Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Dynamic Environment Responsive Online Meta-Learning with Fairness Awareness

Published: 29 April 2024 Publication History

Abstract

The fairness-aware online learning framework has emerged as a potent tool within the context of continuous lifelong learning. In this scenario, the learner’s objective is to progressively acquire new tasks as they arrive over time, while also guaranteeing statistical parity among various protected sub-populations, such as race and gender when it comes to the newly introduced tasks. A significant limitation of current approaches lies in their heavy reliance on the i.i.d (independent and identically distributed) assumption concerning data, leading to a static regret analysis of the framework. Nevertheless, it’s crucial to note that achieving low static regret does not necessarily translate to strong performance in dynamic environments characterized by tasks sampled from diverse distributions. In this article, to tackle the fairness-aware online learning challenge in evolving settings, we introduce a unique regret measure, FairSAR, by incorporating long-term fairness constraints into a strongly adapted loss regret framework. Moreover, to determine an optimal model parameter at each time step, we introduce an innovative adaptive fairness-aware online meta-learning algorithm, referred to as FairSAOML. This algorithm possesses the ability to adjust to dynamic environments by effectively managing bias control and model accuracy. The problem is framed as a bi-level convex-concave optimization, considering both the model’s primal and dual parameters, which pertain to its accuracy and fairness attributes, respectively. Theoretical analysis yields sub-linear upper bounds for both loss regret and the cumulative violation of fairness constraints. Our experimental evaluation of various real-world datasets in dynamic environments demonstrates that our proposed FairSAOML algorithm consistently outperforms alternative approaches rooted in the most advanced prior online learning methods.

