PRO-UX: System Redesign Process for Improving the UX
Authors: 
Joseane O. V. Paiva, Bosco Borges, Paulo Duarte, Ismayle S. Santos, Rossana M. C. Andrade, Valéria LelliAuthors Info & Claims
Joseane O. V. Paiva, Bosco Borges, Paulo Duarte, Ismayle S. Santos, Rossana M. C. Andrade, Valéria LelliAuthors Info & ClaimsArticle No.: 26, Pages 1 - 9
Abstract
System redesign is a software modernization strategy that consists of restructuring a solution to provide a new graphical interface, improving the user experience, and using modern technologies while preserving relevant system functionalities. When it comes to enterprise applications, the challenge for redesign becomes greater. It is necessary to ensure that the system can operate according to existing business rules and that its operation will not compromise the integrity of the enterprise. This paper presents a process for redesigning systems to improve the user experience. We also describe a case study where we applied this process to redesign an enterprise application and share some lessons learned during the application redesign.
References
[1]
Meghan Ede and Garett Dworman. 2016. Why Designers Might Want to Redesign Company Processes to Get to Better UX Design: A Case Study. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 840–848.
[2]
Gartner. 2016. Gartner IT glossary: digitalization. Available at: http://www. gartner.com/it-glossary/digitalization/ (2016).
[3]
M. Keeling. 2021. Headwinds to Redesign. IEEE Software 38, 02 (mar 2021), 128–132. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2020.3043081
[4]
Thomas Keller. 2011. Contextual Requirements Elicitation An Overview.
[5]
Klaus Krippendorff. 2018. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage publications.
[6]
Jonathan Lazar, Jinjuan Heidi Feng, and Harry Hochheiser. 2017. Research methods in human-computer interaction. Morgan Kaufmann.
[7]
Tanu Malhotra and Krishnan Vijayaraghavan. 2018. Learnings from Designing ‘Simplified’UX for Complex Planning and Scheduling Application for Enterprises. In Proceedings of the 32nd International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference 32. 1–4.
[8]
Christine Murad, Cosmin Munteanu, Benjamin R Cowan, and Leigh Clark. 2019. Revolution or evolution? Speech interaction and HCI design guidelines. IEEE Pervasive Computing 18, 2 (2019), 33–45.
[9]
Jakob Nielsen. 1994. Usability inspection methods. In Conference companion on Human factors in computing systems. 413–414.
[10]
Deniese Pierotti. 1995. Heuristic evaluation-a system checklist. Xerox Corporation 12(1995).
[11]
Per Runeson and Martin Höst. 2009. Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering. Empirical software engineering 14, 2 (2009), 131–164.
[12]
G Shabrina, LA Lestari, BM Iqbal, and DH Syaifullah. 2019. Redesign of User Interface Zakat Mobile Smartphone Application with User Experience Approach. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Vol. 505. IOP Publishing, 012088.
[13]
H. Sharp, J. Preece, and Y. Rogers. 2019. Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction. Wiley. https://books.google.com.br/books?id=AlSQDwAAQBAJ
[14]
Johannes Vrana and Ripi Singh. 2021. Digitization, Digitalization, and Digital Transformation. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48200-8_39-1
Index Terms
- PRO-UX: System Redesign Process for Improving the UX
Recommendations
Usability and UX practices in small enterprises: lessons from a survey of the Brazilian context
SIGDOC '16: Proceedings of the 34th ACM International Conference on the Design of CommunicationThe role of small and medium enterprises (SME), especially small businesses, has significantly increased in the developing of interactive applications. Given the relevance of these companies in the market, the adoption of usability and user experience (...
Approaches and Principles for UX Web Experiences: A Case Study Approach
The challenge of creating user experiences involves a panoply of multidisciplinary competences in terms of knowing tools, processes and the business itself. This study intends to identify and synthesize the main approaches and principles adopted by web ...
Developing a UX KPI based on the user experience questionnaire
Highlights- We have developed an interpretable user experience KPI for use in organizations based on the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ).
AbstractDecisions in Companies are made typically by using a number of entirely different key figures. A user experience key figure is one of many important key figures that represents one aspect of the success of the company or its products. ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
November 2022
352 pages
ISBN:9781450399999
DOI:10.1145/3571473
- Editors:
- Edna Dias Canedo,
- Davi Viana,
- Vinicius Garcia,
- Carla Bezerra,
- Ismayle de Sousa Santos,
- Bruno Gadelha,
- Ivan Machado,
- Sérgio Soares,
- Uirá Kulesza,
- Breno de França,
- Tayana Conte,
- José Carlos Maldonado,
- Sheila Reinehr,
- Andreia Malucelli,
- Adriano Bessa Albuquerque,
- Gleison Santos,
- Ivan Machado,
- Monalessa Perini Barcellos,
- Rodrigo Santos,
- Sheila Reinehr,
- Tayana Conte,
- Crescencio Lima,
- Danilo Monteiro,
- Adriana Damian,
- Larissa Rocha
Copyright © 2022 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 27 January 2023
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Funding Sources
Conference
SBQS '22
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 35 of 99 submissions, 35%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 74Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)38
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)8
Reflects downloads up to 15 Oct 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format