Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Engineering Rehabilitation: Blending Two Tool-supported Approaches to Close the Loop from Tasks-based Rehabilitation to Exercises and Back Again

Published: 19 June 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Post-stroke or post-brain injuries rehabilitation is a long-term process defined by therapists and tuned to the specific damages and their consequences for each patient. This process requires the definition of well-defined multiple exercises to be performed multiple times by each patient over a long period of time. One of the key findings in the rehabilitation domain is that exercises should be tasks and goals oriented to increase functional independence, enhance development and prevent disability [24]. Patients performing the exercises must be carefully monitored to identify progress, possible regression and prevent damages due to the inadequate performance of the exercises. The SIVIRE tool [20] provides interactive graphical feedback to patients about the performance of their exercises and deviations from nominal, planed practice but fails at providing high-level descriptions of exercises and at connecting them to high-level rehabilitation goals (e.g. gain autonomy in cleaning a room). The HAMSTERS-XLE tool [16] provides a tuneable editor and a simulator to describe goals and task models including low-level tasks covering perception of the various senses, cognition and motoric actions. This paper presents the integration of these two tools and the benefits it brings both to the patients and to the therapists. The resulting tool and its engineering are presented in detail highlighting some generic integration mechanisms. On a case study, we show how exercises can be defined in HAMSTERS-XLE, transferred to SIVRE for fine tuning, monitored by SIVRE during the multiple practices of the patient and transferred back again to HAMSTERS-XLE to monitor progress, identify issues with the exercises and provide therapists with goal and task-based data about patients' evolutions

