Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article
Open access

Change Point Detection with Adaptive Measurement Schedules for Network Performance Verification

Published: 12 December 2023 Publication History

Abstract

When verifying that a communications network fulfills its specified performance, it is critical to note sudden shifts in network behavior as quickly as possible. Change point detection methods can be useful in this endeavor, but classical methods rely on measuring with a fixed measurement period, which can often be suboptimal in terms of measurement costs. In this paper, we extend the existing framework of change point detection with a notion of physical time. Instead of merely deciding when to stop, agents must now also decide at which future time to take the next measurement. Agents must now minimize the necessary number of measurements pre- and post-change, while maintaining a trade-off between post-change delay and false alarm rate. We establish, through this framework, the suboptimality of typical periodic measurements and propose a simple alternative, called crisis mode agents. We show analytically that crisis mode agents significantly outperform periodic measurements schemes. We further verify this in numerical evaluation, both on an array of synthetic change point detection problems as well as on the problem of detecting traffic load changes in a 5G test bed through end-to-end RTT measurements.

References

[1]
3GPP. 2020. Service requirements for cyber-physical control applications in vertical domains. Technical Specification (TS). 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP). Version 17.4.0.
[2]
3GPP. 2021. NR; Physical layer procedures for control. Technical Specification (TS) 38.213. 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP). Version 16.5.0.
[3]
Junaid Ansari, Christian Andersson, Peter de Bruin, János Farkas, Leefke Grosjean, Joachim Sachs, Johan Torsner, Balázs Varga, Davit Harutyunyan, Niels König, et al. 2022. Performance of 5G Trials for Industrial Automation. Electronics, Vol. 11, 3 (2022), 412.
[4]
Tom Berrett and Yi Yu. 2021. Locally private online change point detection. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Vol. 34 (2021), 3425--3437.
[5]
Djalel Chefrour. 2021. One-way delay measurement from traditional networks to sdn: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), Vol. 54, 7 (2021), 1--35.
[6]
Meyer A Girshick and Herman Rubin. 1952. A Bayes approach to a quality control model. The Annals of mathematical statistics, Vol. 23, 1 (1952), 114--125.
[7]
Robert Gruen, Eyal Ofek, Anthony Steed, Ran Gal, Mike Sinclair, and Mar Gonzalez-Franco. 2020. Measuring system visual latency through cognitive latency on video see-through AR devices. In 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). IEEE, Atlanta, GA, USA, 791--799.
[8]
Rajesh Gupta, Sudeep Tanwar, Sudhanshu Tyagi, and Neeraj Kumar. 2019. Tactile-internet-based telesurgery system for healthcare 4.0: An architecture, research challenges, and future directions. IEEE network, Vol. 33, 6 (2019), 22--29.
[9]
Chung-Hsing Hsu and Ulrich Kremer. 1998. IPERF: A framework for automatic construction of performance prediction models. In Workshop on Profile and Feedback-Directed Compilation (PFDC). Citeseer, Paris, France, 1--10.
[10]
Tze Leung Lai. 1998. Information bounds and quick detection of parameter changes in stochastic systems. IEEE Transactions on Information theory, Vol. 44, 7 (1998), 2917--2929.
[11]
Tze Leung Lai and Haipeng Xing. 2010. Sequential change-point detection when the pre-and post-change parameters are unknown. Sequential analysis, Vol. 29, 2 (2010), 162--175.
[12]
Andrew B Lawson and Ken Kleinman. 2005. Spatial and syndromic surveillance for public health. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA.
[13]
Gary Lorden. 1971. Procedures for reacting to a change in distribution. The annals of mathematical statistics, Vol. 42, 6 (1971), 1897--1908.
[14]
Odalric-Ambrym Maillard. 2019. Sequential change-point detection: Laplace concentration of scan statistics and non-asymptotic delay bounds. In Algorithmic Learning Theory. PMLR, Chicago, IL, USA, 610--632.
[15]
A Morton and L Ciavattone. 2010. Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP) Reflect Octets and Symmetrical Size Features. Technical Report. AT&T Labs.
[16]
George V Moustakides. 1986. Optimal stopping times for detecting changes in distributions. the Annals of Statistics, Vol. 14, 4 (1986), 1379--1387.
[17]
E. S. Page. 1954. Continuous Inspection Schemes. Biometrika, Vol. 41, 1--2 (06 1954), 100--115.
[18]
Moshe Pollak. 1985. Optimal detection of a change in distribution. The Annals of Statistics, Vol. 13, 1 (1985), 206--227.
[19]
Jon Postel. 1981. Internet control message protocol. Technical Report. ISI.
[20]
Lin Quan, John Heidemann, and Yuri Pradkin. 2013. Trinocular: Understanding internet reliability through adaptive probing. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, Vol. 43, 4 (2013), 255--266.
[21]
Akhila Rao, William Tärneberg, Emma Fitzgerald, Lorenzo Corneo, Aleksandr Zavodovski, Omkar Rai, Sixten Johansson, Viktor Berggren, Hassam Riaz, Caner Kilinc, and Andreas Johnsson. 2022. Prediction and Exposure of Delays from a Base Station Perspective in 5G and Beyond Networks. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on 5G Measurements, Modeling, and Use Cases (5G-MeMU).
[22]
SW Roberts. 1966. A comparison of some control chart procedures. Technometrics, Vol. 8, 3 (1966), 411--430.
[23]
Albert N Shiryaev. 1963. On optimum methods in quickest detection problems. Theory of Probability & Its Applications, Vol. 8, 1 (1963), 22--46.
[24]
Rebecca Steinert and Daniel Gillblad. 2010. Long-term adaptation and distributed detection of local network changes. In 2010 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference GLOBECOM 2010. IEEE, Miami, FL, USA, 1--5.
[25]
Alexander G Tartakovsky, Boris L Rozovskii, Rudolf B Blavz ek, and Hongjoong Kim. 2006. Detection of intrusions in information systems by sequential change-point methods. Statistical methodology, Vol. 3, 3 (2006), 252--293.
[26]
Alexander G Tartakovsky and Venugopal V Veeravalli. 2004. Change-point detection in multichannel and distributed systems. Applied Sequential Methodologies: Real-World Examples with Data Analysis, Vol. 173 (2004), 339--370.
[27]
Alexander G Tartakovsky and Venugopal V Veeravalli. 2008. Asymptotically optimal quickest change detection in distributed sensor systems. Sequential Analysis, Vol. 27, 4 (2008), 441--475.
[28]
Niels LM Van Adrichem, Christian Doerr, and Fernando A Kuipers. 2014. Opennetmon: Network monitoring in openflow software-defined networks. In 2014 IEEE Network Operations and Management Symposium (NOMS). IEEE, Krakow, Poland, 1--8.
[29]
A Wald. 1945. Sequential Tests of Statistical Hypotheses. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, Vol. 16, 2 (1945), 117--186.
[30]
Binfeng Wang and Jinshu Su. 2018. FlexMonitor: A flexible monitoring framework in SDN. Symmetry, Vol. 10, 12 (2018), 713.
[31]
Liyan Xie, Shaofeng Zou, Yao Xie, and Venugopal V Veeravalli. 2021. Sequential (quickest) change detection: Classical results and new directions. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Information Theory, Vol. 2, 2 (2021), 494--514.
[32]
Min Xie, Qiong Zhang, Andres J Gonzalez, Pål Grønsund, Paparao Palacharla, and Tadashi Ikeuchi. 2019. Service assurance in 5G networks: A study of joint monitoring and analytics. In 2019 IEEE 30th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC). IEEE, Istanbul, Turkey, 1--7.
[33]
Wenxiao Zhang, Bo Han, and Pan Hui. 2017. On the networking challenges of mobile augmented reality. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality Network. ACM, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 24--29. iogr

