Just Accepted
“I really need your help with this work.”: A System for Navigating the Tricky Terrain of Managing Up by Leveraging One’s Motivation to Get Things Done
Accepted on 15 February 2024
Abstract
When people need help from their supervisors or peers, they often have to manage up to get things done. However, unlike managing subordinates (managing down), managing people of equal or higher status (managing up) are not obligated to help. These requests often involve collaborative tasks between requesters and performers. Through interviews, we found that these collaborative tasks require coordination work that is not materialized in existing management tools. We also found that requesters are willing to take on this coordination work to see their requests fulfilled. To address this issue, we propose a system called TaskLight, which allows requesters to handle coordination work themselves. For example, requesters can collect useful context and information for their performers. We conducted two deployment studies and found that TaskLight leads to better outcomes because requesters are able to assist performers more effectively. Our findings demonstrate a new way to reduce the social burdens of managing up and improve collaboration.
References
[1]
Mark S Ackerman. 2000. The intellectual challenge of CSCW: The gap between social requirements and technical feasibility. Human–Computer Interaction 15, 2-3 (2000), 179–203.
[2]
Noura Alomar, Nouf Almobarak, Sarah Alkoblan, Sarah Alhozaimy, and Shahad Alharbi. 2016. Usability engineering of agile software project management tools. In International Conference of Design, User Experience, and Usability. Springer, 197–208.
[3]
Maruthi Rohit Ayyagari and Issa Atoum. 2019. Understanding Customer Voice of Project Portfolio Management Software. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications 10, 5(2019). https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2019.0100508
[4]
Rosanne Badowski and Roger Gittines. 2004. Managing up: How to forge an effective relationship with those above you. Currency.
[5]
Aruna D Balakrishnan, Tara Matthews, and Thomas P Moran. 2010. Fitting an activity-centric system into an ecology of workplace tools. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 787–790.
[6]
Peter Bamberger. 2009. Employee help-seeking: Antecedents, consequences and new insights for future research. In Research in personnel and human resources management. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
[7]
Victoria Bellotti, Brinda Dalal, Nathaniel Good, Peter Flynn, Daniel G Bobrow, and Nicolas Ducheneaut. 2004. What a to-do: studies of task management towards the design of a personal task list manager. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 735–742.
[8]
Victoria Bellotti, Nicolas Ducheneaut, Mark Howard, and Ian Smith. 2003. Taking email to task: the design and evaluation of a task management centered email tool. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 345–352.
[9]
Ofer Bergman, Ruth Beyth-Marom, and Rafi Nachmias. 2006. The project fragmentation problem in personal information management. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems. 271–274.
[10]
Ofer Bergman, Ruth Beyth-Marom, Rafi Nachmias, Noa Gradovitch, and Steve Whittaker. 2008. Improved search engines and navigation preference in personal information management. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 26, 4 (2008), 1–24.
[11]
Ofer Bergman, Richard Boardman, Jacek Gwizdka, and William Jones. 2004. Personal information management. In Chi’04 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems. 1598–1599.
[12]
Michael S Bernstein, Max Van Kleek, MC Schraefel, and David R Karger. 2007. Management of personal information scraps. In CHI’07 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2285–2290.
[13]
Richard Boardman and M Angela Sasse. 2004. ” Stuff goes into the computer and doesn’t come out” a cross-tool study of personal information management. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 583–590.
[14]
Mark C Bolino, K Michele Kacmar, William H Turnley, and J Bruce Gilstrap. 2008. A multi-level review of impression management motives and behaviors. Journal of Management 34, 6 (2008), 1080–1109.
[15]
Marcelo Cataldo, Patrick A. Wagstrom, James D. Herbsleb, and Kathleen M. Carley. 2006. Identification of coordination requirements: implications for the Design of collaboration and awareness tools. In Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on Computer supported cooperative work - CSCW ’06. ACM Press, 353. https://doi.org/10.1145/1180875.1180929
[16]
Elizabeth F Churchill. 2017. Planning time: HCI’s project-management challenges. Interactions 24, 5 (2017), 20–21.
