Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3604321.3604346acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesimxConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Better Use of Battery, Better Life Quality: Effects on the Digital Ecological Footprint through Chromatic Interface Design

Published: 27 October 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Most of the internet we use is powered by fossil fuels. If we want a sustainable internet for better life quality in the future, we must design digital products with awareness of carbon emissions. The tool we propose operates within ecological limits and based on the availability of renewable energy produced domestically. This aspect contributes to reducing the necessary energy consumption. In this article, we will focus on the importance of chromatic choice in interface design. We will later expand the study to the impact of other interface elements, such as images, graphics, and animations. We applied these guidelines on the design  of a new tab browser plug-in tool designed with awareness of carbon emissions – Bettery. The tool operates on three energy availability modes. Each energy state corresponds to a distinct interface design configuration. Real-time energy availability is calculated based on three variables: carbon intensity, device battery percentage, and internet connection type. Future energy availability depends largely on carbon intensity prediction, information available 48 hours in advance.

References

[1]
Mohammad Ahmadi Achachlouei, Åsa Moberg, Elisabeth Hochschorner. 2015. Life Cycle Assessment of a Magazine, Part I: Tablet Edition in Emerging and Mature States. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 19(4), 575-589. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12227
[2]
Chris Preist, Daniel Schien, Paul Shabajee, Stephen Wood, Christopher Hodgson. 2014. Analyzing End-to-End Energy Consumption for Digital Services. Computer, 47(5), 92-95. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2014.110
[3]
Meyerson, D. (2001). Tempered radicals. Boston (October 2001). Harvard Business School.
[4]
Kristin Hanks, William Odom, David Roedl, and Eli Blevis. 2008. Sustainable millennials: attitudes towards sustainability and the material effects of interactive technologies. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '08). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 333–342. https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357111
[5]
Tom Jarrett. 2021. Designing: Sustainable Interaction Design Principles. Branch. Retrieved October 28, 2022, from https://branch.climateaction.tech/issues/issue-1/designing-branch-sustainable-interaction-design-principles
[6]
Daniel Pargman & Barath Raghavan. 2015. Introduction to LIMITS ’15: First workshop on computing within limits. First Monday, 20(8). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v20i8.6118
[7]
Mira Ahn, Jiyun Kang, Gwendolyn Hustvedt. 2015. A model of sustainable household technology acceptance: Sustainable Household Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 40(1), 83-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12217
[8]
Daniele Cerri, Sergio Terzi. 2016. Proposal of a toolset for the improvement of industrial systems' lifecycle sustainability through the utilization of ICT technologies. Computers in Industry, 81, 47-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2015.09.003
[9]
Linda Steg, Charles Vlek. 2009. Encouraging pro-environmental behavior: an integrative review and research agenda. J. Environ. Psychol. 29(3), 309–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004
[10]
Markus Hadler, Max Haller. 2011. Global activism and nationally driven recycling: The influence of world society and national contexts on public and private environmental behavior. International Sociology, 26(3), 315–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580910392258
[11]
Leila Elgaaıë d-Gambier, Laurent Bertrandias, Yohan Bernard. 2020. Cutting the Internet's Environmental Footprint: An Analysis of Consumers' Self-Attribution of Responsibility. Journal of Interactive Marketing. 50. 120-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2020.02.001
[12]
San Murugesan, G. R. Gangadharan. 2012. Harnessing Green IT: Principles and Practices. John Wiley and Sons, UK.
[13]
Ritesh Chugh, Santoso Wibowo, Srimannarayana Grandh. 2016. Environmentally sustainable Information and Communication Technology usage: awareness and practices of Indian Information and Communication Technology professionals, Journal of Cleaner Production, 131, 435- 446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.004
[14]
Venkadeshwaran, K. 2019. Green Technology and Its Effect on the Modern World. Jetir. Retrieved January 21, 2023, from https://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIREW06032.pdf
[15]
Inge Røpke, Toke Haunstrup Christensen. 2012. Energy impacts of ICT and Insights from an everyday life perspective. Telematics and Informatics 29(4), 348–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2012.02.001
[16]
J V Chamary. 2021. Dark Mode Saves Battery Life, But You Might Not Notice. Forbes. Retrieved September 02, 2022, from https://www.forbes.com/sites/jvchamary/2021/07/31/phone-battery-life-dark-mode/?sh=5abdaf1e72df
[17]
Lewis, N. (2022). The benefits of using Dark Mode (April 2021). sustainable.dev. Retrieved November 14, 2022, from https://the-sustainable.dev/the-benefits-of-using-dark-mode
[18]
Sander Vroegindeweij, Rachel Eardley, Parthasarathy Ranganathan & Erik Geelhoed. 2023. Design Principals for Energy-Aware User Interfaces on OLED-based handhelds.

Index Terms

  1. Better Use of Battery, Better Life Quality: Effects on the Digital Ecological Footprint through Chromatic Interface Design
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Information & Contributors

          Information

          Published In

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          IMXw '23: Proceedings of the 2023 ACM International Conference on Interactive Media Experiences Workshops
          June 2023
          143 pages
          ISBN:9798400708459
          DOI:10.1145/3604321
          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          Published: 27 October 2023

          Permissions

          Request permissions for this article.

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Short-paper
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Funding Sources

          • ITI/LARSyS
          • CIEBA

          Conference

          IMXw '23

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate 69 of 245 submissions, 28%

          Contributors

          Other Metrics

          Bibliometrics & Citations

          Bibliometrics

          Article Metrics

          • 0
            Total Citations
          • 26
            Total Downloads
          • Downloads (Last 12 months)15
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
          Reflects downloads up to 01 Feb 2025

          Other Metrics

          Citations

          View Options

          Login options

          View options

          PDF

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format.

          HTML Format

          Figures

          Tables

          Media

          Share

          Share

          Share this Publication link

          Share on social media