The Effects of Goal-setting on Learning Outcomes and Self-Regulated Learning Processes
Pages 278 - 290
Abstract
We present a user study (N = 40) that investigated the role of goal-setting on learning during search. To this end, we developed a tool called the Subgoal Manager (SM). The SM was designed to help searchers break apart a learning-oriented search task into smaller subgoals. The tool enabled participants to add, delete, and modify subgoals; take notes with respect to subgoals; and mark subgoals as completed. During the study, participants completed a single learning-oriented search task and were assigned to one of two subgoal conditions. In the Subgoals condition, participants had access to the SM; were instructed to develop at least three subgoals before the search session; and could add, delete, and modify subgoals during the search session. In the NoSubgoals condition, participants were not instructed to set subgoals and were simply provided with a text editor to take notes. We investigate the effects of the subgoal condition on: (RQ1) learning and retention and (RQ2) the extent to which participants engaged in specific self-regulated learning (SRL) processes during the search session. Our results found two important trends. First, participants in the Subgoals condition had better learning outcomes, especially with respect to retention. Second, based on a qualitative analysis of participants’ search sessions, participants in the Subgoals condition engaged in more self-regulated learning (SRL) processes. Combined, our results suggest that goal-setting improves learning during search by encouraging and supporting greater engagement with SRL processes.
References
[1]
Mustafa Abualsaud. 2017. Learning Factors and Determining Document-level Satisfaction In Search-as-Learning. Master’s thesis. University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
[2]
Deanne M. Adams, Bruce M. McLaren, Kelley Durkin, Richard E. Mayer, Bethany Rittle-Johnson, Seiji Isotani, and Martin van Velsen. 2014. Using erroneous examples to improve mathematics learning with a web-based tutoring system. Computers in Human Behavior 36 (2014), 401–411.
[3]
James Allan, Bruce Croft, Alistair Moffat, and Mark Sanderson. 2012. Frontiers, challenges, and opportunities for information retrieval: Report from SWIRL 2012 the second strategic workshop on information retrieval in Lorne. ACM SIGIR Forum 46, 1 (May 2012), 2. https://doi.org/10.1145/2215676.2215678
[4]
Roger Azevedo, Susan Ragan, Jennifer G. Cromley, and Stacy Pritchett. 2002. Do Different Goal-Setting Conditions Facilitate Students’ Ability to Regulate Their Learning of Complex Science Topics with RiverWeb?https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED482509
[5]
Peter Bailey, L Chen, and S Grosenick. 2012. User task understanding: a web search engine perspective. NII Shonan workshop (Oct. 2012), 17. http://research.nii.ac.jp/ntcir/shonan/Bailey-NIIShonan-UserTaskUnderstanding.pdf
[6]
Maria Bannert, Melanie Hildebrand, and Christoph Mengelkamp. 2009. Effects of a metacognitive support device in learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior 25, 4 (July 2009), 829–835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.07.002
[7]
Nilavra Bhattacharya and Jacek Gwizdka. 2019. Measuring Learning During Search: Differences in Interactions, Eye-Gaze, and Semantic Similarity to Expert Knowledge. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval. ACM, Glasgow Scotland UK, 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1145/3295750.3298926
[8]
Monique Boekaerts, Moshe Zeidner, Paul R. Pintrich, and Paul R Pintrich. 1999. Handbook of Self-Regulation. Elsevier Science & Technology, San Diego, UNITED STATES. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/unc/detail.action?docID=300645
[9]
Robert Capra, Jaime Arguello, Anita Crescenzi, and Emily Vardell. 2015. Differences in the Use of Search Assistance for Tasks of Varying Complexity. In Proceedings of the 38th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval(SIGIR ’15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1145/2766462.2767741
[10]
Kevyn Collins-Thompson, Preben Hansen, and Claudia Hauff. 2017. Search as Learning (Dagstuhl Seminar 17092). (2017). https://doi.org/10.4230/dagrep.7.2.135
[11]
Kevyn Collins-Thompson, Soo Young Rieh, Carl C. Haynes, and Rohail Syed. 2016. Assessing Learning Outcomes in Web Search: A Comparison of Tasks and Query Strategies. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM on Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval(CHIIR ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1145/2854946.2854972
[12]
Arthur Câmara, Nirmal Roy, David Maxwell, and Claudia Hauff. 2021. Searching to Learn with Instructional Scaffolding. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval(CHIIR ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 209–218. https://doi.org/10.1145/3406522.3446012
[13]
Sarah Davies, Kirsten Butcher, and Corey Stevens. 2013. Self-Regulated Learning with Graphical Overviews: When Spatial Information Detracts from Learning. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 35, 35 (2013). https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5kp8b0n9
[14]
Victor M. Deekens, Jeffrey A. Greene, and Nikki G. Lobczowski. 2018. Monitoring and depth of strategy use in computer-based learning environments for science and history. British Journal of Educational Psychology 88, 1 (2018), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12174 _eprint: https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/bjep.12174.
