Cited By
View all- Moreno CShalf MRoque R(2024)Visualizing the Unseen Design Work of EducatorsProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3660751(1956-1969)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
Imagining Alternative Visions of Computing: Photo-Visuals of Material, Social, and Emotional Contexts from Family Creative Learning
Pages 68 - 81
Abstract
This pictorial presents visuals of families engaging with creative technologies as “knowledge-building artifacts” to provoke reflection on the social, material, and emotional context of designed interactions (“things that make you think”) as well as provocations to re-value these contexts and promote alternative visions in what and how engagement with computing can look like (“things that matter”). The selected images are from a large and ongoing collection of documentation from a family technology program. The images were captured using the Reggio Emilia documentation approach to documentation, which aims to “make learning visible.”
References
[1]
Shaowen Bardzell and Jeffrey Bardzell. 2011. Towards a feminist HCI methodology: social science, feminism, and HCI. In Proceedings of the SIG-CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 675–684. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979041
[2]
Brigid Barron, Caitlin Kennedy Martin, Lori Takeuchi, and Rachel Fithian. 2009. Parents as learning partners in the development of technological fluency. International Journal of Learning and Media, 55–77.
[3]
carla bergman and Nick Montgomery. 2017. Joyful militancy: Building thriving resistance in toxic times. AK Press.
[4]
Eli Blevis. 2016. Being Photo-Visual in HCI and Design. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (Brisbane, QLD, Australia) (DIS ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 983–995. https://doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901863
[5]
Shunying An Blevis, Eli Blevis, and Bonnie Nardi. 2019. All the Tea in China: Interaction Design Inspirations. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Creativity and Cognition (San Diego, CA, USA) (Camp;C ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 333–345. https: //doi.org/10.1145/3325480.3326569
[6]
Angela N Booker, Shirin Vossoughi, and Paula K Hooper. 2014. Tensions and possibilities for political work in the learning sciences. Boulder, CO: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
[7]
Sapna Cheryan, Victoria C Plaut, Paul G Davies, and Claude M Steele. 2009. Ambient belonging: how stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. Journal of personality and social psychology 97, 6 (2009), 1045.
[8]
Reggio Children. 1999. Everything has a Shadow, Except Ants. Reggio Children, Italy.
[9]
Michael B. Dando, Nathan Holbert, and Isabel Correa. 2019. Remixing Wakanda: Envisioning Critical Afrofuturist Design Pedagogies. In Proceedings of FabLearn 2019 (FL2019), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 156–159.
[10]
Norma González. 2005. Beyond culture: The hybridity of funds of knowledge. Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms (2005), 29–46.
[11]
Kris D Gutiérrez, P Zitlali Morales, and Danny C Martinez. 2009. Re-mediating literacy: Culture, difference, and learning for students from nondominant communities. Review of research in education 33, 1 (2009), 212–245.
[12]
Tim Ingold. 2010. The textility of making. Cambridge Journal of Economics 34, 1 (2010), 91–102.
[13]
Mara Krechevsky, Melissa Rivard, and Fredrick R Burton. 2009. Accountability in three realms: Making learning visible inside and outside the classroom. Theory into practice 49, 1 (2009), 64–71.
[14]
Jean Lave, Etienne Wenger, 1991. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge university press.
[15]
Luis C. Moll, Cathy Amanti, Deborah Neff, and Norma Gonzalez. 1992. Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice 31, 2(1992), 132–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849209543534
[16]
Na'ilah Suad Nasir and Jamal Cooks. 2009. Becoming a hurdler: How learning settings afford identities. Anthropology & Education Quarterly 40, 1 (2009), 41–61.
[17]
Na'ilah Suad Nasir and Victoria M Hand. 2006. Exploring sociocultural perspectives on race, culture, and learning. Review of educational research 76, 4 (2006), 449–475.
[18]
Seymour Papert. 1980. Mindstorms: Children, computers and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books.
[19]
William R Penuel and Lorrie A Shepard. 2016. Assessment and teaching. Handbook of research on teaching 5 (2016), 787–850.
[20]
Thomas M Philip and Flávio S Azevedo. 2017. Everyday science learning and equity: Mapping the contested terrain. Science Education 101, 4 (2017), 526–532.
[21]
Project Zero and Reggio Children. 2001. Making Learning Visible: Children as Individual and Group Learners. Reggio Children, Italy.
[22]
Mitchel Resnick and Brian Silverman. 2005. Some reflections on designing construction kits for kids. Proceeding of the 2005 conference on Interaction design and children (IDC) (2005). https://doi.org/10.1145/1109540.1109556
[23]
Wendy Roldan, Paola Vanegas, Laura Pina, Carmen Gonzalez, and Jason Yip. 2019. The Role of Funds of Knowledge in Online Search and Brokering. (2019).
[24]
Ricarose Roque. 2016. Family Creative Learning. In Makeology: Makerspaces as learning environments, Kylie Peppler, Erica Halverson, and Yasmin B Kafai (Eds.). Vol. 1. Routledge New York, NY, 47–63.
[25]
Ricarose Roque. 2020. Building projects, building relationships: Designing for family learning. In Designing Constructionist Futures: The Art, Theory, and Practice of Learning Designs (2020), MIT Press.
