Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3629296.3629345acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicetcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Genetic Programming-Enabled Prediction for Students Academic Performance in Blended Learning

Published: 15 January 2024 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    Blended learning has become increasingly significant for college campus courses typically since the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak. Analyzing and predicting students’ learning performance is essential for providing personalized intervention and guidance. In recent years many machine learning models have been utilized for predicting students’ academic performance, however, these supervised learning prediction models experience strong limitation in their little interpretability due to black-box characteristic. To address this issue, this paper develops a genetic programing (GP) academic performance prediction model to explicitly define the quantitative relations between students’ learning activities and final academic performance in one blended computing thinking course. A comparison is also conducted with conventional machine learning models including ANN and SVR. The experiment reveal that the proposed GP prediction model is a viable tool and can provide more satisfactory prediction performance. In additional, numerical optimization analysis of GP prediction model indicate that most critical factors that affect student’ academic perform in our course are the score of laboratory subjects, following by the score of online quizzes, class participation and online video watching time. The results can contribute to learning about students learning situations and help teacher to provide precise intervention.

    References

    [1]
    Elaine Voci and Kevin Young. 2001. Blended learning working in a leadership development programme. Ind. Commer. Train. (2001), 157-161. DOI 10.1108/00197850110398927
    [2]
    Owen H. T. Lu, Anna Y. Q. Huang, Jeff C. H. Huang, Albert J. Q. Lin, Hiroaki Ogata, and Stephen J. H. Yang. 2018. Applying Learning Analytics for the Early Prediction of Students' Academic Performance in Blended Learning. Educ. Technol. Soc. (2018), 220-232.
    [3]
    Naglaa Megahed and Ehab Ghoneim. 2022. Blended Learning: The New Normal for Post-COVID-19 Pedagogy. Int. J. Mob. Blended Learn. (2022). DOI 10.4018/IJMBL.291980
    [4]
    Jayendira P. Sankar, R. Kalaichelvi, Kesavan Vadakalur Elumalai, and Mufleh Salem M. Alqahtani. 2022. EFFECTIVE BLENDED LEARNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION DURING COVID-19. Inf. Technol. Learn. Tools (2022), 214-228. DOI 10.33407/itlt.v88i2.4438
    [5]
    Huijuan Zhuang, Jing Dong, Su Mu, and Haiming Liu. 2022. Learning Performance Prediction and Alert Method in Hybrid Learning. Sustainability (2022). DOI 10.3390/su142214685
    [6]
    Zhuojia Xu, Hua Yuan, and Qishan Liu. 2021. Student Performance Prediction Based on Blended Learning. IEEE Trans. Educ. (2021), 66-73. DOI 10.1109/TE.2020.3008751
    [7]
    Pengcheng Jiao, Fan Ouyang, Qianyun Zhang, and Amir H. Alavi. 2022. Artificial intelligence-enabled prediction model of student academic performance in online engineering education. Artif. Intell. Rev. (2022), 6321-6344. DOI 10.1007/s10462-022-10155-y
    [8]
    Yangyang Luo, Xibin Han, and Chaoyang Zhang. 2022. Prediction of learning outcomes with a machine learning algorithm based on online learning behavior data in blended courses. Asia Pac. Educ. Rev. (2022). DOI 10.1007/s12564-022-09749-6
    [9]
    Otgontsetseg Sukhbaatar, Tsuyoshi Usagawa, and Lodoiravsal Choimaa. 2019. An Artificial Neural Network Based Early Prediction of Failure-Prone Students in Blended Learning Course. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. (2019), 77-92. DOI 10.3991/ijet.v14i19.10366
    [10]
    Yongchang Zhang. 2018. Influencing Factors of Students' Acceptance of Blended Learning Based on Cognitive Neural Network. NEUROQUANTOLOGY (2018), 387-395. DOI 10.14704/nq.2018.16.5.1305
    [11]
    Chenxi Huang, Junsheng Zhou, Jinling Chen, Jane Yang, Kathy Clawson, and Yonghong Peng. 2021. A feature weighted support vector machine and artificial neural network algorithm for academic course performance prediction. Neural Comput. Appl. (2021). DOI 10.1007/s00521-021-05962-3
