Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article
Free access

Humble AI

Published: 23 August 2023 Publication History

Abstract

An effort to bring artificial intelligence into better alignment with our moral aims and finally realize the vision of superior decision making through AI.

References

[1]
Alfano, M. Friendship and the Structure of Trust (2016).
[2]
Bakker, M.A. et al. Beyond reasonable doubt: Improving fairness in budget-constrained decision making using confidence thresholds. In Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conf. on AI, Ethics, and Society (July 2021), 346--356.
[3]
Barassi, V. et al. David Graeber, bureaucratic violence, and the critique of surveillance capitalism. Annals of the Fondazione Luigi Einaudi 55 (2021), 237--254.
[4]
Bartlett, P.L. and Wegkamp, M.H. Classification with a reject option using a hinge loss. J. of Machine Learning Research 9 (August 2008), 1823--1840.
[5]
Bhatt, U. et al. Uncertainty as a form of transparency: Measuring, communicating, and using uncertainty. In Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conf. on AI, Ethics, and Society (July 2021), 401--413.
[6]
Bu, Y. et al. Fair selective classification via sufficiency. In Proceedings of the Intern. Conf. on Machine Learning (July 2021), 6076--6086.
[7]
Cover, T.M. and Joy, A.A. Elements of Information Theory, Wiley (2012).
[8]
D'Cruz, J. Humble trust. Philosophical Studies 176, 4 (2019), 933--953.
[9]
D'Cruz, J.R. et al. The empathy gap: Why AI can forecast behavior but cannot assess trustworthiness. AAAI 2022 Fall Symp. Series.
[10]
Fetchenhauer, D. and Dunning, D. Why so cynical? Asymmetric feedback underlies misguided skepticism regarding the trustworthiness of others. Psychological Science 21, 2 (2010), 189--193.
[11]
Guo, C. et al. On calibration of modern neural networks. In Proceedings of the Intern. Conf. on Machine Learning (August 2017), 1321--1330.
[12]
How security clearance credit check rules impact many military service members. Consolidated Credit (2018); https://tinyurl.com/2mr2uf9y.
[13]
Jones, E.E. and Harris, V.A. The attribution of attitudes. J. of Experimental Social Psychology 3, 1 (1967), 1--24.
[14]
Jones, K. Trust, distrust, and affective looping. Philosophical Studies 176, 4 (2019), 955--968.
[15]
Knowles, B. et al. The many facets of trust in AI: Formalizing the relation between trust and fairness, accountability, and transparency. (2022); arXiv preprint arXiv: 2208.00681.
[16]
Kurt, D. The side effects of bad credit. Investopedia (2021); https://bit.ly/43xYuJp.
[17]
Marks, P. Algorithmic hiring needs a human face. Communications of the ACM 65, 3 (2022), 17--19.
[18]
McGeer, V. Developing trust. Philosophical Explorations 5, 1 (2002), 21--38.
[19]
McGeer, V. Trust, hope and empowerment. Australasian J. of Philosophy 86, 2 (2008), 237--254.
[20]
Moldovan, T.M. and Abbeel, P.P. Safe exploration in Markov decision processes. In Proceedings of the Intern. Conf. on Machine Learning (June 2012), 1451--1458.
[21]
O'Neill, O. A question of trust. Lecture 2: Trust and Terror. The Reith Lectures, BBC (2002).
[22]
Pettit, P. The cunning of trust. Philosophy Public Affairs 24, 3 (1995), 202--225.
[23]
Pope, D.G. and Sydnor, J.R. Implementing antidiscrimination policies in statistical profiling models. American Economic J. Economic Policy 3, 3 (2011), 206--231.
[24]
Public attitudes to data and AI: Tracker survey. Centre for Data Ethics and Innovation. (2022); https://tinyurl.com/ycfjxb8d.
[25]
Slepian, M.L. and Ames, D.R. Internalized impressions: The link between apparent facial trustworthiness and deceptive behavior is mediated by targets' expectations of how they will be judged. Psychological Science 27, 2 (2016), 282--288.
[26]
Speakman, S. et al. Three population covariate shift for mobile phone-based credit-scoring. In Proceedings of the ACM Conf. on Computing and Sustainable Societies. (June 2018), 20.
[27]
The public don't trust computer algorithms to make decisions about them, survey finds. BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT (2020); https://tinyurl.com/2ryf9rvs.
[28]
Varshney, L.R. and Varshney, K.R. Decision making with quantized priors leads to discrimination. In Proceedings of the IEEE 105, 2 (2016), 241--255.
[29]
Wei, D. Decision-making under selective labels: Optimal finite-domain policies and beyond. In Proceedings of the Inter. Conf. on Machine Learning (July 2021), 11035--11046.
[30]
Wierzbicki, A.P. A mathematical basis for satisficing decision making. Mathematical Modelling 3, 5 (1982), 391--405.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Algorithmic Reproductive JusticeProceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency10.1145/3630106.3658903(254-266)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Mitigating false negatives in imbalanced datasets: An ensemble approachExpert Systems with Applications10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125674(125674)Online publication date: Nov-2024
  • (2024)Machine Learning and Human UnlearningExtended Selected Papers of the 14th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems, and Applications10.1007/978-3-031-67426-6_4(72-118)Online publication date: 14-Aug-2024

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Communications of the ACM
Communications of the ACM  Volume 66, Issue 9
September 2023
97 pages
ISSN:0001-0782
EISSN:1557-7317
DOI:10.1145/3617556
  • Editor:
  • James Larus
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 23 August 2023
Published in CACM Volume 66, Issue 9

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)1,213
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)283
Reflects downloads up to 10 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Algorithmic Reproductive JusticeProceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency10.1145/3630106.3658903(254-266)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Mitigating false negatives in imbalanced datasets: An ensemble approachExpert Systems with Applications10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125674(125674)Online publication date: Nov-2024
  • (2024)Machine Learning and Human UnlearningExtended Selected Papers of the 14th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems, and Applications10.1007/978-3-031-67426-6_4(72-118)Online publication date: 14-Aug-2024

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Digital Edition

View this article in digital edition.

Digital Edition

Magazine Site

View this article on the magazine site (external)

Magazine Site

Get Access

Login options

Full Access

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media