Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3657054.3657275acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesdg-oConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Creating private and public value in data-related management projects: a cross-border case study from Switzerland and Italy

Published: 11 June 2024 Publication History

Abstract

The literature in the field of smart cities shows a continuous emphasis and interest in the topic of big data due to the extensive use of Information and Communication Technologies by public and private institutions within each city. There is undoubtedly value in big data: in data lie insights on the city, its stakeholders, citizens, products, and services. Challenges, though, lie in data's variety, volume, and velocity, but also in managing them, considering the complex interplay between stakeholders inside a city or a country. Another layer of complexity is added when we consider a smart city as a smart destination where the visitor - often an international tourist - becomes an additional stakeholder of a smart city bringing in additional data. Such challenges, though, are even stronger when tourists do not stop at geographical borders: smart destinations become cross-border destinations. While there is a physical border between them, but most importantly, a legal difference in how data should be collected, stored, managed, and re-used [56, 59], data flows do not stop at this border. This complexity has to be managed both by governmental and tourism agencies. However, the literature between eGovernment and tourism is often theoretical in nature, and while it highlights the potential benefits of smart destinations and data-management processes, it does not provide detailed guidelines on how to implement these concepts in practice [41], especially in the context of cross-border smart destinations. With regards to this, not only has the need for guidelines risen to help tourism destinations tackle smart data- and technology-related projects, but also to define how stakeholders can come together to determine data policies and governance in order to create private as well as public value [60]. This paper responds to such a need by presenting the results of a cross-border research project conducted in Switzerland and Italy, where the model of a smart destination's structure proposed by Ivars-Baidal et al. [35] has been applied, and its dimensions have been operationalized in a data-related management project. This allowed the authors to understand how to create public and private value managing data flows in a cross-border context, while also elaborating on the model reflecting on data's dual role as a starting point but also as a central component impacting other dimensions.

