Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Global Filter: Augmenting Images to Support Seeing the “Big Picture” for People with Local Interference

Published: 10 June 2023 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    Some neurodivergent people prioritize visual details over the “big picture”. While excellent attention to detail has many advantages, some contexts require the rapid integration of global and local information. A local processing style can be so strong that local details interfere with the fluid integration of global information required for processing of information rapidly displayed on user interfaces. This disconnect between context of an interaction and processing style can be termed local interference. Personalization of visual stimuli can promote a more accessible computing experience. We describe how technological interventions can support shifting of visual attention from local to global features to make them more accessible. We present two empirical studies. One study with one autistic adult revealed a significant shift in eye gaze fixation, and the other study with 20 autistic children revealed filters that visually emphasize primary aspects encouraged more global comments about the image content.

    References

    [1]
    M. Ahissar and S. Hochstein. 2004. The reverse hierarchy theory of visual perceptual learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8, 10 (Oct. 2004), 457–464. DOI:
    [2]
    M. B. Almourad and E. Bataineh. 2020. Visual attention toward human face recognizing for autism spectrum disorder and normal developing children: An eye tracking study. In Proceedings of the 2020 6th International Conference on E-Business and Applications (New York, NY, USA, Feb. 2020), 99–104.
    [3]
    D. R. Badcock et al. 2005. Interactions between luminance and contrast signals in global form detection. Vision Research 45, 7 (Mar. 2005), 881–889. DOI:
    [4]
    M. Bar. 2004. Visual objects in context. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 5, 8 (Aug. 2004), 617–629. DOI:
    [5]
    S. Baron-Cohen et al. 2009. Talent in autism: Hyper-systemizing, hyper-attention to detail and sensory hypersensitivity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 364, 1522 (May 2009), 1377–1383. DOI:
    [6]
    S. Baron-Cohen and M. V. Lombardo. 2017. Autism and talent: The cognitive and neural basis of systemizing. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience 19, 4 (Dec. 2017), 345–353. DOI:
    [7]
    C. Becchio et al. 2010. Perception of shadows in children with autism spectrum disorders. PLOS ONE 5, 5 (May 2010), e10582. DOI:
    [8]
    A. Benavoli et al. Should We Really Use Post-Hoc Tests Based on Mean-Ranks? 10.
    [9]
    L. Bouvet et al. 2011. Global precedence effect in audition and vision: Evidence for similar cognitive styles across modalities. Acta Psychologica 138, 2 (Oct. 2011), 329–335. DOI:
    [10]
    L. E. Boyd et al. 2017. Evaluating an iPad game to address overselectivity in preliterate AAC users with minimal verbal behavior. In Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (New York, NY, Oct. 2017), 240–249.
    [11]
    J. Christie et al. 2012. Global versus local processing: seeing the left side of the forest and the right side of the trees. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 6, (Feb. 2012). DOI:
    [12]
    E. Courchesne and K. Pierce. 2005. Why the frontal cortex in autism might be talking only to itself: Local over-connectivity but long-distance disconnection. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 15, 2 (Apr. 2005), 225–230. DOI:
    [13]
    J. Davidoff et al. 2008. Local and global processing: Observations from a remote culture. Cognition 108, 3 (Sep. 2008), 702–709. DOI:
    [14]
    W. V. Dube and K. M. Wilkinson. 2014. The potential influence of “Stimulus Overselectivity” in AAC: Information from Eye-tracking and behavioral studies of attention. Augmentative and Alternative Communication (Baltimore, Md. : 1985) 30, 2 (Jun. 2014), 172–185. DOI:
    [15]
    S. Eraslan et al. 2021. “Keep it simple!”: An eye-tracking study for exploring complexity and distinguishability of web pages for people with autism. Universal Access in the Information Society 20, 1 (Mar. 2021), 69–84. DOI:
    [16]
    S. Eraslan et al. 2019. Web users with autism: Eye tracking evidence for differences. Behaviour & Information Technology 38, 7 (Jul. 2019), 678–700. DOI:
    [17]
    G. R. Fink et al. 1997. Neural mechanisms involved in the processing of global and local aspects of hierarchically organized visual stimuli. Brain 120, 10 (Oct. 1997), 1779–1791. DOI:
    [18]
    J. W. de Fockert and A. Cooper. 2014. Higher levels of depression are associated with reduced global bias in visual processing. Cognition and Emotion 28, 3 (Apr. 2014), 541–549. DOI:
    [19]
    N. E. V. Foster et al. 2016. Effects of age and attention on auditory global–local processing in children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 46, 4 (Apr. 2016), 1415–1428. DOI:
    [20]
