research-article

Open access

Enacting Data Feminism in Advocacy Data Work

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Volume 7, Issue CSCW1

Article No.: 47, Pages 1 - 28

https://doi.org/10.1145/3579480

Published: 16 April 2023 Publication History

Abstract

In this paper, we present the results of a study that examines the role of data in nonprofit advocacy work. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 25 individuals who play critical roles in the data work of 18 different advocacy organizations. Our analysis reveals five key stakeholders in advocacy data work-beneficiaries, policymakers, funding and partner organizations, gatekeepers, and local publics. It also contributes a framework of four functions of data work in nonprofit organizations-data as amplifier, activator, legitimizer, and incubator. We characterize the challenges in data work that exist, particularly in widespread attempts to reappropriate data work across functions. These challenges in reappropriation are often rooted in participants' effects to enact data feminist principles from the margins of the data economy. Finally, we discuss how nonprofit institutions operate outside of the dominant data work goals known as the three Ss (surveillance, selling, and science) and propose a fourth S, social good, that is working to challenge the norms of the data economy and should be considered in research regarding the data economy moving forward.

References

[1]

Adriana Alvarado Garcia, Alyson L Young, and Lynn Dombrowski. 2017. On making data actionable: How activists use imperfect data to foster social change for human rights violations in Mexico. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 1, CSCW (2017), 1--19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3134654

Digital Library

[2]

Arjun Appadurai. 2006. Fear of small numbers. Duke University Press, Durham, NC, USA.

[3]

Elliot Aronson and Shelley Patnoe. 2010. Cooperation in the classroom: The jigsaw method. Pinter & Martin, London, UK.

[4]

Mariam Asad and Christopher A Le Dantec. 2019. This Is Shared Work:" Negotiating Boundaries in a Social Service Intermediary Organization. Media and Communication, Vol. 7, 3 (2019), 69--78.

[5]

Jo Bates, Yu-Wei Lin, and Paula Goodale. 2016. Data journeys: Capturing the socio-material constitution of data objects and flows. Big Data & Society, Vol. 3, 2 (July--December 2016), 1--12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716654502

[6]

Abigail Baum. 2015. Expanding Audience and Impact: Nonprofits Communicating Data to External Audiences. Urban Institute. http://urbn.is/2eiR2Oj

[7]

Lehn M Benjamin. 2008. Account space: How accountability requirements shape nonprofit practice. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Vol. 37, 2 (2008), 201--223.

[8]

Lehn M Benjamin. 2021. Bringing Beneficiaries More Centrally Into Nonprofit Management Education and Research. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Vol. 50, 1 (2021), 5--26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764020918662

[9]

Lehn M Benjamin and David C Campbell. 2014. Programs aren't everything. Stanford Social Innovation Review, Vol. 12, 2 (2014), 42--47. https://doi.org/10.48558/G0EC-AN20

[10]

Lehn M Benjamin, Amy Voida, and Chris Bopp. 2018. Policy fields, data systems, and the performance of nonprofit human service organizations. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, Vol. 42, 2 (2018), 185--204. https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2017.1422072

[11]

Ruha Benjamin. 2019. Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the new Jim Code. Polity Press, Cambridge, UK.

[12]

Kati Tusinski Berg. 2009. Finding connections between lobbying, public relations and advocacy. Public Relations Journal, Vol. 3, 3 (2009), 19 pages. https://prjournal.instituteforpr.org/wp-content/uploads/Finding-Connections.pdf

[13]

Chris Bopp. 2019. Doing "Good" with Data? Understanding and Working Around Data Doubles in Human Services Organizations. In Companion Publication of the 2019 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '19). ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 33--37. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311957.3361850

Digital Library

[14]

Chris Bopp, Ellie Harmon, and Amy Voida. 2017. Disempowered by data: Nonprofits, social enterprises, and the consequences of data-driven work. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI '17). ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 3608--3619. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025694

Digital Library

[15]

GC Bowker and Lisa Gitelman. 2013. Raw Data" Is an Oxymoron.

[16]

Paul Brest. 2020. 16. The Outcomes Movement in Philanthropy and the Nonprofit Sector. In The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook 3rd ed.), Walter W. Powell and Patricia Bromley (Eds.). Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, USA, 381--408.

[17]

Simone Browne. 2015. Dark Matters. Duke University Press, Durham, NC, USA.

