Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

REST: Debiased Social Recommendation via Reconstructing Exposure Strategies

Published: 13 November 2023 Publication History

Abstract

The recommendation system, relying on historical observational data to model the complex relationships among users and items, has achieved great success in real-world applications. Selection bias is one of the most important issues of the existing observational data-based approaches, which is actually caused by multiple types of unobserved exposure strategies (e.g., promotions and holiday effects). Though various methods have been proposed to address this problem, they are mainly relying on the implicit debiasing techniques but not explicitly modeling the unobserved exposure strategies. By explicitly Reconstructing Exposure STrategies (REST), we formalize the recommendation problem as the counterfactual reasoning and propose the debiased social recommendation method. In REST, we assume that the exposure of an item is controlled by the latent exposure strategies, the user, and the item. Based on the above generation process, we first provide the theoretical guarantee of our method via identification analysis. Second, we employ a variational auto-encoder to reconstruct the latent exposure strategies, with the help of the social networks and the items. Third, we devise a counterfactual reasoning based recommendation algorithm by leveraging the recovered exposure strategies. Experiments on four real-world datasets, including three published datasets and one private WeChat Official Account dataset, demonstrate significant improvements over several state-of-the-art methods.

References

[1]
Qingyao Ai, Keping Bi, Cheng Luo, Jiafeng Guo, and W. Bruce Croft. 2018. Unbiased learning to rank with unbiased propensity estimation. In Proceedings of the 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 385–394.
[2]
Ricardo Baeza-Yates, Carlos Hurtado, and Marcelo Mendoza. 2004. Query recommendation using query logs in search engines. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Extending Database Technology. Springer, 588–596.
[3]
Stephen Bonner and Flavian Vasile. 2018. Causal embeddings for recommendation. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 104–112.
[4]
Sarah Bouraga, Ivan Jureta, Stéphane Faulkner, and Caroline Herssens. 2014. Knowledge-based recommendation systems: A survey. Int. J. Intell. Info. Technol. 10, 2 (2014), 1–19.
[5]
Rocío Cañamares and Pablo Castells. 2018. Should I follow the crowd? A probabilistic analysis of the effectiveness of popularity in recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR’18). ACM, New York, NY, 415–424.
[6]
Yukuo Cen, Jianwei Zhang, Xu Zou, Chang Zhou, Hongxia Yang, and Jie Tang. 2020. Controllable multi-interest framework for recommendation. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 2942–2951.
[7]
Jiawei Chen, Hande Dong, Yang Qiu, Xiangnan He, Xin Xin, Liang Chen, Guli Lin, and Keping Yang. 2021. AutoDebias: Learning to debias for recommendation. In Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR ’21). ACM, New York, NY, 21–30.
[8]
Jiawei Chen, Hande Dong, Xiang Wang, Fuli Feng, Meng Wang, and Xiangnan He. 2020. Bias and debias in recommender system: A survey and future directions. Retrieved from https://arXiv:2010.03240
[9]
Paul Covington, Jay Adams, and Emre Sargin. 2016. Deep neural networks for youtube recommendations. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 191–198.
[10]
Shuiguang Deng, Longtao Huang, Guandong Xu, Xindong Wu, and Zhaohui Wu. 2016. On deep learning for trust-aware recommendations in social networks. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 28, 5 (2016), 1164–1177.
[11]
Wenqi Fan, Tyler Derr, Yao Ma, Jianping Wang, Jiliang Tang, and Qing Li. 2019. Deep adversarial social recommendation. Retrieved from https://arXiv:1905.13160
[12]
Wenqi Fan, Yao Ma, Qing Li, Yuan He, Eric Zhao, Jiliang Tang, and Dawei Yin. 2019. Graph neural networks for social recommendation. In Proceedings of the World Wide Web Conference. 417–426.
[13]
Xiangnan He, Kuan Deng, Xiang Wang, Yan Li, Yongdong Zhang, and Meng Wang. 2020. Lightgcn: Simplifying and powering graph convolution network for recommendation. In Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 639–648.
[14]
Xiangnan He, Lizi Liao, Hanwang Zhang, Liqiang Nie, Xia Hu, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2017. Neural collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web. 173–182.
[15]
Mohsen Jamali and Martin Ester. 2010. A matrix factorization technique with trust propagation for recommendation in social networks. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 135–142.
[16]
Eric Jang, Shixiang Gu, and Ben Poole. 2016. Categorical reparameterization with gumbel-softmax. Retrieved from https://arXiv:1611.01144.
[17]
