Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
survey

A Survey of Quantum-cognitively Inspired Sentiment Analysis Models

Published: 26 August 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Quantum theory, originally proposed as a physical theory to describe the motions of microscopic particles, has been applied to various non-physics domains involving human cognition and decision-making that are inherently uncertain and exhibit certain non-classical, quantum-like characteristics. Sentiment analysis is a typical example of such domains. In the last few years, by leveraging the modeling power of quantum probability (a non-classical probability stemming from quantum mechanics methodology) and deep neural networks, a range of novel quantum-cognitively inspired models for sentiment analysis have emerged and performed well. This survey presents a timely overview of the latest developments in this fascinating cross-disciplinary area. We first provide a background of quantum probability and quantum cognition at a theoretical level, analyzing their advantages over classical theories in modeling the cognitive aspects of sentiment analysis. Then, recent quantum-cognitively inspired models are introduced and discussed in detail, focusing on how they approach the key challenges of the sentiment analysis task. Finally, we discuss the limitations of the current research and highlight future research directions.

Supplementary Material

CSUR-2022-0291-APP (csur-2022-0291-app.zip)
Supplementary materials

References

[1]
Luisberis Velazquez Abad. 2012. Principles of classical statistical mechanics: A perspective from the notion of complementarity. Annals of Physics 327, 6 (2012), 1682–1693.
[2]
Zainab Abohashima, Mohamed Elhosen, Essam H. Houssein, and Waleed M. Mohamed. 2020. Classification with quantum machine learning: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.12270 (2020).
[3]
Elena Agliari, Adriano Barra, Peter Sollich, and Lenka Zdeborová. 2020. Machine learning and statistical physics: Preface. J. Phys. Math. Theor 53 (2020), 500401.
[4]
Md. Ali, Wei-Ming Huang, Wei-Min Zhang, et al. 2020. Quantum thermodynamics of single particle systems. Scientific Reports 10, 1 (2020), 1–16.
[5]
Mehrdad Ashtiani and Mohammad Abdollahi Azgomi. 2015. A survey of quantum-like approaches to decision making and cognition. Mathematical Social Sciences 75 (2015), 49–80.
[6]
Remo Badii and Antonio Politi. 1997. Thermodynamics and complexity of cellular automata. Physical Review Letters 78, 3 (1997), 444.
[7]
Fabio Bagarello. 2012. Quantum Dynamics for Classical Systems: With Applications of the Number Operator. John Wiley & Sons.
[8]
Mark A. Bedau. 2003. Artificial life: Organization, adaptation and complexity from the bottom up. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7, 11 (2003), 505–512.
[9]
Elizabeth C. Behrman, John Niemel, James E. Steck, and Steve R. Skinner. 1996. A quantum dot neural network. In Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Physics of Computation. 22–24.
[10]
Jacob Biamonte, Peter Wittek, Nicola Pancotti, Patrick Rebentrost, Nathan Wiebe, and Seth Lloyd. 2017. Quantum machine learning. Nature 549, 7671 (2017), 195–202.
[11]
Pablo Bianucci, Cesar Miquel, Juan Pablo Paz, and Marcos Saraceno. 2002. Discrete Wigner functions and the phase space representation of quantum computers. Physics Letters A 297, 5–6 (2002), 353–358.
[12]
Reinhard Blutner, Emmanuel M. Pothos, and Peter Bruza. 2013. A quantum probability perspective on borderline vagueness. Topics in Cognitive Science 5, 4 (2013), 711–736.
[13]
Niels Bohr. 2010. Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge. Courier Dover Publications.
[14]
Niels Bohr and Léon Rosenfeld. 1972. Collected Works. Vol. 3. North Holland.
[15]
Max Born. 1926. Zur Quantenmechanik der Sto\s svorg”ange. Zeitschrift fü Physik 37, 12 (Dec.1926), 863–867. DOI:
[16]
Valentino Braitenberg. 1986. Vehicles: Experiments in Synthetic Psychology. MIT Press.
[17]
Adam Brandenburger. 2010. The relationship between quantum and classical correlation in games. Games and Economic Behavior 69, 1 (2010), 175–183.
[18]
