Co-Design of a Robotic Mental Well-Being Coach to Help University Students Manage Public Speaking Anxiety
Authors: 
Samira Rasouli, 
Linda Johnston, Jennifer Yuen, 
Moojan Ghafurian, Leah Foster, Kerstin DautenhahnAuthors Info & Claims
Samira Rasouli, Linda Johnston, Jennifer Yuen, Moojan Ghafurian, Leah Foster, Kerstin DautenhahnAuthors Info & ClaimsPages 200 - 208
Abstract
Public speaking anxiety, one of the most common subtypes of social anxiety, is prevalent among university students and can negatively impact their academic success and mental well-being. Limited access to human coaches and interventions calls for innovative technological solutions, including social robots, to extend and complement mental health support and increase accessibility. This study employs a co-design approach to design a robotic mental well-being coach aimed at assisting university students in managing public speaking anxiety. Collaborative co-design sessions with five mental health professionals were conducted to identify the design-related needs (i.e., robot behaviour and interactions) for developing a robotic coach that can effectively assist students’ public speaking anxiety. In addition, a co-design study involving university students was conducted to gather opinions for further improvements of the robotic coach. Students provided feedback on the developed system and generally found the robot engaging, relaxing, knowledgeable, and beneficial for learning relaxation exercises. The findings provide insights into the development of a robotic coach for supporting university students in managing public speaking anxiety.
References
[1]
Henny Admoni and Brian Scassellati. 2017. Social eye gaze in human-robot interaction: a review. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction 6, 1 (2017), 25–63. https://doi.org/10.5898/JHRI.6.1.Admoni
[2]
Samer Al Moubayed, Jonas Beskow, Gabriel Skantze, and Björn Granström. 2012. Furhat: A Back-Projected Human-Like Robot Head for Multiparty Human-Machine Interaction. In Cognitive Behavioural Systems, Anna Esposito, Antonietta M. Esposito, Alessandro Vinciarelli, Rüdiger Hoffmann, and Vincent C. Müller (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 114–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34584-5_9
[3]
Maryam Alimardani, Linda Kemmeren, Kazuki Okumura, and Kazuo Hiraki. 2020. Robot-assisted mindfulness practice: Analysis of neurophysiological responses and affective state change. In 2020 29th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). IEEE, 683–689.
[4]
American Psychiatric Association. 2013. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). American Psychiatric Pub. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
[5]
Victor Nikhil Antony, Sue Min Cho, and Chien-Ming Huang. 2023. Co-Designing with Older Adults, for Older Adults: Robots to Promote Physical Activity. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Stockholm, Sweden) (HRI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 506–515. https://doi.org/10.1145/3568162.3576995
[6]
Carlos Alberto Baptista, Sonia Regina Loureiro, Flávia de Lima Osório, Antonio Waldo Zuardi, Pedro V Magalhães, Flávio Kapczinski, Alaor Santos Filho, Maria Cecília Freitas-Ferrari, and José Alexandre S Crippa. 2012. Social phobia in Brazilian university students: Prevalence, under-recognition and academic impairment in women. Journal of affective disorders 136, 3 (2012), 857–861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2011.09.022
[7]
Elin A. Björling and Emma Rose. 2019. Participatory Research Principles in Human-Centered Design: Engaging Teens in the Co-Design of a Social Robot. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 3, 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/mti3010008
[8]
Cynthia Breazeal, Kerstin Dautenhahn, and Takayuki Kanda. 2016. Social robotics. In Springer handbook of robotics. Springer, 1935–1972. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32552-1_72
[9]
Mirko Duradoni, Giulia Colombini, Paola Andrea Russo, and Andrea Guazzini. 2021. Robotic Psychology: A PRISMA Systematic Review on Social-Robot-Based Interventions in Psychological Domains. J 4, 4 (2021), 664–709. https://doi.org/10.3390/j4040048
[10]
Karen Kangas Dwyer and Marlina M Davidson. 2012. Is public speaking really more feared than death?Communication Research Reports 29, 2 (2012), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2012.667772
[11]
Miss Kristina Fenn and Dr Majella Byrne. 2013. The key principles of cognitive behavioural therapy. InnovAiT 6, 9 (2013), 579–585. https://doi.org/10.1177/1755738012471029 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/1755738012471029
[12]
Mary Ellen Foster, Patricia Candelaria, Lauren J. Dwyer, Summer Hudson, Alan Lindsay, Fareha Nishat, Mykelle Pacquing, Ronald P. A. Petrick, Andrés Alberto Ramírez-Duque, Jennifer Stinson, Frauke Zeller, and Samina Ali. 2023. Co-Design of a Social Robot for Distraction in the Paediatric Emergency Department. In Companion of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Stockholm, Sweden) (HRI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 461–465. https://doi.org/10.1145/3568294.3580127
[13]
Moojan Ghafurian, Jesse Hoey, and Kerstin Dautenhahn. 2021. Social Robots for the Care of Persons with Dementia: A Systematic Review. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (THRI) 10, 4 (2021), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/3469653
[14]
Philippe R Goldin and James J Gross. 2010. Effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) on emotion regulation in social anxiety disorder.Emotion 10, 1 (2010), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018441
[15]
Richard G. Heimberg. 2002. Cognitive-behavioral therapy for social anxiety disorder: current status and future directions. Biological Psychiatry 51, 1 (2002), 101–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3223(01)01183-0 Social Anxiety: From Laboratory Studies to Clinical Practice.