Diederik P. Kingma and Max Welling. 2013. Auto-encoding variational bayes. Retrieved from https://arXiv:1312.6114
[18]
Thomas N. Kipf and Max Welling. 2016. Variational graph auto-encoders. Retrieved from https://arXiv:1611.07308
[19]
Yehuda Koren, Robert Bell, and Chris Volinsky. 2009. Matrix factorization techniques for recommender systems. Computer 42, 8 (2009), 30–37.
[20]
Zijian Li, Ruichu Cai, Fengzhu Wu, Sili Zhang, Hao Gu, Yuexing Hao, and Yuguang Yan. 2022. TEA: A sequential recommendation framework via temporally evolving aggregations. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems (2022), 1–12.
[21]
Dawen Liang, Laurent Charlin, and David M. Blei. 2016. Causal inference for recommendation. In Proceedings of the Causation: Foundation to Application Workshop at UAI (AUAI’16).
[22]
Dawen Liang, Rahul G. Krishnan, Matthew D. Hoffman, and Tony Jebara. 2018. Variational autoencoders for collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the World Wide Web Conference. 689–698.
[23]
G. Linden, B. Smith, and J. York. 2003. Amazon.com recommendations: Item-to-item collaborative filtering. IEEE Internet Comput. 7, 1 (2003), 76–80.
[24]
Dugang Liu, Pengxiang Cheng, Hong Zhu, Zhenhua Dong, Xiuqiang He, Weike Pan, and Zhong Ming. 2021. Mitigating confounding bias in recommendation via information bottleneck. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys’21). ACM, New York, NY, 351–360.
[25]
Huafeng Liu, Liping Jing, Jingxuan Wen, Zhicheng Wu, Xiaoyi Sun, Jiaqi Wang, Lin Xiao, and Jian Yu. 2020. Deep global and local generative model for recommendation. In Proceedings of the Web Conference. 551–561.
[26]
Jiazhen Lou, Hong Wen, Fuyu Lv, Jing Zhang, Tengfei Yuan, and Zhao Li. 2022. Re-weighting negative samples for model-agnostic matching. In Proceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR ’22). ACM, New York, NY, 1823–1827.
[27]
Christos Louizos, Uri Shalit, Joris Mooij, David Sontag, Richard Zemel, and Max Welling. 2017. Causal effect inference with deep latent-variable models. In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 6449–6459.
[28]
Hao Ma, Haixuan Yang, Michael R. Lyu, and Irwin King. 2008. Sorec: Social recommendation using probabilistic matrix factorization. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 931–940.
[29]
Jianxin Ma, Chang Zhou, Peng Cui, Hongxia Yang, and Wenwu Zhu. 2019. Learning disentangled representations for recommendation. Retrieved from https://arXiv:1910.14238
[30]
Andriy Mnih and Russ R. Salakhutdinov. 2007. Probabilistic matrix factorization. Adv. Neural Info. Process. Syst. 20 (2007), 1257–1264.
[31]
Zohreh Ovaisi, Ragib Ahsan, Yifan Zhang, Kathryn Vasilaky, and Elena Zheleva. 2020. Correcting for selection bias in learning-to-rank systems. In Proceedings of the Web Conference. 1863–1873.
[32]
George Papamakarios, Eric Nalisnick, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, Shakir Mohamed, and Balaji Lakshminarayanan. 2019. Normalizing flows for probabilistic modeling and inference. Retrieved from https://arXiv:1912.02762
[33]
Judea Pearl. 2009. Causality. Cambridge University Press.
[34]
Steffen Rendle, Christoph Freudenthaler, Zeno Gantner, and Lars Schmidt-Thieme. 2009. BPR: Bayesian personalized ranking from implicit feedback. In Proceedings of the 25th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. 452–461.
[35]
Tobias Schnabel, Adith Swaminathan, Ashudeep Singh, Navin Chandak, and Thorsten Joachims. 2016. Recommendations as treatments: Debiasing learning and evaluation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 1670–1679.
[36]
Uri Shalit, Fredrik D. Johansson, and David Sontag. 2017. Estimating individual treatment effect: Generalization bounds and algorithms. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 3076–3085.
[37]
Amit Sharma, Jake M. Hofman, and Duncan J. Watts. 2015. Estimating the causal impact of recommendation systems from observational data. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Economics and Computation. 453–470.
[38]
Ilya Shenbin, Anton Alekseev, Elena Tutubalina, Valentin Malykh, and Sergey I. Nikolenko. 2020. RecVAE: A new variational autoencoder for Top-N recommendations with implicit feedback. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. 528–536.
[39]
Chunyao Song, Yao Ge, Tingjian Ge, Haixia Wu, Zhutian Lin, Hong Kang, and Xiaojie Yuan. 2021. Similar but foreign: Link recommendation across communities. Info. Sci. 552 (2021), 142–166.
[40]
Harald Steck. 2011. Item popularity and recommendation accuracy. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 125–132.
[41]
Moshe Tennenholtz and Oren Kurland. 2019. Rethinking search engines and recommendation systems: A game theoretic perspective. Commun. ACM 62, 12 (2019), 66–75.
[42]
Petar Veličković, Guillem Cucurull, Arantxa Casanova, Adriana Romero, Pietro Lio, and Yoshua Bengio. 2017. Graph attention networks. Retrieved from https://arXiv:1710.10903
