Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/505202.505239acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesimcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

An empirical study of realvideo performance across the internet

Published: 01 November 2001 Publication History

Abstract

The tremendous increase in computer power and bandwidth connectivity has fueled the growth of streaming video over the Internet to the desktop. While there have been large scale empirical studies of Internet, Web and multimedia traffic, the performance of popular Internet streaming video technologies and the impact of streaming video on the Internet is still largely unkown. This paper presents analysis from a wide-scale empirical study of RealVideo traffic from several Internet servers to many geographically diverse users. We find typical RealVideos to have high quality, achieving an average frame rate of 10 frames per second and very smooth playout, but very few videos achieve full-motion frame rates. Overall video performance is most influenced by the bandwidth of the end-user connection to the Internet, but high-bandwidth Internet connections are pushing the video performance bottleneck closer to the server.

References

[1]
A. Bouch and M. A. Sasse, QUASS - A Tool for Measuring the Subjective Quality of Real-Time Multimedia Audio and Video, In the HCI'98 Conference Companion, pp. 94-95, 1998.
[2]
M. Claypool and J. Riedl. The Effects of High-Speed Networks on Multimedia Jitter, In Proceedings of SCS Euromedia Conference (COMTEC), Munich, Germany, April 1999.
[3]
M. Claypool and J. Tanner. The Effects of Jitter on the Perceptual Quality of Video, In Proceedings of the ACM Multimedia Confirence, Vol. 2, Orlando, Florida, USA, November 1999.
[4]
M. Chesire, A. Wolman, G. Voelker, and H. Levy. Measurement and Analysis of a Streaming Media Workload, In Proceedings of the USENIX Symposium on Internet Technologies and Systems (USITS), San Francisco, CA, USA, March 2001.
[5]
J. Devore and R. Peck, Statistics - The Exploration and Analysis of Data, 2nd edition, Wadsworth, Inc., 1993.
[6]
S. Floyd and K. Fall. Promoting the Use of End-to-End Congestion Control in the Internet, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, February 1998.
[7]
J. Gerek and W. Buchanan. MMLib - A Library for End-to-End Simulation of Multimedia over a WAN, Major Qualifying Project MQP- MLC-MJ98, May 1998. (Advisor Mark Claypool).
[8]
Jupiter Media Metrix. "Users of Media Player Applications Increased 33 Percent Since Last Year", Press Release, April 2001. http://www.jup.comicompany/pressrelease-.jsp?doc=pr010403
[9]
B. Krishnamurthy and C. Wills. Analyzing Factors that Influence End-to-End Web Performance. In Proceedings of the Ninth International World Wide Web Conference, Amsterdam, Netherlands, May 2000.
[10]
Y. Liu and M. Claypool. Using Redundancy to Repair Video Damaged by Network Data Loss, In Proceedings of ACM Multimedia Computing and Networking (MMCN), San Jose, CA, USA, January 2000.
[11]
B. Mah. An Empirical Model of HTTP Network Trafftc, In Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM Conference, pp. 30 1-3 13, 1997.
[12]
J. van der Merwe, R. Caceres, Y-H. Chu, C. Sreenan. Mmdump - A Tool for Monitoring Internet Multimedia Traffic. ACM Computer Communication Review, 30(4), October 2000.
[13]
A. Mena and J. Heidemann. An Empirical Study of Real Audio Traffic. In Proceedings of the IEEE Infocom, pp. 101-110. Tel-Aviv, Israel. March 2000.
[14]
V. Paxson. End-to-end Internet Packet Dynamics, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 271-292, 1999.
[15]
C. Perkins, O. Hodson and V. Hardman. A Survey of Packet- Loss Recovery Techniques for Streaming Audio, IEEE Network Magazine, September/October 1998.
[16]
Real Networks Incorporated, RealProducer User's Guide, copyright 2000. http://www.service.real.com/help/library/guides/producerplus85/producer.htm
[17]
Real Networks Incorporated, RealPlayer 8 User Manual, copyright 2000. http://service.real.com/help/player/plus_manual.8/rppmanual.htm
[18]
R. Ramjee, J. Kurose, D. Towsley and H. Schulzrinne, Adaptive Playout Mechanisms for Packetized Audio Applications in Wide-Area Networks, In Proceedings of IEEE Computer and Communications Societies on Networking for Global Communication, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 1994.
[19]
D. Stone and K. Jeffay, An Empirical Study of Delay Jitter Management Policies, ACM Multimedia Systems, Vol. 2, No. 6, pp. 267- 279, January 1995.
[20]
H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao and R. Lanphier. Real Time Streaming Protocol (RTSP), Internet Request for Comments RFC 2326, April 1998.
[21]
R. Steinmetz, Human Perception of Jitter and Media Synchronization, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, Vol. 14, No. 1, January 1996.
[22]
A. Tripathi and M. Claypool. Improving Multimedia Streaming with Content-Aware Video Scaling, Technical Report WPI-CS-TR-01-02, CS Department, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, February 2001.
[23]
K. Thompson, G. Miller and R. Wilder. Wide-Area Interent Traffic Patterns and Characteristics, IEEE Network, November/December 1997.
[24]
A. Watson and M. A. Sasse, Evaluating Audio and Video Quality in Low-Cost Multimedia Conferencing Systems, Interacting with Computers, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 255-275.
[25]
A. Watson and M. A. Sasse. Measuring Perceived Quality of Speech and Video in Multimedia Conferencing Applications, In Proceedings of the ACM Multimedia Conference, pp. 55-60, Bristol, UK, September 1998.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Modeling and Analysis of Broadcast-Cellular Converged Networks for Hybrid Live and On-Demand ServicesIEEE Transactions on Broadcasting10.1109/TBC.2023.333201170:1(14-25)Online publication date: Mar-2024
  • (2018)An Empirical Analysis of User Behavior for P2P IPTV WorkloadsThe International Conference on Advanced Machine Learning Technologies and Applications (AMLTA2018)10.1007/978-3-319-74690-6_25(252-263)Online publication date: 26-Jan-2018
  • (2016)Measurement of Quality of Experience of Video-on-Demand Services: A SurveyIEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials10.1109/COMST.2015.240142418:1(401-418)Online publication date: 27-Jan-2016
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
IMW '01: Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Internet measurement
November 2001
319 pages
ISBN:1581134355
DOI:10.1145/505202
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 November 2001