[16]
Sooyeon Jeong, Sharifa Alghowinem, Laura Aymerich-Franch, Kika Arias, Agata Lapedriza, Rosalind Picard, Hae Won Park, and Cynthia Breazeal. 2020. A robotic positive psychology coach to improve college students’ wellbeing. In 2020 29th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). IEEE, 187–194. https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN47096.2020.9223588
[17]
Elizabeth S Kim, Lauren D Berkovits, Emily P Bernier, Dan Leyzberg, Frederick Shic, Rhea Paul, and Brian Scassellati. 2013. Social robots as embedded reinforcers of social behavior in children with autism. Journal of autism and developmental disorders 43, 5 (2013), 1038–1049. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-012-1645-2
[18]
Glenn E Knowlton and Kevin T Larkin. 2006. The influence of voice volume, pitch, and speech rate on progressive relaxation training: application of methods from speech pathology and audiology. Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback 31 (2006), 173–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-006-9014-6
[19]
Kyveli Kompatsiari, Francesca Ciardo, Vadim Tikhanoff, Giorgio Metta, and Agnieszka Wykowska. 2021. It’s in the eyes: The engaging role of eye contact in HRI. International Journal of Social Robotics 13, 3 (2021), 525–535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-019-00565-4
[20]
Falk Leichsenring, Wolfgang Hiller, Michael Weissberg, and Eric Leibing. 2006. Cognitive-behavioral therapy and psychodynamic psychotherapy: techniques, efficacy, and indications. American journal of psychotherapy 60, 3 (2006), 233–259. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.2006.60.3.233
[21]
Anna Carolina Ferreira Marinho, Adriane Mesquita de Medeiros, Ana Cristina Côrtes Gama, and Letícia Caldas Teixeira. 2017. Fear of public speaking: perception of college students and correlates. Journal of Voice 31, 1 (2017), 127.e7–127.e11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.12.012
[22]
Martin N Marshall. 1996. Sampling for qualitative research. Family Practice 13, 6 (12 1996), 522–526. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/13.6.522 arXiv:https://academic.oup.com/fampra/article-pdf/13/6/522/6737096/13-6-522.pdf
[23]
Kayla Matheus, Marynel Vázquez, and Brian Scassellati. 2022. A Social Robot for Anxiety Reduction via Deep Breathing. In 2022 31st IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). 89–94. https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN53752.2022.9900638
[24]
James C. McCroskey, Michael J. Beatty, Patricia Kearney, and Timothy G. Plax. 1985. The content validity of the PRCA‐24 as a measure of communication apprehension across communication contexts. Communication Quarterly 33, 3 (1985), 165–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463378509369595
[25]
Nicholas Moroz, Isabella Moroz, and Monika Slovinec D’Angelo. 2020. Mental health services in Canada: Barriers and cost-effective solutions to increase access. Healthcare Management Forum 33, 6 (2020), 282–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0840470420933911 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/0840470420933911PMID: 32613867.
