Expert Insights on Robots for Safeguarding Children: How (not) and Why (not)?
Pages 600 - 611
Abstract
To investigate a robot’s role in children’s welfare and safety, we conducted interviews with 8 Subject Matter Experts and Professionals (SMEs) across the disciplines of robotics, child technology, psychology, and psychiatry disciplines. Through qualitative analysis, we synthesize the challenges of safeguarding, compounding limitations, and potential solutions for involving robots in safeguarding as broadly defined in SME interviews. While they agree robots should not be responsible for making judgement calls, the experts also identified the ways robots can be a valuable addition to the safeguarding team. However, more conversations spanning disciplines need to occur to inform policy and legal frameworks that will better establish a robot’s role in intimate spaces in children’s lives. While this line of inquiry is specific to robots in safeguarding, many of the themes reflect the nuances of finding appropriate places for child-robot interactions in the context of children’s welfare.
References
[1]
Nida Itrat Abbasi, Micol Spitale, Joanna Anderson, Tamsin Ford, Peter B Jones, and Hatice Gunes. 2022. Can robots help in the evaluation of mental wellbeing in children? an empirical study. In 2022 31st IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). IEEE, 1459–1466.
[2]
Eileen M Ahlin. 2019. Semi-structured interviews with expert practitioners: Their validity and significant contribution to translational research. (2019).
[3]
Musaddak Jamael Alhabeeb. 2007. On consumer trust and product loyalty. International Journal of Consumer Studies 31, 6 (2007), 609–612.
[4]
Patrícia Alves-Oliveira, Tiago Ribeiro, Sofia Petisca, Eugenio Di Tullio, Francisco S Melo, and Ana Paiva. 2015. An empathic robotic tutor for school classrooms: Considering expectation and satisfaction of children as end-users. In Social Robotics: 7th International Conference, ICSR 2015, Paris, France, October 26-30, 2015, Proceedings 7. Springer, 21–30.
[5]
Valentina Andries and Judy Robertson. 2023. " Alexa doesn’t have that many feelings": Children’s understanding of AI through interactions with smart speakers in their homes. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.05597 (2023).
[6]
Lindsey Arnold. 2016. Emobie™: A robot companion for children with anxiety. In 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 413–414.
[7]
Donna Baines. 2006. Quantitative Indicators “whose needs are being served?” quantitative metrics and the reshaping of social services. Studies in Political Economy 77, 1 (2006), 195–209.
[8]
Cindy L Bethel, Zachary Henkel, Kristen Stives, David C May, Deborah K Eakin, Melinda Pilkinton, Alexis Jones, and Megan Stubbs-Richardson. 2016. Using robots to interview children about bullying: Lessons learned from an exploratory study. In 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). IEEE, 712–717.
[9]
Cindy L Bethel, Matthew R Stevenson, and Brian Scassellati. 2011. Secret-sharing: Interactions between a child, robot, and adult. In 2011 IEEE International Conference on systems, man, and cybernetics. IEEE, 2489–2494.
[10]
Jason Borenstein and Ronald C Arkin. 2017. Nudging for good: robots and the ethical appropriateness of nurturing empathy and charitable behavior. Ai & Society 32 (2017), 499–507.
[11]
Bengisu Cagiltay, Nathan White, Rabia Ibtasar, Bilge Mutlu, and Joseph Michaelis. 2022. Understanding Factors that Shape Children’s Long Term Engagement with an In-Home Learning Companion Robot.
[12]
Federal Trade Commission 2015. Internet of things: Privacy & security in a connected world. Washington, DC: Federal Trade Commission (2015).
[13]
Juliet Corbin and Anselm Strauss. 2008. Basics of qualitative research. 3rd edn Thousand Oaks.
[14]
Ivana Cukovic-Bagic, Richard R Welbury, Gordana Buljan Flander, Sahza Hatibovic-Kofman, and Emilio Nuzzolese. 2013. Child protection: legal and ethical obligation regarding the report of child abuse in four different countries. The Journal of Forensic Odonto-Stomatology 31, 1 (2013), 15.
