants: Intersecting Disability Theory, Chronic Illness, and More-than-Human Design✱Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661509(1044-1058)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Get Access

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media