References

[1]
Vito Albino, Umberto Berardi, and Rosa Maria Dangelico. 2015. Smart Cities: Definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives. Journal of Urban Technology 22, 1, 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2014.942092
[2]
Mohammed Al-Husban, and Carl Adams. 2014. Connected Services Delivery Framework: Towards Interoperable Government. In Mahmood Zaigham (ed.), Emerging Mobile and Web 2.0 Technologies for Connected E-Government. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 50-75. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-6082-3
[3]
Karin Axelsson, and Malin Granath. 2018. Stakeholders' stake and relation to smartness in smart city development: Insights from a Swedish city planning project. Government Information Quarterly 35, 4, 693-702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.09.001
[4]
Rodolfo Baggio, and Miriam Scaglione. 2018. Strategic visitor flows and destination management organization. Information Technology and Tourism 18, 3, 29-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40558-017-0096-1
[5]
Sabina Baraniewicz-Kotasińska. 2022. Smart city. Four approaches to the concept of understanding. Urban Research & Practice 15, 3, 397-420. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2020.1818817
[6]
Carlo Batini, Anisa Rula, Monica Scannapieco, and Gianluigi Viscusi. 2015. From data quality to big data quality. Journal of Database Management (JDM) 26, 1, 60-82. https://doi.org/10.4018/jdm.2015010103
[7]
Simon Elias Bibri. 2018. The IoT for smart sustainable cities of the future: An analytical framework for sensor-based big data applications for environmental sustainability. Sustainable Cities and Society 38, 230-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.12.034
[8]
Kim Boes, Dimitrios Buhalis, and Alessandro Inversini. 2015. Conceptualising smart tourism destination dimensions. In Iis Tussyadiah, and Alessandro Inversini (eds.), Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2015. Springer, Cham, 391-403. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14343-9_2
[9]
Kim Boes, Dimitrios Buhalis, and Alessandro Inversini. 2016. Smart tourism destinations: ecosystems for tourism destination competitiveness. International Journal of Tourism Cities 2, 2, 108-124. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJTC-12-2015-0032
[10]
Tobias Brandt, Johannes Bendler, and Dirk Neumann. 2017. Social media analytics and value creation in urban smart tourism ecosystems. Information Management 54, 6, 703-713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2017.01.004
[11]
Amber Brown, Jacqueline Kappes, and Joe Marks. 2013. Mitigating theme park crowding with incentives and information on mobile devices. Journal of Travel Research 52, 4, 426-436. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287512475216
[12]
Dimitrios Buhalis. 2000. Marketing the competitive destination of the future. Tourism management 21, 1, 97-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(99)00095-3
[13]
Dimitrios Buhalis, and Aditya Amaranggana. 2013. Smart Tourism Destinations. In Iis Tussyadiah, and Zheng Xiang (eds.), Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2014. Springer, Cham, 553-564. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03973-2_40
[14]
Dimitrios Buhalis, and Aditya Amaranggana. 2015. Smart tourism destinations enhancing tourism experience through personalisation of services. In Iis Tussyadiah, and Alessandro Inversini (eds.), Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2015. Springer, Cham, 377-389. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14343-9
[15]
Andrea Caragliu, Chiara Del Bo, and Peter Nijkamp. 2011. Smart cities in Europe. Journal of Urban Technology 18, 2, 65-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2011.601117
[16]
Walter Castelnovo, Gianluca Misuraca, and Alberto Savoldelli. 2016. Smart cities governance: The need for a holistic approach to assessing urban participatory policy making. Social Science Computer Review 34, 6, 724-739. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439315611103
[17]
Magdalena Ciesielska, and Aurora Sanchez Ortiz. 2023. Examining Failure of Smart City Public Value Co-Creation: The Role of Institutional Commitment. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (dg.o 2023). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 449-457. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209415.3209433
[18]
Pin-Yu Chu, and Hsien-Lee Tseng. 2018. Open data in support of E-governance evaluation: A public value framework. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 338-343. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209415.3209433
[19]
Namho Chung, Heejeong Han, and Youhee Joun. 2015. Tourists’ intention to visit a destination: The role of augmented reality (AR) application for a heritage site. Computers in Human Behavior 50, 588-599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.068
[20]
Boyd Cohen. 2014. The Smartest Cities In The World 2015: Methodology. Retrieved February 2, 2023 from https://www.fastcompany.com/3038818/the-smartest-cities-in-the-world-2015-methodology
[21]
Pedro Manuel da Costa Liberato, Elisa Alén-González, and Dália Filipa Veloso de Azevedo Liberato. 2018. Digital technology in a smart tourist destination: The case of Porto. Journal of Urban Technology 25, 1, 75–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2017.1413228
[22]
Giacomo Del Chiappa, and Rodolfo Baggio. 2015. Knowledge transfer in smart tourism destinations: Analyzing the effects of a network structure. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management 4, 3, 145-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2015.02.001
[23]
Jelena Dorcic, Jelena Komsic, and Suzana Markovic. 2019. Mobile technologies and applications towards smart tourism – state of the art. Tourism Review 74, 1, 82-103. https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-07-2017-0121
[24]
Noella Edelmann, and Shefali Virkar. 2023. The Impact of Sustainability on Co-Creation of Digital Public Services. Administrative Sciences 13, 2, 43-52. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13020043
[25]
European Union. 2019. Competition for the European Capital of Smart Tourism. Guide for applicants. Retrieved February 2, 2023 from https://smart-tourism-capital.ec.europa.eu/guide-applicants_en
[26]
Francisco Femenia-Serra, and Barbara Neuhofer. 2018. Smart tourism experiences: conceptualisation, key dimensions and research agenda. Investigaciones Regionales – Journal of Regional Research 42, 129-150.
[27]
Elide Garbani-Nerini, Elena Marchiori, and Lorenzo Cantoni. 2022. Destinations and Data State-of-the-Art in Switzerland and Liechtenstein. In Jason L. Stienmetz, Berta Ferrer-Rosell, and David Massimo (eds.), Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2022. Springer, Cham, 200-212. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94751-4_18
[28]
Rudolf Giffinger, Christian Fertner, Hans Kramar, Robert Kalasek, Natasa Pichler Milanovic, and Evert Meijers. 2007. Smart cities – Ranking of European medium-sized cities. Vienna University of Technology. Retrieved April 30, 2024 from https://www.smart-cities.eu/download/smart_cities_final_report.pdf
[29]
Ulrike Gretzel, Marianna Sigala, Zheng Xiang, and Chulmo Koo. 2015. Smart tourism: foundations and developments. Electronic Markets 25, 179-188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-015-0196-8
[30]
Ulrike Gretzel, Hannes Werthner, Chulmo Koo, and Carlos Lamsfus. 2015. Conceptual foundations for understanding smart tourism ecosystems. Computers in Human Behavior 50, 558-563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.043
[31]
Colin Harrison, and Ian Abbott Donnelly. 2011. A Theory of Smart Cities. In Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the ISSS – 2011, Hull, UK, 55, 1.
[32]
Lea Hasenzahl, Nadzeya Kalbaska, and Lorenzo Cantoni. 2019. Digital transformation in the national tourism policies. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (dg.o 2019). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 417-424. https://doi.org/10.1145/3325112.3325225
[33]
IESE. 2018. IESE Cities in Motion Index. Retrieved February 3, 2023 from https://media.iese.edu/research/pdfs/ST-0471-E.pdf
[34]
IMD. 2023. Smart city observatory. Retrieved February 2, 2023 from https://www.imd.org/smart-city-observatory/home/
[35]
Josep A. Ivars-Baidal, Marco A. Celdrán-Bernabeu, Francisco Femenia-Serra, José F. Perles-Ribes, and David Giner-Sánchez. 2021. Measuring the progress of smart destinations: The use of indicators as a management tool. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management 19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2020.100531
[36]
Josep A. Ivars-Baidal, Marco A. Celdrán-Bernabeu, Jose-Norberto Mazón, and Angel F. Perles-Ivars. 2017. Smart destinations and the evolution of ICTs: a new scenario for destination management? Current Issues in Tourism 22, 13, 1581-1600. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2017.1388771
[37]
Tomasz Janowski. 2015. Digital government evolution: From transformation to contextualization. Government Information Quarterly 32, 3, 221-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.001
[38]
Marijn Janssen, Yannis Charalabidis, and Anneke Zuiderwijk. 2012. Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Information Systems Management 29, 4, 258-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2012.716740
[39]
Dobrica Z. Jovicic. 2019. From the traditional understanding of tourism destination to the smart tourism destination. Current Issues in Tourism 22, 3, 276-282, https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2017.1313203
[40]
Nadzeya Kalbaska, Tomasz Janowski, Elsa Estevez, and Lorenzo Cantoni. 2016. E-government relationships framework in the tourism domain. A first map. In Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2016, Proceedings of the International Conference in Bilbao, Spain. Springer, Cham, 73-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28231-2_6
[41]
Nadzeya Kalbaska, Tomasz Janowski, Elsa Estevez, and Lorenzo Cantoni. 2017. When digital government matters for tourism: a stakeholder analysis. Information Technology & Tourism 17, 315-333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40558-017-0087-2
[42]
Chulmo Koo, Seunghun Shin, Ulrike Gretzel, William Canon Hunter, and Namho Chung. 2016. Conceptualization of Smart Tourism Destination Competitiveness. Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems 26, 4, 561-576. http://dx.doi.org/10.14329/apjis.2016.26.4.561
[43]
Metin Kozak, and Dimitrios Buhalis. 2019. Cross–border tourism destination marketing: Prerequisites and critical success factors. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management 14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2019
[44]
Jingjing Li, Lizhi Xu, Ling Tang, Shouyang Wang, and Ling Li. 2018. Big data in tourism research: a literature review. Tourism Management 68, 301-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.03.009
[45]
Karl Löfgren, and C. William R. Webster. 2020. The value of Big Data in government: The case of ‘smart cities’. Big Data & Society 7, 1. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720912775
[46]
Estela Marine-Roig, and Salvador Anton Clavé. 2015. Tourism analytics with massive user-generated content: A case study of Barcelona. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management 4, 3, 162-172. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2015.06.004
