Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3597638.3614549acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesassetsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper
Open access

Co-designing new keyboard and mouse solutions with people living with motor impairments

Published: 22 October 2023 Publication History

Abstract

In this report we share a co-design process for developing more accessible alternatives to traditional keyboard and mouse interfaces, involving individuals with motor impairments. We describe our methodology, including initial discovery phases that inspired three subsequent co-design workshops with three individuals with motor impairments and 26 designers. Based on our experience, we highlight the importance of creating an equitable and effective dialogue between designers and individuals with motor impairments, emphasizing the personal nature of each participant’s experiences and the potential of technology as an enabler rather than a generic solution. Guided simulations and hands-on prototyping were employed to trigger meaningful conversations. We underscore the significance of “being with” during the co-design process and the importance of a transparent prototyping and development process for creating genuinely accessible and inclusive interactive systems. By sharing our findings and recommendations, we aim to assist researchers running future co-design workshops that involve prototyping with technology and people of diverse backgrounds.

References

[1]
Leila Aflatoony and Su Jin (Susan) Lee. 2020. AT Makers: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Co-Designing Assistive Technologies by Co-Optimizing Expert Knowledge. In Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020 - Participation(s) Otherwise - Volume 2. ACM, Manizales Colombia, 128–132. https://doi.org/10.1145/3384772.3385158
[2]
Rahaf Alharbi, Ada Ng, Rawan Alharbi, and Josiah Hester. 2020. "I Am Not an Engineer": Understanding How Clinicians Design & Alter Assistive Technology. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Honolulu HI USA, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3382982
[3]
Stephanie Arevalo Arboleda, Max Pascher, Annalies Baumeister, Barbara Klein, and Jens Gerken. 2021. Reflecting upon Participatory Design in Human-Robot Collaboration for People with Motor Disabilities: Challenges and Lessons Learned from Three Multiyear Projects. In The 14th PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments Conference. ACM, Corfu Greece, 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1145/3453892.3458044
[4]
Cynthia L. Bennett and Daniela K. Rosner. 2019. The Promise of Empathy: Design, Disability, and Knowing the "Other". In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Glasgow Scotland Uk, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300528
[5]
Hugh Beyer and Karen Holtzblatt. 1998. Contextual design: defining customer-centered systems. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, Calif.
[6]
Erin Buehler, Stacy Branham, Abdullah Ali, Jeremy J. Chang, Megan Kelly Hofmann, Amy Hurst, and Shaun K. Kane. 2015. Sharing is Caring: Assistive Technology Designs on Thingiverse. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Seoul Republic of Korea, 525–534. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702525
[7]
Ruei-Che Chang, Wen-Ping Wang, Chi-Huan Chiang, Te-Yen Wu, Zheer Xu, Justin Luo, Bing-Yu Chen, and Xing-Dong Yang. 2021. AccessibleCircuits: Adaptive Add-On Circuit Components for People with Blindness or Low Vision. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Yokohama Japan, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445690
[8]
Robert A. Curedale. 2018. Design Thinking Process & Methods 4th Edition. Design Community College Inc.
[9]
Lieven De Couvreur and Richard Goossens. 2011. Design for (every)one : co-creation as a bridge between universal design and rehabilitation engineering. CoDesign 7, 2 (June 2011), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2011.609890
[10]
Claudio Dell’Era and Paolo Landoni. 2014. Living Lab: A Methodology between User-Centred Design and Participatory Design: Living Lab. Creativity and Innovation Management 23, 2 (June 2014), 137–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12061
[11]
James Devine, Michal Moskal, Peli De Halleux, Thomas Ball, Steve Hodges, Gabriele D’Amone, David Gakure, Joe Finney, Lorraine Underwood, Kobi Hartley, Paul Kos, and Matt Oppenheim. 2022. Plug-and-play Physical Computing with Jacdac. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 6, 3 (Sept. 2022), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/3550317
[12]
J. Goodman-Deane, S. D. Waller, M. Bradley, P. J. Clarkson, and O. Bradley. 2018. Using Inclusive Design to Drive Usability Improvements Through to Implementation. In Breaking Down Barriers, Pat Langdon, Jonathan Lazar, Ann Heylighen, and Hua Dong (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 65–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75028-6_6
[13]
Felicity Goodyear-Smith, Claire Jackson, and Trisha Greenhalgh. 2015. Co-design and implementation research: challenges and solutions for ethics committees. BMC Medical Ethics 16, 1 (Dec. 2015), 78. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-015-0072-2
[14]
Amy Hurst and Shaun Kane. 2013. Making "making" accessible. New York (2013). https://doi.org/10.1145/2485760.2485883
[15]