[15]
Diego Demaree, Halszka Jarodzka, Saskia Brand-Gruwel, and Yvonne Kammerer. 2020. The Influence of Device Type on Querying Behavior and Learning Outcomes in a Searching as Learning Task with a Laptop or Smartphone. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval(CHIIR ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 373–377. https://doi.org/10.1145/3343413.3378000
[16]
Carsten Eickhoff, Jaime Teevan, Ryen White, and Susan Dumais. 2014. Lessons from the journey: a query log analysis of within-session learning. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM international conference on Web search and data mining - WSDM ’14. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 223–232. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556195.2556217
[17]
Kathleen M. Fisher, Kathy S. Williams, and Jennifer Evarts Lineback. 2011. Osmosis and Diffusion Conceptual Assessment. CBE—Life Sciences Education 10, 4 (Dec. 2011), 418–429. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.11-04-0038 Publisher: American Society for Cell Biology (lse).
[18]
Luanne Freund, Rick Kopak, and Heather O’Brien. 2016. The effects of textual environment on reading comprehension: Implications for searching as learning. Journal of Information Science 42, 1 (Feb. 2016), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551515614472 Publisher: SAGE Publications Ltd.
[19]
Ujwal Gadiraju, Ran Yu, Stefan Dietze, and Peter Holtz. 2018. Analyzing Knowledge Gain of Users in Informational Search Sessions on the Web. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Human Information Interaction & Retrieval(CHIIR ’18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3176349.3176381
[20]
Inga Glogger, Rolf Schwonke, Lars Holzäpfel, Matthias Nückles, and Alexander Renkl. 2012. Learning strategies assessed by journal writing: Prediction of learning outcomes by quantity, quality, and combinations of learning strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology 104, 2 (2012), 452–468. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026683 Place: US Publisher: American Psychological Association.
[21]
Jeffrey Alan Greene and Roger Azevedo. 2007. A Theoretical Review of Winne and Hadwin’s Model of Self-Regulated Learning: New Perspectives and Directions. Review of Educational Research 77, 3 (Sept. 2007), 334–372. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430303953 Publisher: American Educational Research Association.
[22]
Jeffrey Alan Greene, Cheryl Mason Bolick, William P. Jackson, Alfred M. Caprino, Christopher Oswald, and Megan McVea. 2015. Domain-specificity of self-regulated learning processing in science and history. Contemporary Educational Psychology 42 (July 2015), 111–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.06.001
[23]
Jeffrey Alan Greene, Dana Z. Copeland, Victor M. Deekens, and Seung B. Yu. 2018. Beyond knowledge: Examining digital literacy’s role in the acquisition of understanding in science. Computers & Education 117 (Feb. 2018), 141–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.10.003
[24]
Jeffrey A. Greene, Nikki G. Lobczowski, Rebekah Freed, Brian M. Cartiff, Cynthia Demetriou, and A. T. Panter. 2020. Effects of a Science of Learning Course on College Students’ Learning With a Computer. American Educational Research Journal 57, 3 (June 2020), 947–978. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831219865221 Publisher: American Educational Research Association.
[25]
R. Hake. 2002. Relationship of Individual Student Normalized Learning Gains in Mechanics with Gender, High-School Physics, and Pretest Scores on Mathematics and Spatial Visualization, Vol. 8. 1–14. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Relationship-of-Individual-Student-Normalized-Gains-Hake/ab557de0fdafe5def057a795c25264e74ac0e332
[26]
Michael Heilman, Kevyn Collins-Thompson, Jamie Callan, Maxine Eskenazi, Alan Juffs, and Lois Wilson. 2010. Personalization of Reading Passages Improves Vocabulary Acquisition. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 20, 1 (Jan. 2010), 73–98. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAI-2010-0003 Publisher: IOS Press.
