Emerging Telepresence Technologies for Hybrid Meetings: an Interactive Workshop
Authors: 
Andriana Boudouraki, Houda Elmimouni, Marta Orduna, Pablo Perez, Ester Gonzalez-Sosa, 
Pablo Cesar, JesÚS GutiÉRrez, Taffeta Wood, Verónica Ahumada-Newhart, and 
Joel E FischerAuthors Info & Claims
Andriana Boudouraki, Houda Elmimouni, Marta Orduna, Pablo Perez, Ester Gonzalez-Sosa, Pablo Cesar, JesÚS GutiÉRrez, Taffeta Wood, Verónica Ahumada-Newhart, and Joel E FischerAuthors Info & ClaimsOctober 2023
Pages 547 - 552
Abstract
We are rapidly moving to a hybrid world, where telepresence technologies play a crucial role. But, are current technologies ready for such a shift? Do they provide adequate support for interaction and collaboration? In this workshop, together with the participants, we will try out a variety of telepresence technologies for hybrid meetings. Based on small hybrid group activities we will explore how different systems compare in terms of immersion, interaction, and usability. Additionally, we will reflect on the social implications of telepresence. The aim of the workshop is to bring together the lived experiences of both remote and local participants, with activities that stimulate reflections on our experiences. These reflections will fuel group discussions, to identify future research areas in telepresence and hybrid meeting technologies. Results from the workshop will be published as a white paper with recommendations for the design of future telepresence and hybrid meeting technologies.
References
[1]
[n.d.]. ISMAR 2021 Contest. https://ismar21.org/contribute/ismar-2021-contest/. Accessed: 2022-05-09.
[2]
Veronica Ahumada-Newhart and Jacquelynne S Eccles. 2020. A Theoretical and Qualitative Approach to Evaluating Children’s Robot-Mediated Levels of Presence.Technology, Mind, and Behavior 1, 1 (2020).
[3]
Veronica Ahumada-Newhart and Judith S Olson. 2019. Going to school on a robot: Robot and user interface design features that matter. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 26, 4 (2019), 1–28.
[4]
Alberta A Ansah, Adriana S Vivacqua, Sailin Zhong, Susanne Boll, Marios Constantinides, Himanshu Verma, Abdallah El Ali, Alina Lushnikova, Hamed Alavi, Sean Rintel, 2023. Reflecting on Hybrid Events: Learning from a Year of Hybrid Experiences. In Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–4.
[5]
Rachel Bergmann, Sean Rintel, Nancy Baym, Advait Sarkar, Damian Borowiec, Priscilla Wong, and Abigail Sellen. 2022. Meeting (the) Pandemic: Videoconferencing Fatigue and Evolving Tensions of Sociality in Enterprise Video Meetings During COVID-19. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) (2022), 1–37.
[6]
Patrik Björnfot, Joakim Bergqvist, and Victor Kaptelinin. 2018. Non-technical users’ first encounters with a robotic telepresence technology: an empirical study of office workers. Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics 9, 1 (2018), 307–322.
[7]
Anna Bleakley, Daniel Rough, Justin Edwards, Philip Doyle, Odile Dumbleton, Leigh Clark, Sean Rintel, Vincent Wade, and Benjamin R Cowan. 2021. Bridging social distance during social distancing: exploring social talk and remote collegiality in video conferencing. Human–Computer Interaction (2021), 1–29.
[8]
Nicholas Bloom. 2021. Hybrid is the Future of Work. Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research (SIEPR): Stanford, CA, USA (2021).
[9]
Nicholas Bloom, Paul Mizen, and Shivani Taneja. 2021. Returning to the office will be hard. VoxEU Column (2021).
[10]
Andriana Boudouraki, Joel E Fischer, Stuart Reeves, and Sean Rintel. 2021. " I can’t get round" Recruiting Assistance in Mobile Robotic Telepresence. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 4, CSCW3 (2021), 1–21.
[11]
Andriana Boudouraki, Joel E Fischer, Stuart Reeves, and Sean Rintel. 2023. " Being in on the Action" in Mobile Robotic Telepresence: Rethinking Presence in Hybrid Participation. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 63–71.
[12]
Andriana Boudouraki, Joel E Fischer, Stuart Reeves, and Sean Rintel. 2023. Your mileage may vary: Case study of a robotic telepresence pilot roll-out for a hybrid knowledge work organisation. In Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–7.
[13]
Andriana Boudouraki, Stuart Reeves, Joel E Fischer, and Sean Rintel. 2022. Mediated Visits: Longitudinal Domestic Dwelling with Mobile Robotic Telepresence. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–16.
[14]
Marilyn Y Byrd. 2022. Creating a culture of inclusion and belongingness in remote work environments that sustains meaningful work. Human Resource Development International 25, 2 (2022), 145–162.
