Issues and Opinions: A Rejoinder to
Pages 128 - 134
Abstract
In the preceding essay, the author presents a number of challenges regarding the philosophical positioning of critical realism (CR). Although we find the essay to indeed be thought-provoking and interesting, we also believe that several of his points are misrepresentative of CR. In the current response, we address his concerns and point out opportunities to improve CR research.
References
[1]
Bhaskar, R. (1978). A realist theory of science. Harvester Press.
[2]
Burton-Jones, A., & Volkoff, O. (2017). How can we develop contextualized theories of effective use? A demonstration in the context of community-care electronic health records. Information Systems Research, 28(3), 468--489.
[3]
Bygstad, B., Munkvold, B. E., & Volkoff, O. (2016). Identifying generative mechanisms through affordances: A framework for critical realist data analysis. Journal of Information Technology, 31(1), 83--96.
[4]
Campbell, D. T. (1988). Descriptive epistemology: Psychological, sociological, and evolutionary. In E. S. Overman (Ed.), Methodology and epistemology for social science: Selected papers (pp. 435--486). University of Chicago Press.
[5]
Danermark, B., Ekstrom, M., & Jakobsen, L. (2005). Explaining society: An introduction to critical realism in the social sciences. Routledge.
[6]
Easton, G. (2010). Critical realism in case study research. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(1), 118--128.
[7]
Grover, V., & Lyytinen, K. (2015). New state of play in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 39(2), 271--296.
[8]
Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75--105.
[9]
Karahanna, E., Xu, S. X., Xu, Y., & Zhang, N. A. (2018). The needs--affordances--features perspective for the use of social media. MIS Quarterly, 42(3), 737--756.
[10]
Klein, H. K., & Myers, M. D. (1999). A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 23(1), 67--93.
[11]
Lattman, P. (2007, September 27). The origins of Justice Stewart's 'I know it when I see it.' Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/BL-LB-4558
[12]
Lee, A. S. (2020). Commentary on 'Demystifying the influential IS legends of positivism.' Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 21(4), 836--842.
[13]
Mingers, J. (2001). Combining IS research methods: Towards a pluralist methodology. Information Systems Research, 12(3), 240--259.
[14]
Mingers, J. (2004). Real-izing information systems: Critical realism as an underpinning philosophy for information systems. Information and Organization, 14(2), 87--103.
[15]
Mingers, J., Mutch, A., & Willcocks, L. (2013). Critical realism in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 37(3), 795--802.
[16]
Mingers, J., & Standing, C. (2017). Why things happen--Developing the critical realist view of causal mechanisms. Information and Organization, 27(3), 171--189.
[17]
Mukumbang, F. C. (2021). Retroductive theorizing: A contribution of critical realism to mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 17(1), 93--114.
[18]
Myers, M. D., & Klein, H. K. (2011). A set of principles for conducting critical research in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 17--36.
[19]
Sayer, R. A. (1992). Method in social science: A realist approach. Psychology Press.
[20]
Sellars, R. W. (1916). Critical realism: A study of the nature and conditions of knowledge. Rand McNally.
[21]
Siponen, M., & Tsohou, A. (2018) Demystifying the influential IS legends of positivism. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 19(7), 600--617.
[22]
Straub, D. W., Gefen, D., & Recker, J. (2022). Quantitative research in information systems. http://www.janrecker.com/quantitative-research-in-information-systems/
[23]
Talisse, R., & Aikin, S. F. (2006). Two forms of the straw man. Argumentation, 20(3), 345--352.
[24]
Volkoff, O., & Strong, D. M. (2013). Critical realism and affordances: Theorizing IT-associated organizational change processes. MIS Quarterly, 37(3), 819--834.
[25]
Walsham, G. (1995). Interpretive case studies in IS research: Nature and method. European Journal of Information Systems, 4(2), 74--81.
[26]
Weber, R. (2003). Theoretically speaking. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), iii--xii.
[27]
Weber, R. (2004). Editor's comments: The rhetoric of positivism versus interpretivism: A personal view. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), iii--xii.
[28]
Williams, C. K., & Wynn, D. E., Jr. (2018). A critical realist script for creative theorising in information systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 27(3), 315--325.
[29]
Wynn, D., Jr., & Williams, C. K. (2012). Principles for conducting critical realist case study research in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 36(3), 787--810.
[30]
Wynn, D. E., Jr., & Williams, C. K. (2020). Recent advances and opportunities for improving critical realism-based case study research in IS. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 21(1), 8.
[31]
Zachariadis, M., Scott, S., & Barrett, M. (2013). Methodological implications of critical realism for mixed-methods research. MIS Quarterly, 37(3), 855--879.
Index Terms
- Issues and Opinions: A Rejoinder to
Recommendations
The Philosopher's Corner: Questioning the Third Way Rhetoric of Critical Realism
Roy Bhaskar's critical realism (CR) has become a popular metatheoretical foundation in information systems (IS) research. CR is often framed as a "third way" or a "middle ground" between positivism and interpretivism. In this essay, I deconstruct this ...
Some of the philosophical issues underpinning research in information systems: from positivism to critical realism
SAICSIT '04: Proceedings of the 2004 annual research conference of the South African institute of computer scientists and information technologists on IT research in developing countriesIn response to the South African Journal of Computing's editorial of June 2003, this paper reviews some of the philosophical issues underpinning academic research in Information Systems (IS). This is a reflective or theoretical paper, which considers a ...
Critical realism and ICT4D research
AbstractThere is little overt engagement with research paradigms in ICT4D research, but what there is shows a dominance of positivism and interpretivism. In this paper, we explore the value of a “third way” research paradigm: critical realism. We ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
November 2024
129 pages
EISSN:1532-0936
DOI:10.1145/3701613
- Editors:
- K.D. Joshi,
- Nancy Deng,
- Jessica Assink,
- Mina Jafarijoo
Copyright © 2024 Copyright is held by the owner/author(s).
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 22 October 2024
Published in SIGMIS Volume 55, Issue 4
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 28Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)28
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
Reflects downloads up to 19 Feb 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in