References

[1]
Dan Biddle. 2006. Adverse impact and test validation: A practitioner’s guide to valid and defensible employment testing. Gower, page 220. DOI:
[2]
Nicolò Cesa-Bianchi and Gábor Lugosi. 2006. Prediction, Learning, and Games. Cambridge University Press
[3]
Amit Daniely, Alon Gonen, and Shai Shalev-Shwartz. 2015. Strongly adaptive online learning. In Proceedings of the ICML.
[4]
Cynthia Dwork, et al. 2012. Fairness through awareness. In Proceedings of the 3rd Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference.
[5]
Chelsea Finn, Pieter Abbeel, and Sergey Levine. 2017. Model-agnostic meta-learning for fast adaptation of deep networks. In Proceedings of the ICML.
[6]
Chelsea Finn, Aravind Rajeswaran, Sham Kakade, and Sergey Levine. 2019. Online meta-learning. In Proceedings of the ICML.
[7]
András Gyorgy, Tamás Linder, and Gábor Lugosi. 2012. Efficient tracking of large classes of experts. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 58, 11 (2012), 6709–6725.
[8]
Moritz Hardt, Eric Price, and Nati Srebro. 2016. Equality of opportunity in supervised learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 3323–3331.
[9]
Elad Hazan and Edgar Minasyan. 2020. Faster projection-free online learning. In Proceedings of the 33rd Conference on Learning Theory.
[10]
Elad Hazan, and Comandur Seshadhri. 2007. Adaptive algorithms for online decision problems. Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity (ECCC). 14, 088 (2007).
[11]
Rodolphe Jenatton, Jim Huang, and Cedric Archambeau. 2016. Adaptive algorithms for online convex optimization with long-term constraints. Proceedings of the ICML.
[12]
Kwang-Sung Jun, Francesco Orabona, Stephen Wright, and Rebecca Willett. 2017. Improved strongly adaptive online learning using coin betting. In Proceedings of the AISTATS.
[13]
Pang Wei Koh, Shiori Sagawa, Henrik Marklund, Sang Michael Xie, Marvin Zhang, Akshay Balsubramani, Weihua Hu, Michihiro Yasunaga, Richard Lanas Phillips, Irena Gao, Tony Lee, Etienne David, Ian Stavness, Wei Guo, Berton Earnshaw, Imran Haque, Sara M. Beery, Jure Leskovec, Anshul Kundaje, Emma Pierson, Sergey Levine, Chelsea Finn, and Percy Liang. 2021. WILDS: A benchmark of in-the-wild distribution shifts. In Proceedings of the ICML.
[14]
Michael Lohaus, Michael Perrot, and Ulrike Von Luxburg. 2020. Too relaxed to be fair. In Proceedings of the ICML.
[15]
Haipeng Luo and Robert E. Schapire. 2015. Achieving all with no parameters: Adanormalhedge. In Proceedings of the Conference on Learning Theory. PMLR, 1286–1304.
[16]
Mehrdad Mahdavi, Rong Jin, and Tianbao Yang. 2012. Trading regret for efficiency: online convex optimization with long term constraints. The Journal of Machine Learning Research 13.1 (2012), 2503–2528.
[17]
Jennifer Miller. 2020. Is an algorithm less racist than a loan officer? Retrieved Sept. 18 2020 fromhttps://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/18/business/digital-mortgages.html
[18]
Yuanyu Wan, Bo Xue, and Lijun Zhang. 2021. Projection-free online learning in dynamic environments. InProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
[19]
Zhuoyi Wang, Yuqiao Chen, Chen Zhao, Yu Lin, Xujiang Zhao, Hemeng Tao, Yigong Wang, and Latifur Khan. 2021. CLEAR: Contrastive-prototype learning with drift estimation for resource constrained stream mining. In Proceedings of the WWW.
[20]
Yongkai Wu, Lu Zhang, and Xintao Wu. 2019. On convexity and bounds of fairness-aware classification. In Proceedings of the WWW.
[21]
Jiahao Xie, Zebang Shen, Chao Zhang, Boyu Wang, and Hui Qian. 2020. Efficient projection-free online methods with stochastic recursive gradient. In Proceedings of the AAAI.
[22]
Jianjun Yuan and Andrew Lamperski. 2018. Online convex optimization for cumulative constraints. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 6140–6149.
[23]
Lijun Zhang, Shiyin Lu, and Tianbao Yang. 2020. Minimizing dynamic regret and adaptive regret simultaneously. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics.
[24]
Lijun Zhang, Shiyin Lu, and Zhi-Hua Zhou. 2018. Adaptive online learning in dynamic environments. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 1323–1333.
[25]
Chen Zhao. 2021. Fairness-Aware Multi-Task and Meta Learning. Ph. D. Dissertation.
[26]
Chen Zhao and Feng Chen. 2019. Rank-based multi-task learning for fair regression. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM).
[27]
Chen Zhao and Feng Chen. 2020. Unfairness discovery and prevention for few-shot regression. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Knowledge Graph (ICKG).
[28]
Chen Zhao, Feng Chen, and Bhavani Thuraisingham. 2021. Fairness-aware online meta-learning. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining.
[29]
Chen Zhao, Feng Mi, Xintao Wu, Kai Jiang, Latifur Khan, and Feng Chen. 2022. Adaptive fairness-aware online meta-learning for changing environments. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 2565–2575.
[30]
Martin Zinkevich. 2003. Online convex programming and generalized infinitesimal gradient ascent. In Proceedings of the ICML.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Algorithmic Fairness Generalization under Covariate and Dependence Shifts SimultaneouslyProceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining10.1145/3637528.3671909(4419-4430)Online publication date: 25-Aug-2024
  • (2024)3rd Workshop on Ethical Artificial Intelligence: Methods and Applications (EAI)Proceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining10.1145/3637528.3671482(6751-6752)Online publication date: 25-Aug-2024

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data
ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data  Volume 18, Issue 6
July 2024
760 pages
EISSN:1556-472X
DOI:10.1145/3613684
Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 29 April 2024
Online AM: 20 February 2024
Accepted: 15 December 2023
Received: 15 September 2023
Published in TKDD Volume 18, Issue 6

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Fairness
  2. online meta-learning
  3. changing environments
  4. adaption

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

  • Start-up fund of Baylor University, by the National Science Foundation
  • National Center for Transportation Cybersecurity and Resiliency (TraCR) headquartered in Clemson, South Carolina, USA

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)153
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)27
Reflects downloads up to 11 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Algorithmic Fairness Generalization under Covariate and Dependence Shifts SimultaneouslyProceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining10.1145/3637528.3671909(4419-4430)Online publication date: 25-Aug-2024
  • (2024)3rd Workshop on Ethical Artificial Intelligence: Methods and Applications (EAI)Proceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining10.1145/3637528.3671482(6751-6752)Online publication date: 25-Aug-2024

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Full Text

View this article in Full Text.

Full Text

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media