[26]
Nigel Newbutt, Louis Rice, Séverin Lemaignan, Joe Daly, Vicky Charisi, and Iian Conley. 2022. Co-designing a social robot in a special educational needs school: Listening to the ambitions of autistic children and their teachers. Interaction Studies 23, 2 (2022), 204–242. https://doi.org/10.1075/is.21031.new
[27]
Tatsuya Nomura and Takayuki Kanda. 2015. Influences of evaluation and gaze from a robot and humans’ fear of negative evaluation on their preferences of the robot. International Journal of Social Robotics 7 (2015), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-014-0270-y
[28]
Anastasia K. Ostrowski, Cynthia Breazeal, and Hae Won Park. 2021. Long-Term Co-Design Guidelines: Empowering Older Adults as Co-Designers of Social Robots. In 2021 30th IEEE International Conference on Robot & Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). 1165–1172. https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN50785.2021.9515559
[29]
Sarah M Rabbitt, Alan E Kazdin, and Brian Scassellati. 2015. Integrating socially assistive robotics into mental healthcare interventions: Applications and recommendations for expanded use. Clinical psychology review 35 (2015), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2014.07.001
[30]
Andrés A Ramírez-Duque, Luis F Aycardi, Adriana Villa, Marcela Munera, Teodiano Bastos, Tony Belpaeme, Anselmo Frizera-Neto, and Carlos A Cifuentes. 2021. Collaborative and inclusive process with the autism community: a case study in Colombia about social robot design. International Journal of Social Robotics 13 (2021), 153–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00627-y
[31]
Samira Rasouli, Moojan Ghafurian, Elizabeth Nilsen, and Kerstin Dautenhahn. [n. d.]. University Students’ Opinions on Using Intelligent Agents to Cope with Stress and Anxiety in Social Situations. (Under Review).
[32]
Samira Rasouli, Garima Gupta, Elizabeth Nilsen, and Kerstin Dautenhahn. 2022. Potential applications of social robots in robot-assisted interventions for social anxiety. International Journal of Social Robotics 14, 5 (2022), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-021-00851-0
[33]
Nicole Lee Robinson, Timothy Vaughan Cottier, and David John Kavanagh. 2019. Psychosocial health interventions by social robots: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Journal of medical Internet research 21, 5 (2019), e13203. https://doi.org/10.2196/13203
[34]
Thomas L Rodebaugh, Robert M Holaway, and Richard G Heimberg. 2004. The treatment of social anxiety disorder. Clinical Psychology Review 24, 7 (2004), 883–908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2004.07.007
[35]
Graham Russell and Phil Topham. 2012. The impact of social anxiety on student learning and well-being in higher education. Journal of Mental Health 21, 4 (2012), 375–385. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638237.2012.694505
[36]
Elizabeth B.-N. Sanders and Pieter Jan Stappers. 2008. Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign 4, 1 (2008), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068
[37]
Arielle AJ Scoglio, Erin D Reilly, Jay A Gorman, and Charles E Drebing. 2019. Use of social robots in mental health and well-being research: systematic review. Journal of medical Internet research 21, 7 (2019), e13322. https://doi.org/10.2196/13322
[38]
Marc Steen. 2013. Co-Design as a Process of Joint Inquiry and Imagination. Design Issues 29, 2 (04 2013), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00207 arXiv:https://direct.mit.edu/desi/article-pdf/29/2/16/1715163/desi_a_00207.pdf
Index Terms
- Co-Design of a Robotic Mental Well-Being Coach to Help University Students Manage Public Speaking Anxiety
Recommendations
Alexa as Coach: Leveraging Smart Speakers to Build Social Agents that Reduce Public Speaking Anxiety
CHI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsPublic speaking anxiety is one of the most common social phobias. We explore the feasibility of using a conversational agent to reduce this anxiety. We developed a public-speaking tutor on the Amazon Alexa platform that enables users to engage in ...
Robotic Mental Well-being Coaches for the Workplace: An In-the-Wild Study on Form
HRI '23: Proceedings of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot InteractionThe World Health Organization recommends that employers take action to protect and promote mental well-being at work. However, the extent to which these recommended practices can be implemented in the workplace is limited by the lack of resources and ...
Robotic Coaches Delivering Group Mindfulness Practice at a Public Cafe
HRI '23: Companion of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot InteractionGroup meditation is known to keep people motivated and committed over longer periods of time, as compared to individual practice. Robotic coaching is a promising avenue for engaging people in group meditation and mindfulness exercises. However, the ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
December 2023
506 pages
ISBN:9798400708244
DOI:10.1145/3623809
Copyright © 2023 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 04 December 2023
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Funding Sources
- Canada 150 Research Chairs Program
Conference
HAI '23
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 121 of 404 submissions, 30%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 163Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)163
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)20
Reflects downloads up to 03 Oct 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format