research-article

Disentangling Affordances of Online Collaboration Tools for Mutual Aid in Emergencies: Insights from the COVID-19 Lockdown

Authors:

Dimple R. Thadani,

Patrick Y. K. ChauAuthors Info & Claims

ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems, Volume 14, Issue 4

Article No.: 32, Pages 1 - 27

https://doi.org/10.1145/3593056

Published: 26 October 2023 Publication History

Abstract

With the uncertain trajectory of COVID-19 conditions worldwide, there lies the potential for emergencies to arise, abruptly yielding mass social and economic disruption. Gaining insight into how digital technologies may be leveraged for effective emergency response is therefore pertinent. Emergency-induced needs may prompt citizens to organize mutual aid initiatives where people give what they can and get what they need in response. An increasingly prominent technology used for emergency response, online collaboration tools (OCTs), enables the appropriate match between the supply of aid and its relevant demand in mutual aid initiatives by mediating information and interactions between participants. Through analysis of mutual aid cases during the 2022 Shanghai COVID-19 lockdown, this study elucidates the benefits OCTs provide through the lens of affordance theory and identifies five key affordances of OCTs for emergency mutual aid: persistent accessibility, iterative modifiability, structured consolidation and retrieval, multisynchronous participation, and multichannel broadcasting. We illustrate how such affordances are actualized and how their enabling features work across information flow processes, specifically highlighting benefits of software minimalism with implications for practitioners and future software design in emergency situations. This study contributes to the body of knowledge on OCTs and affordances by disentangling its role in emergency responses.

References

[1]

Andrew McAfee. 2009. Enterprise 2.0: New Collaborative Tools for Your Organization's Toughest Challenges. Harvard Business Press, Cambridge, MA.

[2]

Ivy M. Tarun. 2019. The effectiveness of a customized online collaboration tool for teaching and learning. J. Info. Tech Ed.: Res. 18 (Jun. 2019), 275–292. DOI:

[3]

Thomasina Borkman, Carol Munn-Giddings, and Melanie Boyce. 2020. Self-help/mutual aid groups and peer support. Voluntarist. Rev. 5, 2-3 (Dec. 2020), 1–219. DOI:

[4]

Geoffrey Nelson, Joanna Ochocka, Kara Griffin, and John Lord. 1998. “Nothing about me, without me”: Participatory action research with self-help/mutual aid organizations for psychiatric consumer/survivors. Am. J. Com. Psych. 26, 6 (Dec. 1998), 881–912. DOI:

[5]

Athula Ginige, Luca Paolino, Marco Romano, Monica Sebillo, Genoveffa Tortora, and Giuliana Vitiello. 2014. Information sharing among disaster responders—An interactive spreadsheet-based collaboration approach. Comp. Sup. Cooperative Work 23, 4-6 (Jul. 2014), 547–583. DOI:

Digital Library

[6]

Zoe Kenney. 2019. Solidarity, not charity: Mutual aid in natural disaster relief. Proquest Dis. Theses NAU Global. Retrieved June 9, 2022 from https://mutualaiddisasterrelief.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Solidarity-Not-Charity-Mutual-Aid-in-Natural-Disaster-Relief-Thesis.pdf.

[7]

Gregory Asmolov. 2014. Virtual Rynda—The atlas of help: Mutual aid as a Form of Social Activism. Global Dimensions of Digital Activism. MIT Center for Civic Media.

[8]

Tomer Simon, Avishay Goldberg, and Bruria Adini. 2015. Socializing in emergencies—A review of the use of social media in emergency situations. Int. J. Info. Man. 35, 5 (Oct. 2015), 609–619. DOI:

Digital Library

[9]

Olga Volkoff and Diane M. Strong. 2013. Critical realism and affordances: Theorizing IT-associated organizational change processes. MIS Quart. 37, 3 (Sep. 2013), 819–834.

Digital Library

[10]

Tim Lehrig, Oliver Krancher, and Jens Dibbern. 2017. How users perceive and actualize affordances: An exploratory case study of collaboration platforms. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS’17).

[11]

Eike Bernhard, Jan Recker, and Andrew Burton-Jones. 2013. Understanding the actualization of affordances: A study in the process modeling context. In Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS’13). Association for Inf. Sys. (AIS), Milano, Italy, 1–11.

[12]

Chad Anderson and Daniel Robey. 2017. Affordance potency: Explaining the actualization of technology affordances. Info. Organiz. 27, 2, 1 (Jun. 2017), 00–115.

