Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3679318.3685341acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesnordichiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

The Right to Repair (R2R) Cards: Aligning Law and Design For A More Sustainable Consumer Internet of Things.

Published: 13 October 2024 Publication History

Abstract

We present The Right to Repair (R2R) Cards, a novel design tool to support development of more sustainable consumer Internet of Things (IoT) devices. Current IoT systems are not built to last, with planned obsolescence and multiple routes to redundancy due to combined failures in hardware, software, and data management. This ultimately contributes to growing global eWaste. We consider the role of law in encouraging better IoT design practices. Our R2R cards consolidate analysis of 25 pieces of UK / EU legislation and standards, establishing 90 legal requirements around repair, cybersecurity, environmental design, consumer, and data rights. The R2R cards are a novel method for translating legal obligations for IoT system designers and wider stakeholders. We document the card development process, and insights from workshops with 37 participants, evaluating the utility of cards for critical reflection on legal obligations, and supporting transition to more sustainable IoT design.

References

[1]
Ali, R. 2023. Mobile emissions. Uswitch. https://www.uswitch.com/mobiles/compare/sim-only-deals/mobile-emissions/.
[2]
Apple “screwing” new iPhones out of simple DIY repair: 2011. https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2011/01/apple-screwing-new-iphones-out-of-simple-diy-repair/. Accessed: 2024-08-20.
[3]
Baldé, C.P. 2024. The Global E-waste Monitor 2024. https://ewastemonitor.info/the-global-e-waste-monitor-2024/.
[4]
Belman, J. 2011. Grow-A-Game: A Tool for Values Conscious Design and Analysis of Digital Games. (2011).
[5]
Blevis, E. 2007. Sustainable interaction design: invention & disposal, renewal & reuse. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose California USA, Apr. 2007), 503–512.
[6]
Boniface, C. 2024. Towards a right to repair for the Internet of Things: A review of legal and policy aspects. Computer Law & Security Review. 52, (Apr. 2024), 105934.
[7]
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 3, 2 (Jan. 2006), 77–101.
[8]
Bring life back to your Pebble: https://rebble.io/. Accessed: 2024-04-24.
[9]
Camp, J.V. 2019. My Jibo Is Dying and It's Breaking My Heart. Wired Magazine.
[10]
Carneiro, G. 2012. ilo Cards: A tool to support the design of interactive artifacts. DRS Biennial Conference Series. (Jul. 2012).
[11]
Castle-Green, T. 2024. “It's All Connected” - A Boardgame to Communicate Climate Impacts of IoT. Proceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Information Technology for Social Good (Bremen Germany, Sep. 2024), 249–256.
[12]
Cohen, M.J. eds. 2014. Innovations in Sustainable Consumption: New Economics, Socio-technical Transitions and Social Practices. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
[13]
Commission Regulation (EU) - laying down ecodesign requirements for smartphones, mobile phones other than smartphones, cordless phones and slate tablets.: 2023. https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/publications/commission-regulation-eu-laying-down-ecodesign-requirements-smartphones-mobile-phones-other_en. Accessed: 2024-08-20.
[14]
D. Urquhart, L. and J. Craigon, P. 2021. The Moral-IT Deck: a tool for ethics by design. Journal of Responsible Innovation. 8, 1 (Jan. 2021), 94–126.
[15]
Denning, T. 2013. Control-Alt-Hack: the design and evaluation of a card game for computer security awareness and education. Proceedings of the 2013 ACM SIGSAC conference on Computer & communications security - CCS ’13 (Berlin, Germany, 2013), 915–928.
[16]
DiSalvo, C. 2010. Mapping the landscape of sustainable HCI. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Atlanta Georgia USA, Apr. 2010), 1975–1984.
[17]
Fedosov, A. 2019. Sharing Economy Design Cards. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow Scotland Uk, May 2019), 1–14.
[18]
Felt, U. 2018. IMAGINE RRI. A card-based method for reflecting on responsibility in life science research. Journal of Responsible Innovation. 5, 2 (May 2018), 201–224.