References

[1]
Angelo Basteris, Sharon M. Nijenhuis, Arno HA. Stienen, Jaap H Buurke, Gerdienke B Prange, Farshid Amirabdollahian. 2014. Training modalities in robot-mediated upper limb rehabilitation in stroke: a framework for classification based on a systematic review. J. Neuro Eng. Rehabil., 11 (1), p. 111, https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003--11--111
[2]
David Bell. 2004. UML Basics: The Component Diagram. IBM Global Services, https://www.softwareresearch.net/fileadmin/src/docs/teaching/WS13/SE/UML_basics-_The_component_diagram.pdf
[3]
Thamar JH Bovend'Eerdt, Rachel E Botell, Derick T Wade. 2009. Writing SMART rehabilitation goals and achieving goal attainment scaling: a practical guide. Clin Rehabil. Apr 23 (4), 352--61. https:// .ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19237435/
[4]
Dan Diaper. 2004. Understanding task analysis for Human-Computer Interaction. The handbook of task analysis for human-computer interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, https://doi.org/10.1201/b12470
[5]
Margaret Duff, Yinpeng Chen, Suneth Attygalle, Janice Herman, Hari Sundaram, Gang Qian, Jiping He, and Thanassis Rikakis. 2010. An Adaptive Mixed Reality Training System for Stroke Rehabilitation. Trans. on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 18, 5 (2010), 531--541. https://doi.org/10.1109/tnsre.2010.2055061
[6]
Peter Forbrig, Alexandru Bundea. (2020). Modelling the Collaboration of a Patient and an Assisting Humanoid Robot During Training Tasks. In: Kurosu, M. (eds) Human-Computer Interaction. Multimodal and Natural Interaction. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12182. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3-030--49062--1_40
[7]
Peter Forbrig, Alexandru Bundea, and Sebastian Bader. 2021. Engineering the Interaction of a Humanoid Robot Pepper with Post-Stroke Patients During Training Tasks. In Companion of the 2021 ACM SIGCHI Symposium on Engineering Interactive Computing Systems (EICS '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 38--43. https://doi.org/10.1145/3459926.3464756
[8]
Peter Forbrig, Alexandru Bundea, Mathias Kühn. 2022. Challenges with Traditional Human-Centered Design for Developing Neurorehabilitation Software. In: Bernhaupt, R., Ardito, C., Sauer, S. (eds) Human-Centered Software Engineering. HCSE 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13482. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3-031--14785--2_3
[9]
Peter Forbrig, Alexandru Bundea, Ann Pedersen, Thomas Platz. 2020. Digitalization of Training Tasks and Specification of the Behaviour of a Social Humanoid Robot as Coach. In: Bernhaupt, R., Ardito, C., Sauer, S. (eds) Human-Centered Software Engineering. HCSE 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12481. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3-030--64266--2_3
[10]
Juan Enrique Garrido, Victor M. R. Penichet, Maria D. Lozano, Alberto M. Plata, José A. F. Valls. 2019. The use of joint coordinates to monitor patients in a movement-based interaction system. Univ Access Inf Soc 18, 3--16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-017-0587-z
[11]
Yiwen Gu, Murtadha Bahrani, Anne Billot, Sha Lai, Emily J. Braun, Maria Varkanitsa, Julia Bighetto, Brenda Rapp, Todd B. Parrish, D. Caplan, C. K. Thompson, Swathi Kiran, and Margrit Betke. A machine learning approach for predicting post-stroke aphasia recovery: a pilot study. Proc. of the 13th ACM Conf. on Pervasive Tech. Related to Assistive Environments (PETRA '20). 22, 1--9.
[12]
HASOMED, RehaCom, https://hasomed.de/en/products/rehacom/, last accessed February 2023.
[13]
Aftab Khan, Sebastian Mellor, Eugen Berlin, Robin Thompson, Roisin McNaney, Patrick Olivier, and Thomas Plötz. Beyond activity recognition: skill assessment from accelerometer data. Proc. of the Conf. on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Comp. (UbiComp '15), 1155--1166.
[14]
Peter Langhorne, Julie Bernhardt, and Gert Kwakkel. 2011. Stroke rehabilitation. The Lancet 377, 9778 (2011), 1693--1702.
[15]
Kate E. Laver, Belinda Lange, Stacey George, Judy E. Deutsch, Gustavo Saposnik, & Maria Crotty. 2017. Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation. Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 11, https:// .ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29156493/
[16]
Célia Martinie, Philippe Palanque, Elodie Bouzekri, Andy Cockburn, Alexandre Canny, and Eric Barboni. 2019. Analysing and Demonstrating Tool-Supported Customizable Task Notations. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, EICS, Article 12 (jun 2019), 26 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3331154
[17]
Qiaoling Meng, Meng Wang, Shichuan Xiang, Hongliu Yu, Haicun Shao, and Hui Zhang. 2017. Mechanical Design of an Elbow Exoskeleton Device. Proc. of the Convention on Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology (i-CREATe 2017), Article 4.DOI : https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3162110.3162115
[18]
David Navarre, Philippe Palanque, Eric Barboni, and Tomasz Mistrzyk. 2007. On the Benefit of Synergistic Model-Based Approach for Safety Critical Interactive System Testing. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (2007), 140--154.
[19]
James L. Patton, Mary Ellen Stoykov, Mark Kovic, and Ferdinando A. Mussa-Ivaldi. 2006. Evaluation of robotic training forces that either enhance or reduce error in chronic hemiparetic stroke survivors. Experimental Brain Research 168, 3 (2006), 368--383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-0097--8
[20]
Victor M. R. Penichet, Maria D. Lozano, Juan Enrique Garrido, Félix Albertos Marco, Raymond Bond, Maurice D. Mulvenna. 2022. Designing postures for rehabilitation therapies in a multimodal system based on a 3D virtual environment and movement-based interaction. Multimed Tools Appl 81,. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022--13292--2
[21]
Alberto Mora Plata, Juan E. Garrido, Jose A. F. Valls, Victor M. R. Penichet, and Maria Dolores Lozano. 2016. Looking for an Adequate Monitoring Mechanism for Rehabilitation Systems Based on Movement Interaction. In Proceedings of the XVII International Conference on Human Computer Interaction (Interacción '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 11, 1--8.
[22]
Science Soft, VR for stroke rehabilitation, https://www.scnsoft.com/virtual-reality/healthcare/vr-stroke-rehabilitation, last accessed in February 2023.
[23]
José A. F. Valls, Juan E. Garrido, Alberto M. Plata, Víctor M. R. Penichet, and María D. Lozano. 2016. 3D editor to define generic rehabilitation therapies as a source to monitor and guide patients. In Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on ICTs for improving Patients Rehabilitation Research Techniques (REHAB '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 93--96. https://doi.org/10.1145/3051488.3051506
[24]
Derick T. Wade. 2009. Goal setting in rehabilitation: an overview of what, why and how. Clinical rehabilitation, vol. 23, no 4, p. 291--295, https:// .ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19293289/
[25]
Thomas Weiss, Elisabeth Sens, Ulrike Teschner, Winfried Meissner, Christoph Preul, Otto W. Witte, Wolfgang HR Miltner. 2011. Deafferentation of the affected arm: a method to improve rehabilitation? Stroke. May, 42 (5),1363--70, https:// .ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21454817/
[26]
Steven L. Wolf, Komal Sahu, R.Curtis Bay, Sharon Buchanan, Aimee Reiss, Susan Linder, Anson Rosenfeldt, Jay Alberts. 2015. The HAAPI (Home Arm Assistance Progression Initiative) trial: a novel robotics delivery approach in stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair, 29 (10), pp. 958--968, https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968315575612
[27]
World Health Organization. Clinical Guideline on Stroke Rehabilitation, 2013, https://extranet.who.int/ncdccs/Data/MNG_D1_2.%20Rehabilitation%20guideline%20of%20Stroke.pdf
[28]
World Stroke Organization. 2022. Global Stroke Fact Sheet 2022. https://www.world-stroke.org/assets/downloads/WSO_Global_Stroke_Fact_Sheet.pdf, last accessed in February 2023.
[29]
Hang Zhang, Hiroko Austin, Sharon Buchanan, Richard Herman, Jim Koeneman, Jiping He. 2011. Feasibility studies of robot-assisted stroke rehabilitation at clinic and home settings using RUPERT. IEEE Int. Conf. Rehabil. Robot, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICORR.2011.5975440
[30]
Célia Martinie, David Navarre, Philippe A. Palanque, Camille Fayollas. A generic tool-supported framework for coupling task models and interactive applications. 7th ACM SIGCHI symposium on engineering interactive comp. systems. EICS 2015: 244--253
[31]
Camille Fayollas, Célia Martinie, David Navarre, Philippe A. Palanque. Engineering mixed-criticality interactive applications. EICS 2016: 108--119
[32]
Navarre, D., Dragicevic, P., Palanque, P., Bastide, R., Schyn, A. (2005). Very-High-Fidelity Prototyping for Both Presentation and Dialogue Parts of Multimodal Interactive Systems. In: Bastide, R., Palanque, P., Roth, J. (eds) Engineering Human Computer Interaction and Interactive Systems. EHCI 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3425. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11431879_11
[33]
David Navarre, Philippe A. Palanque, Eric Barboni, Tomasz Mistrzyk On the Benefit of Synergistic Model-Based Approach for Safety Critical Interactive System Testing. TAMODIA 2007, ACM DL, 140--154
[34]
Célia Martinie, Philippe A. Palanque, Alberto Pasquini, Martina Ragosta, E. Rigaud, S. Silvagni. Using complementary models-based approaches for representing and analysing ATM systems' variability. ATACCS 2012, ACM DL, 146--157
[35]
Navarre, D., Palanque, P., Paternò, F., Santoro, C., Bastide, R. (2001). A Tool Suite for Integrating Task and System Models through Scenarios. In: Johnson, C. (eds) Interactive Systems: Design, Specification, and Verification. DSV-IS 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2220. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3--540--45522--1_6
[36]
Navarre, D., Palanque, P., Bastide, R., Sy, O. (2001). Structuring Interactive Systems Specifications for Executability and Prototypability. In: Palanque, P., Paternò, F. (eds) Interactive Systems Design, Specification, and Verification. DSV-IS 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1946. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3--540--44675--3_7
[37]
Giorgia Lallai, Giovanni Loi Zedda, Célia Martinie, Philippe A. Palanque, Mauro Pisano, Lucio Davide Span. Engineering Task-based Augmented Reality Guidance: Application to the Training of Aircraft Flight Procedures. Interact. Comput. 33(1): 17--39 (2021)
[38]
Eric Barboni, Jean-François Ladry, David Navarre, Philippe A. Palanque, Marco Winckler. Beyond modelling: an integrated environment supporting co-execution of tasks and systems models. EICS 2010: 165--174