Brian Harold Bransden and Charles Jean Joachain. 1989. Introduction to Quantum Mechanics. Addison-Wesley Longman, The Limited.
[19]
Peter D. Bruza, Zheng Wang, and Jerome R. Busemeyer. 2015. Quantum cognition: A new theoretical approach to psychology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19, 7 (2015), 383–393.
[20]
Jerome R. Busemeyer and Peter D. Bruza. 2012. Quantum Models of Cognition and Decision. Cambridge University Press.
[21]
Jerome R. Busemeyer and Zheng Wang. 2014. Quantum cognition: Key issues and discussion. Topics in Cognitive Science 6, 1 (2014), 43–46.
[22]
Jerome R. Busemeyer and Zheng Wang. 2015. What is quantum cognition, and how is it applied to psychology? Current Directions in Psychological Science 24, 3 (2015), 163–169.
[23]
Giuseppe Carleo and Matthias Troyer. 2017. Solving the quantum many-body problem with artificial neural networks. Science 355, 6325 (2017), 602–606.
[24]
Juan Carrasquilla and Giacomo Torlai. 2021. How to use neural networks to investigate quantum many-body physics. PRX Quantum 2, 4 (2021), 040201.
[25]
Dushyant Singh Chauhan, Dhanush S. R, Asif Ekbal, and Pushpak Bhattacharyya. 2020. Sentiment and emotion help sarcasm? A multi-task learning framework for multi-modal sarcasm, sentiment and emotion analysis. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL’20), Dan Jurafsky, Joyce Chai, Natalie Schluter, and Joel R. Tetreault (Eds.). Association for Computational Linguistics, 4351–4360. DOI:
[26]
Haifeng Chen, Dongmei Jiang, and Hichem Sahli. 2020. Transformer encoder with multi-modal multi-head attention for continuous affect recognition. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 23 (2020), 4171–4183.
[27]
Yiwei Chen, Yu Pan, and Daoyi Dong. 2020. Quantum language model with entanglement embedding for question answering. CoRR abs/2008.09943 (2020). arxiv:2008.09943. https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.09943.
[28]
Ronald Chrisley. 1995. Quantum learning. In New Directions in Cognitive Science: Proceedings of the International Symposium, Vol. 4.
[29]
Bob Coecke, Giovanni de Felice, Konstantinos Meichanetzidis, and Alexis Toumi. 2020. Foundations for near-term quantum natural language processing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.03755 (2020).
[30]
A. C. C Coolen. 2001. Statistical mechanics of recurrent neural networks II—Dynamics. In Handbook of Biological Physics. Vol. 4. Elsevier, 619–684.
[31]
A. C. C. Coolen. 2001. Statistical mechanics of recurrent neural networks I—Statics. In Handbook of Biological Physics. Vol. 4. Elsevier, 553–618.
[32]
A. Daffertshofer, A. R. Plastino, and A. Plastino. 2002. Classical no-cloning theorem. Physical Review Letters 88, 21 (2002), 210601.
[33]
Yijie Dang, Nan Jiang, Hao Hu, Zhuoxiao Ji, and Wenyin Zhang. 2018. Image classification based on quantum K-Nearest-Neighbor algorithm. Quantum Information Processing 17, 9 (2018), 1–18.
[34]
Aymen Danoun, Etienne Prulière, and Yves Chemisky. 2022. Thermodynamically consistent Recurrent Neural Networks to predict non linear behaviors of dissipative materials subjected to non-proportional loading paths. Mechanics of Materials 173 (2022), 104436.
[35]
John B. DeBrota and Blake C. Stacey. 2020. Discrete Wigner functions from informationally complete quantum measurements. Physical Review A 102, 3 (2020), 032221.
[36]
Dong-Ling Deng, Xiaopeng Li, and S. Das Sarma. 2017. Quantum entanglement in neural network states. Physical Review X 7, 2 (2017), 021021.
[37]
D. G. B. J. Dieks. 1982. Communication by EPR devices. Physics Letters A 92, 6 (1982), 271–272.
[38]
Paul Adrien Maurice Dirac. 1945. On the analogy between classical and quantum mechanics. Reviews of Modern Physics 17, 2–3 (1945), 195.
[39]
Paul Adrien Maurice Dirac. 1981. The Principles of Quantum Mechanics. Number 27. Oxford University Press.
[40]
Shi Dong, Ping Wang, and Khushnood Abbas. 2021. A survey on deep learning and its applications. Computer Science Review 40 (2021), 100379.
[41]
Ewa Drabik. 2011. On certain analogies between the laws of quantum mechanics and rules of an English auction. Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia 10, 2 (2011), 19–34.