[13]

Sutirtha Chatterjee, Gregory Moody, Paul B. Lowry, Suranjan Chakraborty, and Andrew Hardin. 2020. Information technology and organizational innovation: Harmonious information technology affordance and courage-based actualization. J. Strat. Info. Syst. 29, 1 (Mar. 2020), 101596. DOI:

Digital Library

[14]

Kimberly Bender, Danielle M. Littman, Annie Z. Dunbar, Madi Boyett, Tara Milligan, Marisa Santarella, and Trish Becker-Hafnor. 2021. Emergent media scan of digital mutual aid organizing during the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Com. Prac. 29, 3 (Sep. 2021), 280–298. DOI:

[15]

Michael K. Lindell. 2014. Evacuation planning, analysis, and management. In Handbook of Emergency Response: A Human Factors and Systems Engineering Approach. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 121–149.

[16]

Carolynne Hultquist and Ramzi M. Tubbeh. 2022. Digital sociotechnical systems of mutual aid: How communities connected, adapted, and innovated during the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City. Citizen Sci.: Theory Pract. 7, 1 (May, 2022) 20. DOI:

[17]

John Twigg and Irina Mosel. 2017. Emergent groups and spontaneous volunteers in urban disaster response. Envir. Urbaniz. 29, 2 (Aug. 2017), 443–458. DOI:

[18]

Nayomi Kankanamge, Tan Yigitcanlar, Ashantha Goonetilleke, and Md Kamruzzaman. 2019. Can volunteer crowdsourcing reduce disaster risk? A systematic review of the literature. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 35 (2019), 101097. DOI:

[19]

Robert Soden and Embry Owen. 2021. Dilemmas in mutual aid: Lessons for crisis informatics from an emergent community response to the pandemic. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. 1–19. DOI:

Digital Library

[20]

Benjamin Shepard. 2014. Community Projects as Social Activism. Sage, London, UK.

[21]

Robert A. Stallings and Enrico L. Quarantelli. 1985. Emergent citizen groups and emergency management. Pub. Admin. Rev. 45 (Jan. 1985), 93. DOI:

[22]

Joshua Whittaker, Blythe McLennan, and John Handmer. 2015. A review of informal volunteerism in emergencies and disasters: Definition, opportunities and challenges. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 13 (Sep. 2015), 358–368. DOI:

[23]

Lauren S. Fernandez, Joseph A. Barbera, and Johan R. Van Dorp. 2006. Strategies for managing volunteers during incident response: A systems approach. Hom. Sec. Aff. 2, 3 (Oct. 2006), 1–16.

[24]

Bimal K. Paul. 2018. Convergence phenomenon. Disaster Relief Aid. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. 195–231. DOI:

[25]

Madhu C. Reddy, Sharoda A. Paul, Joanna Abraham, Michael McNeese, Christopher DeFlitch, and John Yen. 2009. Challenges to effective crisis management: Using information and communication technologies to coordinate emergency medical services and emergency department teams. Int. J. Med Inform. 78 4 (Apr. 2009), 259–269.

[26]

Erik Auf der Heide. 2003. Convergence behavior in disasters. Ann. Emer. Med. 41, 4 (Apr. 2003), 463–466. DOI:

[27]

Kate Starbird. 2012. Crowd computation: organizing information during mass disruption events. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work Companion. ACM, New York, NY. DOI:

Digital Library

[28]

Tricia Wachtendorf, Bethany Brown, and Jose Holguin-Veras. 2013. Catastrophe characteristics and their impact on critical supply chains: Problematizing materiel convergence and management following hurricane Katrina. J. Homeland Sec. Emer. Man. 10, 2 (Sep. 2013), 49–65. DOI:

[29]

Shan-Ling Pan, Gary Pan, and Dorothy E. Leidner. 2012. Crisis response information networks. J. Assoc. Info. Syst. 13, 1 (2012), 31.

[30]

Kate Starbird, Leysia Palen, Amanda L. Hughes, and Sarah Vieweg. 2010. Chatter on the red: What hazards threat reveals about the social life of microblogged information. In Proceedings of the ACM conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. 241–250.

Digital Library

[31]

Kate Starbird and Leysia Palen. 2010. Pass it on?: Retweeting in mass emergency. In Proceedings of the 7th International ISCRAM Conference.

[32]

Starr R. Hiltz, Paloma Diaz, and Gloria Mark. 2011. Introduction: Social media and collaborative systems for crisis management. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 18, 4 (Dec. 2011), 1–6.