[18]

Sarah Carnochan, Mark Samples, Michael Myers, and Michael J Austin. 2014. Performance measurement challenges in nonprofit human service organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Vol. 43, 6 (2014), 1014--1032. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764013508009

[19]

Juliet Corbin and Anselm Strauss. 2015. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory 4th ed.). Sage Publications, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

[20]

Daniel Cressey. 2015. UK funders demand strong statistics for animal studies. Nature, Vol. 520 (2015), 271--272. https://doi.org/10.1038/520271a

[21]

Jones Deondre. 2019. National Taxonomy of Exempt Entities Classification Code. Urban Institute. https://nccs.urban.org/project/national-taxonomy-exempt-entities-ntee-codes

[22]

Catherine D'Ignazio and Lauren F. Klein. 2020. Seven intersectional feminist principles for equitable and actionable COVID-19 data. Big data & society, Vol. 7, 2 (July--December 2020), 1--6. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720942544

[23]

Catherine D'ignazio and Lauren F Klein. 2020. Data Feminism. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.

[24]

Lynn Dombrowski, Amy Voida, Gillian R Hayes, and Melissa Mazmanian. 2012. The labor practices of service mediation: a study of the work practices of food assistance outreach. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). ACM Press, Neew York, NY, USA, 1977--1986. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208342

Digital Library

[25]

Rodriguez Dylan, Ruth Wilson Gilmore, Robert Allen, Christine Ahn, Tiffany Lethabo King, Equare Osayande, Amara Perez, Madonna Thunder Hawk, Stephanie Guilloud, WIlliam Cordery, and et al. 2017. The revolution will not be funded beyond the non-profit industrial complex. Duke University Press.

[26]

Ruth Edgett. 2002. Toward an ethical framework for advocacy in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, Vol. 14, 1 (2002), 1--26. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532754XJPRR1401_1

[27]

Robert M Entman. 1993. Framing: Towards clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Commiunication, Vol. 43, 4 (Dec. 1993), 51--58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460--2466.1993.tb01304.x

[28]

Steven Epstein. 1998. Impure science: AIDS, activism, and the politics of knowledge. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, USA.

[29]

Sheena Erete, Emily Ryou, Geoff Smith, Khristina Marie Fassett, and Sarah Duda. 2016. Storytelling with data: Examining the use of data by non-profit organizations. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM conference on Computer-Supported cooperative work & social computing (CSCW '16). ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 1273--1283. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2820068

Digital Library

[30]

Peter Frumkin. 2009. On Being Nonprofit. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.

[31]

Brent Goldfarb. 2008. The effect of government contracting on academic research: Does the source of funding affect scientific output? Research Policy, Vol. 37, 1 (2008), 41--58.

[32]

Lauren Guggenheim, S Mo Jang, Soo Young Bae, and W Russell Neuman. 2015. The dynamics of issue frame competition in traditional and social media. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 659, 1 (2015), 207--224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716215570549

[33]

Chao Guo and Gregory D Saxton. 2014. Tweeting social change: How social media are changing nonprofit advocacy. Nonprofit and voluntary sector quarterly, Vol. 43, 1 (2014), 57--79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764012471585

[34]

Ron Haskins and Jon Baron. 2011. Building the Connection between Policy and Evidence: The Obama Evidence-Based Initiatives. Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/research/building-the-connection-between-policy-and-evidence-the-obama-evidence-based-initiatives/

[35]

Sun-ha Hong. 2020. Fuck Your Feelings: The Affective Weaponisation of Facts and Reason. In Affective Politics of Digital Media: Propaganda by Other Means, Megan Boler and Elizabeth Davis (Eds.). Routledge, New York, NY, USA, 86--100. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003052272

[36]

INCITE! Women of Color Against Violence. 2017. The Revolution Will Not Be Funded: Beyond the Non-Profit Industrial Complex. Duke University Press, Durham, NC, USA.