[47]
Merriam-Webster. 2024. Real estate. Retrieved April 30, 2024 from: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/real%20estate
[48]
Taewoo Nam, and Theresa A. Pardo. 2011. Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times (dg.o 2011). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 282-291. https://doi.org/10.1145/2037556.2037602
[49]
Paolo Neirotti, Alberto De Marco, Anna Corinna Cagliano, Giulio Mangano, and Francesco Scorrano. 2014. Current Trends in Smart City Initiatives: Some Stylised Facts. Cities, 38, 25-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2013.12.010
[50]
Barbara Neuhofer, Dimitrios Buhalis, and Adele Ladkin. 2012. Conceptualising technology enhanced destination experiences. Journal of Destination Marketing and Management 1, 1-2, 36-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2012.08.001
[51]
Anastasija Nikiforova, Nina Rizun, Magdalena Ciesielska, Charalampos Alexopoulos, and Andrea Miletić. 2023. Towards High-Value Datasets determination for data-driven development: a systematic literature review. In Ida Lindgren, Csaba Csáki, Evangelos Kalampokis, Marijn Janssen, Gabriela Viale Pereira, Shefali Virkar, Efthimios Tambouris, and Anneke Zuiderwijk (eds.), Electronic Government. EGOV 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 14130. Springer, Cham, 221-229. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41138-0_14
[52]
Anna Picco-Schwendener, Nadzeya Kalbaska, Lea Hasenzahl, and Lorenzo Cantoni. 2022. e-Government and Tourism. In Zheng Xiang, Matthias Fuchs, Ulrike Gretzel, and Wolfram Höpken (eds.), Handbook of e-Tourism. Springer, Cham, 1629-1644. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05324-6_101-2
[53]
Nadzeya Sabatini. 2023. Tourism Governments and Solidarity: Can Destination Management Organizations be involved in a refugee crisis while exploiting their digital capabilities? In Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (dg.o 2023). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 646-647. https://doi.org/10.1145/3598469.3598568
[54]
SEGITTUR. 2015. Libro Blanco Destinos Turísticos Inteligentes. Retrieved February 3, 2023 from https://www.segittur.es/destinos-turisticos-inteligentes/proyectos-destinos/libro-blanco-destinos-turisticos-inteligentes/
[55]
Sanaz Shafiee, Ali Rajabzadeh Ghatari, Alireza Hasanzadeh, and Saeed Jahanyan. 2019. Developing a model for sustainable smart tourism destinations: A systematic review. Tourism Management Perspectives 31, 287-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2019.06.002
[56]
Arie Stoffelen, Dimitri Ioannides, and Dominique Vanneste. 2017. Obstacles to achieving cross-border tourism governance: A multi-scalar approach focusing on the German-Czech borderlands. Annals of Tourism Research 64, 126-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2017.03.003
[57]
Yunchuan Sun, Houbing Song, Antonio J. Jara, and Rongfang Bie. 2016. Internet of Things and Big Data Analytics for Smart and Connected Communities. IEEE Access 4, 766-773. http://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2529723
[58]
Gabriela Viale Pereira, Maria Alexandra Cunha, Thomas J. Lampoltshammer, Peter Parycek, and Maurício Gregianin Testa. 2017. Increasing collaboration and participation in smart city governance: A cross-case analysis of smart city initiatives. Information Technology for Development 23, 3, 526-553. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2017.1353946
[59]
Adi Weidenfeld. 2013. Tourism and cross border regional innovation systems. Annals of Tourism Research 42, 191-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2013.01.003
[60]
Maria A. Wimmer. 2012. Integrated service modelling for online one-stop government. Electronic Markets 12, 3, 149-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/101967802320245910
[61]
Zheng Xiang, and Daniel R. Fesenmaier. 2017. Big Data Analytics, Tourism Design and Smart Tourism. In Zheng Xiang, and Daniel R. Fesenmaier (eds.), Analytics in Smart Tourism Design. Tourism on the Verge. Springer, Cham, 299-307. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44263-1_17
[62]
Thomas Zefferer, Bernd Prunster, Christian Kollmann, Andreea Ancuta Corici, Lukas Alber, Roland Czerny, and Blaz Podgorelec. 2023. A Security-Evaluation Framework for Mobile Cross-Border e-Government Solutions. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (dg.o 2023). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 536-543.

Index Terms

  1. Creating private and public value in data-related management projects: a cross-border case study from Switzerland and Italy

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        dg.o '24: Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research
        June 2024
        1089 pages
        ISBN:9798400709883
        DOI:10.1145/3657054
        This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        Published: 11 June 2024

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Conference

        dg.o 2024

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate 150 of 271 submissions, 55%

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • 0
          Total Citations
        • 69
          Total Downloads
        • Downloads (Last 12 months)69
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)22
        Reflects downloads up to 03 Oct 2024

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        View Options

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format.

        HTML Format

        Get Access

        Login options

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media