Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3665689.3665751acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesbicConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The Anti-tumor Effects of Ultrasonic Mechanical Force on human liver cancer cells

Published: 28 June 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Malignant tumors (ie, cancer) are major public health problems in China and even in the gable wide. Since the early 1970s, the anti-tumor effects of ultrasound have been widely used in the clinical treatment of various tumors, mainly relying on the thermal effect and cavitation, both of which have unsolved problems during applications, thus the use of ultrasonic mechanical mechanisms has become a possible breakthrough. In 2008, it was reported that mechanical stress inhibited the growth of tumor cells, and ultrasound was the propagation of mechanical vibrational energy. Ultrasonic mechanical force (UMF) has following advantages of inhibiting tumor: 1. Low power. There is no damage to normal cells and surface contact skin; 2. Frequency differences between tumors. There are frequency differences between normal cells and cancer cells and between different types of cancer cells, which make ultrasonic therapy more precise. This study intended to use human liver cancer cells as experimental subjects and found out their sensitive frequency. Hepatoma cells showed a significant frequency dependence on UMF, and the changes of oxidative stress level and biological behavior were the most obvious under the action of sensitive frequency UMF at 600 kHz.

References

[1]
Frederick WK. 1979. Cancer Therapy with ultrasound: a historical review. J Clin Ultrasound. 7(4): 287-300. http://doi org/10.1002/jcu.1870070410
[2]
Halliburton G, Murad HY, Kala Zhang M and Khismatullin D. 2017. In vivo investigation of high-intensity focused ultrasound combined with thermally triggered chemotherapy for liver cancer treatment. J Acoust Soci Am. 142(4): 2720-2721. http://doi org/10.1121/1.5014927
[3]
Xiaoping L and Leizhen Z. 2013. Advances of high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for pancreatic cancer. Int J Hyperthermia. 29(7): 678-82. http://doi org/10.3109/02656736.2013.837199
[4]
Ploussard G. 2018. Re: Salvage High-intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) for locally recurrent prostate cancer after failed radiation therapy: multi-institutional analysis of 418 patients. Eur Urol. 73(1): 140-141. http://doi org/10.1016/j.eururo
[5]
Hwang DW, Song HS, Kim HS, Chun KC, Koh JW and Kim YA. 2017. Delayed intestinal perforation and vertebral osteomyelitis after high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment for uterine leiomyoma. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 60(5): 490-493. http://doi org/10.5468/ogs.2017.60.5.490
[6]
Wu X, Giridhar Babu A, Kim B L, Kim JO, Shin JH and Kim DP. 2016. Ultrasound-mediated intracellular delivery of fluorescent dyes and DNA into microalgal cells. Alg Res. 15:2 10-216. http://doi org/10.1016/j.algal.2016.02.017
[7]
Louw TM, Budhiraja G, Viljoen HJ and Subramanian A. 2013. Mechanotransduction of ultrasound is frequency dependent below the cavitation threshold. Ultrasound Med Biol. 39(7): 1303-19. http://doi org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2013.01.015
[8]
Domenici F, Giliberti C, Bedini A, Palomba R, Luongo F, Sennato S, Olmati C, Pozzi D, Morrone S, Congiu Castellano A and Bordi F. 2013. Ultrasound well below the intensity threshold of cavitation can promote efficient uptake of small drug model molecules in fibroblast cells. Drug Deliv. 20(7): 285-95. http://doi org/10.3109/10717544.2013.836620
[9]
Marketing Clearance of Diagnostic Ultrasound Systems and Transducers. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/marketing-clearance-diagnostic-ultrasound-systems-and-transducers (accessed 16 December 2023)
[10]
Plaksin M, Kimmel E and Shoham S. 2016. Cell-type-selective effects of intramembrane cavitation as a unifying theoretical framework for ultrasonic neuromodulation. eNeuro. 3(3): ENEURO.0136-15.2016. http://doi org/10.1523/ENEURO.0136-15.2016
[11]
Padilla F, Puts R, Vico L, Guignandon A and Raum K. 2016. Stimulation of Bone Repair with Ultrasound. Adv Exp Med Biol. 80: 385-427. http://doi org/10.1007/978-3-319-22536-4_21
