Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3620679.3620714acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicbetConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Performance evaluation of different 3D printing techniques for PCL-based scaffold fabrication

Published: 19 December 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Polycaprolactone (PCL) is a widely employed biodegradable thermoplastic polymer that finds extensive use in the development of scaffolds for hard tissue engineering, including bone and cartilage regeneration. Different 3D printing methods are available for fabricating PCL-based scaffolds, utilizing various forms of raw materials such as powder, pellets, and filaments. The selection of an appropriate technique for a specific application demands a thorough understanding of the characteristics associated with each method. To ensure standardized and uniform comparisons, this study employs a multi-head 3D printer equipped with three distinct printheads: screw-based extrusion (SBE), filament-based deposition (FBD), and melt-based extrusion (MBE). The performance of these printing techniques is evaluated based on several criteria, including printing speed, printing accuracy, equipment cost, pre-printing time, and waste material generation. Thorough experimentation is conducted to assess the performance and determine the strengths and limitations of each printing technique in scaffold fabrication. The findings of this investigation offer valuable insights and recommendations for selecting an appropriate printing technique tailored to specific requirements in tissue engineering applications.

References

[1]
Loh, Q.L. and C. Choong. 2013. Three-Dimensional Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering Applications: Role of Porosity and Pore Size. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 19(6), 485-485 https://doi.org/10.1089/TEN.TEB.2012.0437.
[2]
Alagoz, A.S. and V. Hasirci. 2019. 3D printing of polymeric tissue engineering scaffolds using open-source fused deposition modeling. Emergent Mater. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42247-019-00048-2.
[3]
Cao, T., K.H. Ho, and S.H. Teoh. 2003. Scaffold design and in vitro study of osteochondral coculture in a three-dimensional porous polycaprolactone scaffold fabricated by fused deposition modeling. Tissue Eng. 9(SUPPL. 1), https://doi.org/10.1089/10763270360697012.
[4]
Kim, J.Y., E.K. Park, S. Y. Kim, J. W. Shin, and D. W. Cho. 2008. Fabrication of a SFF-based three-dimensional scaffold using a precision deposition system in tissue engineering. J Micromech Microeng. 18(5), 055027-055027 https://doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/18/5/055027.
[5]
Shor, L., S. Güçeri, X. Wen, M. Gandhi, and W. Sun. 2007. Fabrication of three-dimensional polycaprolactone/hydroxyapatite tissue scaffolds and osteoblast-scaffold interactions in vitro. Biomaterials. 28(35), 5291-5297 https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOMATERIALS.2007.08.018.
[6]
Phung, L.X., T. Do, P. Tran, and T.K. Nguyen. 2022. Development of a fuzzy-AHP system to select the printing method for polycaprolactone (PCL)-based scaffolds. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 121(9-10), 5971-5990 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-09655-6.
[7]
Andrea Roberto, C., R. Sinha, J. Harings, K.V. Bernaerts, C. Mota, and L. Moroni. 2021. Additive Manufacturing Using Melt Extruded Thermoplastics for Tissue Engineering. Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.). 214775-99 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0611-7_7.

Index Terms

  1. Performance evaluation of different 3D printing techniques for PCL-based scaffold fabrication

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICBET '23: Proceedings of the 2023 13th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Technology
      June 2023
      271 pages
      ISBN:9798400707438
      DOI:10.1145/3620679
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 19 December 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. 3D printing
      2. PCL-based material
      3. Scaffold
      4. Tissue engineering

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Funding Sources

      • Vingroup Innovation Foundation

      Conference

      ICBET 2023

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • 0
        Total Citations
      • 18
        Total Downloads
      • Downloads (Last 12 months)18
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
      Reflects downloads up to 15 Oct 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format.

      HTML Format

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media