[27]
Michael Heilman and Maxine Eskenazi. 2006. Language Learning: Challenges for Intelligent Tutoring Systems. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Intelligent Tutoring Systems for Ill-Defined Domains.
[28]
William R. Hersh, Diane L. Elliot, David H. Hickam, Stephanie L. Wolf, and Anna Molnar. 1995. Towards new measures of information retrieval evaluation. In Proceedings of the 18th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval - SIGIR ’95. ACM Press, Seattle, Washington, United States, 164–170. https://doi.org/10.1145/215206.215355
[29]
Bernard J. Jansen, Danielle Booth, and Brian Smith. 2009. Using the taxonomy of cognitive learning to model online searching. Information Processing & Management 45, 6 (Nov. 2009), 643–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2009.05.004
[30]
Rishita Kalyani and Ujwal Gadiraju. 2019. Understanding User Search Behavior Across Varying Cognitive Levels. In Proceedings of the 30th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media(HT ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1145/3342220.3343643
[31]
Yvonne Kammerer, Rowan Nairn, Peter Pirolli, and Ed H. Chi. 2009. Signpost from the masses: learning effects in an exploratory social tag search browser. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’09). Association for Computing Machinery, Boston, MA, USA, 625–634. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518797
[32]
Diane Kelly, Jaime Arguello, Ashlee Edwards, and Wan-ching Wu. 2015. Development and Evaluation of Search Tasks for IIR Experiments Using a Cognitive Complexity Framework. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on The Theory of Information Retrieval(ICTIR ’15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1145/2808194.2809465
[33]
Saskia Kistner, Katrin Rakoczy, Barbara Otto, Charlotte Dignath-van Ewijk, Gerhard Büttner, and Eckhard Klieme. 2010. Promotion of self-regulated learning in classrooms: investigating frequency, quality, and consequences for student performance. Metacognition and Learning 5, 2 (Aug. 2010), 157–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-010-9055-3
[34]
J. Richard Landis and Gary G. Koch. 1977. The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. Biometrics 33, 1 (1977), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310 Publisher: [Wiley, International Biometric Society].
[35]
Gary P. Latham and Travor C. Brown. 2006. The Effect of Learning vs. Outcome Goals on Self-Efficacy, Satisfaction and Performance in an MBA Program. Applied Psychology: An International Review 55, 4 (2006), 606–623. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2006.00246.x Place: United Kingdom Publisher: Blackwell Publishing.
[36]
Gary P. Latham, Terence R. Mitchell, and Dennis L. Dossett. 1978. Importance of participative goal setting and anticipated rewards on goal difficulty and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 63, 2 (1978), 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.63.2.163 Place: US Publisher: American Psychological Association.
[37]
Gary P. Latham and Lise M. Saari. 1979. Application of social-learning theory to training supervisors through behavioral modeling. Journal of Applied Psychology 64, 3 (1979), 239–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.64.3.239 Place: US Publisher: American Psychological Association.
[38]
Pei-Lan Lei, Chuen-Tsai Sun, Sunny S. J. Lin, and Tsung-Kuan Huang. 2015. Effect of metacognitive strategies and verbal-imagery cognitive style on biology-based video search and learning performance. Computers & Education 87 (Sept. 2015), 326–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.004
[39]
Chang Liu and Xiaoxuan Song. 2018. How do Information Source Selection Strategies Influence Users’ Learning Outcomes’. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Human Information Interaction & Retrieval(CHIIR ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 257–260. https://doi.org/10.1145/3176349.3176876
[40]
Hanrui Liu, Chang Liu, and Nicholas J. Belkin. 2019. Investigation of users’ knowledge change process in learning-related search tasks. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology 56, 1 (2019), 166–175. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.63
[41]
Edwin A. Locke and Gary P. Latham. 1990. A theory of goal setting & task performance. Prentice-Hall, Inc, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, US. Pages: xviii, 413.
[42]
Edwin A. Locke and Gary P. Latham. 2002. Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist 57, 9 (Sept. 2002), 705–717. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705 Publisher: American Psychological Association.
[43]
Edwin A. Locke and Gary P. Latham. 2006. New Directions in Goal-Setting Theory. Current Directions in Psychological Science 15, 5 (Oct. 2006), 265–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00449.x Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc.