[37]

S Mo Jang and P Sol Hart. 2015. Polarized frames on climate change" and global warming" across countries and states: Evidence from Twitter big data. Global Environmental Change, Vol. 32 (2015), 11--17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.02.010

[38]

Naveena Karusala, Jennifer Wilson, Phebe Vayanos, and Eric Rice. 2019. Street-Level Realities of Data Practices in Homeless Services Provision. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 3, CSCW, Article 184 (2019), 23 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359286

Digital Library

[39]

Charles Kenny and Tanvi Jaluka. 2018. Assessing the gender gap at nonprofits in global development. Center For Global Development. https://www.cgdev.org/blog/assessing-gender-gap-nonprofits-global-development

[40]

Vera Khovanskaya and Phoebe Sengers. 2019. Data Rhetoric and Uneasy Alliances: Data Advocacy in US Labor History. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '19). ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 1391--1403. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3323691

Digital Library

[41]

Andrei P Kirilenko and Svetlana O Stepchenkova. 2014. Public microblogging on climate change: One year of Twitter worldwide. Global environmental change, Vol. 26 (2014), 171--182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.02.008

[42]

Klaus Krippendorff. 2018. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology 4th ed.). Sage Publications, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

[43]

Christopher A Le Dantec and W Keith Edwards. 2010. Across boundaries of influence and accountability: The multiple scales of public sector information systems. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '10). ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 113--122. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753345

Digital Library

[44]

Marion Lean. 2021. Materialising Data Feminism -- How Textile Designers Are Using Materials to Explore Data Experience. Journal of Textile Design Research and Practice, Vol. 9, 2 (2021), 184--209. https://doi.org/10.1080/20511787.2021.1928987

[45]

Susan Leavy, Barry O'Sullivan, and Eugenia Siapera. 2020. Data, Power and Bias in Artificial Intelligence. arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.07341 (2020).

[46]

Yvonna S Lincoln and Egon G Guba. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA, USA.

[47]

Dyana P Mason. 2015. Advocacy in nonprofit organizations: A leadership perspective. Nonprofit Policy Forum, Vol. 6, 3 (2015), 297--324. https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2014-0036

[48]

Dyana P Mason. 2017. Yes, You Can--and Should! Nonprofit Advocacy as a Core Competency. Nonprofit Quarterly (Nov. 2017). https://nonprofitquarterly.org/yes-can-nonprofit-advocacy-core-competency/

[49]

Nan L Maxwell, Dana Rotz, and Christina Garcia. 2016. Data and decision making: Same organization, different perceptions; different organizations, different perceptions. American Journal of Evaluation, Vol. 37, 4 (2016), 463--485. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214015623634

[50]

Cecelia Merkel, Umer Farooq, Lu Xiao, Craig Ganoe, Mary Beth Rosson, and John M Carroll. 2007. Managing technology use and learning in nonprofit community organizations: Methodological challenges and opportunities. In Proceedings of the 2007 Symposium on Computer Human Interaction for the Management of Information Technology (CHIMIT '07). ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 8--es. https://doi.org/10.1145/1234772.1234783

Digital Library

[51]

C Thi Nguyen. 2020. Echo chambers and epistemic bubbles. Episteme, Vol. 17, 2 (2020), 141--161. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2018.32

[52]

Jonathan A Obar, Paul Zube, and Clifford Lampe. 2012. Advocacy 2.0: An analysis of how advocacy groups in the United States perceive and use social media as tools for facilitating civic engagement and collective action. Journal of Information Policy, Vol. 2 (2012), 1--25. https://doi.org/10.5325/jinfopoli.2.2012.0001

[53]

Kathleen H Pine and Max Liboiron. 2015. The politics of measurement and action. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 3147--3156. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702298

Digital Library

[54]

Theodore M Porter. 2020. Trust in Numbers. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA.

[55]

Aruna Ranganathan and Alan Benson. 2020. A numbers game: Quantification of work, auto-gamification, and worker productivity. American Sociological Review, Vol. 85, 4 (2020), 573--609. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122420936665

[56]

David O Renz. 2016. The Jossey-Bass Handbook of Nonprofit Leadership and Management. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA.

[57]

Jennifer Ceema Samimi. 2010. Funding America's nonprofits: The nonprofit industrial complex's hold on social justice. (2010).

[58]

James D Savage. 2000. Funding science in America: Congress, universities, and the politics of the academic pork barrel. Cambridge University Press.

