Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3610548.3618207acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagessiggraph-asiaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Neural Stress Fields for Reduced-order Elastoplasticity and Fracture

Published: 11 December 2023 Publication History

Abstract

We propose a hybrid neural network and physics framework for reduced-order modeling of elastoplasticity and fracture. State-of-the-art scientific computing models like the Material Point Method (MPM) faithfully simulate large-deformation elastoplasticity and fracture mechanics. However, their long runtime and large memory consumption render them unsuitable for applications constrained by computation time and memory usage, e.g., virtual reality. To overcome these barriers, we propose a reduced-order framework. Our key innovation is training a low-dimensional manifold for the Kirchhoff stress field via an implicit neural representation. This low-dimensional neural stress field (NSF) enables efficient evaluations of stress values and, correspondingly, internal forces at arbitrary spatial locations. In addition, we also train neural deformation and affine fields to build low-dimensional manifolds for the deformation and affine momentum fields. These neural stress, deformation, and affine fields share the same low-dimensional latent space, which uniquely embeds the high-dimensional simulation state. After training, we run new simulations by evolving in this single latent space, which drastically reduces the computation time and memory consumption. Our general continuum-mechanics-based reduced-order framework is applicable to any phenomena governed by the elastodynamics equation. To showcase the versatility of our framework, we simulate a wide range of material behaviors, including elastica, sand, metal, non-Newtonian fluids, fracture, contact, and collision. We demonstrate dimension reduction by up to 100,000 × and time savings by up to 10 ×.

Supplemental Material

MP4 File
Presentation video [saconferencepapers23-74.mp4], Supplemental document (Appendix) [saconferencepapers23-74_supp.pdf]
MP4 File
"supplementary video", "supplementary document"
MP4 File
supplemental_document, supplemental_video
PDF File
Presentation video [saconferencepapers23-74.mp4], Supplemental document (Appendix) [saconferencepapers23-74_supp.pdf]
PDF File
"supplementary video", "supplementary document"
PDF File
supplemental_document, supplemental_video

References

[1]
Noam Aigerman, Kunal Gupta, Vladimir G Kim, Siddhartha Chaudhuri, Jun Saito, and Thibault Groueix. 2022. Neural Jacobian Fields: Learning Intrinsic Mappings of Arbitrary Meshes. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.02904 (2022).
[2]
Steven S An, Theodore Kim, and Doug L James. 2008. Optimizing cubature for efficient integration of subspace deformations. ACM transactions on graphics (TOG) 27, 5 (2008), 1–10.
[3]
Jernej Barbič and Doug L James. 2005. Real-time subspace integration for St. Venant-Kirchhoff deformable models. ACM transactions on graphics (TOG) 24, 3 (2005), 982–990.
[4]
Jernej Barbič and Yili Zhao. 2011. Real-time large-deformation substructuring. ACM transactions on graphics (TOG) 30, 4 (2011), 1–8.
[5]
Peter Benner, Serkan Gugercin, and Karen Willcox. 2015. A survey of projection-based model reduction methods for parametric dynamical systems. SIAM review 57, 4 (2015), 483–531.
[6]
Gal Berkooz, Philip Holmes, and John L Lumley. 1993. The proper orthogonal decomposition in the analysis of turbulent flows. Annual review of fluid mechanics 25, 1 (1993), 539–575.
[7]
Ronaldo I Borja. 2013. Plasticity. Vol. 2. Springer.
[8]
Jeremiah U Brackbill and Hans M Ruppel. 1986. FLIP: A method for adaptively zoned, particle-in-cell calculations of fluid flows in two dimensions. Journal of Computational physics 65, 2 (1986), 314–343.
[9]
Kevin Carlberg, Matthew Barone, and Harbir Antil. 2017. Galerkin v. least-csquares Petrov–Galerkin projection in nonlinear model reduction. J. Comput. Phys. 330 (2017), 693–734.
[10]
Honglin Chen, Rundi Wu, Eitan Grinspun, Changxi Zheng, and Peter Yichen Chen. 2022. Implicit Neural Spatial Representations for Time-dependent PDEs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.00124 (2022).
[11]
Peter Yichen Chen, Maytee Chantharayukhonthorn, Yonghao Yue, Eitan Grinspun, and Ken Kamrin. 2021. Hybrid discrete-continuum modeling of shear localization in granular media. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 153 (2021), 104404.
[12]
Peter Yichen Chen, Maurizio M Chiaramonte, Eitan Grinspun, and Kevin Carlberg. 2023a. Model reduction for the material point method via an implicit neural representation of the deformation map. J. Comput. Phys. 478 (2023), 111908.
[13]
Peter Yichen Chen, Jinxu Xiang, Dong Heon Cho, Yue Chang, G A Pershing, Henrique Teles Maia, Maurizio M Chiaramonte, Kevin Thomas Carlberg, and Eitan Grinspun. 2023b. CROM: Continuous Reduced-Order Modeling of PDEs Using Implicit Neural Representations. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations. https://openreview.net/forum?id=FUORz1tG8Og
[14]
Zhiqin Chen and Hao Zhang. 2019. Learning implicit fields for generative shape modeling. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 5939–5948.
[15]
Gilles Daviet and Florence Bertails-Descoubes. 2016. A semi-implicit material point method for the continuum simulation of granular materials. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 35, 4 (2016), 1–13.
[16]
Mengyuan Ding, Xuchen Han, Stephanie Wang, Theodore F Gast, and Joseph M Teran. 2019. A thermomechanical material point method for baking and cooking. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 38, 6 (2019), 1–14.
[17]
Yu Fang, Minchen Li, Ming Gao, and Chenfanfu Jiang. 2019. Silly rubber: an implicit material point method for simulating non-equilibrated viscoelastic and elastoplastic solids. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 38, 4 (2019), 1–13.
[18]
Yun Fei, Christopher Batty, Eitan Grinspun, and Changxi Zheng. 2019. A multi-scale model for coupling strands with shear-dependent liquid. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 38, 6 (2019), 1–20.
[19]
Yun Fei, Yuhan Huang, and Ming Gao. 2021. Principles towards Real-Time Simulation of Material Point Method on Modern GPUs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.00699 (2021).
[20]
Lawson Fulton, Vismay Modi, David Duvenaud, David IW Levin, and Alec Jacobson. 2019. Latent-space Dynamics for Reduced Deformable Simulation. In Computer graphics forum, Vol. 38. Wiley Online Library, 379–391.
[21]
Ming Gao, Xinlei Wang, Kui Wu, Andre Pradhana, Eftychios Sifakis, Cem Yuksel, and Chenfanfu Jiang. 2018. GPU optimization of material point methods. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 37, 6 (2018), 1–12.
[22]
Oscar Gonzalez and Andrew M Stuart. 2008. A first course in continuum mechanics. Vol. 42. Cambridge University Press.
[23]
Francis H Harlow. 1962. The particle-in-cell method for numerical solution of problems in fluid dynamics. Technical Report. Los Alamos National Lab.(LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States).
[24]
Jan Hegemann, Chenfanfu Jiang, Craig Schroeder, and Joseph M Teran. 2013. A level set method for ductile fracture. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation. 193–201.
[25]
Philip Holmes, John L Lumley, Gahl Berkooz, and Clarence W Rowley. 2012. Turbulence, coherent structures, dynamical systems and symmetry. Cambridge university press.
[26]
Yuanming Hu, Tzu-Mao Li, Luke Anderson, Jonathan Ragan-Kelley, and Frédo Durand. 2019. Taichi: a language for high-performance computation on spatially sparse data structures. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 38, 6 (2019), 1–16.
[27]
Chenfanfu Jiang, Craig Schroeder, Andrew Selle, Joseph Teran, and Alexey Stomakhin. 2015. The affine particle-in-cell method. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 34, 4 (2015), 1–10.
[28]
Chenfanfu Jiang, Craig Schroeder, Joseph Teran, Alexey Stomakhin, and Andrew Selle. 2016. The material point method for simulating continuum materials. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2016 Courses. 1–52.
[29]
Byungsoo Kim, Vinicius C Azevedo, Nils Thuerey, Theodore Kim, Markus Gross, and Barbara Solenthaler. 2019. Deep fluids: A generative network for parameterized fluid simulations. In Computer Graphics Forum, Vol. 38. Wiley Online Library, 59–70.
[30]
Theodore Kim and John Delaney. 2013. Subspace fluid re-simulation. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 32, 4 (2013), 1–9.
[31]
Theodore Kim and Doug L James. 2009. Skipping steps in deformable simulation with online model reduction. In ACM SIGGRAPH Asia 2009 papers. 1–9.
[32]
Gergely Klár, Theodore Gast, Andre Pradhana, Chuyuan Fu, Craig Schroeder, Chenfanfu Jiang, and Joseph Teran. 2016. Drucker-prager elastoplasticity for sand animation. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 35, 4 (2016), 1–12.
[33]
Kookjin Lee and Kevin T Carlberg. 2020. Model reduction of dynamical systems on nonlinear manifolds using deep convolutional autoencoders. J. Comput. Phys. 404 (2020), 108973.
[34]
Bethany Lusch, J Nathan Kutz, and Steven L Brunton. 2018. Deep learning for universal linear embeddings of nonlinear dynamics. Nature communications 9, 1 (2018), 4950.
[35]
Miles Macklin. 2022. Warp: A High-performance Python Framework for GPU Simulation and Graphics. https://github.com/nvidia/warp. NVIDIA GPU Technology Conference (GTC).
[36]
Lars Mescheder, Michael Oechsle, Michael Niemeyer, Sebastian Nowozin, and Andreas Geiger. 2019. Occupancy networks: Learning 3d reconstruction in function space. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 4460–4470.
[37]
Ben Mildenhall, Pratul P Srinivasan, Matthew Tancik, Jonathan T Barron, Ravi Ramamoorthi, and Ren Ng. 2020. Nerf: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view synthesis. In European conference on computer vision. Springer, 405–421.
[38]
Jorge Nocedal and Stephen J Wright. 1999. Numerical optimization. Springer.
[39]
Shaowu Pan, Steven L Brunton, and J Nathan Kutz. 2023. Neural Implicit Flow: a mesh-agnostic dimensionality reduction paradigm of spatio-temporal data. Journal of Machine Learning Research 24, 41 (2023), 1–60.
[40]
Jeong Joon Park, Peter Florence, Julian Straub, Richard Newcombe, and Steven Lovegrove. 2019. Deepsdf: Learning continuous signed distance functions for shape representation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 165–174.
[41]
Yuxing Qiu, Samuel Temple Reeve, Minchen Li, Yin Yang, Stuart Ryan Slattery, and Chenfanfu Jiang. 2023. A Sparse Distributed Gigascale Resolution Material Point Method. ACM Transactions on Graphics 42, 2 (2023), 1–21.
[42]
Maziar Raissi, Paris Perdikaris, and George E Karniadakis. 2019. Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. J. Comput. Phys. 378 (2019), 686–707.
[43]
Alvaro Sanchez-Gonzalez, Jonathan Godwin, Tobias Pfaff, Rex Ying, Jure Leskovec, and Peter Battaglia. 2020. Learning to simulate complex physics with graph networks. In International conference on machine learning. PMLR, 8459–8468.
[44]
Nicholas Sharp, Cristian Romero, Alec Jacobson, Etienne Vouga, Paul G Kry, David IW Levin, and Justin Solomon. 2023. Data-Free Learning of Reduced-Order Kinematics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.03846 (2023).
[45]
Siyuan Shen, Yin Yang, Tianjia Shao, He Wang, Chenfanfu Jiang, Lei Lan, and Kun Zhou. 2021. High-Order Differentiable Autoencoder for Nonlinear Model Reduction. ACM Trans. Graph. 40, 4, Article 68 (jul 2021), 15 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3450626.3459754
[46]
Eftychios Sifakis and Jernej Barbic. 2012. FEM Simulation of 3D Deformable Solids: A Practitioner’s Guide to Theory, Discretization and Model Reduction. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2012 Courses (Los Angeles, California) (SIGGRAPH ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 20, 50 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2343483.2343501
[47]
Vincent Sitzmann, Julien Martel, Alexander Bergman, David Lindell, and Gordon Wetzstein. 2020. Implicit neural representations with periodic activation functions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33 (2020), 7462–7473.
[48]
Alexey Stomakhin, Craig Schroeder, Lawrence Chai, Joseph Teran, and Andrew Selle. 2013. A material point method for snow simulation. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 32, 4 (2013), 1–10.
[49]
Deborah Sulsky, Shi-Jian Zhou, and Howard L Schreyer. 1995. Application of a particle-in-cell method to solid mechanics. Computer physics communications 87, 1-2 (1995), 236–252.
[50]
Matthew Tancik, Vincent Casser, Xinchen Yan, Sabeek Pradhan, Ben Mildenhall, Pratul P Srinivasan, Jonathan T Barron, and Henrik Kretzschmar. 2022. Block-nerf: Scalable large scene neural view synthesis. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 8248–8258.
[51]
Adrien Treuille, Andrew Lewis, and Zoran Popović. 2006. Model reduction for real-time fluids. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 25, 3 (2006), 826–834.
[52]
Stephanie Wang. 2020. A Material Point Method for Elastoplasticity with Ductile Fracture and Frictional Contact. University of California, Los Angeles.
[53]
Stephanie Wang, Mengyuan Ding, Theodore F Gast, Leyi Zhu, Steven Gagniere, Chenfanfu Jiang, and Joseph M Teran. 2019. Simulation and visualization of ductile fracture with the material point method. Proceedings of the ACM on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques 2, 2 (2019), 1–20.
[54]
Xinlei Wang, Minchen Li, Yu Fang, Xinxin Zhang, Ming Gao, Min Tang, Danny M Kaufman, and Chenfanfu Jiang. 2020a. Hierarchical optimization time integration for cfl-rate mpm stepping. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 39, 3 (2020), 1–16.
[55]
Xinlei Wang, Yuxing Qiu, Stuart R Slattery, Yu Fang, Minchen Li, Song-Chun Zhu, Yixin Zhu, Min Tang, Dinesh Manocha, and Chenfanfu Jiang. 2020b. A massively parallel and scalable multi-GPU material point method. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 39, 4 (2020), 30–1.
[56]
Steffen Wiewel, Moritz Becher, and Nils Thuerey. 2019. Latent space physics: Towards learning the temporal evolution of fluid flow. In Computer graphics forum, Vol. 38. Wiley Online Library, 71–82.
[57]
Joshuah Wolper, Yunuo Chen, Minchen Li, Yu Fang, Ziyin Qu, Jiecong Lu, Meggie Cheng, and Chenfanfu Jiang. 2020. AnisoMPM: Animating Anisotropic Damage Mechanics. ACM Trans. Graph. 39, 4, Article 37 (2020).
[58]
Joshuah Wolper, Yu Fang, Minchen Li, Jiecong Lu, Ming Gao, and Chenfanfu Jiang. 2019. CD-MPM: continuum damage material point methods for dynamic fracture animation. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 38, 4 (2019), 1–15.
[59]
Yiheng Xie, Towaki Takikawa, Shunsuke Saito, Or Litany, Shiqin Yan, Numair Khan, Federico Tombari, James Tompkin, Vincent Sitzmann, and Srinath Sridhar. 2021. Neural Fields in Visual Computing and Beyond. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.11426 (2021).
[60]
Hongyi Xu, Yijing Li, Yong Chen, and Jernej Barbič. 2015. Interactive material design using model reduction. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 34, 2 (2015), 1–14.
[61]
Guandao Yang, Serge Belongie, Bharath Hariharan, and Vladlen Koltun. 2021. Geometry Processing with Neural Fields. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 34 (2021).
[62]
Yin Yang, Dingzeyu Li, Weiwei Xu, Yuan Tian, and Changxi Zheng. 2015. Expediting precomputation for reduced deformable simulation. ACM Trans. Graph 34, 6 (2015).
[63]
Yonghao Yue, Breannan Smith, Christopher Batty, Changxi Zheng, and Eitan Grinspun. 2015. Continuum foam: A material point method for shear-dependent flows. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 34, 5 (2015), 1–20.
[64]
Yonghao Yue, Breannan Smith, Peter Yichen Chen, Maytee Chantharayukhonthorn, Ken Kamrin, and Eitan Grinspun. 2018. Hybrid grains: Adaptive coupling of discrete and continuum simulations of granular media. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 37, 6 (2018), 1–19.
[65]
Jonas Zehnder, Yue Li, Stelian Coros, and Bernhard Thomaszewski. 2021. Ntopo: Mesh-free topology optimization using implicit neural representations. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 34 (2021), 10368–10381.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Near-realtime Facial Animation by Deep 3D Simulation Super-ResolutionACM Transactions on Graphics10.1145/367068743:5(1-20)Online publication date: 9-Aug-2024

Index Terms

  1. Neural Stress Fields for Reduced-order Elastoplasticity and Fracture

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SA '23: SIGGRAPH Asia 2023 Conference Papers
    December 2023
    1113 pages
    ISBN:9798400703157
    DOI:10.1145/3610548
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 11 December 2023

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Neural field
    2. model reduction
    3. reduced-order model
    4. the material point method

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    SA '23
    Sponsor:
    SA '23: SIGGRAPH Asia 2023
    December 12 - 15, 2023
    NSW, Sydney, Australia

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 178 of 869 submissions, 20%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)742
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)76
    Reflects downloads up to 12 Sep 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Near-realtime Facial Animation by Deep 3D Simulation Super-ResolutionACM Transactions on Graphics10.1145/367068743:5(1-20)Online publication date: 9-Aug-2024

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Get Access

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media