Digital Library

[33]

Nitesh Bharosa, JinKyu Lee, and Marijn Janssen. 2010. Challenges and obstacles in sharing and coordinating information during multi-agency disaster response: Propositions from field exercises. Info. Syst. Front. 12, 1 (Mar. 2010), 49–65.

Digital Library

[34]

Shan-Ling Pan, Gary Pan, and Paul R. Devadoss. 2005. E-Government capabilities and crisis management: Lessons from combating SARS in Singapore. MIS Quart. Executive 4, 4 (2005), 385–397.

[35]

Muhammad Imran, Carlos Castillo, Fernando Diaz, and Sarah Vieweg. 2015. Processing social media messages in mass emergency: A survey. ACM Comp. Sur. 47, 4 (July 2015), 1–38.

Digital Library

[36]

Kjerstin Thorson and Chris Wells. 2016. Curated flows: A framework for mapping media exposure in the digital age. Comm. Th. 26, 3 (Aug. 2016), 309–328.

[37]

Jamison M. Day, Iris Junglas, and Leiser Silva. 2009. Information flow impediments in disaster relief supply chains. J. Ass. Info. Syst. 10, 8 (Aug. 2009), 1.

[38]

Ann Majchrzak, Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa, and Andrea B. Hollingshead. 2007. Coordinating expertise among emergent groups responding to disasters. Org. Sci. 18, 1 (Feb. 2007), 147–161.

Digital Library

[39]

Adélie Chevée. 2021. Mutual aid in north London during the Covid-19 pandemic. Soc. Mov. S. 21, 4 (Mar. 2021), 413–419. DOI:

[40]

Patric R. Spence, Kenneth A. Lachlan, and Adam M. Rainear. 2016. Social media and crisis research: Data collection and directions. Comput. Hum. Behav. 54 (2016), 667–672. DOI:

Digital Library

[41]

Aelita Skaržauskienė, Rūta Tamošiūnaitė, and Inga Žalėnienė. 2013. Defining social technologies: Evaluation of social collaboration tools and technologies. Elec. J. Info. Syst. Eval. 16, 3 (2013), 231–240.

[42]

Dominique M. Steinberg. 2010. Mutual aid: A contribution to best-practice social work. Soc. Work Groups 33, 1 (Jan. 2010), 53–68. DOI:

[43]

Danielle M. Littman, Madi Boyett, Kimberly Bender, Annie Z. Dunbar, Marisa Santarella, Trish Becker-Hafnor, Kate Saavedra, and Tara Milligan. 2022. Values and beliefs underlying mutual aid: An exploration of collective care during the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Soc. Soc. Work Res. 13, 1 (Mar. 2022), 89–115.

[44]

James J. Gibson. 1977. The theory of affordances. In Robert E. Shaw, John Bransford, Robert E. Shaw, and John Bransford (Eds.). Perceiving, Acting and Knowing. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London, UK, 67–82.

[45]

James J. Gibson. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, MA.

[46]

Samer Faraj and Bijan Azad. 2012. The materiality of technology: An affordance perspective. In Materiality and Organizing: Social Interaction in a Technological World, Bonnie A. Nardi, Jannis Kallinikos, and Jannis Kallinikos (Eds.). Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 237–258.

[47]

Brad McKenna. 2020. Creating convivial affordances: A study of virtual world social movements. Info. Syst. J. 30, 1 (Jan. 2020), 185–214.

[48]

Elena Karahanna, Sean X. Xu, Yan Xu, and Nan A. Zhang. 2018. The needs-affordances-features perspective for the use of social media. MIS Quart. 42, 3 (Sep. 2018), 737–756.

Digital Library

[49]

Ann Majchrzak, M. Lynne Markus, and Jonathan Wareham. 2016. Designing for digital transformation: Lessons for Information systems research from the study of ICT and societal challenges. MIS Quart. 40, 2 (Jun. 2016), 267–277.

Digital Library

[50]

Diane M. Strong, Olga Volkoff, Sharon A. Johnson, Lori R. Pelletier, Bengisu Tulu, Isa Bar-On, John Trudel, and Lawrence Garber. 2014. A theory of organization-EHR affordance actualization. J. Ass. Info. Syst. 15, 2 (Feb. 2014), 53–85.

[51]

HuiGang Liang, ZeYu Peng, YaJiong Xue, XiTong Guo, and NengMin Wang. 2015. Employees' exploration of complex systems: An integrative view. J. Man. Info. Syst. 32, 1 (Jul. 2016), 322–357.