[26]
Ricarose Roque and Rupal Jain. 2018. Becoming facilitators of creative computing in out-of-school settings. In Rethinking learning in the digital age: Making the learning sciences count: The International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2018, R Kay, J Luckin (Ed.). London: International Society of the Learning Sciences, 592–599.
[27]
Ricarose Roque, Karina Lin, and Richard Liuzzi. 2016. “I'm Not Just a Mom”: Parents Developing Multiple Roles in Creative Computing. In Transforming learning, empowering learners: The International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2016, J. Cress U. Reimann P. C. K. Looi, Polman (Ed.). Singapore: International Society of the Learning Sciences, 663–670.
[28]
Ricarose Roque and Rupal Jain. 2018. Becoming Facilitators of Creative Computing in Out-of-School Settings. International Society of the Learning Sciences [ISLS].
[29]
Ricarose Roque and Mariana Aki Tamashiro. 2022. Making Learning Visible in Constructionist Learning Contexts. In Interaction Design and Children (IDC ‘22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1145/3501712.3534093
[30]
Natalie Rusk, Mitchel Resnick, and Stina Cooke. 2009. Origins and guiding principles of the computer clubhouse. The computer clubhouse: Constructionism and creativity in youth communities (2009), 17–25.
[31]
Schlesinger, A. 2017. Intersectional HCI: Engaging Identity through Gender, Race, and Class. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’17.
[32]
Miriam Sturdee, Sarah Robinson, and Conor Linehan. 2020. Research Journeys: Making the Invisible, Visual. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2163–2175. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395590
[33]
Enrique Suárez, Carrie Tzou, Megan Bang, Ricarose Roque, Nichole Pinkard, Raymond McDermott, Brigid Barron, Shelley Goldman, Megan Luce, Tanner Vea, 2018. Designing for axiological innovation within family-centered learning environments. International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc.[ISLS].
[34]
Mike Tissenbaum, David Weintrop, Nathan Holbert, and Tamara Clegg. 2021. The case for alternative endpoints in computing education. British Journal of Educational Technology 52, 3 (2021), 1164–1177
[35]
Sherry Turkle and Seymour Papert. 1992. Epis-temological pluralism and the revaluation of the concrete. Journal of Mathematical Behavior 11, 1 (1992), 3–33.
[36]
Sepehr Vakil. 2018. Ethics, identity, and political vision: Toward a justice-centered approach to equity in computer science education. Harvard Educational Review 88, 1 (2018), 26–52.
[37]
Sepehr Vakil. 2020. “I've Always Been Scared That Someday I'm Going to Sell Out’’: Exploring the relationship between Political Identity and Learning in Computer Science Education. Cognition and Instruction 38, 2 (2020), 87–115.
[38]
Sepehr Vakil, Maxine McKinney de Royston, Na'ilah Suad Nasir, and Ben Kirshner. 2016. Rethinking race and power in design-based research: Reflections from the field. Cognition and Instruction 34, 3 (2016), 194–209.
[39]
Tanner Vea. 2020. The learning of emotion in/as sociocultural practice: The case of animal rights activism. Journal of the Learning Sciences 29, 3 (2020), 311–346.
[40]
Sara Vogel, Rafi Santo, and Dixie Ching. 2017. Visions of Computer Science Education: Unpacking Arguments for and Projected Impacts of CS4All Initiatives. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE ‘17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 609–614. https://doi.org/10.1145/3017680.3017755
[41]
Shirin Vossoughi. 2017. Access and equity in out-of-school learning. SAGE encyclopedia of out-of-school learning (2017), 1–5.
[42]
Shirin Vossoughi, Ava Jackson, Suzanne Chen, Wendy Roldan, and Meg Escudé. 2020. Embodied pathways and ethical trails: Studying learning in and through relational histories. Journal of the Learning Sciences 29, 2 (2020), 183–223.
[43]
Junnan Yu, Chenke Bai, and Ricarose Roque. 2020. Considering Parents in Coding Kit Design: Understanding Parents’ Perspectives and Roles. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376130
Recommendations
Creative Computing for Bespoke Ideation
COMPSAC '15: Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 39th Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference - Volume 01Today, idea generation is an extremely important activity for both academic researchers and industrial groups. A considerable number of applications and research studies have been made in the past years in order to increase the effectiveness of idea ...
Material inspiration: the practice-led research of a craft artist
C&C '09: Proceedings of the seventh ACM conference on Creativity and cognitionA tangible material is a primary element in the everyday creative practice of any craft artist. Although craft artists implicitly understand the expressive aspects of the tangible material they use to create their artworks, they rarely discuss or give a ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
June 2023
824 pages
ISBN:9798400701313
DOI:10.1145/3585088
Copyright © 2023 Owner/Author.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 19 June 2023
Check for updates
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
IDC '23
Sponsor:
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 172 of 578 submissions, 30%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- View Citations1Total Citations
- 414Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)267
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)18
Reflects downloads up to 10 Nov 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
Cited By
View all- Moreno CShalf MRoque R(2024)Visualizing the Unseen Design Work of EducatorsProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3660751(1956-1969)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
View Options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in