Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3657054.3657266acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesdg-oConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Unveiling the Mechanisms Behind Open Government Data Use: The Interplay of Internal Resources and Institutional Pressures

Published: 11 June 2024 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    This paper explores the use of open government data (OGD) from both resource-based and institutional theoretical perspectives to understand how internal capabilities and external environmental pressures influence its effective utilization. Despite global efforts to harness OGD for societal benefits, its true utility is hindered by both the suboptimal deployment of resources within governments and inadequate responsiveness to external demands and regulatory frameworks. The study integrates resource-based theory, which emphasizes the strategic management of valuable, rare, and hard-to-imitate resources, with institutional theory, which accounts for external pressures such as regulatory, normative, and mimetic influences that shape organizational behavior and policy. This dual approach highlights the necessity of aligning internal resource management with external environmental conditions to enhance OGD’s accessibility, usability, and overall impact. The paper argues that for OGD to reach its full potential, governments must not only improve data accessibility and promote data literacy but also align their data management strategies with broader societal and institutional demands. By examining the interaction between supply and demand, the research identifies strategic insights for policymakers to foster more effective governance and public engagement with open data.

    References

    [1]
    Mubarak Alruwaie, Ramzi El-Haddadeh, and Vishanth Weerakkody. 2020. Citizens’ continuous use of eGovernment services: The role of self-efficacy, outcome expectations and satisfaction. Government information quarterly 37, 3 (2020), 101485.
    [2]
    Paul J DiMaggio, Walter W Powell, 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American sociological review 48, 2 (1983), 147–160.
    [3]
    Mila Gascó-Hernández, Erika G Martin, Luigi Reggi, Sunyoung Pyo, and Luis F Luna-Reyes. 2018. Promoting the use of open government data: Cases of training and engagement. Government Information Quarterly 35, 2 (2018), 233–242.
    [4]
    Robert E Hoskisson, Lorraine Eden, Chung Ming Lau, and Mike Wright. 2000. Strategy in emerging economies. Academy of management journal 43, 3 (2000), 249–267.
    [5]
    Mohammad Tariqul Islam, Md Shamim Talukder, Abul Khayer, and AKM Najmul Islam. 2023. Exploring continuance usage intention toward open government data technologies: An integrated approach. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems 53, 4 (2023), 785–807.
    [6]
    Dima Jamali. 2008. A stakeholder approach to corporate social responsibility: A fresh perspective into theory and practice. Journal of business ethics 82 (2008), 213–231.
    [7]
    Ilka Kawashita, Ana Alice Baptista, and Delfina Soares. 2022. Open government data use by the public sector-an overview of its benefits, barriers, drivers, and enablers. (2022).
    [8]
    Steven A Lippman and Richard P Rumelt. 1982. Uncertain imitability: An analysis of interfirm differences in efficiency under competition. The bell journal of Economics (1982), 418–438.
    [9]
    Francisco J Mata, William L Fuerst, and Jay B Barney. 1995. Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: A resource-based analysis. MIS quarterly (1995), 487–505.
    [10]
    John W Meyer and Brian Rowan. 1977. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American journal of sociology 83, 2 (1977), 340–363.
    [11]
    Edith Tilton Penrose. 2009. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford university press.
    [12]
    Walter W Powell and Paul J DiMaggio. 2012. The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. University of Chicago press.
    [13]
    Richard L Priem and John E Butler. 2001. Is the resource-based “view” a useful perspective for strategic management research?Academy of management review 26, 1 (2001), 22–40.
    [14]
    Erna Ruijer, Stephan Grimmelikhuijsen, Michael Hogan, Sem Enzerink, Adegboyega Ojo, and Albert Meijer. 2017. Connecting societal issues, users and data. Scenario-based design of open data platforms. Government Information Quarterly 34, 3 (2017), 470–480.
    [15]
    W Richard Scott. 2008. Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests. Sage.
    [16]
    W Richard Scott. 2013. Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities. Sage publications.
    [17]
    Philip Selznick. 1996. Institutionalism" old" and" new". Administrative science quarterly (1996), 270–277.
    [18]
    Tong Tang, Chun-Ai Ma, Heng-Yu Lv, and Fu-Ying Hao. 2023. The Effect of Corporate Resource Abundance on the Transformation and Upgrading of Manufacturing Enterprises from the Perspective of Whole Process Innovation. Sustainability 15, 14 (2023), 11003.
    [19]
    Birger Wernerfelt. 1984. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic management journal 5, 2 (1984), 171–180.
    [20]
    Bernd W Wirtz, Marcel Becker, and Jan C Weyerer. 2023. Open government: development, concept, and future research directions. International Journal of Public Administration 46, 12 (2023), 797–812.
    [21]
    Ying Zhang and Marijn Janssen. 2022. Coordination between Governmental Resources and Citizen Engagement with Open Government Data: A Coupling Coordinated Model. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. 237–241.
    [22]
    Yupan Zhao and Bo Fan. 2021. Effect of an agency’s resources on the implementation of open government data. Information & management 58, 4 (2021), 103465.
    [23]
    Yupan Zhao, Yunjuan Liang, Chen Yao, and Xiao Han. 2022. Key factors and generation mechanisms of open government data performance: A mixed methods study in the case of China. Government Information Quarterly 39, 4 (2022), 101717.
    [24]
    Anneke Zuiderwijk, Marijn Janssen, and Yogesh K Dwivedi. 2015. Acceptance and use predictors of open data technologies: Drawing upon the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Government information quarterly 32, 4 (2015), 429–440.
    [25]
    Anneke Zuiderwijk, Marijn Janssen, and Iryna Susha. 2016. Improving the speed and ease of open data use through metadata, interaction mechanisms, and quality indicators. Journal of organizational computing and electronic commerce 26, 1-2 (2016), 116–146.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    dg.o '24: Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research
    June 2024
    1089 pages
    ISBN:9798400709883
    DOI:10.1145/3657054
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 11 June 2024

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. data accessibility and usability
    2. institutional theory
    3. open government data
    4. resource-based theory
    5. strategic management and policy alignment

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Funding Sources

    • National Social Science Fund

    Conference

    dg.o 2024

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 150 of 271 submissions, 55%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 4
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
    Reflects downloads up to 26 Jul 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media