[52]

Likoebe M. Maruping and Massimo Magni. 2015. Motivating employees to explore collaboration technology in team contexts. MIS Quart. 39, 1 (Mar. 2015), 1–16.

Digital Library

[53]

Christian Ehnis and Deborah Bunker. 2012. Social media in disaster response: Queensland police service-public engagement during the 2011 floods. In Proceedings of the Australasian Conference on Information Science (ACIS’12).

[54]

Sophia B. Liu, Leysia Palen, Jeannette Sutton, Amanda L. Hughes, and Sarah Vieweg. 2008. In search of the bigger picture: The emergent role of on-line photo sharing in times of disaster. In Proceedings of the Inf. Sys. for Crisis Response and Management Conference (ISCRAM), Citeseer. Washington DC, 4–7.

[55]

Samer Faraj, Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa, and Ann Majchrzak. 2011. Knowledge collaboration in online communities. Org. Sci. 22, 5 (Feb. 2011), 1224–1239.

Digital Library

[56]

Jeffrey W. Treem and Paul M. Leonardi. 2012. Social media use in organizations: Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Comm. Yrbk. 36, 1 (Aug. 2012), 143–189.

[57]

David Wagner, Gabriele Vollmar, and Heinz-Theo Wagner. 2014. The impact of information technology on knowledge creation. J. Ent. Info. Man. 27, 1 (Feb. 2014), 31–44.

[58]

Center for Systems Science and Engineering (CSSE) Johns Hopkins University. COVID-19 data repository. Retrieved July 15, 2022 from https://github.com/CSSEGISandData/COVID-19.

[59]

BBC. 2022. Shanghai: Residents “running out of food” in Covid lockdown. BBC, 61019975. Retrieved July 21, 2022 from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-61019975.

[60]

Robert K. Yin. 2009. Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Vol. 5. Sage, Thousand Oaks., CA.

[61]

Uwe Flick. 2018. An Introduction to Qualitative Research. Sage, London, UK.

[62]

Kathleen M. Eisenhardt. 1989. Building theories from case study research. Acad, Man. Rev. 14, 4 (Oct. 1989), 532–550.

[63]

Kathleen M. Eisenhardt and Melissa E. Graebner. 2007. Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Acad. Man. J. 50, 1 (2007), 25–32.

[64]

Robert K. Yin. 1994. Discovering the future of the case study. Method in evaluation research. Eval. Practice 15, 3 (Oct. 1994), 283–290.

[65]

Morten Skovdal and Flora Cornish. 2015. Qualitative Research for Development: A Guide for Practitioners. Practical Action Publishing.

[66]

Anastasios A. Economides and Maria A. Perifanou. 2018. MOOC affordances model. In Proceedings of the IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON’18).

[67]

Mostafa Mesgari and Samer Faraj. 2012. Technology affordances: The case of Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS’12).

[68]

Kirsi Lainema, Kirsi Syynimaa, Timo Lainema, and Raija Hämäläinen. 2021. Organizing for collaboration in simulation-based environments: An affordance perspective. J. Res. Tech. Ed. (Oct. 2021), 1–17.

[69]

Sheila O'Riordan, Joseph Feller, and Tadhg Nagle. 2012. Exploring the affordances of social network sites: An analysis of three networks. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS’12). 177–1.

[70]

Arvind Malhotra, Ann Majchrzak, and Kalle Lyytinen. 2021. Socio-technical affordances for large-scale collaborations: Introduction to a virtual special issue. Org. Sci. 32, 5 (Mar. 2021), 1371–1390. DOI:

[71]

Jessica Vitak and Nicole B. Ellison. 2012. “There's a network out there you might as well tap”: Exploring the benefits of and barriers to exchanging informational and support-based resources on Facebook. New Media Soc. 15, 2 (Jul. 2012), 243–259.

[72]

Tommy K. H. Chan, Christy M. K. Cheung, and Randy Y. M. Wong. 2019. Cyberbullying on social networking sites: The crime opportunity and affordance perspectives. J. Man. Info. Syst. 36, 2 (Jun. 2019), 574–609.

[73]

Thomas Ludwig, Christoph Kotthaus, Christian Reuter, Sören van Dongen, and Volkmar Pipek. 2017. Situated crowdsourcing during disasters: Managing the tasks of spontaneous volunteers through public displays. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Syst. 102 (Jun. 2017), 103–121.