    J. M. Foxton et al. 2003. Reading skills are related to global, but not local, acoustic pattern perception. Nature Neuroscience 6, (2003), 343–344.
    [21]
    S. Franceschini et al. 2017. A different vision of dyslexia: Local precedence on global perception. Scientific Reports 7, 1 (Dec. 2017), 17462. DOI:
    [22]
    J. B. Ganz et al. 2015. Impact of PECS tablet computer app on receptive identification of pictures given a verbal stimulus. Developmental Neurorehabilitation 18, 2 (Mar. 2015), 82–87. DOI:
    [23]
    B. A. Gargaro et al. 2018. Attentional mechanisms in autism, ADHD, and Autism-ADHD using a local–global paradigm. Journal of Attention Disorders 22, 14 (Dec. 2018), 1320–1332. DOI:
    [24]
    L. Graham. 2008. Gestalt theory in interactive media design. Journal of Humanitites and Social Science 2, 1 (2008).
    [25]
    Great jobs for detail-oriented people. Retrieved from https://www.monster.com/career-advice/article/detail-oriented-jobs-0916 Accessed: 2022-05-05.
    [26]
    T. F. Gross. 2005. Global–Local precedence in the perception of facial age and emotional expression by children with autism and other developmental disabilities. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 35, 6 (Nov. 2005), 773. DOI:
    [27]
    Q. Guillon et al. 2014. Visual social attention in autism spectrum disorder: Insights from eye tracking studies. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 42, (May 2014), 279–297. DOI:
    [28]
    R. Hübner and G. Volberg. 2005. The integration of object levels and their content: A theory of global/local processing and related hemispheric differences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 31, 3 (2005), 520–541. DOI:
    [29]
    H. C. Hughes et al. 1996. Global precedence, spatial frequency channels, and the statistics of natural images. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 8, 3 (Jul. 1996), 197–230. DOI:
    [30]
    H. C. Hughes et al. 1990. Global versus local processing in the absence of low spatial frequencies. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2, 3 (Jul. 1990), 272–282. DOI:
    [31]
    K. K. Imbir. 2019. Does reading words differing in arousal load influence local vs. global scope of perception? Roczniki Psychologiczne 22, 3 (2019), 277–297. DOI:
    [32]
    T. Jolliffe and S. Baron-Cohen. 2000. Linguistic processing in high-functioning adults with autism or Asperger's syndrome. Is global coherence impaired? Psychological Medicine 30, 5 (Sep. 2000), 1169–1187. DOI:
    [33]
    E. Kalay et al. 2020. Authentic leadership outcomes in detail-oriented occupations: Commitment, role-stress, and intentions to leave. Journal of Management & Organization 26, 5 (Sep. 2020), 832–849. DOI:
    [34]
    D. A. Kaliukhovich et al. 2021. Visual preference for biological motion in children and adults with autism spectrum disorder: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 51, 7 (Jul. 2021), 2369–2380. DOI:
    [35]
    M. Katagiri et al. 2013. Individuals with asperger's disorder exhibit difficulty in switching attention from a local level to a global level. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 43, 2 (Feb. 2013), 395–403. DOI:
    [36]
    K. Kihara and Y. Takeda. 2019. The role of low-spatial frequency components in the processing of deceptive faces: A study using artificial face models. Frontiers in Psychology 10, (2019), 1468. DOI:
    [37]
    A. Klin et al. 2002. Visual fixation patterns during viewing of naturalistic social situations as predictors of social competence in individuals with autism. Archives of General Psychiatry 59, 9 (Sep. 2002), 809–816. DOI:
    [38]
    K. Koldewyn et al. 2013. Global/Local processing in autism: Not a disability, but a disinclination. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 43, 10 (Oct. 2013), 2329–2340. DOI:
    [39]
    J. Light et al. 2019. Designing effective AAC displays for individuals with developmental or acquired disabilities: State of the science and future research directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 35, 1 (2019), 42–55.
    [40]
    E. O. Lillie et al. 2011. The n-of-1 clinical trial: the ultimate strategy for individualizing medicine? Personalized Medicine 8, 2 (Mar. 2011), 161–173. DOI:
    [41]
    Y. Lu and H. Guo. 1999. Background removal in image indexing and retrieval. In Proceedings 10th International Conference on Image Analysis and Processing (Sep. 1999), 933–938.
    [42]
    K. Mack et al. 2021. What Do We Mean by “Accessibility Research”? A Literature Survey of Accessibility Papers in CHI and ASSETS from 1994 to 2019. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, May 2021), 1–18.
    [43]
    E. Milne and M. Szczerbinski. 2009. Global and local perceptual style, field-independence, and central coherence: An attempt at concept validation. Advances in Cognitive Psychology 5, (Apr. 2009), 1–26. DOI:
    [44]
    A. Muth et al. 2014. Visuo-Spatial performance in autism: A meta-analysis. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 44, 12 (Dec. 2014), 3245–3263. DOI:
    [45]
    D. Navon. 1969. Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Perception and Psychophysics 5, (1969), 197–200.
    [46]
    D. Navon. 1981. The forest revisited: More on global precedence. Psychological Research 43, 1 (Jul. 1981), 1–32. DOI:
    [47]
    A. Oliva and P. G. Schyns. 1997. Coarse blobs or fine edges? Evidence that information diagnosticity changes the perception of complex visual stimuli. Cognitive Psychology 34, 1 (Oct. 1997), 72–107. DOI:
    [48]
    A. Oliva and A. Torralba. 2002. Scene-Centered description from spatial envelope properties. Biologically Motivated Computer Vision (Berlin, 2002), 263–272.
    [49]
    K. S. Papadopoulos and D. B. Goudiras. 2005. Accessibility assistance for visually-impaired people in digital texts. British Journal of Visual Impairment 23, 2 (May 2005), 75–83. DOI:
    [50]
    E. A. Papagiannopoulou et al. 2014. A systematic review and meta-analysis of eye-tracking studies in children with autism spectrum disorders. Social Neuroscience 9, 6 (Nov. 2014), 610–632. DOI:
    [51]
    F. H. Previc. 1990. Functional specialization in the lower and upper visual fields in humans: Its ecological origins and neurophysiological implications. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13, 3 (Sep. 1990), 519–542. DOI:
    [52]
    G. Rance et al. 2014. The use of listening devices to ameliorate auditory deficit in children with autism. The Journal of Pediatrics 164, 2 (Feb. 2014), 352–357. DOI:
    [53]
    L. Rello and R. Baeza-Yates. 2016. The effect of font type on screen readability by people with dyslexia. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing 8, 4 (May 2016), 1–33. DOI:
    [54]
    L. Rello and J. P. Bigham. 2017. Good background colors for readers: A study of people with and without dyslexia. In Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (New York, NY, 2017), 72–80.
    [55]
    N. J. Rinehart et al. 2000. Atypical interference of local detail on global processing in high- functioning autism and asperger's disorder. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines 41, 6 (Sep. 2000), 769–778.
    [56]
    C. E. Robertson and S. Baron-Cohen. 2017. Sensory perception in autism. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 18, 11 (Nov. 2017), 671–684. DOI:
    [57]
    O. Rubinsten and A. Henik. 2006. Double dissociation of functions in developmental dyslexia and dyscalculia. Journal of Educational Psychology 98, 4 (2006), 854–867. DOI:
    [58]
    A. Shah and U. Frith. 1983. An islet of ability in autistic children: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 24, 4 (1983), 613–620. DOI:
    [59]
    D. J. Sheskin. 2003. Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures: Third Edition Chapman and Hall/CRC.
    [60]
    D. Smith et al. 2015. Visual integration in autism. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 9, (2015).
    [61]
    Y. Song and Y. Hakoda. 2015. Lack of global precedence and global-to-local interference without local processing deficit: A robust finding in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder under different visual angles of the Navon task. Neuropsychology 29, 6 (2015), 888–894. DOI:
    [62]
    G. Soroor et al. 2021. Priming global processing strategy improves the perceptual performance of children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (Apr. 2021). DOI:
    [63]
    R. A. Stevenson et al. 2018. Seeing the forest and the trees: Default local processing in individuals with high autistic traits does not come at the expense of global attention. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 48, 4 (Apr. 2018), 1382–1396. DOI:
    [64]
    S. E. Taylor. 1991. Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: The mobilization-minimization hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin 110, 1 (1991), 67–85. DOI:
    [65]
    R. Van der Hallen et al. 2015. Global processing takes time: A meta-analysis on local–global visual processing in ASD. Psychological Bulletin 141, 3 (2015), 549.
    [66]
    S. Wang et al. 2015. Atypical visual saliency in autism spectrum disorder quantified through model-based eye tracking. Neuron 88, 3 (Nov. 2015), 604–616. DOI:
    [67]
    X. WANG. 2017. BEING SOCIAL IN ISOCIAL: A Case Study of Youth with Autism Spectrum Disorder Learning Social Competence in 3D Collaborative Virtual Learning Environment American Academic Press.
    [68]
    J. Xu et al. 2014. Predicting human gaze beyond pixels. Journal of Vision 14, 1 (Jan. 2014), 28–28. DOI:
    [69]
    V. Yaneva et al. 2015. Accessible texts for autism: An eye-tracking study. In Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility - ASSETS ’15 (Lisbon, Portugal, 2015), 49–57.
    [70]
    V. Yanulevskaya et al. 2013. A proto-object-based computational model for visual saliency. Journal of Vision 13, 13 (Nov. 2013), 27. DOI:
    [71]
    I. Yovel et al. 2005. Who sees trees before forest?: The obsessive-compulsive style of visual attention. Psychological Science 16, 2 (Feb. 2005), 123–129. DOI:

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Visual Noise Cancellation: Exploring Visual Discomfort and Opportunities for Vision AugmentationsACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/363469931:2(1-26)Online publication date: 29-Jan-2024

    Index Terms

    1. Global Filter: Augmenting Images to Support Seeing the “Big Picture” for People with Local Interference

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
      ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction  Volume 30, Issue 3
      June 2023
      544 pages
      ISSN:1073-0516
      EISSN:1557-7325
      DOI:10.1145/3604411
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 10 June 2023
      Online AM: 02 December 2022
      Accepted: 21 October 2022
      Revised: 17 May 2022
      Received: 06 June 2021
      Published in TOCHI Volume 30, Issue 3

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Autism
      2. assistive technology
      3. sensory processing
      4. visual filters
      5. accessibility
      6. Neurodiversity
      7. global local processing
      8. local interference
      9. slow global order processing

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Funding Sources

      • Chapman University Institutional Review Board
      • Microsoft Ada Lovelace fellowship for the Jazette Johnson

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)186
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)11
      Reflects downloads up to 10 Aug 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Visual Noise Cancellation: Exploring Visual Discomfort and Opportunities for Vision AugmentationsACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/363469931:2(1-26)Online publication date: 29-Jan-2024

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      Full Access

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Full Text

      View this article in Full Text.

      Full Text

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media