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)RoME-QCD: Robust and Measurement Efficient Quickest Change Detection in 5G Networks2024 8th Network Traffic Measurement and Analysis Conference (TMA)10.23919/TMA62044.2024.10558964(1-11)Online publication date: 21-May-2024
  • (2024)NetGSR: Towards Efficient and Reliable Network Monitoring with Generative Super ResolutionProceedings of the ACM on Networking10.1145/36964002:CoNEXT4(1-27)Online publication date: 25-Nov-2024
  • (2024)Change Point Detection with Adaptive Measurement Schedules for Network Performance VerificationACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review10.1145/3673660.365504952:1(83-84)Online publication date: 13-Jun-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Measurement and Analysis of Computing Systems
Proceedings of the ACM on Measurement and Analysis of Computing Systems  Volume 7, Issue 3
POMACS
December 2023
599 pages
EISSN:2476-1249
DOI:10.1145/3637453
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 12 December 2023
Published in POMACS Volume 7, Issue 3

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. applied statistics
  2. change detection
  3. hypothesis testing
  4. network management
  5. network measurements

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)328
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)59
Reflects downloads up to 24 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)RoME-QCD: Robust and Measurement Efficient Quickest Change Detection in 5G Networks2024 8th Network Traffic Measurement and Analysis Conference (TMA)10.23919/TMA62044.2024.10558964(1-11)Online publication date: 21-May-2024
  • (2024)NetGSR: Towards Efficient and Reliable Network Monitoring with Generative Super ResolutionProceedings of the ACM on Networking10.1145/36964002:CoNEXT4(1-27)Online publication date: 25-Nov-2024
  • (2024)Change Point Detection with Adaptive Measurement Schedules for Network Performance VerificationACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review10.1145/3673660.365504952:1(83-84)Online publication date: 13-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Change Point Detection with Adaptive Measurement Schedules for Network Performance VerificationAbstracts of the 2024 ACM SIGMETRICS/IFIP PERFORMANCE Joint International Conference on Measurement and Modeling of Computer Systems10.1145/3652963.3655049(83-84)Online publication date: 10-Jun-2024

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Full Access

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media