[17]
Justin Cranshaw, Emad Elwany, Todd Newman, Rafal Kocielnik, Bowen Yu, Sandeep Soni, Jaime Teevan, and Andrés Monroy-Hernández. 2017. Calendar. help: Designing a workflow-based scheduling agent with humans in the loop. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2382–2393.
[18]
Nicola Dell, Vidya Vaidyanathan, Indrani Medhi, Edward Cutrell, and William Thies. 2012. ” Yours is better!” participant response bias in HCI. In Proceedings of the sigchi conference on human factors in computing systems. 1321–1330.
[19]
Nicolas Ducheneaut and Victoria Bellotti. 2001. E-mail as habitat: an exploration of embedded personal information management. interactions 8, 5 (2001), 30–38.
[20]
Thomas Erickson. 2006. From PIM to GIM: personal information management in group contexts. Commun. ACM 49, 1 (2006), 74–75.
[21]
Thomas Erickson and Wendy A. Kellogg. 2000. Social Translucence: An Approach to Designing Systems That Support Social Processes. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 7, 1 (mar 2000), 59–83. https://doi.org/10.1145/344949.345004
[22]
Oren Etzioni, Alon Y Halevy, Henry M Levy, and Luke K McDowell. 2003. Semantic Email: Adding Lightweight Data Manipulation Capabilities to the Email Habitat. In WebDB. 13–18.
[23]
Danyel Fisher. 2004. Social and temporal structures in everyday collaboration (dissertation). Ph.D. Dissertation.
[24]
Fernando Flores, Michael Graves, Brad Hartfield, and Terry Winograd. 1988. Computer systems and the design of organizational interaction. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 6, 2 (1988), 153–172. https://doi.org/10.1145/45941.45943
[25]
freshdesk 2010. Freshdesk. https://freshdesk.com/.
[26]
Werner Geyer, Michael J Muller, Martin Thomas Moore, Eric Wilcox, L-T Cheng, Beth Brownholtz, Charles Hill, and David R Millen. 2006. Activity Explorer: Activity-centric collaboration from research to product. IBM Systems Journal 45, 4 (2006), 713–738.
[27]
Werner Geyer, Jürgen Vogel, Li-Te Cheng, and Michael Muller. 2003. Supporting activity-centric collaboration through peer-to-peer shared objects. In Proceedings of the 2003 international ACM SIGGROUP conference on Supporting group work. 115–124.
[28]
Victor M González and Gloria Mark. 2004. ” Constant, constant, multi-tasking craziness” managing multiple working spheres. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 113–120.
[29]
Catherine Grevet, David Choi, Debra Kumar, and Eric Gilbert. 2014. Overload is overloaded: email in the age of Gmail. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) (CHI ’14). 793–802. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557013
[30]
Jonathan Grudin. 1988. Why CSCW applications fail: problems in the design and evaluationof organizational interfaces. In Proceedings of the 1988 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work. 85–93.
[31]
Jacek Gwizdka. 2002. Reinventing the inbox: supporting the management of pending tasks in email. In CHI’02 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 550–551.
[32]
Jacek Gwizdka. 2002. TaskView: design and evaluation of a task-based email interface. http://eprints.rclis.org/13700/1/GwizdkaJ-2002-CASCON-Conf.pdf Accessed 12 Jan 2022.
[33]
Sandra G Hart and Lowell E Staveland. 1988. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In Advances in psychology. Vol. 52. Elsevier, 139–183.
[34]
James Hollan, Edwin Hutchins, and David Kirsh. 2000. Distributed cognition: toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 7, 2(2000), 174–196.
[35]
Julie S Hui, Darren Gergle, and Elizabeth M Gerber. 2018. Introassist: A tool to support writing introductory help requests. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13.
[36]
Caryn Ines. 2017. Managing Up and Across. (2017).