[42]
Pablo Gomez Esteban and David Rios Insua. 2017. A model for an affective non-expensive utility-based decision agent. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing 10, 4 (2017), 498–509.
[43]
Hugh Everett III. 1957. “Relative state” formulation of quantum mechanics. Reviews of Modern Physics 29, 3 (1957), 454.
[44]
Alexandr A. Ezhov and Dan Ventura. 2000. Quantum neural networks. In Future Directions for Intelligent Systems and Information Sciences. Springer, 213–235.
[45]
Jean Faber and Gilson A. Giraldi. 2002. Quantum models for artificial neural networks.
[46]
Lauren Fell, Shahram Dehdashti, Peter Bruza, and Catarina Pinto Moreira. 2019. An experimental protocol to derive and validate a quantum model of decision-making. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci’19). Cognitive Science Society, 1724–1730.
[47]
Zbigniew Ficek and Stuart Swain. 2005. Quantum Interference and Coherence: Theory and Experiments. Vol. 100. Springer Science & Business Media.
[48]
Marylou Gabrié. 2019. Mean-field inference methods for neural networks. CoRR abs/1911.00890 (2019). arxiv:1911.00890. http://arxiv.org/abs/1911.00890.
[49]
Deepanway Ghosal, Md. Shad Akhtar, Dushyant Chauhan, Soujanya Poria, Asif Ekbal, and Pushpak Bhattacharyya. 2018. Contextual inter-modal attention for multi-modal sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 3454–3466.
[50]
Deepanway Ghosal, Navonil Majumder, Soujanya Poria, Niyati Chhaya, and Alexander Gelbukh. 2019. DialogueGCN: A graph convolutional neural network for emotion recognition in conversation. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP’19). 154–164.
[51]
Debanjan Ghosh, Alexander Richard Fabbri, and Smaranda Muresan. 2017. The role of conversation context for sarcasm detection in online interactions. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual SIGdial Meeting on Discourse and Dialogue, Kristiina Jokinen, Manfred Stede, David DeVault, and Annie Louis (Eds.). Association for Computational Linguistics, 186–196. DOI:
[52]
Dimitris Gkoumas, Qiuchi Li, Shahram Dehdashti, Massimo Melucci, Yijun Yu, and Dawei Song. 2021. Quantum cognitively motivated decision fusion for video sentiment analysis. In 35th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI’21), 33rd Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (IAAI’21), The 11th Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence (EAAI’21), Virtual Event. AAAI Press, 827–835. https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AAAI/article/view/16165.
[53]
Dimitris Gkoumas, Qiuchi Li, Yijun Yu, and Dawei Song. 2021. An entanglement-driven fusion neural network for video sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the 30th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’21), Virtual Event, Zhi-Hua Zhou (Ed.). ijcai.org, 1736–1742. DOI:
[54]
Andrew M. Gleason. 1975. Measures on the Closed Subspaces of a Hilbert Space.
[55]
Robert B. Griffiths. 2003. Consistent Quantum Theory. Cambridge University Press.
[56]
Peng Guo. 2021. Quantum-inspired hierarchical attention mechanism for question answering. In 2021 IEEE 33rd International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI’21). IEEE, 943–950.
[57]
Peng Guo, Junwei Zhang, Yuexian Hou, Xiujun Gong, Panpan Wang, and Yazhou Zhang. 2019. Quantum-inspired DMATT-BiGRU for conversational sentiment analysis. In 31st IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI’19). IEEE, 1602–1606. DOI:
[58]
William Rowan Hamilton. 1833. On a General Method of Expressing the Paths of Light, & of the Planets, by the Coefficients of a Characteristic Function. PD Hardy.
[59]
Teiko Heinosaari, Takayuki Miyadera, and Mário Ziman. 2016. An invitation to quantum incompatibility. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 49, 12 (2016), 123001.
[60]
M. O. S. M. Hillery, Robert F. O’Connell, Marlan O. Scully, and Eugene P. Wigner. 1984. Distribution functions in physics: Fundamentals. Physics Reports 106, 3 (1984), 121–167.
[61]
Essam H. Houssein, Zainab Abohashima, Mohamed Elhoseny, and Waleed M. Mohamed. 2022. Machine learning in the quantum realm: The state-of-the-art, challenges, and future vision. Expert Systems with Applications 194 (2022), 116512. DOI:
[62]
Hiroyuki Iizuka and Takashi Ikegami. 2004. Adaptability and diversity in simulated turn-taking behavior. Artificial Life 10, 4 (2004), 361–378.
[63]
S. K. Jeswal and S. Chakraverty. 2019. Recent developments and applications in quantum neural network: A review. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering 26, 4 (2019), 793–807.
[64]
Yongyu Jiang, Peng Zhang, Hui Gao, and Dawei Song. 2020. A quantum interference inspired neural matching model for ad-hoc retrieval. In Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR’20), Jimmy Huang, Yi Chang, Xueqi Cheng, Jaap Kamps, Vanessa Murdock, Ji-Rong Wen, and Yiqun Liu (Eds.). ACM, 19–28. DOI:
[65]
Bjarni Jónsson, Bela Bauer, and Giuseppe Carleo. 2018. Neural-network states for the classical simulation of quantum computing. arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.05232 (2018).
[66]
Michael I. Jordan and Tom M. Mitchell. 2015. Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects. Science 349, 6245 (2015), 255–260.
[67]
Andrei Khrennikov. 2010. Ubiquitous Quantum Structure. Springer.
[68]
Yoon Kim. 2014. Convolutional neural networks for sentence classification. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP’14), a meeting of SIGDAT, a Special Interest Group of the ACL, Alessandro Moschitti, Bo Pang, and Walter Daelemans (Eds.). ACL, 1746–1751. DOI:
[69]
A. N. Kolmogorov and Albert T. Bharucha-Reid. 2018. Foundations of the Theory of Probability: Second English Edition. Courier Dover Publications.
[70]
Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Geoffrey E. Hinton. 2017. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Communications of the ACM 60, 6 (2017), 84–90.
[71]
Solomon Kullback. 1997. Information Theory and Statistics. Courier Corporation.
[72]
Avinash Kumar, Vishnu Teja Narapareddy, Veerubhotla Aditya Srikanth, Aruna Malapati, and Lalita Bhanu Murthy Neti. 2020. Sarcasm detection using multi-head attention based bidirectional LSTM. IEEE Access 8 (2020), 6388–6397. DOI:
[73]
Oleg Kupervasser. 2009. The basic paradoxes of statistical classical physics and the quantum mechanics. arXiv preprint arXiv:0911.2076 (2009).
[74]
Jonas Landman, Natansh Mathur, Yun Yvonna Li, Martin Strahm, Skander Kazdaghli, Anupam Prakash, and Iordanis Kerenidis. 2022. Quantum methods for neural networks and application to medical image classification. Quantum 6 (2022), 881.
[75]
Yoav Levine, David Yakira, Nadav Cohen, and Amnon Shashua. 2018. Deep learning and quantum entanglement: Fundamental connections with implications to network design. In International Conference on Learning Representations.
[76]
Qiuchi Li, Dimitris Gkoumas, Christina Lioma, and Massimo Melucci. 2021. Quantum-inspired multimodal fusion for video sentiment analysis. Information Fusion 65 (2021), 58–71.
[77]
Qiuchi Li, Dimitris Gkoumas, Alessandro Sordoni, Jian-Yun Nie, and Massimo Melucci. 2021. Quantum-inspired neural network for conversational emotion recognition. In 35th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI’21), 33rd Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (IAAI’21), the 11th Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence (EAAI’21), Virtual Event. AAAI Press, 13270–13278. https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AAAI/article/view/17567.
[78]
Qiuchi Li, Sagar Uprety, Benyou Wang, and Dawei Song. 2018. Quantum-inspired complex word embedding. In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Representation Learning for NLP (Rep4NLP@ACL’18), Isabelle Augenstein, Kris Cao, He He, Felix Hill, Spandana Gella, Jamie Kiros, Hongyuan Mei, and Dipendra Misra (Eds.). Association for Computational Linguistics, 50–57. DOI:
[79]
Si Li and Yuexian Hou. 2021. Quantum-inspired model based on convolutional neural network for sentiment analysis. In 2021 4th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Big Data (ICAIBD’21). IEEE, 347–351.
[80]
Zachary C. Lipton. 2016. The Mythos of Model Interpretability. DOI:
[81]