[19]
Fiesler, C. 2020. Lawful Users: Copyright Circumvention and Legal Constraints on Technology Use. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu HI USA, Apr. 2020), 1–11.
[20]
Friedman, B. and Hendry, D. 2012. The envisioning cards: a toolkit for catalyzing humanistic and technical imaginations. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Austin Texas USA, May 2012), 1145–1148.
[21]
Games as Speculative Design: Allowing Players to Consider Alternative Presents and Plausible Futures: 2016. https://www.drs2016.org/015. Accessed: 2024-08-20.
[22]
Golembewski, M. and Selby, M. 2010. Ideation decks: a card-based design ideation tool. Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (Aarhus Denmark, Aug. 2010), 89–92.
[23]
Gruschka, N. eds. 2021. Privacy Technologies and Policy: 9th Annual Privacy Forum, APF 2021, Oslo, Norway, June 17–18, 2021, Proceedings. Springer International Publishing.
[24]
Guiltinan, J. 2009. Creative Destruction and Destructive Creations: Environmental Ethics and Planned Obsolescence. Journal of Business Ethics. 89, S1 (May 2009), 19–28.
[25]
Hatta, M. 2020. The Right to Repair, the Right to Tinker, and the Right to Innovate. Annals of Business Administrative Science. 19, 4 (Aug. 2020), 143–157.
[26]
Hern, A. 2016. Revolv devices bricked as Google's Nest shuts down smart home company. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/apr/05/revolv-devices-bricked-google-nest-smart-home. Accessed: 2024-08-20.
[27]
Hinton, E. and Goodman, M. 2010. Sustainable Consumption: Developments, Considerations and New Directions. The International Handbook of Environmental Sociology. 245–261.
[28]
House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee Electronic waste and the Circular Economy: 2020. https://committees.parliament.uk/work/170/electronic-waste-and-the-circular-economy/. Accessed: 2024-08-20.
[29]
How Inclusive Skills Can Boost the Circular Economy: Recommendations from Social Enterprises | RREUSE: 2023. https://rreuse.org/how-inclusive-skills-can-boost-the-circular-economy-recommendations-from-social-enterprises/. Accessed: 2024-08-20.
[30]
Hsieh, G. 2023. What is in the Cards: Exploring Uses, Patterns, and Trends in Design Cards. Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, Apr. 2023), 1–18.
[31]
Is Technological Innovation Making Society More Unequal? 2017. https://unu.edu/merit/blog-post/technological-innovation-making-society-more-unequal. Accessed: 2024-08-20.
[32]
Know Cards: 2014. https://www.designswarm.com/know-cards/. Accessed: 2024-08-20.
[33]
Koops, B.-J. and Leenes, R. 2014. Privacy regulation cannot be hardcoded. A critical comment on the ‘privacy by design’ provision in data-protection law. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology. 28, 2 (May 2014), 159–171.
[34]
Lechelt, S. 2024. On Disused Connected Devices: Understanding Disuse, “Holding On,” and Barriers to Circularity. ACM Journal on Computing and Sustainable Societies. 2, 2 (Jun. 2024), 1–27.
[35]
Ledwaba, P. and Sosibo, N. 2017. Cathode Ray Tube Recycling in South Africa. Recycling. 2, 1 (Feb. 2017), 4.
[36]
Lepawsky, J. 2017. Best of two worlds? Towards ethical electronics repair, reuse, repurposing and recycling. Geoforum. 81, (May 2017), 87–99.
[37]
Lucero, A. 2016. Designing with Cards. Collaboration in Creative Design. P. Markopoulos, eds. Springer International Publishing. 75–95.
[38]
Luger, E. 2015. Playing the Legal Card: Using Ideation Cards to Raise Data Protection Issues within the Design Process. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, Apr. 2015), 457–466.
[39]
Manwaring, K. 2024. ‘Slowing down the loop’: smart devices and the right to repair. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology. (Mar. 2024), 1–29.
[40]
Mathur, D. 2022. Available to be Poisoned: Toxicity as a Form of Life. Lexington Books - Rowman & Littlefield.
[41]
Method Cards: 2003. https://www.ideo.com/journal/method-cards. Accessed: 2024-08-20.
[42]
Mével, O. 2005. Nabaztag. https://collections.vam.ac.uk/item/O1731303/nabaztag-smart-device-olivier-mevel/nabaztag-smart-device-olivier-m%C3%A9vel/. Accessed: 2024-08-20.
[43]
Mikolajczak, C. 2020. Apple crushes one-man repair shop in Norway's Supreme Court, after three-year battle. Right to Repair Europe. https://repair.eu/news/apple-crushes-one-man-repair-shop/. Accessed: 2024-08-20.