[37]
Anthony M Johnson. 2019. ‘‘I Can Turn It on When I Need To’’: Pre-college Integration, Culture, and Peer Academic Engagement among Black and Latino/a Engineering Students. Sociology of Education 92, 1 (2019), 1–20.
[38]
Heather A Johnson. 2017. Trello. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA 105, 2 (2017), 209.
[39]
William Jones. 2004. Finders, keepers? The present and future perfect in support of personal information management. First monday (2004).
[40]
William Jones, Abe Wenning, and Harry Bruce. 2014. How do people re-find files, emails and web pages?iConference 2014 Proceedings(2014).
[41]
David R Karger and William Jones. 2006. Data unification in personal information management. Commun. ACM 49, 1 (2006), 77–82.
[42]
David R Karger and Dennis Quan. 2004. Collections: flexible, essential tools for information management. In CHI’04 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. 1159–1162.
[43]
David R Karger and Dennis Quan. 2004. Haystack: a user interface for creating, browsing, and organizing arbitrary semistructured information. In CHI’04 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. 777–778.
[44]
Harmanpreet Kaur, Alex C Williams, Anne Loomis Thompson, Walter S Lasecki, Shamsi T Iqbal, and Jaime Teevan. 2018. Creating better action plans for writing tasks via vocabulary-based planning. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW(2018), 1–22.
[45]
Nicolas Kokkalis, Thomas Köhn, Johannes Huebner, Moontae Lee, Florian Schulze, and Scott R Klemmer. 2013. Taskgenies: Automatically providing action plans helps people complete tasks. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 20, 5(2013), 1–25.
[46]
Nicolas Kokkalis, Thomas Köhn, Carl Pfeiffer, Dima Chornyi, Michael S Bernstein, and Scott R Klemmer. 2013. EmailValet: Managing email overload through private, accountable crowdsourcing. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work. 1291–1300.
[47]
Sanjiv Kumar, Vivek S Adhish, and Abhimanyu Chauhan. 2015. Managing bosses and peers. Indian journal of community medicine: official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine 40, 1 (2015), 14.
[48]
Kostadin Kushlev and Elizabeth W. Dunn. 2015. Checking email less frequently reduces stress. Comput. Hum. Behav. 43(2015), 220–228.
[49]
LT Leung, TJ Humphreys, and AJ Weakley. 2008. Email as co-habitat in distributed organisations. In Australian Computer Human Interaction Conference. ACM Digital Library.
[50]
Kurt Luther, Kevin Ziegler, Kelly E Caine, and Amy Bruckman. 2009. Predicting successful completion of online collaborative animation projects. In Proceedings of the seventh ACM conference on Creativity and cognition. 391–392.
[51]
Wayne G Lutters, Mark S Ackerman, and Xiaomu Zhou. 2007. Group information management. Personal information management(2007), 236–248.
[52]
Wendy E Mackay. 1988. More than just a communication system: diversity in the use of electronic mail. In Proceedings of the 1988 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work. 344–353.
[53]
Thomas W Malone, Kenneth R Grant, Kum-Yew Lai, Ramana Rao, and David Rosenblitt. 1987. Semistructured messages are surprisingly useful for computer-supported coordination. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 5, 2 (1987), 115–131.
[54]
Gloria Mark, Shamsi T Iqbal, Mary Czerwinski, Paul Johns, Akane Sano, and Yuliya Lutchyn. 2016. Email duration, batching and self-interruption: Patterns of email use on productivity and stress. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1717–1728.
[55]
Kate McCready and Claire Stewart. 2017. Sheriff, IRS Auditor, Psychotherapist, Hostage Negotiator All in One: Project Management for Everyone. At the Helm: Leading Transformation: The Proceedings of the ACRL 2017 Conference, March 22–25, 2017, Baltimore, Maryland (Mar 2017), 597–603. https://experts.umn.edu/en/publications/sheriff-irs-auditor-psychotherapist-hostage-negotiator-all-in-one
[56]
Nora McDonald, Sarita Schoenebeck, and Andrea Forte. 2019. Reliability and inter-rater reliability in qualitative research: Norms and guidelines for CSCW and HCI practice. Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction 3, CSCW(2019), 1–23.