[15]
Howard Dubowitz and Susan Bennett. 2007. Physical abuse and neglect of children. The Lancet 369, 9576 (2007), 1891–1899.
[16]
Nils Ehrenberg and Turkka Keinonen. 2021. The technology is enemy for me at the moment: How smart home technologies assert control beyond intent. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–11.
[17]
Meghann Fior, Sarah Nugent, Tanya N Beran, Alejandro Ramirez-Serrano, and Roman Kuzyk. 2010. Children’s relationships with robots: robot is child’s new friend. (2010).
[18]
Lisa Aronson Fontes. 2005. Child abuse and culture: Working with diverse families. Guilford Press.
[19]
Great Britain. Department for Education. 2006. Working together to safeguard children: A guide to inter-agency working to safeguard and promote the welfare of children. The Stationery Office.
[20]
Eduard Fosch-Villaronga, Simone Van der Hof, Christoph Lutz, and Aurelia Tamò-Larrieux. 2023. Toy story or children story? Putting children and their rights at the forefront of the artificial intelligence revolution. AI & society 38, 1 (2023), 133–152.
[21]
Nicholas C Georgiou, Rebecca Ramnauth, Emmanuel Adeniran, Michael Lee, Lila Selin, and Brian Scassellati. 2022. Is Someone There Or Is That The TV? Detecting Social Presence Using Sound. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (2022).
[22]
Eldar Haber. 2019. Toying with privacy: Regulating the Internet of Toys. Ohio St. LJ 80 (2019), 399.
[23]
Eldar Haber. 2020. The Internet of Children: Protecting Children’s Privacy in a Hyper-Connected World. U. Ill. L. Rev. (2020), 1209.
[24]
Jonathan Haidt and Selink Kesebir. [n. d.]. Haidt, J., & Kesebir, S.(2010). Morality. In S. Fiske, D. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.) Handbook of Social Psychology, Hobeken, NJ: Wiley. Pp. 797-832. ([n. d.]).
[25]
Jeong-Hye Han, Mi-Heon Jo, Vicki Jones, and Jun-H Jo. 2008. Comparative study on the educational use of home robots for children. Journal of Information Processing Systems 4, 4 (2008), 159–168.
[26]
Joanne Horton, Richard Macve, and Geert Struyven. 2004. Qualitative research: experiences in using semi-structured interviews. In The real life guide to accounting research. Elsevier, 339–357.
[27]
Juan Pablo Hourcade, Anja Zeising, Ole Sejer Iversen, Narcis Pares, Michael Eisenberg, Chris Quintana, and Mikael B Skov. 2017. Child-computer interaction sig: Ethics and values. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems. 1334–1337.
[28]
Enkelejda Kasneci, Kathrin Seßler, Stefan Küchemann, Maria Bannert, Daryna Dementieva, Frank Fischer, Urs Gasser, Georg Groh, Stephan Günnemann, Eyke Hüllermeier, 2023. ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and individual differences 103 (2023), 102274.
[29]
Allison Langer, Peter J Marshall, and Shelly Levy-Tzedek. 2023. Ethical Considerations in Child-Robot Interactions. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (2023), 105230.
[30]
Min Kyung Lee, Karen P Tang, Jodi Forlizzi, and Sara Kiesler. 2011. Understanding users’ perception of privacy in human-robot interaction. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Human-robot interaction. 181–182.
[31]
Roxanne Leitão. 2019. Anticipating smart home security and privacy threats with survivors of intimate partner abuse. In Proceedings of the 2019 on designing interactive systems conference. 527–539.
[32]
Iolanda Leite, Carlos Martinho, and Ana Paiva. 2013. Social robots for long-term interaction: a survey. International Journal of Social Robotics 5 (2013), 291–308.
[33]
Leigh Levinson, Gonzalo A Garcia, Guillermo Perez, Gloria Alvarez-Benito, J Gabriel Amores, Mario Castaño-Ocaña, Manuel Castro-Malet, Randy Gomez, and Selma Šabanović. 2022. Living with Haru4Kids: Child and Parent Perceptions of a Co-Habitation Robot for Children. In International Conference on Social Robotics. Springer, 54–63.