[43]
Wenjie Wang, Fuli Feng, Xiangnan He, Xiang Wang, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2021. Deconfounded recommendation for alleviating bias amplification. Retrieved from https://arXiv:2105.10648
[44]
Wenjie Wang, Fuli Feng, Xiangnan He, Hanwang Zhang, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2020. “Click” is not equal to “like”: Counterfactual recommendation for mitigating clickbait issue. Retrieved from https://arXiv:2009.09945
[45]
Xuanhui Wang, Michael Bendersky, Donald Metzler, and Marc Najork. 2016. Learning to rank with selection bias in personal search. In Proceedings of the 39th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 115–124.
[46]
Xiang Wang, Xiangnan He, Fuli Feng, Liqiang Nie, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2018. TEM: Tree-Enhanced Embedding Model for Explainable Recommendation. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, Republic and Canton of Geneva, CHE, 1543–1552.
[47]
Xiang Wang, Xiangnan He, Meng Wang, Fuli Feng, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2019. Neural graph collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 42nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 165–174.
[48]
Xiaojie Wang, Rui Zhang, Yu Sun, and Jianzhong Qi. 2019. Doubly robust joint learning for recommendation on data missing not at random. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 6638–6647.
[49]
Zifeng Wang, Xi Chen, Rui Wen, Shao-Lun Huang, Ercan E. Kuruoglu, and Yefeng Zheng. 2020. Information theoretic counterfactual learning from missing-not-at-random feedback. Retrieved from https://arXiv:2009.02623
[50]
Tianxin Wei, Fuli Feng, Jiawei Chen, Chufeng Shi, Ziwei Wu, Jinfeng Yi, and Xiangnan He. 2020. Model-agnostic counterfactual reasoning for eliminating popularity bias in recommender system. Retrieved from https://arXiv:2010.15363
[51]
Da Xu, Chuanwei Ruan, Evren Korpeoglu, Sushant Kumar, and Kannan Achan. 2020. Adversarial counterfactual learning and evaluation for recommender system. Adv. Neural Info. Process. Syst. 33 (2020).
[52]
Bo Yang, Yu Lei, Jiming Liu, and Wenjie Li. 2017. Social collaborative filtering by trust. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 39, 8 (2017), 1633–1647.
[53]
Junliang Yu, Hongzhi Yin, Jundong Li, Min Gao, Zi Huang, and Lizhen Cui. 2022. Enhancing social recommendation with adversarial graph convolutional networks. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 34, 8 (2022), 3727–3739.
[54]
Shuai Zhang, Lina Yao, Aixin Sun, and Yi Tay. 2019. Deep learning based recommender system: A survey and new perspectives. ACM Comput. Surveys 52, 1 (2019), 1–38.
[55]
Yongfeng Zhang and Xu Chen. 2020. Explainable recommendation: A survey and new perspectives. Found. Trends Info. Retriev. 14, 1 (2020), 1–101.
[56]
Yang Zhang, Fuli Feng, Xiangnan He, Tianxin Wei, Chonggang Song, Guohui Ling, and Yongdong Zhang. 2021. Causal intervention for leveraging popularity bias in recommendation. Retrieved from https://arXiv:2105.06067
[57]
Fan Zhou, Yuhua Mo, Goce Trajcevski, Kunpeng Zhang, Jin Wu, and Ting Zhong. 2020. Recommendation via collaborative autoregressive flows. Neural Netw. 126 (2020), 52–64.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Towards long-term depolarized interactive recommendationsInformation Processing & Management10.1016/j.ipm.2024.10383361:6(103833)Online publication date: Nov-2024

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data
ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data  Volume 18, Issue 2
February 2024
401 pages
EISSN:1556-472X
DOI:10.1145/3613562
Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 13 November 2023
Online AM: 20 September 2023
Accepted: 06 September 2023
Revised: 24 March 2023
Received: 10 May 2022
Published in TKDD Volume 18, Issue 2

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Recommendation system
  2. social recommendation system
  3. causal effect
  4. variational auto-encoders

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

  • National Key R&D Program of China
  • National Science Fund for Excellent Young Scholars
  • Natural Science Foundation of China
  • Open Foundation of Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Public Finance and Taxation with Big Data Application

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)223
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)11
Reflects downloads up to 04 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Towards long-term depolarized interactive recommendationsInformation Processing & Management10.1016/j.ipm.2024.10383361:6(103833)Online publication date: Nov-2024

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Full Text

View this article in Full Text.

Full Text

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media