Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
introduction
Free access

Trustworthy Recommendation and Search: Introduction to the Special Section - Part 2

Published: 28 July 2023 Publication History

1 Introduction

Recommendation and search systems have already become indispensable means of helping web users identify the most relevant information/services in the era of information overload. The applications of such systems are multi-faceted, including targeted advertising, intelligent medical assistance, and e-commerce, and are bringing immense convenience to people’s daily lives. However, despite rapid advances in recommendation and search, the increasing public awareness of the trustworthiness of relevant recommendation and search applications has introduced higher expectations on relevant research. First, the unprecedentedly growing heterogeneity of use cases has been challenging the adaptivity of contemporary algorithms to various settings, e.g., dynamic user interests [Chen et al. 2019], highly sparse interaction records [Chen et al. 2020b], and limited computing resources [Long et al. 2022; Imran et al. 2022]. Second, in a broader sense, a trustworthy recommendation/search approach should also be robust, interpretable, secure, privacy-preserving, and fair across different use cases. Specifically, robustness evaluates a model’s performance consistency under various operating conditions like noisy data [Zhang et al. 2020]; interpretability and fairness respectively evaluate if a model can make its decision processes transparent [Chen et al. 2020c;, 2021; Lyu et al. 2021; Cui et al. 2022; Ren et al. 2021] and the decision outcomes unbiased [Chen et al. 2020a; Li et al. 2021; Yu et al. 2022; Yin et al. 2012]; while security and privacy respectively emphasize a model’s ability to handle cyber-attacks [Zhang et al. 2021b;, 2022b; Yuan et al. 2023a] and to prevent personal information leakage [Zhang and Yin 2022; Zhang et al. 2021c;, 2021a; Yuan et al. 2023c; Wang et al. 2022a; Yuan et al. 2023b]. Consequently, trustworthiness is becoming a key performance indicator for state-of-the-art recommendation and search approaches. In light of these emerging challenges, this special section focuses on novel research in this field with the notion of trustworthiness. The articles presented in this special issue will further promote responsible AI applications, thus better universalizing the advanced techniques to a wider range of the common public.

2 Overview of Articles

The submission deadline of the special issue was 15th June, 2022 and we received 41 valid submissions in total; among them, 23 submissions were finally accepted. This issue is the second part of the special issue that contains 13 accepted articles.
This issue covers a variety of topics related to trustworthy recommendation and search, including five articles on the interpretability of recommendation and search, two articles on the security of recommendation and search (i.e., adversarial attacks and defenses), two papers on the robustness of search and click models, two articles on the robustness of recommendation models to the data sparsity, one article on the fairness of recommendation systems, and one article on the federated recommender system to protect user privacy. In what follows, we provide an overview of these accepted articles.
Interpretability is crucial for recommendation and search systems as it helps users to understand how results are generated, as well as being able to improve the trustworthiness of the system. Zhou et al. [2022] argue that most existing sequence-based and graph-based methods learn user preferences in a black-box fashion, which leads to poor interpretability. In light of this, they propose an explainable hyperbolic temporal point process for the user-item interaction sequence generation (EHTPP), which introduces four influence factors from local and global perspectives. Notably, one of the influence factors, the popularity tendency factor, is used to interpret the recommendation results, as it indicates the occurrence probability of the user-item interaction. Leonhardt et al. [2022] propose a two-stage SELECT-AND-RANK method for interpretable document ranking, which first extracts the given number of sentences from the input document from a denoised point of view and then only performs relevance estimation over these extracted sentences. Xue et al. [2022] propose a novel sequential recommendation model that learns user representations from two distinct views, i.e., the item view and the factor view. Specifically, the item-view representation is learned from the sequence graph that includes the concrete timespans of the interaction between users and items, and the factor-view representation is learned from the sequence graph that is incorporated with the item genres by a hierarchical graph neural network, thereby providing explicit interpretability for recommendation results. Li et al. [2022] propose a Topic-aware Intention Network (TIN) for the explainable recommendation. It explains the recommendation results by a knowledge-enhanced neural topic model that learns the user intent. In this way, the generated user intent can be considered interpretable semantics. Quotations are crucial for successful explanations and persuasions. However, finding the right quotations to use can be challenging. Wang et al. [2022b] propose a novel quotation recommendation framework for multi-party online conversations, which considers both semantic-level and topic-level information of conversations by jointly training semantic-based and topic-based recommendation models. Thus, the proposed method can well rank the candidate quotations by the similarities between conversation representations and quotations representations.
Adversarial attacks and defenses are essential in recommendation and search as they help identify vulnerabilities and improve the reliability of recommendation and search models against malicious attacks, which is crucial in preventing online spamming. Xu et al. [2022] present a malicious attack on graph learning-based collaborative filtering (GCLF), which uses a greedy strategy to search the local optimal perturbations and develops a proper attacking utility function to deal with the non-differentiable ranking-oriented metrics. In light of this security risk, a defense strategy based on measuring the suspicious score of each interaction and reducing the message weight of suspicious interactions during propagation is proposed to robustify GCLF further. Chen et al. [2022] propose a Word Substitution Ranking Attack on neural ranking models by adding adversarial perturbations to the target document, thereby promoting its ranking and exposure rate. Specifically, the proposed method is in the black-box attack setting where the model information is unavailable to the attackers. They present a Pseudo Relevance-based ADversarial ranking Attack approach to finding the adversarial perturbations based on the generated gradients from a surrogate model.
The robustness of search and ranking models is a critical topic frequently discussed. One aspect of this is their ability to handle data noise and distributional shifts. He et al. [2022] present an unsupervised semantic hashing framework, MASH, for similar text search. In addition, they introduce a relevance constraint and optimize hashing learning in the global space to ensure code balance. Notably, to ensure that the learned hash codes are robust to the noise, an improved SMASH model consisting of a noise-aware encoder-decoder framework is proposed to account for the noise degree of each text. On the other hand, Deffayet et al. [2022] first analyze the limitations of the traditional offline evaluation protocol for click models; that is, they need to consider the robustness of these models to policy distributional shift. Then, the authors propose a new evaluation protocol that measures the robustness of six different click models under various shifts, training configurations, and downstream tasks. The study provides insights into factors that increase sensitivity to the policy distributional shift and offers guidelines to mitigate risks when deploying policies based on click models.
Data sparsity has been a significant challenge in recommender systems. Due to the effectiveness of the cross-domain information in alleviating the sparsity issue in recommender systems, Cross-domain Recommendation (CR) task [Guo et al. 2022b, 2022c, 2023] is gaining immense attention. Guo et al. [2022a] propose a novel end-to-end model, DR-MTCDR, for the multi-target cross-domain recommendation. The model aims to efficiently and effectively transfer trustworthy domain-shared information across multiple domains while avoiding adverse transfer problems. To achieve this, DR-MTCDR uses a unified module to capture disentangled domain-shared and domain-specific information, which supports various domains’ recommendations and is insensitive to the number of domains. In addition, we have an accepted article addressing the data sparsity issue in news recommendations. To address the data sparsity, Meng et al. [2022] integrate user-news interaction relationships with the news click sequences to build a global heterogeneous graph. Then, they propose a heterogeneous transition attention networks-based news recommendation framework, GAINRec, which can learn the news transition patterns and capture the common behavior patterns of users over the constructed global heterogeneous graph. Furthermore, the edge attention weights could be visualized to enhance the interpretability and reliability of the proposed method.
With the growing concerns about privacy and the new privacy protection regulations (e.g., GDPR in the EU and CCPA in the USA), federated recommenders (FedRecs) have recently emerged as a privacy-preserving solution to collaboratively learn a recommendation model among personal devices without uploading user data to a central server. Nevertheless, performing complex operations, e.g., similarity search via inner product, on resource-constrained devices remains a significant challenge for current federated recommender systems. Zhang et al. [2022a] propose a lightweight matrix factorization-based federated recommendation framework, called LightFR, which employs the hash technique to generate high-quality binary codes to perform faster online inference and reduce memory consumption.
Fairness is another important dimension in trustworthy recommendation systems. Fairness means that the recommendations provided by the system should be unbiased and not discriminate. Zhao et al. [2022] propose an adaptive and fair task recommendation framework in spatial crowdsourcing [Nguyen et al. 2018]. Concretely, it first learns workers’ travel-intention-based preferences by capturing both workers’ hometown and out-of-town preferences adaptively based on their locations, and then introduces a fair top-k recommendation method.

3 Conclusions

In summary, these accepted articles are a strong reflection of the depth and breadth of current research on trustworthy recommendations and search. A wide range of research questions have been discussed in Part 2 of this special issue, including how to provide explainable recommendation results, how to understand and prevent possible adversarial attacks, how to improve the robustness of search and click models, how to improve the robustness of recommendation systems to the data sparsity, how to make fair recommendations, and how to lighten local models in federated recommender systems. In the meantime, there are still open challenges to be addressed, such as diversity in recommendation and search, fake news and misinformation detection, and causal reasoning in online recommendations. We look forward to witnessing numerous exceptional works in this field in the future.

Acknowledgements

We thank all researchers who submitted their work to the special issue and all reviewers who spent a significant amount of time and effort to help all authors improve their manuscripts with constructive feedback. We also thank Prof. Min Zhang, the Editor-in-Chief of the journal for the guidance and support provided.

References

[1]
Hongxu Chen, Yicong Li, Xiangguo Sun, Guandong Xu, and Hongzhi Yin. 2021. Temporal meta-path guided explainable recommendation. In WSDM. 1056–1064.
[2]
Jiawei Chen, Hande Dong, Xiang Wang, Fuli Feng, Meng Wang, and Xiangnan He. 2020a. Bias and debias in recommender system: A survey and future directions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.03240 (2020).
[3]
Tong Chen, Hongzhi Yin, Hongxu Chen, Rui Yan, Quoc Viet Hung Nguyen, and Xue Li. 2019. Air: Attentional intention-aware recommender systems. In ICDE. 304–315.
[4]
Tong Chen, Hongzhi Yin, Quoc Viet Hung Nguyen, Wen-Chih Peng, Xue Li, and Xiaofang Zhou. 2020b. Sequence-aware factorization machines for temporal predictive analytics. In ICDE. 1405–1416.
[5]
Tong Chen, Hongzhi Yin, Guanhua Ye, Zi Huang, Yang Wang, and Meng Wang. 2020c. Try this instead: Personalized and interpretable substitute recommendation. In SIGIR. 891–900.
[6]
Wu Chen, Ruqing Zhang, Jiafeng Guo, Maarten De Rijke, Yixing Fan, and Xueqi Cheng. 2022. PRADA: Practical black-box adversarial attacks against neural ranking models. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (2022).
[7]
Zhihong Cui, Hongxu Chen, Lizhen Cui, Shijun Liu, Xueyan Liu, Guandong Xu, and Hongzhi Yin. 2022. Reinforced KGs reasoning for explainable sequential recommendation. World Wide Web Journal 25, 2 (2022), 631–654.
[8]
Romain Deffayet, Jean-Michel Renders, and Maarten De Rijke. 2022. Evaluating the robustness of click models to policy distributional shift. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (2022).
[9]
Lei Guo, Chunxiao Wang, Xinhua Wang, Lei Zhu, and Hongzhi Yin. 2023. Automated prompting for non-overlapping cross-domain sequential recommendation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.04218 (2023).
[10]
Lei Guo, Jinyu Zhang, Tong Chen, Xinhua Wang, and Hongzhi Yin. 2022b. Reinforcement learning-enhanced shared-account cross-domain sequential recommendation. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (2022), 1–14.
[11]
Lei Guo, Jinyu Zhang, Li Tang, Tong Chen, Lei Zhu, and Hongzhi Yin. 2022c. Time interval-enhanced graph neural network for shared-account cross-domain sequential recommendation. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems (2022), 1–15.
[12]
Xiaobo Guo, Shaoshuai Li, Naicheng Guo, Jiangxia Cao, Xiaolei Liu, Qiongxu Ma, Runsheng Gan, and Yunan Zhao. 2022a. Disentangled representations learning for multi-target cross-domain recommendation. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (2022).
[13]
Liyang He, Zhenya Huang, Qi Liu, Shiwei Tong, Hao Wang, Defu Lian, and Shijin Wang. 2022. An efficient and robust semantic hashing framework for similar text search. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (2022).
[14]
Mubashir Imran, Hongzhi Yin, Tong Chen, Nguyen Quoc Viet Hung, Alexander Zhou, and Kai Zheng. 2022. ReFRS: Resource-efficient federated recommender system for dynamic and diversified user preferences. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (2022).
[15]
Jurek Leonhardt, Koustav Rudra, and Avishek Anand. 2022. Extractive explanations for interpretable text ranking. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (2022).
[16]
Qiming Li, Zhao Zhang, Fuzhen Zhuang, Yongjun Xu, and Chao Li. 2022. Topic-aware intention network for explainable recommendation with knowledge enhancement. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (2022).
[17]
Yunqi Li, Hanxiong Chen, Shuyuan Xu, Yingqiang Ge, and Yongfeng Zhang. 2021. Towards personalized fairness based on causal notion. In SIGIR. 1054–1063.
[18]
Jing Long, Tong Chen, Nguyen Quoc Viet Hung, and Hongzhi Yin. 2022. Decentralized collaborative learning framework for next poi recommendation. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (2022).
[19]
Yanzhang Lyu, Hongzhi Yin, Jun Liu, Mengyue Liu, Huan Liu, and Shizhuo Deng. 2021. Reliable recommendation with review-level explanations. In ICDE. 1548–1558.
[20]
Qing Meng, Hui Yan, Bo Liu, Xiangguo Sun, Mingrui Hu, and Jiuxin Cao. 2022. Recognize news transition from collective behavior for news recommendation. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (2022).
[21]
Quoc Viet Hung Nguyen, Huu Viet Huynh, Thanh Tam Nguyen, Matthias Weidlich, Hongzhi Yin, and Xiaofang Zhou. 2018. Computing crowd consensus with partial agreement. In ICDE. 1749–1750.
[22]
Xuhui Ren, Hongzhi Yin, Tong Chen, Hao Wang, Zi Huang, and Kai Zheng. 2021. Learning to ask appropriate questions in conversational recommendation. In SIGIR. 808–817.
[23]
Lingzhi Wang, Xingshan Zeng, and Kam-Fai Wong. 2022b. Quotation recommendation for multi-party online conversations based on semantic and topic fusion. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (2022).
[24]
Qinyong Wang, Hongzhi Yin, Tong Chen, Junliang Yu, Alexander Zhou, and Xiangliang Zhang. 2022a. Fast-adapting and privacy-preserving federated recommender system. The VLDB Journal 31, 5 (2022), 877–896.
[25]
Senrong Xu, Liangyue Li, Zenan Li, Yuan Yao, Feng Xu, Zulong Chen, Quan Lu, and Hanghang Tong. 2022. On the vulnerability of graph learning based collaborative filtering. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (2022).
[26]
Lyuxin Xue, Deqing Yang, Shuoyao Zhai, Yuxin Li, and Yanghua Xiao. 2022. Learning dual-view user representations for enhanced sequential recommendation. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (2022).
[27]
Hongzhi Yin, Bin Cui, Jing Li, Junjie Yao, and Chen Chen. 2012. Challenging the long tail recommendation. VLDB Endowment 5, 9 (2012).
[28]
Junliang Yu, Hongzhi Yin, Xin Xia, Tong Chen, Lizhen Cui, and Quoc Viet Hung Nguyen. 2022. Are graph augmentations necessary? Simple graph contrastive learning for recommendation. In SIGIR. 1294–1303.
[29]
Wei Yuan, Quoc Viet Hung Nguyen, Tieke He, Liang Chen, and Hongzhi Yin. 2023a. Manipulating federated recommender systems: Poisoning with synthetic users and its countermeasures. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.03054 (2023).
[30]
Wei Yuan, Chaoqun Yang, Quoc Viet Hung Nguyen, Lizhen Cui, Tieke He, and Hongzhi Yin. 2023b. Interaction-level membership inference attack against federated recommender systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.10964 (2023).