[34]
Sonia Livingstone. 2021. Children’s rights apply in the digital world!Parenting for a Digital Future (2021).
[35]
Ali Meghdari, Azadeh Shariati, Minoo Alemi, Ali Amoozandeh Nobaveh, Mobin Khamooshi, and Behrad Mozaffari. 2018. Design performance characteristics of a social robot companion “Arash” for pediatric hospitals. International Journal of Humanoid Robotics 15, 05 (2018), 1850019.
[36]
Gail F Melson, Peter H Kahn Jr, Alan Beck, Batya Friedman, Trace Roberts, Erik Garrett, and Brian T Gill. 2009. Children’s behavior toward and understanding of robotic and living dogs. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 30, 2 (2009), 92–102.
[37]
Gary B Melton. 2005. Mandated reporting: A policy without reason. Child abuse & neglect 29, 1 (2005), 9–18.
[38]
Emily R Munro and Esmeranda Manful. 2012. Safeguarding children: a comparison of England’s data with that of Australia, Norway and the United States. Department for Education London.
[39]
US Department of Health, Human Services, 2009. Mandatory reporters of child abuse and neglect. Child Welfare Information Gateway. Available from: www. childwelfare. gov/systemwide/laws_policies/statutes/manda. cfm. Accessed (2009).
[40]
Elise Paul and Ana Ortin. 2019. Correlates of suicidal ideation and self-harm in early childhood in a cohort at risk for child abuse and neglect. Archives of suicide research 23, 1 (2019), 134–150.
[41]
Silvia Rossi, Marwa Larafa, and Martina Ruocco. 2020. Emotional and behavioural distraction by a social robot for children anxiety reduction during vaccination. International Journal of Social Robotics 12 (2020), 765–777.
[42]
Jelle Saldien, K Goris, B Vanderborght, B Verrelst, R Van Ham, and D Lefeber. 2006. ANTY: The development of an intelligent huggable robot for hospitalized children. In 9th International Conference on Climbing and Walking Robots and the Support Technologies for Mobile Machines. 12–14.
[43]
Pedro Sanches, Vasiliki Tsaknaki, Asreen Rostami, and Barry Brown. 2020. Under surveillance: Technology practices of those monitored by the state. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13.
[44]
Evan Selinger and Darrin Durant. 2022. Amazon’s ring: Surveillance as a slippery slope service. Science as culture 31, 1 (2022), 92–106.
[45]
Sofia Serholt and Wolmet Barendregt. 2016. Robots tutoring children: Longitudinal evaluation of social engagement in child-robot interaction. In Proceedings of the 9th nordic conference on human-computer interaction. 1–10.
[46]
Kshitij Sharma and Michail Giannakos. 2021. Sensing technologies and child–computer interaction: Opportunities, challenges and ethical considerations. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 30 (2021), 100331.
[47]
Solace Shen, Petr Slovak, and Malte F Jung. 2018. " Stop. I See a Conflict Happening." A Robot Mediator for Young Children’s Interpersonal Conflict Resolution. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction. 69–77.
[48]
Shannon L Stewart, Angela Celebre, John P Hirdes, and Jeffrey W Poss. 2020. Risk of suicide and self-harm in kids: the development of an algorithm to identify high-risk individuals within the children’s mental health system. Child Psychiatry & Human Development 51 (2020), 913–924.
[49]
Rebecca Stower, Natalia Calvo-Barajas, Ginevra Castellano, and Arvid Kappas. 2021. A meta-analysis on children’s trust in social robots. International Journal of Social Robotics 13, 8 (2021), 1979–2001.
[50]
Anne Taylor. 2020. Overstretched NHS services are sending suicidal students back to universities for help. BMJ 368 (2020).
[51]
Nils F Tolksdorf, Scarlet Siebert, Isabel Zorn, Ilona Horwath, and Katharina J Rohlfing. 2021. Ethical considerations of applying robots in kindergarten settings: Towards an approach from a macroperspective. International Journal of Social Robotics 13 (2021), 129–140.