[57]
Luke McDowell, Oren Etzioni, Alon Halevy, and Henry Levy. 2004. Semantic email. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on World Wide Web. 244–254.
[58]
Joseph Edward McGrath. 1984. Groups: Interaction and performance. Vol. 14. Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
[59]
Thomas P Moran, Alex Cozzi, and Stephen P Farrell. 2005. Unified activity management: supporting people in e-business. Commun. ACM 48, 12 (2005), 67–70.
[60]
Michael Muller, Casey Dugan, Michael Brenndoerfer, Megan Monroe, and Werner Geyer. 2017. What did I ask you to do, by when, and for whom? Passion and compassion in request management. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 1009–1023.
[61]
Michael Muller, Casey Dugan, Aabhas Sharma, Werner Geyer, and Thomas Erickson. 2017. A Stick with a Handle at Each End: Socially Implicated Work Objects for Design of Collaborative Systems. In Proceedings of 15th European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work-Exploratory Papers. European Society for Socially Embedded Technologies (EUSSET).
[62]
Michael J Muller, Werner Geyer, Beth Brownholtz, Eric Wilcox, and David R Millen. 2004. One-hundred days in an activity-centric collaboration environment based on shared objects. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 375–382.
[63]
Michael J Muller and Daniel M Gruen. 2005. Working together inside an emailbox. In ECSCW 2005. Springer, 103–122.
[64]
Soya Park, April Yi Wang, Ban Kawas, Q Vera Liao, David Piorkowski, and Marina Danilevsky. 2021. Facilitating knowledge sharing from domain experts to data scientists for building nlp models. In 26th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. 585–596.
[65]
Soya Park, Amy X Zhang, Luke S Murray, and David R Karger. 2019. Opportunities for automating email processing: A need-finding study. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–12.
[66]
Ei Pa Pa Pe-Than, Laura Dabbish, and James D. Herbsleb. 2018. Collaborative Writing on GitHub: A Case Study of a Book Project. In Companion of the 2018 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. ACM, 305–308. https://doi.org/10.1145/3272973.3274083
[67]
James W Pennebaker, Martha E Francis, and Roger J Booth. 2001. Linguistic inquiry and word count: LIWC 2001. Mahway: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 71, 2001 (2001), 2001.
[68]
David Piorkowski, Soya Park, April Yi Wang, Dakuo Wang, Michael Muller, and Felix Portnoy. 2021. How AI Developers Overcome Communication Challenges in a Multidisciplinary Team: A Case Study. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5, CSCW1, Article 131 (apr 2021), 25 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3449205
[69]
Daniela Retelny, Michael S. Bernstein, and Melissa A. Valentine. 2017. No Workflow Can Ever Be Enough: How Crowdsourcing Workflows Constrain Complex Work. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 1, CSCW(Dec 2017), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3134724
[70]
Bahareh Sarrafzadeh, Ahmed Hassan Awadallah, Christopher H. Lin, Chia-Jung Lee, Milad Shokouhi, and Susan T. Dumais. 2019. Characterizing and Predicting Email Deferral Behavior. In Proceedings of the Twelfth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. ACM, 627–635. https://doi.org/10.1145/3289600.3291028
[71]
Peter Scupelli, Sara Kiesler, Susan R Fussell, and Congrui Chen. 2005. Project view IM: a tool for juggling multiple projects and teams. In CHI’05 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. 1773–1776.
[72]
Shilad Sen, Werner Geyer, Michael Muller, Marty Moore, Beth Brownholtz, Eric Wilcox, and David R Millen. 2006. FeedMe: a collaborative alert filtering system. In Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on Computer supported cooperative work. 89–98.
[73]
O. Seppälä, T. Auvinen, V. Karavirta, A. Vihavainen, and P. Ihantola. 2016. What Communication Tools Do Students Use in Software Projects and How Do Different Tools Suit Different Parts of Project Work?. In 2016 IEEE/ACM 38th International Conference on Software Engineering Companion (ICSE-C). 432–435.