[59]

Dietram A Scheufele. 1999. Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of communication, Vol. 49, 1 (1999), 103--122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460--2466.1999.tb02784.x

[60]

Jonathon P Schuldt, Sara H Konrath, and Norbert Schwarz. 2011. Global warming" or climate change" Whether the planet is warming depends on question wording. Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 75, 1 (2011), 115--124. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfq073

[61]

Alana Conner Snibbe. 2006. Drowning in data. Stanford Social Innovation Review, Vol. 4, 3 (2006), 39--45. https://ssir.org/articles/entry/drowning_in_data

[62]

Finnborg S Steinþórsdóttir, Þorgerður Einarsdóttir, Gyða M Pétursdóttir, and Susan Himmelweit. 2020. Gendered inequalities in competitive grant funding: An overlooked dimension of gendered power relations in academia. Higher Education Research & Development, Vol. 39, 2 (2020), 362--375.

[63]

Nitya Verma and Amy Voida. 2016. On Being Actionable: Mythologies of Business Intelligence and Disconnects in Drill Downs. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP '16). ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 325--334. https://doi.org/10.1145/2957276.2957283

Digital Library

[64]

Amy Voida. 2011. Shapeshifters in the voluntary sector: exploring the human-centered-computing challenges of nonprofit organizations. interactions, Vol. 18, 6 (2011), 27--31.

Digital Library

[65]

Amy Voida, Ellie Harmon, and Ban Al-Ani. 2011. Homebrew databases: Complexities of everyday information management in nonprofit organizations. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11). ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 915--924. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979078

Digital Library

[66]

Amy Voida, Ellie Harmon, Willa Weller, Aubrey Thornsbury, Ariana Casale, Samuel Vance, Forrest Adams, Zach Hoffman, Alex Schmidt, Kevin Grimley, et al. 2017. Competing currencies: Designing for politics in units of measurement. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CHI '17). ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 847--860. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998209

Digital Library

Cited By

Jacobsson MHansson KHo HNormark MLundmark STholander J(2024)Civic technologies in data-driven societiesAdjunct Proceedings of the 2024 Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3677045.3685456(1-4)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3677045.3685456
Flawn LSoden R(2024)Autonomy, Affect, and Reframing: Unpacking the Data Practices of Grassroots Climate Justice ActivistsProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661585(3016-3028)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3661585
Agrawaal TSabie SSoden R(2024)Moving Towards Mobility Justice: Challenges and Considerations for Supporting AdvocacyProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373738:CSCW1(1-22)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3637373
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Enacting Data Feminism in Advocacy Data Work
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)
    1. Empirical studies in HCI

Recommendations

Competing Imaginaries and Partisan Divides in the Data Rhetoric of Advocacy Organizations
CSCW

Data are wielded to shape public opinion, particularly in electoral contexts where the role and veracity of information is questioned. This post-truth era is characterized by world events in which facts too often are obfuscated and evidential standards ...
Triadic Advocacy Work
Scholars of street-level bureaucracy and institutional research focus primarily on the relationships between advocates and their larger bureaucratic and social systems, assuming that advocates have little need to satisfy their beneficiaries. We find ...
Accountability Work: Examining the Values, Technologies and Work Practices that Facilitate Transparency in Charities
CHI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Charities are subject to stringent transparency and accountability requirements from government and funders to ensure that they are conducting work and spending money appropriately. Charities are increasingly important to civic life and have unique ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction Volume 7, Issue CSCW1

CSCW

April 2023

3836 pages

EISSN:2573-0142

DOI:10.1145/3593053

Editor:
Jeff Nichols
Google

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © 2023 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 16 April 2023

Published in PACMHCI Volume 7, Issue CSCW1

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

5
Total Citations
View Citations
708
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)533
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)77

Reflects downloads up to 10 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Jacobsson MHansson KHo HNormark MLundmark STholander J(2024)Civic technologies in data-driven societiesAdjunct Proceedings of the 2024 Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3677045.3685456(1-4)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3677045.3685456
Flawn LSoden R(2024)Autonomy, Affect, and Reframing: Unpacking the Data Practices of Grassroots Climate Justice ActivistsProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661585(3016-3028)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3661585
Agrawaal TSabie SSoden R(2024)Moving Towards Mobility Justice: Challenges and Considerations for Supporting AdvocacyProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373738:CSCW1(1-22)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3637373
Klein LD'Ignazio C(2024)Data Feminism for AIProceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency10.1145/3630106.3658543(100-112)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3630106.3658543
Lau P(2023)AI Gender Biases in Women’s Healthcare: Perspectives from the United Kingdom and the European Legal SpaceYSEC Yearbook of Socio-Economic Constitutions 202310.1007/16495_2023_63(247-274)Online publication date: 8-Dec-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/16495_2023_63

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents