Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article
Open access

The Work to Make Piecework Work: An Ethnographic Study of Food Delivery Work in India During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Published: 04 October 2023 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    This paper considers food delivery work as a form of piecework that is conducted via a particular workflow system -- the food delivery platform and its delivery app. We offer an ethnographic account of food delivery labor during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic in the Indian city of Pune. Our inquiry is focused on (1) the workflow that structures food delivery work and (2) how economic considerations shape how workers work with and around the workflow. Our findings depict both the workflow that structures the delivery work and the efforts workers make beyond it to deal with contingencies and unexpected requirements they encounter on the ground. We recognize the workers' efforts as essential to make the workflow work but also to make the piecework arrangement work for them. We highlight how, in this setting, money is not just the motivation for engaging in gig work; rather, economic considerations infuse every aspect of the work process. Acknowledging the distinct shape gig work takes in a Global South context, our study highlights the value of in-depth,in situ understandings of how gig workers' economic considerations are entangled with their interactions with the technology that structures their work. Our key contribution lies in mapping outthe workflow of piecework andthe work to make piecework work, specifically in a Global South setting, by drawing upon classic CSCW themes around workflows and piecework to strengthen the contemporary scholarly discussion concerning gig work.

    References

    [1]
    Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed, Nicola J. Bidwell, Himanshu Zade, Srihari H. Muralidhar, Anupama Dhareshwar, Baneen Karachiwala, Cedrick N. Tandong, and Jacki O'Neill. 2016. Peer-to-Peer in the Workplace: A View from the Road. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 5063--5075. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858393
    [2]
    Ali Alkhatib, Michael S. Bernstein, and Margaret Levi. 2017. Examining Crowd Work and Gig Work Through The Historical Lens of Piecework. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 4599--4616. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025974
    [3]
    Amit Basole, Rosa Abraham, Rahul Lahoti, Surbhi Kesar, Mrinalini Jha, Paaritosh Nath, Radhicka Kapoor, S Nelson Mandela, Anand Shrivastava, Zico Dasgupta, et al. 2021. State of working India 2021: one year of Covid-19. (2021).
    [4]
    Victoria Bellotti, Alexander Ambard, Daniel Turner, Christina Gossmann, Kamila Demkova, and John M. Carroll. 2015. A Muddle of Models of Motivation for Using Peer-to-Peer Economy Systems. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (CHI '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1085--1094. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702272
    [5]
    Kavya Bharadkar, Kaveri Medappa, Mohan Mani, Pradyumna Taduri, and Sachin Tiwari. 2020. Is platform work decent work? A case of food delivery workers in Karnataka.
    [6]
    John Bowers. 1994. The work to make a network work: studying CSCW in action. In Proceedings of the 1994 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. 287--298.
    [7]
    John Bowers, Graham Button, and Wes Sharrock. 1995. Workflow from within and without: Technology and cooperative work on the print industry shopfloor. In Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work ECSCW'95. Springer, 51--66.
    [8]
    Steen Brahe and Kjeld Schmidt. 2007. The Story of a Working Workflow Management System. In Proceedings of the 2007 International ACM Conference on Supporting Group Work (Sanibel Island, Florida, USA) (GROUP '07). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 249--258. https://doi.org/10.1145/1316624.1316661
    [9]
    Barry Brown, Stuart Reeves, and Scott Sherwood. 2011. Into the wild: challenges and opportunities for field trial methods. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1657--1666.
    [10]
    Taina Bucher. 2017. The algorithmic imaginary: exploring the ordinary affects of Facebook algorithms. Information, communication & society 20, 1 (2017), 30--44.
    [11]
    Callum Cant. 2019. Riding for Deliveroo: resistance in the new economy. John Wiley & Sons.
    [12]
    Valerio De Stefano. 2015. The rise of the just-in-time workforce: On-demand work, crowdwork, and labor protection in the gig-economy. Comp. Lab. L. & Pol'y J. 37 (2015), 471.
    [13]
    Niels van Doorn. 2020. At what price? Labour politics and calculative power struggles in on-demand food delivery. Work Organisation, Labour & Globalisation 14, 1 (2020), 136--149.
    [14]
    Jan Drahokoupil and Agnieszka Piasna. 2019. Work in the platform economy: Deliveroo riders in Belgium and the SMart arrangement. ETUI Research Paper-Working Paper (2019).
    [15]
    Elizabeth Fetterolf. 2022. It's Crowded at the Bottom: Trust, Visibility, and Search Algorithms on Care. com. Journal of Digital Social Research 4, 1 (2022), 49--72.
    [16]
    Frances Flanagan. 2019. Theorising the gig economy and home-based service work. Journal of Industrial Relations 61, 1 (2019), 57--78.
    [17]
    Claudia Flores-Saviaga, Yuwen Li, Benjamin Hanrahan, Jeffrey Bigham, and Saiph Savage. 2020. The challenges of crowd workers in rural and urban America. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing, Vol. 8. 159--162.
    [18]
    Gerald Friedman. 2014. Workers without employers: shadow corporations and the rise of the gig economy. Review of Keynesian Economics 2, 2 (2014), 171--188.
    [19]
    Anweshaa Ghosh, Risha Ramachandran, and Mubashira Zaidi. 2021. Women workers in the gig economy in India: An exploratory study. Available at SSRN 3944205 (2021).
    [20]
    Mareike Glöss, Moira McGregor, and Barry Brown. 2016. Designing for labour: uber and the on-demand mobile workforce. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1632--1643.
    [21]
    Mary L Gray and Siddharth Suri. 2019. Ghost work: How to stop Silicon Valley from building a new global underclass. Eamon Dolan Books.
    [22]
    Kathleen Griesbach, Adam Reich, Luke Elliott-Negri, and Ruth Milkman. 2019. Algorithmic control in platform food delivery work. Socius 5 (2019), 2378023119870041.
    [23]
    Lilly C Irani and M Six Silberman. 2013. Turkopticon: Interrupting worker invisibility in amazon mechanical turk. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 611--620.
    [24]
    Kylie Jarrett. 2022. Digital labor. John Wiley & Sons.
    [25]
    Aniket Kittur, Jeffrey V. Nickerson, Michael Bernstein, Elizabeth Gerber, Aaron Shaw, John Zimmerman, Matt Lease, and John Horton. 2013. The Future of Crowd Work. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (San Antonio, Texas, USA) (CSCW '13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1301--1318. https://doi.org/10.1145/2441776.2441923
    [26]
    Kathleen Kuehn and Thomas F Corrigan. 2013. Hope labor: The role of employment prospects in online social production. The Political Economy of Communication 1, 1 (2013).
    [27]
    Kalle Kusk and Claus Bossen. 2022. Working with Wolt: An Ethnographic Study of Lenient Algorithmic Management on a Food Delivery Platform. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 6, GROUP, Article 4 (jan 2022), 22 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3492823
    [28]
    Airi Lampinen. 2021. The Trouble With Sharing. (2021).
    [29]
    Min Kyung Lee, Daniel Kusbit, Evan Metsky, and Laura Dabbish. 2015. Working with Machines: The Impact of Algorithmic and Data-Driven Management on Human Workers. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (CHI '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1603--1612. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702548
    [30]
    Ya-Wen Lei. 2021. Delivering solidarity: Platform architecture and collective contention in China's platform economy. American Sociological Review 86, 2 (2021), 279--309.
    [31]
    David Martin, Benjamin V Hanrahan, Jacki O'neill, and Neha Gupta. 2014. Being a turker. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing. 224--235.
    [32]
    David Martin, Benjamin V. Hanrahan, Jacki O'Neill, and Neha Gupta. 2014. Being a Turker. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work amp; Social Computing (Baltimore, Maryland, USA) (CSCW '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 224--235. https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531663
    [33]
    Bruno Moreschi, Gabriel Pereira, and Fabio G Cozman. 2020. The Brazilian Workers in Amazon Mechanical Turk: Dreams and realities of ghost workers. Contracampo 39, 1 (2020).
    [34]
    Srihari Hulikal Muralidhar, Claus Bossen, and Jacki O'Neill. 2022. Between a rock and a hard place: Negotiating Dependencies and Precarity in the On-Demand Economy. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Vol. 31 (2022).
    [35]
    Gemma Newlands and Christoph Lutz. 2021. Crowdwork and the mobile underclass: Barriers to participation in India and the United States. new media & society 23, 6 (2021), 1341--1361.
    [36]
    Dhiraj Kumar Nite and Bidhan Chandra Dash. 2022. Caste, Class and Development Experiences: Discourses on Social Inequality/Equality, Merit and Welfare in Modern India. The International Journal of Community and Social Development 4, 4 (2022), 411--425.
    [37]
    Deepankar Pal. 2020. The Deep Tech Behind Estimating Food Preparation Time. Retrieved January 15, 2023 from https://www.uber.com/en-SE/blog/uber-eats-trip-optimization/
    [38]
    Shantanu Prabhat, Sneha Nanavati, and Nimmi Rangaswamy. 2019. India's "Uberwallah": Profiling Uber Drivers in the Gig Economy. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development (Ahmedabad, India) (ICTD '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 43, 5 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287098.3287139
    [39]
    Noopur Raval. 2021. Interrupting invisibility in a global world. Interactions 28, 4 (2021), 27--31.
    [40]
    Noopur Raval and Paul Dourish. 2016. Standing out from the crowd: Emotional labor, body labor, and temporal labor in ridesharing. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. 97--107.
    [41]
    Noopur Raval and Joyojeet Pal. 2019. Making a "Pro": 'Professionalism' after Platforms in Beauty-Work. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, CSCW, Article 175 (nov 2019), 17 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359277
    [42]
    Alex Rosenblat and Luke Stark. 2016. Algorithmic labor and information asymmetries: A case study of Uber's drivers. International journal of communication 10 (2016), 27.
    [43]
    Joel Ross, Lilly Irani, M. Six Silberman, Andrew Zaldivar, and Bill Tomlinson. 2010. Who Are the Crowdworkers? Shifting Demographics in Mechanical Turk. In CHI '10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Atlanta, Georgia, USA) (CHI EA '10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2863--2872. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753846.1753873
    [44]
    Ernel Murati Mohammad Shafkat Amin Nikolaus Volk Ryan Waliany, Lei Kang. 2018. How Trip Inferences and Machine Learning Optimize Delivery Times on Uber Eats. Retrieved January 15, 2023 from https://www.uber.com/en-SE/blog/uber-eats-trip-optimization/
    [45]
    Juliet Schor. 2021. After the gig: How the sharing economy got hijacked and how to win it back. Univ of California Press.
    [46]
    Juliet B Schor, William Attwood-Charles, Mehmet Cansoy, Isak Ladegaard, and Robert Wengronowitz. 2020. Dependence and precarity in the platform economy. Theory and Society 49, 5 (2020), 833--861.
    [47]
    Nick Seaver. 2017. Algorithms as culture: Some tactics for the ethnography of algorithmic systems. Big data & society 4, 2 (2017), 2053951717738104.
    [48]
    Bhavani Seetharaman, Joyojeet Pal, and Julie Hui. 2021. Delivery Work and the Experience of Social Isolation. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5, CSCW1, Article 64 (apr 2021), 17 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3449138
    [49]
    Ujjwal Sehrawat, namit sawhney, Tejaswini Yeleswarapu, and Nimmi Rangaswamy. 2021. The Everyday HCI of Uber Drivers in India: A Developing Country Perspective. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5, CSCW2, Article 424 (oct 2021), 22 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3479568
    [50]
    Ping Sun. 2019. Your order, their labor: An exploration of algorithms and laboring on food delivery platforms in China. Chinese Journal of Communication 12, 3 (2019), 308--323.
    [51]
    Julia Ticona and Alexandra Mateescu. 2018. Trusted strangers: Carework platforms' cultural entrepreneurship in the on-demand economy. New Media & Society 20, 11 (2018), 4384--4404.
    [52]
    Michael Walker, Peter Fleming, and Marco Berti. 2021. You can't pick up a phone and talk to someone': How algorithms function as biopower in the gig economy. Organization 28, 1 (2021), 26--43.
    [53]
    Jamie Woodcock and Mark Graham. 2019. The gig economy. A critical introduction. Cambridge: Polity (2019).
    [54]
    Angie Zhang, Alexander Boltz, Chun Wei Wang, and Min Kyung Lee. 2022. Algorithmic Management Reimagined For Workers and By Workers: Centering Worker Well-Being in Gig Work. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI '22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 14, 20 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3501866

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Amazon Z to A: Speculative Design to Understand the Future of Labor-Intensive WorkplacesProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661561(314-327)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
    • (2024)Not Just A Dot on The Map: Food Delivery Workers as InfrastructureProceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3641918(1-15)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)Fleeting Alliances and Frugal Collaboration in Piecework: A Video-Analysis of Food Delivery Work in IndiaComputer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)10.1007/s10606-024-09501-1Online publication date: 21-Jun-2024
    • Show More Cited By

    Index Terms

    1. The Work to Make Piecework Work: An Ethnographic Study of Food Delivery Work in India During the COVID-19 Pandemic

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
        Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 7, Issue CSCW2
        CSCW
        October 2023
        4055 pages
        EISSN:2573-0142
        DOI:10.1145/3626953
        Issue’s Table of Contents
        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        Published: 04 October 2023
        Published in PACMHCI Volume 7, Issue CSCW2

        Permissions

        Request permissions for this article.

        Check for updates

        Author Tags

        1. COVID-19 pandemic
        2. algorithmic management
        3. ethnography
        4. food delivery
        5. gig work
        6. piecework
        7. workflow system

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article

        Funding Sources

        • dish Research Council grant
        • WASP-HS Marianne and Marcus Wallenberg Foundation project

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)411
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)26
        Reflects downloads up to 11 Aug 2024

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        Cited By

        View all
        • (2024)Amazon Z to A: Speculative Design to Understand the Future of Labor-Intensive WorkplacesProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661561(314-327)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
        • (2024)Not Just A Dot on The Map: Food Delivery Workers as InfrastructureProceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3641918(1-15)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
        • (2024)Fleeting Alliances and Frugal Collaboration in Piecework: A Video-Analysis of Food Delivery Work in IndiaComputer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)10.1007/s10606-024-09501-1Online publication date: 21-Jun-2024
        • (2024)On Algorithmic Time and Daily Contingencies in the Lived Work of Food Delivery ServiceComputer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)10.1007/s10606-024-09500-2Online publication date: 22-May-2024

        View Options

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        Get Access

        Login options

        Full Access

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media