[74]
Preethi Srinivas. 2015. Modeling clinical workflow in daily ICU rounds to support task-based patient monitoring and care. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference Companion on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. 105–108.
[75]
Lucy Suchman. 1993. Do categories have politics? The language/action perspective reconsidered. In Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work 13–17 September 1993, Milan, Italy ECSCW’93. Springer, 1–14.
[76]
Lucy Suchman. 1994. Speech acts and voices: Response to Winogradet al.Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW) 3, 1 (1994), 85–95.
[77]
Lucy Suchman. 2007. Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions. Cambridge university press.
[78]
Sunny Tian, Amy X Zhang, and David Karger. 2020. A System for Interleaving Discussion and Summarization in Collaborative Document Writing. In Conference Companion Publication of the 2020 on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 59–63.
[79]
Carlos Toxtli, Andrés Monroy-Hernández, and Justin Cranshaw. 2018. Understanding Chatbot-mediated Task Management. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173632
[80]
Marcie J Tyre and Wanda J Orlikowski. 1994. Windows of opportunity: Temporal patterns of technological adaptation in organizations. Organization science 5, 1 (1994), 98–118.
[81]
Gina Venoglia, Laura Dabbish, J.J. Cadiz, and Anoop Gupta. 2001. Supporting email workflow. https://ininet.org/supporting-email-workflow-gina-danielle-venolia-laura-dabbish.html Last accessed 16 September 2017.
[82]
Diana White and Joyce Fortune. 2002. Current practice in project management—An empirical study. International journal of project management 20, 1 (2002), 1–11.
[83]
Steve Whittaker, Victoria Bellotti, and Jacek Gwizdka. 2006. Email in personal information management. Commun. ACM 49, 1 (2006), 68–73.
[84]
Steve Whittaker, Tara Matthews, Julian Cerruti, Hernan Badenes, and John Tang. 2011. Am I wasting my time organizing email? A study of email refinding. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 3449–3458.
[85]
Steve Whittaker and Candace Sidner. 1996. Email overload: exploring personal information management of email. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Toronto, Ontario, Canada). 793–802. https://doi.org/10.1145/238386.238530
[86]
Terry Williams. 2005. Assessing and moving on from the dominant project management discourse in the light of project overruns. IEEE Transactions on engineering management 52, 4 (2005), 497–508.
[87]
Terry Winograd. 1987. A Language/Action Perspective on the Design of Cooperative Work. Human–Computer Interaction 3, 1 (1987), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci0301_2
[88]
Terry Winograd, Fernando Flores, and Fernando F Flores. 1986. Understanding computers and cognition: A new foundation for design. Intellect Books.
[89]
Svetlana Yarosh, Tara Matthews, Thomas P Moran, and Barton Smith. 2009. What is an activity? Appropriating an activity-centric system. In IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 582–595.
[90]
zendesk 2007. Zendesk. https://www.zendesk.com/.
[91]
Amy X Zhang and Justin Cranshaw. 2018. Making sense of group chat through collaborative tagging and summarization. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW(2018), 1–27.
[92]
Qianqia (Queenie) Zhang, Soya Park, Michael Muller, and David R. Karger. 2024. ”How fancy you are to make us use your fancy tool”: Coordinating Individuals’ Tool Preference over Group Boundaries. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 8, GROUP, Article 4(feb 2024), 31 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3633069
Index Terms
- “I really need your help with this work..”: A System for Navigating the Tricky Terrain of Managing Up by Leveraging One’s Motivation to Get Things Done
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
EISSN:1557-7325
Table of ContentsCopyright © 2024 Copyright held by the owner/author(s). Publication rights licensed to ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Online AM: 13 March 2024
Accepted: 15 February 2024
Revised: 16 January 2024
Received: 07 June 2022
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 152Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)152
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)28
Reflects downloads up to 02 Sep 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in