Weibo Liu, Zidong Wang, Xiaohui Liu, Nianyin Zeng, Yurong Liu, and Fuad E. Alsaadi. 2017. A survey of deep neural network architectures and their applications. Neurocomputing 234 (2017), 11–26.
[82]
Yaochen Liu, Yazhou Zhang, Qiuchi Li, Benyou Wang, and Dawei Song. 2021. What does your smile mean? jointly detecting multi-modal sarcasm and sentiment using quantum probability. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2021. 871–880.
[83]
Robin Lorenz, Anna Pearson, Konstantinos Meichanetzidis, Dimitri Kartsaklis, and Bob Coecke. 2021. QNLP in practice: Running compositional models of meaning on a quantum computer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.12846 (2021).
[84]
Haiwei Ma and Svetlana Yarosh. 2023. A review of affective computing research based on function-component-representation framework. IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput. 14, 2 (2023), 1655–1674.
[85]
José D. Martín-Guerrero and Lucas Lamata. 2022. Quantum machine learning: A tutorial. Neurocomputing 470 (2022), 457–461.
[86]
Pankaj Mehta, Marin Bukov, Ching-Hao Wang, Alexandre G. R. Day, Clint Richardson, Charles K. Fisher, and David J. Schwab. 2018. A high-bias, low-variance introduction to Machine Learning for physicists. CoRR abs/1803.08823 (2018). arxiv:1803.08823. http://arxiv.org/abs/1803.08823.
[87]
Konstantinos Meichanetzidis, Stefano Gogioso, Giovanni de Felice, Nicolò Chiappori, Alexis Toumi, and Bob Coecke. 2020. Quantum natural language processing on near-term quantum computers. In Proceedings 17th International Conference on Quantum Physics and Logic (QPL’20) (EPTCS), Benoît Valiron, Shane Mansfield, Pablo Arrighi, and Prakash Panangaden (Eds.), Vol. 340. 213–229. DOI:
[88]
Tammy Menneer and Ajit Narayanan. 1995. Quantum-inspired neural networks. Tech. Rep. R329.
[90]
John W. Payne, James R. Bettman, and Eric J. Johnson. 1992. Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing perspective. Annual Review of Psychology 43, 1 (1992), 87–131.
[91]
Mitja Peruš. 1996. Neuro-quantum parallelism in brain-mind and computers. Informatica 20 (1996), 173–183.
[92]
Rolf Pfeifer, Max Lungarella, and Fumiya Iida. 2007. Self-organization, embodiment, and biologically inspired robotics. Science 318, 5853 (2007), 1088–1093.
[93]
Rolf Pfeifer and Christian Scheier. 2001. Understanding Intelligence. MIT Press.
[94]
Hai Pham, Paul Pu Liang, Thomas Manzini, Louis-Philippe Morency, and Barnabás Póczos. 2019. Found in translation: Learning robust joint representations by cyclic translations between modalities. In The 33rd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI’19), The 31st Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference (IAAI’19), The 9th AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence (EAAI’19). AAAI Press, 6892–6899. DOI:
[95]
Krzysztof Pomorski. 2020. Equivalence between classical epidemic model and non-dissipative and dissipative quantum tight-binding model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.09923 (2020).
[96]
Krzysztof Pomorski. 2023. Equivalence between finite state stochastic machine, non-dissipative and dissipative tight-binding and Schroedinger model. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 209 (2023), 362–407.
[97]
Krzysztof Pomorski and Dariusz Kotula. 2023. Thermodynamics in stochastic Conway game of life. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.03195 (2023).
[98]
Moacir P. Ponti Jr. 2011. Combining classifiers: From the creation of ensembles to the decision fusion. In 2011 24th SIBGRAPI Conference on Graphics, Patterns, and Images Tutorials. IEEE, 1–10.
[99]
Soujanya Poria, Erik Cambria, Devamanyu Hazarika, Navonil Majumder, Amir Zadeh, and Louis-Philippe Morency. 2017. Context-dependent sentiment analysis in user-generated videos. In Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL’17), Volume 1: Long Papers, Regina Barzilay and Min-Yen Kan (Eds.). Association for Computational Linguistics, 873–883. DOI:
[100]
Rolandos Alexandros Potamias, Georgios Siolas, and Andreas-Georgios Stafylopatis. 2020. A transformer-based approach to irony and sarcasm detection. Neural Comput. Appl. 32, 23 (2020), 17309–17320. DOI:
[101]