[15]
Li-Fang Chou, An-Chih Wang, Ting-Yu Wang, Min-Ping Huang, and Bor-Shiuan Cheng. 2008. Shared work values and team member effectiveness: The mediation of trustfulness and trustworthiness. Human relations 61, 12 (2008), 1713–1742.
[16]
Silvia Coradeschi, Amy Loutfi, Annica Kristoffersson, Gabriella Cortellessa, and Kerstin Severinson Eklundh. 2011. Social robotic telepresence. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Human-robot interaction. 5–6.
[17]
Houda El mimouni, Susan R. Fussell, Susan Herring, Carman Neustaedter, and Jennifer Rode. 2018. SIG on Telepresence Robots. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI EA ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3185376
[18]
Houda Elmimouni, Amy Kinney, Elizabeth C Brooks, Hannah Li, and Selma Sabanovic. 2023. " Who’s that?" Identity Self-Perception and Projection in the Use of Telepresence Robots in Hybrid Classrooms. In Companion of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 287–291.
[19]
Houda Elmimouni, John Paulin Paulin Hansen, Susan Herring, James Marcin, Marta Orduna, Pablo Perez, Irene Rae, Janet Read, Jennifer Rode, Selma Sabanovic, 2022. Emerging Telepresence Technologies in Hybrid Learning Environments. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts. 1–5.
[20]
Houda Elmimouni, Cooper Young, Selma Sabanovic, and Jennifer Rode. 2023. Does Robotic Telepresence Make the Classroom Accessible?. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 194–197.
[21]
Helen-Ann Brown Epstein. 2020. Virtual meeting fatigue. Journal of Hospital Librarianship 20, 4 (2020), 356–360.
[22]
Stefano Federici, Giovanni Bifolchi, Maria Laura Mele, Marco Bracalenti, Maria Laura De Filippis, Simone Borsci, Giancarlo Gaudino, Massimo Amendola, Antonello Cocco, and Emilio Simonetti. 2022. Remote Working: A Way to Foster Greater Inclusion and Accessibility?. In International Conference on Computers Helping People with Special Needs. Springer, 192–199.
[23]
Susan C Herring, Susan R Fussell, Annica Kristoffersson, Bilge Mutlu, Carman Neustaedter, and Katherine Tsui. 2016. The future of robotic telepresence: visions, opportunities and challenges. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1038–1042.
[24]
Jon Hindmarsh, Mike Fraser, Christian Heath, Steve Benford, and Chris Greenhalgh. 1998. Fragmented interaction: establishing mutual orientation in virtual environments. In Proceedings of the 1998 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. 217–226.
[25]
XANDEX INC. 2022. KUBI Telepresence Robot. https://www.kubiconnect.com/
[26]
Hamed Z Jahromi, Ivan Bartolec, Edwin Gamboa, Andrew Hines, and Raimund Schatz. 2020. You Drive Me Crazy! Interactive QoE Assessment for Telepresence Robot Control. In 2020 Twelfth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX). IEEE, 1–6.
[27]
Redouane Kachach, Sandra Morcuende, Diego Gonzalez-Morin, Pablo Perez-Garcia, Ester Gonzalez-Sosa, Francisco Pereira, and Alvaro Villegas. 2021. The Owl: Immersive Telepresence Communication for Hybrid Conferences. In 2021 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct). IEEE, 451–452.
[28]
Simone Kauffeld and Nale Lehmann-Willenbrock. 2012. Meetings matter: Effects of team meetings on team and organizational success. Small group research 43, 2 (2012), 130–158.
[29]
Annica Kristoffersson, Silvia Coradeschi, and Amy Loutfi. 2013. A review of mobile robotic telepresence. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction 2013 (2013).
[30]
Min Kyung Lee and Leila Takayama. 2011. " Now, i have a body" uses and social norms for mobile remote presence in the workplace. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 33–42.
[31]
Jeffery A LePine, Ronald F Piccolo, Christine L Jackson, John E Mathieu, and Jessica R Saul. 2008. A meta-analysis of teamwork processes: tests of a multidimensional model and relationships with team effectiveness criteria. Personnel psychology 61, 2 (2008), 273–307.
[32]
J. Li, V. Vinayagamoorthy, R. Schwartz, W. IJsselsteijn, D. A. Shamma, and P. Cesar. 2020. Social VR: A New Medium for Remote Communication and Collaboration. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–8.
[33]
Jie Li, Vinoba Vinayagamoorthy, Julie Williamson, David A Shamma, and Pablo Cesar. 2021. Social VR: A new medium for remote communication and collaboration. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–6.
[34]
Paul Luff, Christian Heath, Hideaki Kuzuoka, Jon Hindmarsh, Keiichi Yamazaki, and Shinya Oyama. 2003. Fractured ecologies: creating environments for collaboration. Human–Computer Interaction 18, 1-2 (2003), 51–84.
