Laboratory-Scale AI: Open-Weight Models are Competitive with ChatGPT Even in Low-Resource Settings
Authors: 
Robert Wolfe, Isaac Slaughter, Bin Han, Bingbing Wen, Yiwei Yang, Lucas Rosenblatt, Bernease Herman, Eva Brown, Zening Qu, Nic Weber, 
Bill HoweAuthors Info & Claims
Robert Wolfe, Isaac Slaughter, Bin Han, Bingbing Wen, Yiwei Yang, Lucas Rosenblatt, Bernease Herman, Eva Brown, Zening Qu, Nic Weber, Bill HoweAuthors Info & ClaimsPages 1199 - 1210
Abstract
The rapid proliferation of generative AI has raised questions about the competitiveness of lower-parameter, locally tunable, open-weight models relative to high-parameter, API-guarded, closed-weight models in terms of performance, domain adaptation, cost, and generalization. Centering under-resourced yet risk-intolerant settings in government, research, and healthcare, we see for-profit closed-weight models as incompatible with requirements for transparency, privacy, adaptability, and standards of evidence. Yet the performance penalty in using open-weight models, especially in low-data and low-resource settings, is unclear.
We assess the feasibility of using smaller, open-weight models to replace GPT-4-Turbo in zero-shot, few-shot, and fine-tuned regimes, assuming access to only a single, low-cost GPU. We assess value-sensitive issues around bias, privacy, and abstention on three additional tasks relevant to those topics. We find that with relatively low effort, very low absolute monetary cost, and relatively little data for fine-tuning, small open-weight models can achieve competitive performance in domain-adapted tasks without sacrificing generality. We then run experiments considering practical issues in bias, privacy, and hallucination risk, finding that open models offer several benefits over closed models. We intend this work as a case study in understanding the opportunity cost of reproducibility and transparency over for-profit state-of-the-art zero shot performance, finding this cost to be marginal under realistic settings.
References
[1]
Martin Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian Goodfellow, H Brendan McMahan, Ilya Mironov, Kunal Talwar, and Li Zhang. 2016. Deep learning with differential privacy. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC conference on computer and communications security., 308–318.
[2]
Ebtesam Almazrouei, Hamza Alobeidli, Abdulaziz Alshamsi, Alessandro Cappelli, Ruxandra Cojocaru, Mérouane Debbah, Étienne Goffinet, Daniel Hesslow, Julien Launay, Quentin Malartic, 2023. The Falcon Series of Open Language Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.16867, (2023),.
[3]
Yuntao Bai, Andy Jones, Kamal Ndousse, Amanda Askell, Anna Chen, Nova DasSarma, Dawn Drain, Stanislav Fort, Deep Ganguli, Tom Henighan, 2022. Training a helpful and harmless assistant with reinforcement learning from human feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.05862, (2022),.
[4]
Jeff Beckman. 2023. OpenAI Statistics 2023: Growth, Users, and More. https://techreport.com/statistics/openai-statistics/. [Accessed 19-01-2024].
[5]
Asma Ben Abacha, Wen-wai Yim, Yadan Fan, and Thomas Lin. 2023. An Empirical Study of Clinical Note Generation from Doctor-Patient Encounters. In Proceedings of the 17th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 2291–2302. https://aclanthology.org/2023.eacl-main.168
[6]
Emily M Bender, Timnit Gebru, Angelina McMillan-Major, and Shmargaret Shmitchell. 2021. On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big?. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency., 610–623.
[7]
Lukas Biewald. 2020. Experiment Tracking with Weights and Biases. https://www.wandb.com/ Software available from wandb.com.
[8]
Abeba Birhane, Pratyusha Kalluri, Dallas Card, William Agnew, Ravit Dotan, and Michelle Bao. 2022. The values encoded in machine learning research. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency., 173–184.
[9]
Ekaba Bisong and Ekaba Bisong. 2019. An overview of google cloud platform services. Building Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models on Google Cloud Platform: A Comprehensive Guide for Beginners, (2019), 7–10.
[10]
Rishi Bommasani, Kevin Klyman, Shayne Longpre, Sayash Kapoor, Nestor Maslej, Betty Xiong, Daniel Zhang, and Percy Liang. 2023. The foundation model transparency index. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.12941, (2023),.
[11]
Tom Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared D Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, 2020. Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in neural information processing systems 33 (2020), 1877–1901.
[12]
Yaroslav Bulatov. 2018. Fitting larger networks into memory.https://medium.com/tensorflow/fitting-larger-networks-into-memory-583e3c758ff9. [Accessed 19-01-2024].
[13]
Ilias Chalkidis, Manos Fergadiotis, Prodromos Malakasiotis, Nikolaos Aletras, and Ion Androutsopoulos. 2020. LEGAL-BERT: The Muppets straight out of Law School. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2020., 2898–2904.
[14]
Jerry Chee, Yaohui Cai, Volodymyr Kuleshov, and Christopher De Sa. 2023. Quip: 2-bit quantization of large language models with guarantees. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.13304, (2023),.
[15]
Tianqi Chen, Bing Xu, Chiyuan Zhang, and Carlos Guestrin. 2016. Training deep nets with sublinear memory cost. arXiv preprint arXiv:1604.06174, (2016),.
[16]
Pierre Colombo, Nathan Noiry, Ekhine Irurozki, and Stephan Clemencon. 2022. What are the best systems? New perspectives on NLP Benchmarking. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.03799, (2022),.
[17]
Andrew M Dai and Quoc V Le. 2015. Semi-supervised sequence learning. Advances in neural information processing systems 28, (2015),.
[18]
Hai Dang, Lukas Mecke, Florian Lehmann, Sven Goller, and Daniel Buschek. 2022. How to prompt? Opportunities and challenges of zero-and few-shot learning for human-AI interaction in creative applications of generative models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.01390, (2022),.
[19]
Pradeep Dasigi, Kyle Lo, Iz Beltagy, Arman Cohan, Noah A. Smith, and Matt Gardner. 2021. A Dataset of Information-Seeking Questions and Answers Anchored in Research Papers. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Kristina Toutanova, Anna Rumshisky, Luke Zettlemoyer, Dilek Hakkani-Tur, Iz Beltagy, Steven Bethard, Ryan Cotterell, Tanmoy Chakraborty, and Yichao Zhou (Eds.). Association for Computational Linguistics, Online, 4599–4610. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.365
[20]
Tim Dettmers, Mike Lewis, Younes Belkada, and Luke Zettlemoyer. 2022. Llm. int8 (): 8-bit matrix multiplication for transformers at scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.07339, (2022),.
[21]
Tim Dettmers, Artidoro Pagnoni, Ari Holtzman, and Luke Zettlemoyer. 2023. Qlora: Efficient finetuning of quantized llms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.14314, (2023),.
[22]
Tim Dettmers and Luke Zettlemoyer. 2023. The case for 4-bit precision: k-bit inference scaling laws. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 7750–7774.
[23]
Thomas Diggelmann, Jordan Boyd-Graber, Jannis Bulian, Massimiliano Ciaramita, and Markus Leippold. 2020. Climate-fever: A dataset for verification of real-world climate claims. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.00614, (2020),.
[24]
Ning Ding, Yujia Qin, Guang Yang, Fuchao Wei, Zonghan Yang, Yusheng Su, Shengding Hu, Yulin Chen, Chi-Min Chan, Weize Chen, 2023. Parameter-efficient fine-tuning of large-scale pre-trained language models. Nature Machine Intelligence 5, 3 (2023), 220–235.
[25]
Aos Fatos. 2024. Aos Fatos. https://www.aosfatos.org/. [Accessed 22-01-2024].
[26]
Lise Getoor and Ashwin Machanavajjhala. 2012. Entity resolution: theory, practice & open challenges. Proc. VLDB Endow. 5, 12 (aug 2012), 2018–2019. https://doi.org/10.14778/2367502.2367564
[27]
Badih Ghazi, Noah Golowich, Ravi Kumar, Pasin Manurangsi, and Chiyuan Zhang. 2021. Deep learning with label differential privacy. Advances in neural information processing systems 34 (2021), 27131–27145.
[28]
Fabrizio Gilardi, Meysam Alizadeh, and Maël Kubli. 2023. ChatGPT outperforms crowd workers for text-annotation tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 120, 30 (2023), e2305016120.
[29]
Maoguo Gong, Yu Xie, Ke Pan, Kaiyuan Feng, and Alex Kai Qin. 2020. A survey on differentially private machine learning. IEEE computational intelligence magazine 15, 2 (2020), 49–64.
[30]
Bin Han, Haotian Zhu, Sitong Zhou, Sofia Ahmed, M Rahman, Fei Xia, and Kevin Lybarger. 2023. Huskyscribe at mediqa-sum 2023: Summarizing clinical dialogues with transformers. In. CLEF,.
[31]
Dan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou, Mantas Mazeika, Dawn Song, and Jacob Steinhardt. 2021. Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding. arxiv:2009.03300 [cs.CY]
[32]
Edward J Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu, Yuanzhi Li, Shean Wang, Lu Wang, and Weizhu Chen. 2021. Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.09685, (2021),.
[33]
Albert Q Jiang, Alexandre Sablayrolles, Arthur Mensch, Chris Bamford, Devendra Singh Chaplot, Diego de las Casas, Florian Bressand, Gianna Lengyel, Guillaume Lample, Lucile Saulnier, 2023. Mistral 7B. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.06825, (2023),.
[34]
Di Jin, Eileen Pan, Nassim Oufattole, Wei-Hung Weng, Hanyi Fang, and Peter Szolovits. 2021. What disease does this patient have? a large-scale open domain question answering dataset from medical exams. Applied Sciences 11, 14 (2021), 6421.
[35]
Jan Kocoń, Igor Cichecki, Oliwier Kaszyca, Mateusz Kochanek, Dominika Szydło, Joanna Baran, Julita Bielaniewicz, Marcin Gruza, Arkadiusz Janz, Kamil Kanclerz, 2023. ChatGPT: Jack of all trades, master of none. Information Fusion, (2023), 101861.
[36]
Pang Wei Koh, Shiori Sagawa, Henrik Marklund, Sang Michael Xie, Marvin Zhang, Akshay Balsubramani, Weihua Hu, Michihiro Yasunaga, Richard Lanas Phillips, Irena Gao, 2021. Wilds: A benchmark of in-the-wild distribution shifts. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 5637–5664.
[37]
Percy Liang, Rishi Bommasani, Tony Lee, Dimitris Tsipras, Dilara Soylu, Michihiro Yasunaga, Yian Zhang, Deepak Narayanan, Yuhuai Wu, Ananya Kumar, Benjamin Newman, Binhang Yuan, Bobby Yan, Ce Zhang, Christian Cosgrove, Christopher D. Manning, Christopher Ré, Diana Acosta-Navas, Drew A. Hudson, Eric Zelikman, Esin Durmus, Faisal Ladhak, Frieda Rong, Hongyu Ren, Huaxiu Yao, Jue Wang, Keshav Santhanam, Laurel Orr, Lucia Zheng, Mert Yuksekgonul, Mirac Suzgun, Nathan Kim, Neel Guha, Niladri Chatterji, Omar Khattab, Peter Henderson, Qian Huang, Ryan Chi, Sang Michael Xie, Shibani Santurkar, Surya Ganguli, Tatsunori Hashimoto, Thomas Icard, Tianyi Zhang, Vishrav Chaudhary, William Wang, Xuechen Li, Yifan Mai, Yuhui Zhang, and Yuta Koreeda. 2023. Holistic Evaluation of Language Models. arxiv:2211.09110 [cs.CL]
[38]
Andreas Liesenfeld, Alianda Lopez, and Mark Dingemanse. 2023. Opening up ChatGPT: Tracking openness, transparency, and accountability in instruction-tuned text generators. In Proceedings of the 5th international conference on conversational user interfaces., 1–6.
[39]
Lefteris Loukas, Ilias Stogiannidis, Prodromos Malakasiotis, and Stavros Vassos. 2023. Breaking the Bank with ChatGPT: Few-Shot Text Classification for Finance. In Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Financial Technology and Natural Language Processing and the Second Multimodal AI For Financial Forecasting, Chung-Chi Chen, Hiroya Takamura, Puneet Mathur, Remit Sawhney, Hen-Hsen Huang, and Hsin-Hsi Chen (Eds.). -, Macao, 74–80. https://aclanthology.org/2023.finnlp-1.7
[40]
Meedan. 2024. Meedan. https://meedan.com/. [Accessed 22-01-2024].
[41]
OpenAI, :, Josh Achiam et al. 2023. GPT-4 Technical Report. arxiv:2303.08774 [cs.CL]
[42]
OpenAI. 2022. Introducing ChatGPT. OpenAI Blog, (Nov 2022),.
[43]
OpenAI. 2024. Models. https://platform.openai.com/docs/models/. [Accessed 19-01-2024].
[44]
OpenAI. 2024. Pricing. https://openai.com/pricing. [Accessed 19-01-2024].
[45]
Long Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida, Carroll Wainwright, Pamela Mishkin, Chong Zhang, Sandhini Agarwal, Katarina Slama, Alex Ray, 2022. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 (2022), 27730–27744.
[46]
Alexis Palmer, Noah A Smith, and Arthur Spirling. 2023. Using proprietary language models in academic research requires explicit justification. Nature Computational Science, (2023), 1–2.
[47]
Kishore Papineni, Salim Roukos, Todd Ward, and Wei-Jing Zhu. 2002. Bleu: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. In Proceedings of the 40th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics., 311–318.
[48]
Dylan Patel and Gerald Wong. 2023. GPT-4 Architecture, Infrastructure, Training Dataset, Costs, Vision, MoE. https://www.semianalysis.com/p/gpt-4-architecture-infrastructure. [Accessed 19-01-2024].
[49]
Guilherme Penedo, Quentin Malartic, Daniel Hesslow, Ruxandra Cojocaru, Alessandro Cappelli, Hamza Alobeidli, Baptiste Pannier, Ebtesam Almazrouei, and Julien Launay. 2023. The RefinedWeb dataset for Falcon LLM: outperforming curated corpora with web data, and web data only. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.01116, (2023),.
[50]
Charith Peris, Christophe Dupuy, Jimit Majmudar, Rahil Parikh, Sami Smaili, Richard Zemel, and Rahul Gupta. 2023. Privacy in the Time of Language Models. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining., 1291–1292.
[51]
Jon Porter. 2023. ChatGPT continues to be one of the fastest-growing services ever. The Verge, (Nov 2023),.
[52]
Alec Radford, Karthik Narasimhan, Tim Salimans, Ilya Sutskever, 2018. Improving language understanding by generative pre-training., (2018),.
[53]
Alec Radford, Jeffrey Wu, Rewon Child, David Luan, Dario Amodei, Ilya Sutskever, 2019. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI blog 1, 8 (2019), 9.
[54]
Rafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Stefano Ermon, Christopher D Manning, and Chelsea Finn. 2023. Direct preference optimization: Your language model is secretly a reward model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.18290, (2023),.
[55]
Partha Pratim Ray. 2023. ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems, (2023),.
[56]
Anna Rogers, Niranjan Balasubramanian, Leon Derczynski, Jesse Dodge, Alexander Koller, Sasha Luccioni, Maarten Sap, Roy Schwartz, Noah A. Smith, and Emma Strubell. 2023. Closed AI Models Make Bad Baselines. https://hackingsemantics.xyz/2023/closed-baselines/
[57]
Victor Sanh, Albert Webson, Colin Raffel, Stephen H. Bach, Lintang Sutawika, Zaid Alyafeai, Antoine Chaffin, Arnaud Stiegler, Teven Le Scao, Arun Raja, Manan Dey, M Saiful Bari, Canwen Xu, Urmish Thakker, Shanya Sharma, Eliza Szczechla, Taewoon Kim, Gunjan Chhablani, Nihal V. Nayak, Debajyoti Datta, Jonathan Chang, Mike Tian-Jian Jiang, Han Wang, Matteo Manica, Sheng Shen, Zheng-Xin Yong, Harshit Pandey, Michael McKenna, Rachel Bawden, Thomas Wang, Trishala Neeraj, Jos Rozen, Abheesht Sharma, Andrea Santilli, Thibault Fevry, Jason Alan Fries, Ryan Teehan, Tali Bers, Stella Biderman, Leo Gao, Thomas Wolf, and Alexander M. Rush. 2022. Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalization. In International Conference on Learning Representations.,. https://research.ibm.com/publications/multitask-prompt-tuning-enables-zero-shot-task-generalization
[58]
Rosamond Thalken, Edward Stiglitz, David Mimno, and Matthew Wilkens. 2023. Modeling Legal Reasoning: LM Annotation at the Edge of Human Agreement. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing., 9252–9265.
[59]
Hugo Touvron, Thibaut Lavril, Gautier Izacard, Xavier Martinet, Marie-Anne Lachaux, Timothée Lacroix, Baptiste Rozière, Naman Goyal, Eric Hambro, Faisal Azhar, 2023. Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13971, (2023),.
[60]
Hugo Touvron, Louis Martin, Kevin Stone, Peter Albert, Amjad Almahairi, Yasmine Babaei, Nikolay Bashlykov, Soumya Batra, Prajjwal Bhargava, Shruti Bhosale, 2023. Llama 2: Open foundation and fine-tuned chat models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.09288, (2023),.
[61]
Tao Tu, Shekoofeh Azizi, Danny Driess, Mike Schaekermann, Mohamed Amin, Pi-Chuan Chang, Andrew Carroll, Chuck Lau, Ryutaro Tanno, Ira Ktena, 2023. Towards generalist biomedical AI. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.14334, (2023),.
[62]
Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. 2017. Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems 30, (2017),.
[63]
Ethan Waisberg, Joshua Ong, Nasif Zaman, Sharif Amit Kamran, Prithul Sarker, Alireza Tavakkoli, and Andrew G Lee. 2023. GPT-4 for triaging ophthalmic symptoms. Eye 37, 18 (2023), 3874–3875.
[64]
Wei Wang, Vincent W Zheng, Han Yu, and Chunyan Miao. 2019. A survey of zero-shot learning: Settings, methods, and applications. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST) 10, 2 (2019), 1–37.
[65]
Zengzhi Wang, Qiming Xie, Zixiang Ding, Yi Feng, and Rui Xia. 2023. Is ChatGPT a good sentiment analyzer? A preliminary study. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.04339, (2023),.
[66]
Nicolas Webersinke, Mathias Kraus, Julia Anna Bingler, and Markus Leippold. 2021. Climatebert: A pretrained language model for climate-related text. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.12010, (2021),.
[67]
Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma, Fei Xia, Ed Chi, Quoc V Le, Denny Zhou, 2022. Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 (2022), 24824–24837.
[68]
Bingbing Wen, Bill Howe, and Lucy Lu Wang. 2024. Characterizing LLM Abstention Behavior in Science QA with Context Perturbations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.12452 (2024).
[69]
Thomas Wolf, Lysandre Debut, Victor Sanh, Julien Chaumond, Clement Delangue, Anthony Moi, Pierric Cistac, Tim Rault, Rémi Louf, Morgan Funtowicz, 2019. Huggingface’s transformers: State-of-the-art natural language processing. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.03771, (2019),.
[70]
Lukas Wutschitz, Huseyin A. Inan, and Andre Manoel. 2022. dp-transformers: Training transformer models with differential privacy. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/project/dp-transformers.
[71]
Wen-wai Yim, A Ben Abacha, N Snider, G Adams, and Meliha Yetisgen. 2023. Overview of the mediqa-sum task at imageclef 2023: Summarization and classification of doctor-patient conversations. In CLEF.,.
[72]
Ashkan Yousefpour, Igor Shilov, Alexandre Sablayrolles, Davide Testuggine, Karthik Prasad, Mani Malek, John Nguyen, Sayan Ghosh, Akash Bharadwaj, Jessica Zhao, 2021. Opacus: User-friendly differential privacy library in PyTorch. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.12298, (2021),.
[73]
Da Yu, Saurabh Naik, Arturs Backurs, Sivakanth Gopi, Huseyin A Inan, Gautam Kamath, Janardhan Kulkarni, Yin Tat Lee, Andre Manoel, Lukas Wutschitz, 2021. Differentially private fine-tuning of language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.06500, (2021),.
[74]
Elad Ben Zaken, Yoav Goldberg, and Shauli Ravfogel. 2022. BitFit: Simple Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning for Transformer-based Masked Language-models. In Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers)., 1–9.
[75]
Antonia Zapf, Stefanie Castell, Lars Morawietz, and André Karch. 2016. Measuring inter-rater reliability for nominal data – which coefficients and confidence intervals are appropriate?BMC Medical Research Methodology 16, 1 (Aug. 2016), 93. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0200-9
[76]
Tianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q Weinberger, and Yoav Artzi. 2019. BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT. In International Conference on Learning Representations.,.
[77]
Lianmin Zheng, Wei-Lin Chiang, Ying Sheng, Siyuan Zhuang, Zhanghao Wu, Yonghao Zhuang, Zi Lin, Zhuohan Li, Dacheng Li, Eric P. Xing, Hao Zhang, Joseph E. Gonzalez, and Ion Stoica. 2023. Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena. arxiv:2306.05685 [cs.CL]
Index Terms
- Laboratory-Scale AI: Open-Weight Models are Competitive with ChatGPT Even in Low-Resource Settings
Recommendations
Open government and e-government: democratic challenges from a public value perspective
Special issue on Open Government and Public Participation: Issues and Challenges in Creating Public ValueWe argue that the Obama Administration's Open Government Initiative blurs distinctions between e-democracy and e-government by incorporating historically democratic practices. now enabled by emerging technology. within administrative agencies. We ...
Open government and e-government: democratic challenges from a public value perspective
dg.o '11: Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging TimesWe consider open government (OG) within the context of e-government and its broader implications for the future of public administration. We argue that the current US Administration's Open Government Initiative blurs traditional distinctions between e-...
Contrasting perceptions about transparency, citizen participation, and open government between civil society organization and government
The concepts of Transparency, Citizen Participation and Open Government is increasingly being used by politicians, public officials and civil society. Open Government strategies are being assumed by public administration at different levels of ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
June 2024
2580 pages
ISBN:9798400704505
DOI:10.1145/3630106
Copyright © 2024 Owner/Author.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike International 4.0 License.
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 05 June 2024
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
FAccT '24
FAccT '24: The 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency
June 3 - 6, 2024
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 222Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)222
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)85
Reflects downloads up to 03 Sep 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML FormatGet Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in