Emmanuel M. Pothos and Jerome R. Busemeyer. 2009. A quantum probability explanation for violations of “rational” decision theory. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 276, 1665 (2009), 2171–2178.
[102]
Wasifur Rahman, Md. Kamrul Hasan, Sangwu Lee, AmirAli Bagher Zadeh, Chengfeng Mao, Louis-Philippe Morency, and Mohammed E. Hoque. 2020. Integrating multimodal information in large pretrained transformers. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL’20), Online, Dan Jurafsky, Joyce Chai, Natalie Schluter, and Joel R. Tetreault (Eds.). Association for Computational Linguistics, 2359–2369. DOI:
[103]
Patrick Rebentrost, Masoud Mohseni, and Seth Lloyd. 2014. Quantum support vector machine for big data classification. Physical Review Letters 113, 13 (2014), 130503.
[104]
Tobias Schmale, Moritz Reh, and Martin Gärttner. 2022. Efficient quantum state tomography with convolutional neural networks. NPJ Quantum Information 8, 1 (2022), 1–8.
[105]
Maria Schuld, Ilya Sinayskiy, and Francesco Petruccione. 2015. An introduction to quantum machine learning. Contemporary Physics 56, 2 (2015), 172–185.
[106]
Alessandro Sordoni, Jian-Yun Nie, and Yoshua Bengio. 2013. Modeling term dependencies with quantum language models for ir. In Proceedings of the 36th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information retrieval. 653–662.
[107]
Ilya A. Surov, E. Semenenko, A. V. Platonov, I. A. Bessmertny, F. Galofaro, Z. Toffano, A. Yu. Khrennikov, and A. P. Alodjants. 2021. Quantum semantics of text perception. Scientific Reports 11, 1 (Dec.2021), 4193. DOI:
[108]
Giacomo Torlai, Guglielmo Mazzola, Juan Carrasquilla, Matthias Troyer, Roger Melko, and Giuseppe Carleo. 2018. Neural-network quantum state tomography. Nature Physics 14, 5 (2018), 447–450.
[109]
Yao-Hung Hubert Tsai, Shaojie Bai, Paul Pu Liang, J. Zico Kolter, Louis-Philippe Morency, and Ruslan Salakhutdinov. 2019. Multimodal transformer for unaligned multimodal language sequences. In Proceedings of the 57th Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL’19), Volume 1: Long Papers, Anna Korhonen, David R. Traum, and Lluís Màrquez (Eds.). Association for Computational Linguistics, 6558–6569. DOI:
[110]
M. Uehara. 1986. Analogies between classical statistical mechanics and quantum mechanics. ITA Eng. (Brazil) 7, 9 (1986).
[111]
Sagar Uprety, Shahram Dehdashti, Lauren Fell, Peter Bruza, and Dawei Song. 2019. Modelling dynamic interactions between relevance dimensions. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval (ICTIR’19), Yi Fang, Yi Zhang, James Allan, Krisztian Balog, Ben Carterette, and Jiafeng Guo (Eds.). ACM, 35–42. DOI:
[112]
Sagar Uprety, Dimitris Gkoumas, and Dawei Song. 2020. A survey of quantum theory inspired approaches to information retrieval. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 53, 5 (2020), 1–39.
[113]
Sagar Uprety, Prayag Tiwari, Shahram Dehdashti, Lauren Fell, Dawei Song, Peter Bruza, and Massimo Melucci. 2020. Quantum-like structure in multidimensional relevance judgements. In Advances in Information Retrieval - 42nd European Conference on IR Research (ECIR’20), Proceedings, Part I (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Joemon M. Jose, Emine Yilmaz, João Magalhães, Pablo Castells, Nicola Ferro, Mário J. Silva, and Flávio Martins (Eds.), Vol. 12035. Springer, 728–742. DOI:
[114]
Nicolaas Godfried Van Kampen. 1992. Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry. Vol. 1. Elsevier.
[115]
Cornelis Joost van Rijsbergen. 2004. The Geometry of Information Retrieval. Cambridge University Press.
[116]
Vitaly Vanchurin. 2020. The world as a neural network. Entropy 22, 11 (2020), 1210. DOI:
[117]
John Von Neumann. 2018. Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics: New Edition. Princeton University Press.
[118]
Alex Wang, Amanpreet Singh, Julian Michael, Felix Hill, Omer Levy, and Samuel Bowman. 2018. GLUE: A multi-task benchmark and analysis platform for natural language understanding. In Proceedings of the 2018 EMNLP Workshop BlackboxNLP: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP. 353–355.
[119]
Benyou Wang, Qiuchi Li, Massimo Melucci, and Dawei Song. 2019. Semantic Hilbert space for text representation learning. In The World Wide Web Conference. 3293–3299.
[120]
Benyou Wang, Peng Zhang, Jingfei Li, Dawei Song, Yuexian Hou, and Zhenguo Shang. 2016. Exploration of quantum interference in document relevance judgement discrepancy. Entropy 18, 4 (2016), 144. DOI:
[121]
Panpan Wang, Tianshu Wang, Yuexian Hou, and Dawei Song. 2018. Modeling relevance judgement inspired by quantum weak measurement. In European Conference on Information Retrieval. Springer, 424–436.
[122]
Yequan Wang, Minlie Huang, Xiaoyan Zhu, and Li Zhao. 2016. Attention-based LSTM for aspect-level sentiment classification. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP’16), Jian Su, Xavier Carreras, and Kevin Duh (Eds.). Association for Computational Linguistics, 606–615. DOI:
[123]
Steven Weinberg. 1995. The Quantum Theory of Fields. Vol. 2. Cambridge University Press.
[124]
Kangyu Weng, Aohua Cheng, Ziyang Zhang, Pei Sun, and Yang Tian. 2022. Statistical physics of deep neural networks: Initialization toward optimal channels. CoRR abs/2212.01744 (2022). arxiv:2212.01744
[125]
Stephen Wolfram. 1983. Statistical mechanics of cellular automata. Reviews of Modern Physics 55, 3 (1983), 601.
[126]
William K. Wootters and Wojciech H. Zurek. 1982. A single quantum cannot be cloned. Nature 299, 5886 (1982), 802–803.
[127]
Sixuan Wu, Jian Li, Peng Zhang, and Yue Zhang. 2021. Natural language processing meets quantum physics: A survey and categorization. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 3172–3182.
[128]
Fei Yan, Abdullah M. Iliyasu, and Salvador E. Venegas-Andraca. 2016. A survey of quantum image representations. Quantum Information Processing 15, 1 (2016), 1–35.
[129]
Yuhai Yu, Hongfei Lin, Jiana Meng, and Zhehuan Zhao. 2016. Visual and textual sentiment analysis of a microblog using deep convolutional neural networks. Algorithms 9, 2 (2016), 41.
[130]
Vyacheslav I. Yukalov and Didier Sornette. 2016. Quantum probability and quantum decision-making. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 374, 2058 (2016), 20150100.
[131]
Amir Zadeh, Minghai Chen, Soujanya Poria, Erik Cambria, and Louis-Philippe Morency. 2017. Tensor fusion network for multimodal sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 1103–1114.
[132]
Peng Zhang, Jiabin Niu, Zhan Su, Benyou Wang, Liqun Ma, and Dawei Song. 2018. End-to-end quantum-like language models with application to question answering. In Proceedings of the 32nd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and 30th Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference and 8th AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence (AAAI’18/IAAI’18/EAAI’18). AAAI Press, Article 695, 8 pages.
[133]
Peng Zhang, Zhan Su, Lipeng Zhang, Benyou Wang, and Dawei Song. 2018. A quantum many-body wave function inspired language modeling approach. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 1303–1312.
[134]
Yazhou Zhang, Qiuchi Li, Dawei Song, Peng Zhang, and Panpan Wang. 2019. Quantum-inspired interactive networks for conversational sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’19), Sarit Kraus (Ed.). ijcai.org, 5436–5442.
[135]
Yazhou Zhang, Yaochen Liu, Qiuchi Li, Prayag Tiwari, Benyou Wang, Yuhua Li, Hari Mohan Pandey, Peng Zhang, and Dawei Song. 2021. CFN: A complex-valued fuzzy network for sarcasm detection in conversations. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 29, 12 (2021), 3696–3710.
[136]
Yazhou Zhang, Dawei Song, Xiang Li, Peng Zhang, Panpan Wang, Lu Rong, Guangliang Yu, and Bo Wang. 2020. A quantum-like multimodal network framework for modeling interaction dynamics in multiparty conversational sentiment analysis. Inf. Fusion 62 (2020), 14–31. DOI:
[137]
Yazhou Zhang, Dawei Song, Peng Zhang, Xiang Li, and Panpan Wang. 2019. A quantum-inspired sentiment representation model for twitter sentiment analysis. Applied Intelligence 49, 8 (2019), 3093–3108.
[138]
Yazhou Zhang, Dawei Song, Peng Zhang, Panpan Wang, Jingfei Li, Xiang Li, and Benyou Wang. 2018. A quantum-inspired multimodal sentiment analysis framework. Theor. Comput. Sci. 752 (2018), 21–40.