Digital Library

[74]

Louise K. Comfort. 2007. Crisis management in hindsight: Cognition, communication, coordination, and control. Pub. Adm. Rev. 67 (Dec. 2007), 189–197. DOI:

[75]

Joanne E. Hale, Ronald E. Dulek, and David P. Hale. 2005. Crisis response communication challenges: Building theory from qualitative data. J. Bus. Comm 42, 2 (Apr. 2005), 112–134.

[76]

Alan R. Dennis, Robert M. Fuller, and Joseph S. Valacich. 2008. Media, tasks, and Communication Processes: A theory of media synchronicity. MIS Quart. 32, 3 (Sep. 2008), 575. DOI:

[77]

Mehdi Ahmed-Nacer, Pascal Urso, Valter Balegas, and Nuno Preguica. 2013. Concurrency control and awareness support for multi-synchronous collaborative editing. In Proceedings of the 9th IEEE International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing. DOI:

[78]

Janet A. Sniezek, David C. Wilkins, Patrick L. Wadlington, and Michael R. Baumann. 2002. Training for crisis decision-making: Psychological issues and computer-based solutions. J. Man. Info. Sys. 18, 4 (Spring, 2002), 147–168.

Digital Library

[79]

Stephane Roche, Eliane Propeck-Zimmermann, and Boris Mericskay. 2011. GeoWeb and crisis management: Issues and perspectives of volunteered geographic information. Geojournal 78, 1 (Jun. 2011), 21–40. DOI:

[80]

Dave Yates and Scott Paquette. 2011. Emergency knowledge management and social media technologies: A case study of the 2010 Haitian earthquake. Int. J. Info. Man. 31, 1 (Feb. 2011), 6–13. DOI:

Digital Library

[81]

Jacky Estublier and Sergio Garcia. 2005. Process model and awareness in SCM. In Proceedings of the 12th International Workshop on Software Configuration Management – SCM ‘05. DOI:

Digital Library

[82]

Hartmut Obendorf. 2009. Minimalism: Designing Simplicity. Springer Science and Business Media, New York, NY.

[83]

Wu He, ZuoPeng Zhang, and WenZhuo Li. 2021. Information technology solutions, challenges, and suggestions for tackling the COVID-19 pandemic. Int. J. Info. Man. 57 (Apr. 2021), 102287.

Cited By

Li XKwon JPadmanabhan BZhang P(2023)Introduction to the Special Issue on IT-enabled Business Management and Decision Making in the (Post) Covid-19 EraACM Transactions on Management Information Systems10.1145/362799514:4(1-2)Online publication date: 11-Dec-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3627995

Index Terms

Disentangling Affordances of Online Collaboration Tools for Mutual Aid in Emergencies: Insights from the COVID-19 Lockdown
1. Information systems
  1. Information systems applications
    1. Collaborative and social computing systems and tools

Recommendations

Dilemmas in Mutual Aid: Lessons for Crisis Informatics from an Emergent Community Response to the Pandemic
CSCW2

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, networks of community organizers and activists mobilized to support their neighbors as part of mutual aid groups across the United States. Emergent community response is a common phenomenon during crisis, but mutual ...
The contested ontology of affordances

Ontological debates on affordances hinder research on technological affordances.Theories and conceptualizations of (technical) affordances have evolved over time.ANT-informed research allows a richer understanding of technological affordances. ...
Responding to Emergencies: Lessons Learned and the Need for Analysis

Large-scale emergency incidents, such as acts of terrorism, human-caused accidents, and acts of nature, often overwhelm local first-responder resources. A historical review of five recent major emergencies---the Oklahoma City bombing (1995), the crash ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems

ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems Volume 14, Issue 4

December 2023

114 pages

ISSN:2158-656X

EISSN:2158-6578

DOI:10.1145/3630723

Editor:
Daniel Zeng
Chinese Academy of Sciences, China

Issue’s Table of Contents

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 26 October 2023

Online AM: 03 May 2023

Accepted: 14 March 2023

Revised: 06 March 2023

Received: 14 September 2022

Published in TMIS Volume 14, Issue 4

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Funding Sources

National Natural Science Foundation of China
Zhejiang Natural Science Foundation

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

1
Total Citations
View Citations
330
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)210
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)26

Reflects downloads up to 10 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Li XKwon JPadmanabhan BZhang P(2023)Introduction to the Special Issue on IT-enabled Business Management and Decision Making in the (Post) Covid-19 EraACM Transactions on Management Information Systems10.1145/362799514:4(1-2)Online publication date: 11-Dec-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3627995

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Full Text

View this article in Full Text.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View full text|Download PDF

View Issue’s Table of Contents