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Article

Conference

SIGCOMM WS'01
Sponsor:
SIGCOMM WS'01: ACM SIGCOMM Internet Measurement Workshop 2001
November 1 - 2, 2001
California, San Francisco, USA

Acceptance Rates

IMW '01 Paper Acceptance Rate 29 of 80 submissions, 36%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 29 of 80 submissions, 36%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)10
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 02 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Modeling and Analysis of Broadcast-Cellular Converged Networks for Hybrid Live and On-Demand ServicesIEEE Transactions on Broadcasting10.1109/TBC.2023.333201170:1(14-25)Online publication date: Mar-2024
  • (2018)An Empirical Analysis of User Behavior for P2P IPTV WorkloadsThe International Conference on Advanced Machine Learning Technologies and Applications (AMLTA2018)10.1007/978-3-319-74690-6_25(252-263)Online publication date: 26-Jan-2018
  • (2016)Measurement of Quality of Experience of Video-on-Demand Services: A SurveyIEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials10.1109/COMST.2015.240142418:1(401-418)Online publication date: 27-Jan-2016
  • (2016)The past, present, and future of transport-layer multipathJournal of Network and Computer Applications10.1016/j.jnca.2016.09.00575:C(236-258)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2016
  • (2015)Profiling temporal event behavior for demand prediction in cloud application performance management2015 IEEE International Conference on Communication Workshop (ICCW)10.1109/ICCW.2015.7247458(1902-1908)Online publication date: Jun-2015
  • (2013)A Workload Analysis of Live Event Broadcast Service in CloudProcedia Computer Science10.1016/j.procs.2013.06.14319(1028-1033)Online publication date: 2013
  • (2013)ReferencesScalable Video on Demand10.1002/9780470022702.refs(233-244)Online publication date: 16-Aug-2013
  • (2011)Measurement and analysis of a large scale commercial mobile internet TV systemProceedings of the 2011 ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement conference10.1145/2068816.2068837(209-224)Online publication date: 2-Nov-2011
  • (2011)An Objective Approach to Measuring Video Playback Quality in Lossy Networks using TCPIEEE Communications Letters10.1109/LCOMM.2010.110310.10164215:1(76-78)Online publication date: Jan-2011
  • (2011)Realization of subjective tests in the environment of streaming services2011 9th International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications (ICETA)10.1109/ICETA.2011.6112595(103-107)Online publication date: Oct-2011
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media