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)A Systematic Process to Engineer Dependable Integration of Frame-based Input Devices in a Multimodal Input Chain: Application to Rehabilitation in HealthcareProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36646338:EICS(1-31)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2024
  • (2024)MUMR-MIODMIT: A Generic Architecture Extending Standard Interactive Systems Architecture to Address Engineering Issues for RehabilitationEngineering Interactive Computer Systems. EICS 2023 International Workshops and Doctoral Consortium10.1007/978-3-031-59235-5_4(28-40)Online publication date: 8-Aug-2024

Index Terms

  1. Engineering Rehabilitation: Blending Two Tool-supported Approaches to Close the Loop from Tasks-based Rehabilitation to Exercises and Back Again

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
      Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 7, Issue EICS
      EICS
      June 2023
      568 pages
      EISSN:2573-0142
      DOI:10.1145/3605541
      Issue’s Table of Contents
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 19 June 2023
      Published in PACMHCI Volume 7, Issue EICS

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Badges

      • Best Paper

      Author Tags

      1. continuous monitoring
      2. exercises
      3. post-stroke
      4. rehabilitation
      5. task modelling

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Funding Sources

      • ANR

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)100
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)10
      Reflects downloads up to 30 Aug 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)A Systematic Process to Engineer Dependable Integration of Frame-based Input Devices in a Multimodal Input Chain: Application to Rehabilitation in HealthcareProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36646338:EICS(1-31)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2024
      • (2024)MUMR-MIODMIT: A Generic Architecture Extending Standard Interactive Systems Architecture to Address Engineering Issues for RehabilitationEngineering Interactive Computer Systems. EICS 2023 International Workshops and Doctoral Consortium10.1007/978-3-031-59235-5_4(28-40)Online publication date: 8-Aug-2024

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      Full Access

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media