Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3643650.3658611acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescodaspyConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Exploring the Impact of Increased Health Information Accessibility in Cyberspace on Trust and Self-care Practices

Published: 19 June 2024 Publication History

Abstract

More health information is in cyberspace than ever before, presenting both opportunities and challenges for health information seeking and self-care practices, particularly in underserved populations who face health disparities for various reasons including limited healthcare access and high costs. We have investigated the effect of increased health information accessibility in cyberspace on self-care practices and trust in underserved populations of African descent by surveying how increased health information accessibility in cyberspace affects self-care practices and trust in underserved. Our study observed that online health information seeking is pervasive, growing exponentially, and driven by convenience and accessibility of resources, regardless of access to healthcare providers. However, participants expressed concerns about trustworthiness, accuracy, and potential misdiagnosis or inappropriate treatment choices. So, it is important to focus on enhancing the trustworthiness and quality of online health information, implementing verification mechanisms to reduce misinformation, and addressing underlying factors driving self-medication. The paper details the result of our study and contributes to the existing literature by providing a deeper understanding of the motivations, experiences, and outcomes of online health information use and self-care practices among underserved communities of African descent. Our investigation also highlights the need for further research and interventions to address the challenges and opportunities that arise from the increased accessibility of health information in cyberspace and self-care practices in underserved populations.

References

[1]
Eman A Abahussain and Douglas E Ball. 2007. Disposal of unwanted medicines from households in Kuwait. Pharmacy world & science 29 (2007), 368--373.
[2]
Rasheed A Adeyemi, Temesgen Zewotir, and Shaun Ramroop. 2019. Joint spatial mapping of childhood anemia and malnutrition in sub-Saharan Africa: a crosssectional study of small-scale geographical disparities. African health sciences 19, 3 (2019), 2692--2712.
[3]
Wuraola Akande-Sholabi, Amen T Ajamu, and Rasaq Adisa. 2021. Prevalence, knowledge and perception of self-medication practice among undergraduate healthcare students. Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice 14, 1 (2021), 49.
[4]
Catherine Audrin and Bertrand Audrin. 2022. Key factors in digital literacy in learning and education: a systematic literature review using text mining. Education and Information Technologies 27, 6 (2022), 7395--7419.
[5]
Gopi Battineni, Simone Baldoni, Nalini Chintalapudi, Getu Gamo Sagaro, Graziano Pallotta, Giulio Nittari, and Francesco Amenta. 2020. Factors affecting the quality and reliability of online health information. Digital health 6 (2020), 2055207620948996.
[6]
Darshana Bennadi. 2013. Self-medication: A current challenge. Journal of basic and clinical pharmacy 5, 1 (2013), 19.
[7]
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2023. 18 Approaches to thematic analysis. Starting Research in Clinical Education (2023), 165.
[8]
Wen-ying Sylvia Chou, Yvonne M Hunt, Ellen B Beckjord, Richard P Moser, and Bradford W Hesse. 2009. Social media use in the United States: implications for health communication. Journal of medical Internet research 11, 4 (2009), e1249.
[9]
John W Creswell and J David Creswell. 2023. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
[10]
Ayogeboh Epizitone, Smangele Pretty Moyane, and Israel Edem Agbehadji. 2023. A systematic literature review of health information systems for healthcare. In Healthcare, Vol. 11. MDPI, 959.
[11]
Benjamin Eysenbach, Matthieu Geist, Sergey Levine, and Ruslan Salakhutdinov. 2023. A Connection between One-Step Regularization and Critic Regularization in Reinforcement Learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.12968 (2023).
[12]
Annabel Farnood, Bridget Johnston, and Frances S Mair. 2020. A mixed methods systematic review of the effects of patient online self-diagnosing in the "smartphone society'on the healthcare professional-patient relationship and medical authority. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 20 (2020), 1--14. ACM SaT-CPS 2024, June 21, 2024, Porto, Portugal Clark, O et al.
[13]
Susannah Fox and Maeve Duggan. 2013. Health Online 2013. Pew Research Center. National survey by the Pew Research Center's Internet and American Life Project (2013).
[14]
Lisa Neal Gualtieri. 2009. The doctor as the second opinion and the internet as the first. In CHI'09 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2489--2498.
[15]
Bradford W Hesse, David E Nelson, Gary L Kreps, Robert T Croyle, Neeraj K Arora, Barbara K Rimer, and Kasisomayajula Viswanath. 2005. Trust and sources of health information: the impact of the Internet and its implications for health care providers: findings from the first Health Information National Trends Survey. Archives of internal medicine 165, 22 (2005), 2618--2624.
[16]
Stephen Holland, Jamie Cawthra, Tamara Schloemer, and Peter Schröder-Bäck. 2022. Trust and the acquisition and use of public health information. Health Care Analysis (2022), 1--17.
[17]
Mila Nu Nu Htay, Laurence Lloyd Parial, Ma Carmen Tolabing, Kevin Dadaczynski, Orkan Okan, Angela Yee Man Leung, and Tin Tin Su. 2022. Digital health literacy, online information-seeking behaviour, and satisfaction of Covid-19 information among the university students of East and South-East Asia. PLoS One 17, 4 (2022), e0266276.
[18]
X Jia, Y Pang, and LS Liu. 2021. Online Health Information Seeking Behavior: A Systematic Review. Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) 9, 12 (2021), 1740--1740.
[19]
Jaime Ibarra Jimenez, Hamid Jahankhani, and Stefan Kendzierskyj. 2020. Health care in the cyberspace: Medical cyber-physical system and digital twin challenges. Digital twin technologies and smart cities (2020), 79--92.
[20]
Jennifer L Kraschnewski, Cynthia H Chuang, Erika S Poole, Tamara Peyton, Ian Blubaugh, Jaimey Pauli, Alyssa Feher, and Madhu Reddy. 2014. Paging ?Dr. Google": does technology fill the gap created by the prenatal care visit structure? Qualitative focus group study with pregnant women. Journal of medical Internet research 16, 6 (2014), e3385.
[21]
Amanda Krupa, Jill B Roark, and Kirsten Barrett. [n. d.]. The Critical Role of Web Accessibility in Health Information Access, Understanding, and Use. Technical Report. Mathematica Policy Research.
[22]
Feifei Liu. 2020. How information-seeking behavior has changed in 22 years. Nielsen Norman Group (2020).
[23]
Zhi-Wei Liu. 2022. Research Progress and Model Construction for Online Health Information Seeking Behavior. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics 6 (2022), 706164.
[24]
Sharan B Merriam and Elizabeth J Tisdell. 2015. Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
[25]
Ogbonnaya I Omenka, Dennis PWatson, and Hugh C Hendrie. 2020. Understanding the healthcare experiences and needs of African immigrants in the United States: a scoping review. BMC Public Health 20 (2020), 1--13.
[26]
Kanayo Patrick Osemene and Adebayo Lamikanra. 2012. A study of the prevalence of self-medication practice among university students in Southwestern Nigeria. Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research 11, 4 (2012), 683--689.
[27]
MB Parish and B Madahar. 2016. Understanding Cyberspace Through Cyber Situational Awareness. The Defence Science and Technology Laboratory: Wiltshire, UK (2016).
[28]
Alberto Sardi, Alessandro Rizzi, Enrico Sorano, and Anna Guerrieri. 2020. Cyber risk in health facilities: A systematic literature review. Sustainability 12, 17 (2020), 7002.
[29]
Ansam F Sawalha. 2008. A descriptive study of self-medication practices among Palestinian medical and nonmedical university students. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy 4, 2 (2008), 164--172.
[30]
Elizabeth Sillence, Pam Briggs, Lesley Fishwick, and Peter Harris. 2004. Trust and mistrust of online health sites. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 663--670.
[31]
Michael Sony, Jiju Antony, and Olivia McDermott. 2022. The impact of medical cyber--physical systems on healthcare service delivery. The TQM Journal 34, 7 (2022), 73--93.
[32]
Saira Hanif Soroya, Adeel Ur Rehman, and Anthony Faiola. 2023. Exploring the impact of Internet and media sources exposure on self-care behavior: mediating the role of health anxiety, literacy and information-seeking behavior. Kybernetes (2023).
[33]
Pei Wu and Runtong Zhang. 2022. Exploring the effects of health information seeking on e-satisfaction in online health communities: an empirical investigation. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 22, 1 (2022), 332.
[34]
Donna M Zulman, Eve A Kerr, Timothy P Hofer, Michele Heisler, and Brian J Zikmund-Fisher. 2010. Patient-provider concordance in the prioritization of health conditions among hypertensive diabetes patients. Journal of general internal medicine 25 (2010), 408--414

Index Terms

  1. Exploring the Impact of Increased Health Information Accessibility in Cyberspace on Trust and Self-care Practices

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SaT-CPS '24: Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Workshop on Secure and Trustworthy Cyber-Physical Systems
    June 2024
    97 pages
    ISBN:9798400705557
    DOI:10.1145/3643650
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 19 June 2024

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. cyberspace
    2. misinformation
    3. online health information (ohi)
    4. trust
    5. underserved populations

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    CODASPY '24
    Sponsor:

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 102
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)102
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)48
    Reflects downloads up to 04 Oct 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Get Access

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media