[12]
Krasovitski B, Frenkel V, Shoham S and Kimmel E. 2011. Intramembrane cavitation as a unifying mechanism for ultrasound-induced bioeffects. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 108(8): 3258-63. http://doi org/10.1073/pnas.1015771108. Epub 2011 Feb 7.
[13]
Peek MC, Ahmed M, Napoli A, ten Haken B, McWilliams S, Usiskin SI, Pinder SE, van Hemelrijck M and Douek M. 2015. Systematic review of high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation in the treatment of breast cancer. Br J Surg. 102(8): 873-82; discussion 882. http://doi org/10.1002/bjs.9793
[14]
Kennedy JE. 2005. High-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of solid tumours. Nat Rev Cancer. 5(4): 321-7. http://doi org/10.1038/nrc1591
[15]
Hwang DW, Song HS, Kim HS, Chun KC, Koh JW and Kim YA. 2017. Delayed intestinal perforation and vertebral osteomyelitis after high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment for uterine leiomyoma. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 60(5): 490-493. http://doi org/10.5468/ogs.2017.60.5.490. Epub 2017 Sep 18
[16]
Tang J, Guha C and Tomé WA. 2015. Biological Effects Induced by Non-thermal Ultrasound and Implications for Cancer Therapy: A Review of the Current Literature. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 14(2): 221-35. http://doi org/10.7785/tcrt.2012.500407. Epub 2014 Nov 21
[17]
Garg S, Dhavala S, Krumova K, Vishnudas VK and Narain NR. 2015. Abstract 2458: Targeting Membrane Fluidity as a Therapeutic Strategy in Cancer Using BPM 31510. Canc Res. 75(15 Supplement): 2458. http://doi org/10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-2458
[18]
Edmond V, Dufour F, Poiroux G, Shoji K, Malleter M, Fouqué A, Tauzin S, Rimokh R, Sergent O, Penna A, Dupuy A, Levade T, Theret N, Micheau O, Ségui B and Legembre P. 2015. Downregulation of ceramide synthase-6 during epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition reduces plasma membrane fluidity and cancer cell motility. Oncogene. 34(8): 996-1005. http://doi org/10.1038/onc.2014.55. Epub 2014 Mar 17
[19]
Zhao W, Prijic S, Urban BC, Tisza MJ, Zuo Y, Li L, Tan Z, Chen X, Mani SA and Chang JT. 2016. Candidate Antimetastasis Drugs Suppress the Metastatic Capacity of Breast Cancer Cells by Reducing Membrane Fluidity. Cancer Res. 76(7): 2037-49. http://doi org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-1970. Epub 2016 Jan 29
[20]
Samandari M, Abrinia K, Mokhtari-Dizaji M and Tamayol A. 2017. Ultrasound induced strain cytoskeleton rearrangement: An experimental and simulation study. J Biomech. 60: 39-47. http://doi org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.06.003. Epub 2017 Jun 20
[21]
Van der Paal J, Neyts EC, Verlackt CCW and Bogaerts A. 2016. Effect of lipid peroxidation on membrane permeability of cancer and normal cells subjected to oxidative stress. Chem Sci. 7(1): 489-498. http://doi org/10.1039/c5sc02311d. Epub 2015 Oct 16
[22]
Huang H, Sun M, Liu M, Pan S, Liu P, Cheng Z, Li J, Xu H, Liu F and Pang Z. 2022. Full encapsulation of oncolytic virus using hybrid erythroctye-liposome membranes for augmented anti-refractory tumor effectiveness. Nano Today. 47: 101671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2022.101671.
[23]
Jia Y, Yuan W, Zhang K, Wang J, Wang P, Liu Q and Wang X. 2015. Comparison of cell membrane damage induced by the therapeutic ultrasound on human breast cancer MCF-7 and MCF-7/ADR cells. Ultrason Sonochem. 26: 128-135. http://doi org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2015.03.001. Epub 2015 Mar 6

Index Terms

  1. The Anti-tumor Effects of Ultrasonic Mechanical Force on human liver cancer cells

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    BIC '24: Proceedings of the 2024 4th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Intelligent Computing
    January 2024
    504 pages
    ISBN:9798400716645
    DOI:10.1145/3665689
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 28 June 2024

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    BIC 2024

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 10
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)10
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
    Reflects downloads up to 23 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media