[44]
Edwin A. Locke and Gary P. Latham. 2012. New Developments in Goal Setting and Task Performance. Routledge, London, UNITED KINGDOM. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/unc/detail.action?docID=1104793
[45]
Edwin A. Locke and Gary P. Latham. 2019. The development of goal setting theory: A half century retrospective. Motivation Science 5, 2 (June 2019), 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000127 Publisher: Educational Publishing Foundation.
[46]
Yihan Lu and I-Han Hsiao. 2017. Personalized Information Seeking Assistant (PiSA): from programming information seeking to learning. Information Retrieval Journal 20, 5 (Oct. 2017), 433–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10791-017-9305-y
[47]
Lindsay McCardle, Elizabeth A. Webster, Adrianna Haffey, and Allyson F. Hadwin. 2017. Examining students’ self-set goals for self-regulated learning: Goal properties and patterns. Studies in Higher Education 42, 11 (Nov. 2017), 2153–2169. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1135117 Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1135117.
[48]
Bruce M. McLaren, Deanne M. Adams, and Richard E. Mayer. 2015. Delayed Learning Effects with Erroneous Examples: a Study of Learning Decimals with a Web-Based Tutor. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 25, 4 (Dec. 2015), 520–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-015-0064-x
[49]
Aleidine J. Moeller, Janine M. Theiler, and Chaorong Wu. 2012. Goal Setting and Student Achievement: A Longitudinal Study. The Modern Language Journal 96, 2 (2012), 153–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01231.x _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01231.x.
[50]
Mark Morgan. 1985. Self-monitoring of attained subgoals in private study. Journal of Educational Psychology 77, 6 (Dec. 1985), 623–630. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.77.6.623 Publisher: American Psychological Association.
[51]
Mark Morgan. 1987. Self-monitoring and goal setting in private study. Contemporary Educational Psychology 12, 1 (Jan. 1987), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-476X(87)80033-4
[52]
Les Nelson, Christoph Held, Peter Pirolli, Lichan Hong, Diane Schiano, and Ed H. Chi. 2009. With a little help from my friends: examining the impact of social annotations in sensemaking tasks. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1795–1798. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518977
[53]
Heather L. O’Brien, Andrea Kampen, Amelia W. Cole, and Kathleen Brennan. 2020. The Role of Domain Knowledge in Search as Learning. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval(CHIIR ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, Vancouver BC, Canada, 313–317. https://doi.org/10.1145/3343413.3377989
[54]
Srishti Palani, Zijian Ding, Stephen MacNeil, and Steven P. Dow. 2021. The "Active Search" Hypothesis: How Search Strategies Relate to Creative Learning. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval(CHIIR ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 325–329. https://doi.org/10.1145/3406522.3446046
[55]
Georg Pardi, Johannes von Hoyer, Peter Holtz, and Yvonne Kammerer. 2020. The Role of Cognitive Abilities and Time Spent on Texts and Videos in a Multimodal Searching as Learning Task. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval. ACM, Vancouver BC Canada, 378–382. https://doi.org/10.1145/3343413.3378001
[56]
Paul R. Pintrich. 2000. Chapter 14 - The Role of Goal Orientation in Self-Regulated Learning. In Handbook of Self-Regulation, Monique Boekaerts, Paul R. Pintrich, and Moshe Zeidner (Eds.). Academic Press, San Diego, 451–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50043-3
[57]
Paul R. Pintrich and Elisabeth V. de Groot. 1990. Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology 82, 1 (1990), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33 Place: US Publisher: American Psychological Association.
[58]
Sihang Qiu, Alessandro Bozzon, and Ujwal Gadiraju. 2020. Conversational interfaces for search as learning. In CIKMW2020: Proceeding of the CIKM 2020 Workshops. CEUR. https://research.tudelft.nl/en/publications/conversational-interfaces-for-search-as-learning
[59]
Sihang Qiu, Ujwal Gadiraju, and Alessandro Bozzon. 2020. Towards Memorable Information Retrieval. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM SIGIR on International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval(ICTIR ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 69–76. https://doi.org/10.1145/3409256.3409830
[60]
Nicole B. Reinke, Mary Kynn, and Ann L. Parkinson. 2019. Conceptual understanding of osmosis and diffusion by Australian first-year biology students. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education 27, 9 (2019). https://doi.org/10.30722/IJISME.27.09.002 Number: 9.
