Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3639631.3639643acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesacaiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Index system and method of power grid risk assessment with participation of adjustable source and load resources

Published: 16 February 2024 Publication History

Abstract

In response to the problem that traditional power grid risk assessment methods cannot simultaneously meet the risk assessment needs of the three sides of the source load after large-scale access of adjustable resources on both sides of the source load, this article constructs a power grid risk assessment index system that considers the participation of adjustable resources on both sides of the source load, and explores the quantification of index parameters and the overall risk calculation method of the system. Firstly, this article analyzes the influencing factors of power grid operation risk and constructs a power grid risk assessment index system based on each influencing factor; Secondly, design a quantitative calculation and expression method for the severity and probability of occurrence of each risk indicator; Finally, a comprehensive calculation method for system overall risk based on improved AHP was designed, and the corresponding operational risk level was determined. The simulation analysis of the indicator system and evaluation method using an improved IEEE-14 node system shows that the risk indicator system and evaluation method constructed in this paper can simultaneously predict the risk of source network load, and have certain practicality and effectiveness.

References

[1]
Liao Jianbo, Wu Kailin, Liu Peng. Power Balance Method Oriented to Synergy of Source-Network-Load-Storage of New Power System [J]. Electric Engineering, 2022(10): 132-138.
[2]
Kang Chongqing, Yao Liangzhong. Key scientific issues and theoretical research framework for power systems with high proportion of renewable energy [J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems. 2017, 41(9): 3-11.
[3]
Chen Lizheng. Power System Risk Assessment Considering Extreme Weather Events [D].Jinan: Shandong University, 2018.
[4]
Wang Yongming, Yin Zili, Li lin, Risk assessment method for distribution network considering operation state in the scene of typhoon disaster [J]. Proceeding of the CSU-EPSA, 2018, 30(12): 60-65.
[5]
Yu L, Lv J, Peng Q, Research on influencing factors of power grid security risk based on “Cognitive-Constraint” model[C]// Journal of Physics: Conference Series. Suzhou, China, 2021, 1771(1): 012005.
[6]
Tang Lei, Shen Chen, Zhang Xuemin. Impact of large-scale wind power centralized integration on transient angle stability of power systems—Part II: Factors affecting transient angle stability [J]. Chinese journal of electrical engineering, 2015, 35(16): 4043-4051.
[7]
Wang L, Yuan M, Zhang F, Research on large-scale photovoltaic planning based on risk assessment in distribution network [J]. Journal of Electrical Engineering & Technology, 2020, 15: 1107-1114.
[8]
Wang Yifeng, Tang Wei, Liu Ludeng, Construction and application of power grid operation risk assessment and rating system [J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems. 2015, 39(8): 141-148.
[9]
Shang Haoyu, Liu Tianqi, Bu Tao, Operational Risk Assessment of Power System Considering Wind Power and Photovoltaic Grid Connection [J]. Modern Electric Power, 2020, 37(04): 358-367.
[10]
Li Jinghua, Zuo Junjun, Wang Sai. Analysis and assessment of operation risk for power system with large-scale wind power integration [J]. Power System Technology, 2016, 40(11): 3503-3513.
[11]
Chen Rui, Liu Shuo, He Xianqiang, Risk assessment and optimal dispatching considering source-network uncertainty [J]. Proceeding of the CSU-EPSA, 1-10[2023-02-28]. cnki. csu-epsa. 001094.
[12]
Mu Yongzheng, Lu Zongxiang, Qiao Ying, A comprehensive evaluation index system of power grid security and benefit based on multi-operator fuzzy hierarchy evaluation method [J]. Power System Technology, 2015, 39(01): 23-28.
[13]
Mao Tian, Huang Ningxin, Cheng Renli, Construction of the benefit evaluation index system of virtual power plant and its example analysis [J]. Southern Power System Technology. 2022: 16(06): 124-131.
[14]
Bin Junji, Liao Kai, Li Bo. High dimensional model and risk assessment of casading fault considering the randomness of source and load [J]. Proceeding of the CSU-EPSA, 1-10[2023-02-28]. cnki. csu-epsa. 001118.
[15]
Li Dexin, Tian Chunguang, Lv Xiangyu, Planning of energy storage system for power grid peaking shaving and frequency regulation based on AHP and CRITIC [J]. Journal of Power Supply, 2021, 19(02): 136-141.
[16]
Tao Yibin, Xue Jinhua, Wang Deshun, Comprehensive Performance Evaluation of BESS for Power Grid Peaking and Frequency Regulation [J]. Power Technology, 2021, 45(6): 764-767.
[17]
Li Yuan, Li Fengting, Wang Sen, Credit evaluation of electricity sales companies based on improved coefficient of variation method and BP neural network [J]. Power System Technology. 2022, 46(11): 4228-4237. 2022.0062.
[18]
Xing Yahong, Meng Changhong, Huang Qian, Multi-objective two-layer planning of electric vehicle charging station considering wind-landscape output uncertainty [J]. Journal of taiyuan university of science and technology, 1-11[2023-02-13].
[19]
Dong Kai, Cai Xinlei, Cui Yanlin, Aggregation modeling based on markov chain and multi-mode control strategies of aggregated electric vehicles for frequency regulation [J]. Power System Technology, 2022, 46(02): 622-634. j.1000-3673.pst.2021.0243.

Index Terms

  1. Index system and method of power grid risk assessment with participation of adjustable source and load resources
      Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ACAI '23: Proceedings of the 2023 6th International Conference on Algorithms, Computing and Artificial Intelligence
      December 2023
      371 pages
      ISBN:9798400709203
      DOI:10.1145/3639631
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 16 February 2024

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tag

      1. Risk Level;Risk assessment;Index parameter

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Conference

      ACAI 2023

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 173 of 395 submissions, 44%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • 0
        Total Citations
      • 9
        Total Downloads
      • Downloads (Last 12 months)9
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
      Reflects downloads up to 16 Feb 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format.

      HTML Format

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media