[31]
Wei Yuan, Hongzhi Yin, Fangzhao Wu, Shijie Zhang, Tieke He, and Hao Wang. 2023c. Federated unlearning for on-device recommendation. WSDM (2023).
[32]
Honglei Zhang, Fangyuan Luo, Jun Wu, Xiangnan He, and Yidong Li. 2022a. LightFR: Lightweight federated recommendation with privacy-preserving matrix factorization. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (2022).
[33]
Minxing Zhang, Zhaochun Ren, Zihan Wang, Pengjie Ren, Zhumin Chen, Pengfei Hu, and Yang Zhang. 2021b. Membership inference attacks against recommender systems. CCS (2021).
[34]
Peng-Fei Zhang, Yang Li, Zi Huang, and Hongzhi Yin. 2021a. Privacy protection in deep multi-modal retrieval. In SIGIR. 634–643.
[35]
Shijie Zhang and Hongzhi Yin. 2022. Comprehensive privacy analysis on federated recommender system against attribute inference attacks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.11857 (2022).
[36]
Shijie Zhang, Hongzhi Yin, Tong Chen, Zi Huang, Lizhen Cui, and Xiangliang Zhang. 2021c. Graph embedding for recommendation against attribute inference attacks. In The Web Conference. 3002–3014.
[37]
Shijie Zhang, Hongzhi Yin, Tong Chen, Zi Huang, Quoc Viet Hung Nguyen, and Lizhen Cui. 2022b. PipAttack: Poisoning federated recommender systems for manipulating item promotion. WSDM (2022).
[38]
Shijie Zhang, Hongzhi Yin, Tong Chen, Quoc Viet Nguyen Hung, Zi Huang, and Lizhen Cui. 2020. Gcn-based user representation learning for unifying robust recommendation and fraudster detection. In SIGIR. 689–698.
[39]
Yan Zhao, Liwei Deng, and Kai Zheng. 2022. AdaTaskRec: An adaptive task recommendation framework in spatial crowdsourcing. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (2022).
[40]
Yuchen Zhou, Yannan Cao, Yanmin Shang, Chuan Zhou, Shirui Pan, Zheng Lin, and Qian Li. 2022. Explainable hyperbolic temporal point process for user-item interaction sequence generation. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (2022).

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Mitigating Exposure Bias in Recommender Systems – A Comparative Analysis of Discrete Choice ModelsACM Transactions on Recommender Systems10.1145/3641291Online publication date: 27-Jan-2024

Index Terms

  1. Trustworthy Recommendation and Search: Introduction to the Special Section - Part 2

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Transactions on Information Systems
      ACM Transactions on Information Systems  Volume 41, Issue 4
      October 2023
      958 pages
      ISSN:1046-8188
      EISSN:1558-2868
      DOI:10.1145/3587261
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 28 July 2023
      Accepted: 10 June 2023
      Received: 08 June 2023
      Published in TOIS Volume 41, Issue 4

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Recommender systems
      2. information retrieval
      3. trustworthiness
      4. robustness
      5. interpretability
      6. fairness
      7. privacy
      8. security

      Qualifiers

      • Introduction

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)276
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)38
      Reflects downloads up to 26 Sep 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Mitigating Exposure Bias in Recommender Systems – A Comparative Analysis of Discrete Choice ModelsACM Transactions on Recommender Systems10.1145/3641291Online publication date: 27-Jan-2024

      View Options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format.

      HTML Format

      Get Access

      Login options

      Full Access

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media