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Self-supervised pre-trained neural network for quantum natural language processingNeural Networks10.1016/j.neunet.2024.107004184(107004)Online publication date: Apr-2025
  • (2025)Quantum-inspired neural network with hierarchical entanglement embedding for matchingNeural Networks10.1016/j.neunet.2024.106915182(106915)Online publication date: Feb-2025
  • (2024)Intrusion Detection Systems Using Quantum-Inspired Density Matrix Encodings2024 54th Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks Workshops (DSN-W)10.1109/DSN-W60302.2024.00019(32-38)Online publication date: 24-Jun-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. A Survey of Quantum-cognitively Inspired Sentiment Analysis Models

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Computing Surveys
      ACM Computing Surveys  Volume 56, Issue 1
      January 2024
      918 pages
      EISSN:1557-7341
      DOI:10.1145/3613490
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 26 August 2023
      Online AM: 13 June 2023
      Accepted: 31 May 2023
      Revised: 29 April 2023
      Received: 28 April 2022
      Published in CSUR Volume 56, Issue 1

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Quantum-cognitively inspired models
      2. non-classical probability from quantum mechanics methodology
      3. sentiment analysis
      4. sarcasm detection
      5. emotion recognition

      Qualifiers

      • Survey

      Funding Sources

      • Natural Science Foundation of Beijing

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)386
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)29
      Reflects downloads up to 03 Feb 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2025)Self-supervised pre-trained neural network for quantum natural language processingNeural Networks10.1016/j.neunet.2024.107004184(107004)Online publication date: Apr-2025
      • (2025)Quantum-inspired neural network with hierarchical entanglement embedding for matchingNeural Networks10.1016/j.neunet.2024.106915182(106915)Online publication date: Feb-2025
      • (2024)Intrusion Detection Systems Using Quantum-Inspired Density Matrix Encodings2024 54th Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks Workshops (DSN-W)10.1109/DSN-W60302.2024.00019(32-38)Online publication date: 24-Jun-2024
      • (2024)FITE-GAT: Enhancing aspect-level sentiment classification with FT-RoBERTa induced trees and graph attention networkExpert Systems with Applications10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125890(125890)Online publication date: Nov-2024
      • (2024)RoBERTa, ResNeXt and BiLSTM with self-attentionApplied Soft Computing10.1016/j.asoc.2024.112018164:COnline publication date: 1-Oct-2024
      • (2024)Quantum robotics: a review of emerging trendsQuantum Machine Intelligence10.1007/s42484-024-00225-56:2Online publication date: 28-Nov-2024

      View Options

      Login options

      Full Access

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Full Text

      View this article in Full Text.

      Full Text

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media