Amy Hurst and Jasmine Tobias. 2011. Empowering individuals with do-it-yourself assistive technology. In The proceedings of the 13th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility. ACM, Dundee Scotland, UK, 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1145/2049536.2049541
[16]
Oussama Metatla and Clare Cullen. 2018. “Bursting the Assistance Bubble”: Designing Inclusive Technology with Children with Mixed Visual Abilities. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Montreal QC Canada, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173920
[17]
Venkatesh Potluri, Jennifer Manloff, James Devine, and Steve Hodges. 2021. Multisensory physical computing for the blind and visually impaired. In CHI Workshop - Rethinking the Senses: A Workshop on Multisensory Embodied Experiences and Disability Interactions.
[18]
Venkatesh Potluri, John Thompson, James Devine, Bongshin Lee, Nora Morsi, Peli De Halleux, Steve Hodges, and Jennifer Mankoff. 2022. PSST: Enabling Blind or Visually Impaired Developers to Author Sonifications of Streaming Sensor Data. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Bend, OR, USA) (UIST ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 46, 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3526113.3545700
[19]
Dorina Rajanen and Mikko Rajanen. 2019. Co-creation of a Safety Culture in Digital Fabrication. In Proceedings of the FabLearn Europe 2019 Conference. ACM, Oulu Finland, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1145/3335055.3335077
[20]
Annamaria Recupero, Patrizia Marti, and Simone Guercio. 2021. Enabling inner creativity to surface: the design of an inclusive handweaving loom to promote self-reliance, autonomy and wellbeing. Behaviour & Information Technology 40, 5 (April 2021), 497–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2021.1909654
[21]
Arielle M. Silverman, Jason D. Gwinn, and Leaf Van Boven. 2015. Stumbling in Their Shoes: Disability Simulations Reduce Judged Capabilities of Disabled People. Social Psychological and Personality Science 6, 4 (May 2015), 464–471. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550614559650
[22]
Arielle M. Silverman, Jennifer S. Pitonyak, Ian K. Nelson, Patricia N. Matsuda, Deborah Kartin, and Ivan R. Molton. 2018. Instilling positive beliefs about disabilities: pilot testing a novel experiential learning activity for rehabilitation students. Disability and Rehabilitation 40, 9 (April 2018), 1108–1113. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2017.1292321
[23]
Alexandre Greluk Szykman, André Luiz Brandão, and João Paulo Gois. 2018. Development of a Gesture-Based Game Applying Participatory Design to Reflect Values of Manual Wheelchair Users. International Journal of Computer Games Technology 2018 (Sept. 2018), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2607618
[24]
Garreth W. Tigwell. 2021. Nuanced Perspectives Toward Disability Simulations from Digital Designers, Blind, Low Vision, and Color Blind People. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Yokohama Japan, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445620
[25]
Rua M. Williams and Juan E. Gilbert. 2019. Cyborg Perspectives on Computing Research Reform. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Glasgow Scotland Uk, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3310421
[26]
Bess Williamson. 2019. Accessible America: A History of Disability and Design. Vol. 2. NYU Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvwrm3zv
[27]
Theodore Zamenopoulos and Katerina Alexiou. 2018. Co-design as collaborative research. Bristol University/AHRC Connected Communities Program (2018). http://oro.open.ac.uk/58301/

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Plug-and-Play Physical Computing and Device Prototyping with JacdacGetMobile: Mobile Computing and Communications10.1145/3686138.368614928:2(38-43)Online publication date: 31-Jul-2024

Index Terms

  1. Co-designing new keyboard and mouse solutions with people living with motor impairments

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ASSETS '23: Proceedings of the 25th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility
      October 2023
      1163 pages
      ISBN:9798400702204
      DOI:10.1145/3597638
      This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 22 October 2023

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. co-design
      2. human interface devices
      3. motor impairments
      4. physical disabilities
      5. rapid prototyping

      Qualifiers

      • Short-paper
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Conference

      ASSETS '23
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      ASSETS '23 Paper Acceptance Rate 55 of 182 submissions, 30%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 436 of 1,556 submissions, 28%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)244
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)26
      Reflects downloads up to 30 Aug 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Plug-and-Play Physical Computing and Device Prototyping with JacdacGetMobile: Mobile Computing and Communications10.1145/3686138.368614928:2(38-43)Online publication date: 31-Jul-2024

      View Options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format.

      HTML Format

      Get Access

      Login options

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media