[61]
Nicole B. Reinke, Mary Kynn, and Ann L. Parkinson. 2021. Immersive 3D Experience of Osmosis Improves Learning Outcomes of First-Year Cell Biology Students. CBE—Life Sciences Education 20, 1 (March 2021), ar1. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-11-0254
[62]
Soo Young Rieh, Kevyn Collins-Thompson, Preben Hansen, and Hye-Jung Lee. 2016. Towards searching as a learning process: A review of current perspectives and future directions. Journal of Information Science 42, 1 (Feb. 2016), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551515615841
[63]
Nirmal Roy, Felipe Moraes, and Claudia Hauff. 2020. Exploring Users’ Learning Gains within Search Sessions. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval(CHIIR ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, Vancouver BC, Canada, 432–436. https://doi.org/10.1145/3343413.3378012
[64]
Nirmal Roy, Manuel Valle Torre, Ujwal Gadiraju, David Maxwell, and Claudia Hauff. 2021. Note the Highlight: Incorporating Active Reading Tools in a Search as Learning Environment. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval(CHIIR ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 229–238. https://doi.org/10.1145/3406522.3446025
[65]
Ladislao Salmerón, Pablo Delgado, and Lucia Mason. 2020. Using eye-movement modelling examples to improve critical reading of multiple webpages on a conflicting topic. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 36, 6 (2020), 1038–1051. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12458 _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/jcal.12458.
[66]
Radhika Santhanam, Sharath Sasidharan, and Jane Webster. 2008. Using Self-Regulatory Learning to Enhance E-Learning-Based Information Technology Training. Information Systems Research 19, 1 (March 2008), 26–47. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1070.0141 Publisher: INFORMS.
[67]
Gregory Schraw and Rayne Sperling Dennison. 1994. Assessing Metacognitive Awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology 19, 4 (Oct. 1994), 460–475. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1033
[68]
Dale H. Schunk and Carl W. Swartz. 1993. Goals and Progress Feedback: Effects on Self-Efficacy and Writing Achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology 18, 3 (July 1993), 337–354. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1993.1024
[69]
Traci Sitzmann and Katherine Ely. 2011. A meta-analysis of self-regulated learning in work-related training and educational attainment: What we know and where we need to go. Psychological Bulletin 137, 3 (2011), 421–442. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022777 Place: US Publisher: American Psychological Association.
[70]
Rohail Syed and Kevyn Collins-Thompson. 2017. Optimizing search results for human learning goals. Information Retrieval Journal 20, 5 (Oct. 2017), 506–523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10791-017-9303-0
[71]
Rohail Syed, Kevyn Collins-Thompson, Paul N. Bennett, Mengqiu Teng, Shane Williams, Dr. Wendy W. Tay, and Shamsi Iqbal. 2020. Improving Learning Outcomes with Gaze Tracking and Automatic Question Generation. In Proceedings of The Web Conference 2020(WWW ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1693–1703. https://doi.org/10.1145/3366423.3380240
[72]
Rohail Syed, Kevyn Collins-Thompson, Paul N Bennett, Mengqiu Teng, Shane Williams, Dr Wendy W Tay, and Shamsi Iqbal. 2020. Improving learning outcomes with gaze tracking and automatic question generation. In Proceedings of The Web Conference 2020. 1693–1703.
[73]
Kelsey Urgo and Jaime Arguello. 2022. Learning assessments in search-as-learning: A survey of prior work and opportunities for future research. Information Processing & Management 59, 2 (March 2022), 102821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102821
[74]
Kelsey Urgo and Jaime Arguello. 2022. Understanding the "Pathway" Towards a Searcher’s Learning Objective. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 40, 4 (Jan. 2022), 77:1–77:42. https://doi.org/10.1145/3495222
[75]
Kelsey Urgo and Jaime Arguello. 2023. Goal-setting in support of learning during search: An exploration of learning outcomes and searcher perceptions. Information Processing & Management 60, 2 (March 2023), 103158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2022.103158
[76]
Gerard van den Boom, Fred Paas, and Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer. 2007. Effects of elicited reflections combined with tutor or peer feedback on self-regulated learning and learning outcomes. Learning and Instruction 17, 5 (Oct. 2007), 532–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.003
[77]
Nino Weingart and Carsten Eickhoff. 2016. Retrieval Techniques for Contextual Learning. SAL @ SIGIR (2016), 5.