[44]
Nurain, N. 2024. Designing a Card-Based Design Tool to Bridge Academic Research & Design Practice For Societal Resilience. Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, May 2024), 1–20.
[45]
Perzanowski, A. ed. 2022. The History of Repair. The Right to Repair: Reclaiming the Things We Own. Cambridge University Press. 49–71.
[46]
Pilling, M. 2023. Fixing the Future: Cultivating a Capacity to Repair IoT Devices through Experiential Futures. IASDR Conference Series. (Oct. 2023).
[47]
Privacy Game: 2012. https://vome.uk/2012/05/03/privacy-game-now-available-to-download-under-a-creative-commons-license/. Accessed: 2024-08-20.
[48]
Reno, J.O. and Halvorson, B. 2021. Waste and whiteness. The Routledge Handbook of Waste Studies. Routledge.
[49]
Right to repair 2024. What we want. Right to Repair Europe. https://repair.eu/what-we-want/. Accessed: 2024-08-20.
[50]
Right to repair: Making repair easier and more appealing to consumers: 2024. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20240419IPR20590/right-to-repair-making-repair-easier-and-more-appealing-to-consumers. Accessed: 2024-08-20.
[51]
Robert D, B. 2002. Confronting Environmental Racism in the Twenty-First Century. Global Dialogue. 4, 1 (2002), 34–48.
[52]
Rosborough, A. 2020. Unscrewing the Future: The Right to Repair and the Circumvention of Software TPMs in the EU. JIPITEC. 11, 1 (Apr. 2020).
[53]
Roy, R. and Warren, J.P. 2019. Card-based design tools: a review and analysis of 155 card decks for designers and designing. Design Studies. 63, (Jul. 2019), 125–154.
[54]
Šajn, N. 2022. Right to repair. European Parliament. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2022/698869/EPRS_BRI(2022)698869_EN.pdf. Accessed: 2024-08-20.
[55]
Stead, M. 2016. A Toaster For Life: Using Design Fiction To Facilitate Discussion On The Creation Of A Sustainable Internet of Things. (Jun. 2016).
[56]
Stead, M. 2019. The Little Book of SUSTAINABILITY for the Internet of Things.
[57]
Stead, M. and Coulton, P. 2022. A more-than-human right-to-repair. (Jun. 2022).
[58]
Sutton, B. 2011. Playful cards, serious talk: a qualitative research technique to elicit women's embodied experiences. Qualitative Research. 11, 2 (Apr. 2011), 177–196.
[59]
Svensson-Hoglund, S. 2021. Barriers, enablers and market governance: A review of the policy landscape for repair of consumer electronics in the EU and the U.S. Journal of Cleaner Production. 288, (Mar. 2021), 125488.
[60]
The next generation Internet of Things | Shaping Europe's digital future: 2024. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/next-generation-internet-things. Accessed: 2024-08-20.
[61]
Toxic E-Waste Dumped in Poor Nations, Says United Nations - Our World: 2013. https://ourworld.unu.edu/en/toxic-e-waste-dumped-in-poor-nations-says-united-nations. Accessed: 2024-08-20.
[62]
Urquhart, L.D. 2022. Legal Provocations for HCI in the Design and Development of Trustworthy Autonomous Systems. Nordic Human-Computer Interaction Conference (New York, NY, USA, Oct. 2022), 1–12.
[63]
Wetzel, R. 2014. Introducing pattern cards for mixed reality game design. Third Workshop on design patterns in games (2014).
[64]
Wölfel, C. and Merritt, T. 2013. Method Card Design Dimensions: A Survey of Card-Based Design Tools. Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2013. P. Kotzé, eds. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 479–486.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
NordiCHI '24: Proceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
October 2024
1236 pages
ISBN:9798400709661
DOI:10.1145/3679318
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives International 4.0 License.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 13 October 2024

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Funding Sources

Conference

NordiCHI 2024

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 379 of 1,572 submissions, 24%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 307
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)307
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)128
Reflects downloads up to 04 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Login options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media