    [12]
    Asif Hussain, Muzammil Khan, and Kifayat Ullah. 2022. Student's performance prediction model and affecting factors using classification techniques. Educ. Inf. Technol. (2022), 8841-8858. DOI 10.1007/s10639-022-10988-8
    [13]
    Shamshad Lakho, Akhtar Hussain Jalbani, Imran Ali Memon, Saima Siraj Soomro, and Asghar Ali Chandio. 2022. Development of an integrated blended learning model and its performance prediction on students' learning using Bayesian network. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. (2022), 2015-2023. DOI 10.3233/JIFS-219301
    [14]
    Luca Cagliero, Lorenzo Canale, Laura Farinetti, Elena Baralis, and Enrico Venuto. 2021. Predicting Student Academic Performance by Means of Associative Classification. Appl. Sci.-Basel (2021). DOI 10.3390/app11041420
    [15]
    Alireza Rostami, Milad Arabloo, and Hojatollah Ebadi. 2017. Genetic programming (GP) approach for prediction of supercritical CO2 thermal conductivity. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. (2017), 164-175. DOI 10.1016/j.cherd.2017.02.028
    [16]
    Gabrielli H. Yamashita, Flavio S. Fogliatto, Michel J. Anzanello, and Guilherme L. Tortorella. 2022. Customized prediction of attendance to soccer matches based on symbolic regression and genetic programming. Expert Syst. Appl. (2022). DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115912
    [17]
    Wassim Ben Chaabene and Moncef L. Nehdi. 2021. Genetic programming based symbolic regression for shear capacity prediction of SFRC beams. Constr. Build. Mater. (2021). DOI 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122523
    [18]
    Wanli Xing, Rui Guo, Eva Petakovic, and Sean Goggins. 2015. Participation-based student final performance prediction model through interpretable Genetic Programming: Integrating learning analytics, educational data mining and theory. Comput. Hum. Behav. (2015), 168-181. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.034
    [19]
    Yuan Xie, Wei Gao, Yiwei Wang, Xin Chen, Shuangshuang Ge, and Sen Wang. 2022. Life prediction of underground structure by sulfate corrosion using Harris hawks optimizing genetic programming. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. (2022), 105190. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105190
    [20]
    Man Wang, Hongwei Zhou, Dongming Zhang, Yingwei Wang, Weihang Du, and Beichen Yu. 2022. Genetic Programming-Based Prediction Model for Microseismic Data. Geofluids (2022). DOI 10.1155/2022/2525923
    [21]
    K. S. Kasiviswanathan, S. Saravanan, M. Balamurugan, and K. Saravanan. 2016. Genetic programming based monthly groundwater level forecast models with uncertainty quantification. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. (2016), 27. DOI 10.1007/s40808-016-0083-0
    [22]
    Ning Wang. 1999. The research of hybrid optimization strategy in neural networks. The Journal of Tsinghua University (1999), 66-70.
    [23]
    Shaobo Huang and Ning Fang. 2013. Predicting student academic performance in an engineering dynamics course: A comparison of four types of predictive mathematical models. Comput. Educ. (2013), 133-145. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.08.015

    Index Terms

    1. Genetic Programming-Enabled Prediction for Students Academic Performance in Blended Learning

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICETC '23: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Education Technology and Computers
      September 2023
      532 pages
      ISBN:9798400709111
      DOI:10.1145/3629296
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 15 January 2024

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Blended Learning
      2. Genetic Programming
      3. Learning behaviors
      4. Students academic performance prediction

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Conference

      ICETC 2023

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • 0
        Total Citations
      • 36
        Total Downloads
      • Downloads (Last 12 months)36
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)10

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format.

      HTML Format

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media