[35]
Stephan Lukosch, Mark Billinghurst, Leila Alem, and Kiyoshi Kiyokawa. 2015. Collaboration in augmented reality. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 24 (2015), 515–525.
[36]
Jessica R Methot, Emily H Rosado-Solomon, Patrick E Downes, and Allison S Gabriel. 2021. Office chitchat as a social ritual: The uplifting yet distracting effects of daily small talk at work. Academy of Management Journal 64, 5 (2021), 1445–1471.
[37]
Hadar Nesher Shoshan and Wilken Wehrt. 2022. Understanding “Zoom fatigue”: a mixed-method approach. Applied Psychology 71, 3 (2022), 827–852.
[38]
Thomas Neumayr, Banu Saatçi, Mirjam Augstein, Hans-Christian Jetter, Clemens Nylandsted Klokmose, Gabriele Anderst-Kotsis, and Sean Rintel. 2019. Hybrid Collaboration–Moving Beyond Purely Co-Located or Remote Collaboration. In Proceedings of 17th European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work-Workshops. European Society for Socially Embedded Technologies (EUSSET).
[39]
Carman Neustaedter, Samarth Singhal, Rui Pan, Yasamin Heshmat, Azadeh Forghani, and John Tang. 2018. From being there to watching: Shared and dedicated telepresence robot usage at academic conferences. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 25, 6 (2018), 1–39.
[40]
Veronica Ahumada Newhart. 2014. Virtual inclusion via telepresence robots in the classroom. In CHI’14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 951–956.
[41]
Veronica Ahumada Newhart and Judith S Olson. 2017. My student is a robot: How schools manage telepresence experiences for students. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 342–347.
[42]
Veronica Ahumada Newhart, Mark Warschauer, and Leonard Sender. 2016. Virtual inclusion via telepresence robots in the classroom: An exploratory case study. The International Journal of Technologies in Learning 23, 4 (2016), 9–25.
[43]
Pablo Pérez, Ester González-Sosa, Jesús Gutiérrez, and Narciso García. 2022. Emerging Immersive Communication Systems: Overview, Taxonomy, and Good Practises for QoE Assessment. Frontiers in Signal Processing, 2 (2022).
[44]
Double Robotics. 2022. Double Robotics - Telepresence Robots for the Hybrid Office. https://www.doublerobotics.com
[45]
Tom Rodden, John A Mariani, and Gordon Blair. 1992. Supporting cooperative applications. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 1 (1992), 41–67.
[46]
Arianna Salazar Miranda and Matthew Claudel. 2021. Spatial proximity matters: A study on collaboration. Plos one 16, 12 (2021), e0259965.
[47]
John C Tang and Ellen Isaacs. 1992. Why do users like video? Studies of multimedia-supported collaboration. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 1 (1992), 163–196.
[48]
Katherine M Tsui, Munjal Desai, Holly A Yanco, and Chris Uhlik. 2011. Exploring use cases for telepresence robots. In 2011 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 11–18.
[49]
Amy Voida, Stephen Voida, Saul Greenberg, and Helen Ai He. 2008. Asymmetry in media spaces. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. 313–322.
Index Terms
- Emerging Telepresence Technologies for Hybrid Meetings: an Interactive Workshop
Recommendations
Handheld or Handsfree?: Remote Collaboration via Lightweight Head-Mounted Displays and Handheld Devices
CSCW '15: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social ComputingEmerging wearable and mobile communication technologies, such as lightweight head-mounted displays (HMDs) and handheld devices, promise support for everyday remote collaboration. Despite their potential for widespread use, their effectiveness as ...
A review of telecollaboration technologies with respect to closely coupled collaboration
Many existing Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) systems have two major deficiencies. Firstly, they support the situation of face-to-face meetings poorly. Secondly, many systems deal badly with data sets and workspaces. This paper outlines the ...
Collaboard: a remote collaboration groupware device featuring an embodiment-enriched shared workspace
GROUP '10: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group WorkIn this paper we present a mixed presence groupware device called "CollaBoard". The device improves collaboration between co-located and remote partners by providing a high level of workspace awareness. This is achieved by superimposing a life-size ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
October 2023
596 pages
ISBN:9798400701290
DOI:10.1145/3584931
Copyright © 2023 Owner/Author.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 14 October 2023
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Extended-abstract
- Research
- Refereed limited
Funding Sources
- NSF National Robotics Initiative
- US National Science Foundation (NSF)
- Spanish Administration Agency CDTI
- European Union Horizon Europe 2020 research and innovation programme
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)
- Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (AEI/FEDER)
Conference
CSCW '23
Sponsor:
CSCW '23: Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing
October 14 - 18, 2023
MN, Minneapolis, USA
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 2,235 of 8,521 submissions, 26%
Upcoming Conference
CSCW '24
- Sponsor:
- sigchi
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 141Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)141
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)19
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format