[52]
Margaret J Trost, Grace Chrysilla, Jeffrey I Gold, Maja Matarić, 2020. Socially-Assistive robots using empathy to reduce pain and distress during peripheral IV placement in children. Pain Research and Management 2020 (2020).
[53]
Andreas Tsirtsis, Nicolas Tsapatsoulis, Makis Stamatelatos, Kwstantinos Papadamou, and Michael Sirivianos. 2016. Cyber security risks for minors: a taxonomy and a software architecture. In 2016 11th international workshop on semantic and social media adaptation and personalization (SMAP). IEEE, 93–99.
[54]
Sherry Turkle. 2017. Empathy machines: forgetting the body. In A Psychoanalytic Exploration of the Body in Today’s World. Routledge, 17–27.
[55]
GOV UK. 2018. Working together to safeguard children.
[56]
Caroline L van Straten, Jochen Peter, and Rinaldo Kühne. 2020. Child–robot relationship formation: A narrative review of empirical research. International Journal of Social Robotics 12 (2020), 325–344.
[57]
Caroline L van Straten, Jochen Peter, Rinaldo Kühne, and Alex Barco. 2022. On sharing and caring: Investigating the effects of a robot’s self-disclosure and question-asking on children’s robot perceptions and child-robot relationship formation. Computers in Human Behavior 129 (2022), 107135.
[58]
Aimee Van Wynsberghe and Shuhong Li. 2019. A paradigm shift for robot ethics: From HRI to human–robot–system interaction (HRSI). Medicolegal and Bioethics (2019), 11–21.
[59]
M Vimalkumar, Sujeet Kumar Sharma, Jang Bahadur Singh, and Yogesh K Dwivedi. 2021. ‘Okay google, what about my privacy?’: User’s privacy perceptions and acceptance of voice based digital assistants. Computers in Human Behavior 120 (2021), 106763.
[60]
Maike Vollstedt and Sebastian Rezat. 2019. An introduction to grounded theory with a special focus on axial coding and the coding paradigm. Compendium for early career researchers in mathematics education 13, 1 (2019), 81–100.
[61]
InSIde What’S. 2015. Mandatory Reporters of Child abuse and neglect. (2015).
[62]
Katie Winkle and Natasha Mulvihill. 2024. Anticipating the Use of Robots in Domestic Abuse: A Typology of Robot Facilitated Abuse to Support Risk Assessment and Mitigation in Human-Robot Interaction. In Proceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 781–790.
[63]
Haibin Yan, Marcelo H Ang, and Aun Neow Poo. 2012. Dorothy Robotubby: A Robotic Nanny. In Social Robotics: 4th International Conference, ICSR 2012, Chengdu, China, October 29-31, 2012. Proceedings 4. Springer, 118–127.
[64]
Zhao Zhao and Rhonda McEwen. 2022. “Let’s read a book together”: A Long-term Study on the Usage of Pre-school Children with Their Home Companion Robot. In 2022 17th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 24–32.
Index Terms
- Expert Insights on Robots for Safeguarding Children: How (not) and Why (not)?
Recommendations
Why Do Children Abuse Robots?
HRI'15 Extended Abstracts: Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction Extended AbstractsWe found that children sometimes abuse a social robot in a hallway of a shopping mall. They spoke bad words, repeatedly obstructed the robot's path, and sometimes even kicked and punched the robot. To investigate why they abused it, we conducted a field ...
Robots, Bullies and Stories: A Remote Co-design Study with Children
IDC '21: Proceedings of the 20th Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children ConferenceBullying in schools is a widespread problem with serious consequences. We are exploring the use of social robots and role-playing to foster anti-bullying peer-support. In this paper, we present results from a co-design study with 22 children (8-12 ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
June 2024
1049 pages
ISBN:9798400704420
DOI:10.1145/3628516
Copyright © 2024 Owner/Author.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives International 4.0 License.
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 17 June 2024
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Funding Sources
- The Cambridge Trusts
- W.D. Armstrong Trust
- EPSRC
Conference
IDC '24
Sponsor:
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 172 of 578 submissions, 30%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 140Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)140
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)26
Reflects downloads up to 04 Oct 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML FormatGet Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in