[78]
C.E. Weinstein, D. Palmer, and A.C. Schulte. 1987. Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI). Clearwater, FL: H & H Publishing (1987).
[79]
Teena Willoughby, S. Alexandria Anderson, Eileen Wood, Julie Mueller, and Craig Ross. 2009. Fast searching for information on the Internet to use in a learning context: The impact of domain knowledge. Computers & Education 52, 3 (April 2009), 640–648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.11.009
[80]
Philip H. Winne and Allyson F. Hadwin. 1998. Studying as self-regulated engagement in learning. In Metacognition in educational theory and practice.
[81]
Philip H. Winne, Dianne Jamieson-Noel, and Krista Muis. 2002. Methodological issues and advances in researching tactics, strategies, and self-regulated learning. In New directions in measures and methods (1. ed ed.), Paul R. Pintrich and Martin L. Maehr (Eds.). Number 12 in Advances in motivation and achievement. JAI, An Imprint of Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.
[82]
Philip H. Winne and Nancy E. Perry. 2000. Measuring self-regulated learning. In Handbook of self-regulation. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, US, 531–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50045-7
[83]
Wan-Ching Wu, Diane Kelly, Ashlee Edwards, and Jaime Arguello. 2012. Grannies, Tanning Beds, Tattoos and NASCAR: Evaluation of Search Tasks with Varying Levels of Cognitive Complexity. In Proceedings of the 4th Information Interaction in Context Symposium(IIIX ’12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 254–257. https://doi.org/10.1145/2362724.2362768 event-place: Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
[84]
Luyan Xu, Xuan Zhou, and Ujwal Gadiraju. 2020. How Does Team Composition Affect Knowledge Gain of Users in Collaborative Web Search?. In Proceedings of the 31st ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media(HT ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1145/3372923.3404784
[85]
Ran Yu, Ujwal Gadiraju, Peter Holtz, Markus Rokicki, Philipp Kemkes, and Stefan Dietze. 2018. Predicting User Knowledge Gain in Informational Search Sessions. In The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval(SIGIR ’18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209978.3210064
[86]
Barry J. Zimmerman. 2000. Chapter 2 - Attaining Self-Regulation: A Social Cognitive Perspective. In Handbook of Self-Regulation, Monique Boekaerts, Paul R. Pintrich, and Moshe Zeidner (Eds.). Academic Press, San Diego, 13–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50031-7
[87]
Barry J. Zimmerman. 2002. Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview. Theory Into Practice 41, 2 (May 2002), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
[88]
Barry J. Zimmerman and Dale H. Schunk. 2011. Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, New York, NY, US. Pages: xiv, 484.
Index Terms
- The Effects of Goal-setting on Learning Outcomes and Self-Regulated Learning Processes
Recommendations
Goal-setting in support of learning during search: An exploration of learning outcomes and searcher perceptions
AbstractWe present a crowdsourced study (N = 120) that investigated the role of goal-setting on learning during search. To study the role of goal-setting, we developed a tool called the Subgoal Manager (SM). The SM was designed as a simple ...
Highlights- Assigned and self-set subgoals gave greater support for planning and monitoring.
Promoting self-regulated learning in web-based learning environments
Self-regulated learning with the Internet or hypermedia requires not only cognitive learning strategies, but also specific and general meta-cognitive strategies. The purposes of the Study2000 project, carried out at the TU Dresden, were to develop and ...
The effect of cues for calibration on learners' self-regulated learning through changes in learners’ learning behaviour and outcomes
AbstractLiterature on blended learning emphasizes the importance of self-regulation for learning in blended learning environments and the role of learners' calibration. Although literature on calibration is clear on its importance for self-...
Highlights- Calibration cues through functional and cognitive validity feedback are effective.
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
March 2024
481 pages
Copyright © 2024 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 10 March 2024
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Funding Sources
Conference
CHIIR '24
CHIIR '24: 2024 ACM SIGIR Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval
March 10 - 14, 2024
Sheffield, United Kingdom
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 55 of 163 submissions, 34%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 564Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)564
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)81
Reflects downloads up to 25 Feb 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML FormatLogin options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in