Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
article

Preliminary evidence for the effect of automatic responses to authority on information technology diffusion

Published: 01 July 2001 Publication History

Abstract

Successful diffusion of IT within an organization can depend on IT use decisions by many individuals. Current rational models focusing on cognitive determinants of such IT use decisions explain 30 to 40 percent of organizational members' use behaviors. This article demonstrates, via a laboratory study, that automatic unthinking responses may be significant in explaining user behavior. We find that automatic responses to authority, that are cued by incentives and controls, may explain more than 20 percent of IT use variance, over and above that accounted for by rational decision making. This suggests interesting opportunities for IT diffusion research, exploring automatic IT use responses resulting from authority, as well as other automatic response generators such as reciprocation and consistency.

References

[1]
Adams, G. R. (1977), "Physical Attractiveness Research: Toward a Developmental Social Psychology of Beauty," Human Development, Vol. 20, pp. 217-239.
[2]
Ajzen, I. (1991), "The Theory of Planned Behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 50, pp. 179-211.
[3]
Ajzen, I. (1987). "Attitudes, Traits, and Actions: Dispositional Prediction of Behavior in Personality and Social Psychology," in L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 20, New York: Academic Press, pp. 1-63.
[4]
Arrow, K. (1985). "The Economics of Agency," in J. W. Pratt and R. J. Zeckhauser (Eds.), Principal and Agents: The Structure of Business, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, pp. 37-51.
[5]
Attewell, P. (1992). "Technology Diffusion and Organizational Learning: The Case of Business Computing," Organization Science, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 1-19.
[6]
Benbasat, I., Dexter, A. S., and Todd, P. (1986). "An Experimental Program Investigating Color-Enhanced and Graphical Information Presentation: An Integration of the Findings," Communication of the ACM, Vol. 29 No. 11, pp. 1094-1105.
[7]
Blacker, F., and Brown, C. (1985). "Evaluation and Impact of Information Technologies on People in Organizations," Human Relations, Vol. 38 No. 3, pp. 213-231.
[8]
Blake, R., and Mouton, J. (1979). "Intergroup Problem Solving in Organizations: From Theory to Practice," in W. Austin and S. Worchel (Eds.), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole, pp. 151-163.
[9]
Bodenhausen, G. V,. and Lichtenstein, M. (1987). "Social Stereotypes and Information Processing Strategies," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 52, pp. 871-880.
[10]
Broeder, D. (1959). "The University of Chicago Jury Project," Nebraska Law Review, Vol. 38, pp. 744-760.
[11]
Byrne, D. (1971). The Attraction Paradigm, New York: Academic Press.
[12]
Chin, W. W., and Frye, T. A. (1994). PLS-Graph User's Manual, University of Calgary, Faculty of Management, Alberta, Canada.
[13]
Cialdini, R. B. (1993). Influence: Science and Practice, 3rd Edition, New York: Harper Collins.
[14]
Cohen, M., and Davis, N. (1981). Medication Errors: Causes and Prevention, Philadelphia, PA: G.F. Stickley Co.
[15]
Curley, K., and Pyburn, P. (1982), "'Intellectual Technologies: The Key to Improving White Collar Productivity," Sloan Management Review, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 31-40.
[16]
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., and Warshaw, P. R. (1989). "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models," Management Science, Vol. 35, No. 8, pp. 982-1003.
[17]
DiMaggio, P., and Powell, W. (1991). "Introduction." in W. Powell and P. DiMaggio (Eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 1-38.
[18]
Driscoll, R., Davis, K. E., Litetz, M. E. (1972). "Parental Interference and Romantic Love: The Romeo and Juliet Effect," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 24, pp. 1-10.
[19]
Eagly, A. H., and Chaiken, S. (1993). The Psychology of Attitudes, New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
[20]
Eisenhardt, K. (1989). "Agency Theory: A Review and an Assessment," Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 57-74.
[21]
Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
[22]
Foushee, M. C. (1984). "Dyads and Triads at 35,000 Feet: Factors Affecting Group Process and Aircraft Performance," American Psychologist, Vol. 39, pp. 885-893.
[23]
Francik, E., Rudman, S. E., Cooper, D., and Levine, S. (1991). "Putting Innovation to Work: Adoption Strategies for Multimedia Communication Systems," Communications of the ACM, Vol. 35, No. 12, pp. 52-63.
[24]
Gouldner, A. W. (1960). "The Norm of Reciprocity: A Preliminary Statement," American Sociological Review, Vol. 25, pp. 161-178.
[25]
Hofling, C. K., Brotzman, E., Dalrymple, S., Graves, N., and Pierce, C. M. (1966). "An Experimental Study of Nurse-Physician Relationships," Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, Vol. 143, pp. 171-180
[26]
Ives, B., and Learmonth, G. (1984). "The Information System as a Competitive Weapon," Communications of the ACM, Vol. 27, No. 12, pp. 1193-1201.
[27]
Keen, P. G. W. (1981). "Information Systems and Organizational Change," Communications of the ACM, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 24-33.
[28]
Keen, P. G. W., and Scott-Morton, M. S. (1978). Decision Support Systems: An Organizational Perspective, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
[29]
Langer, E. J. (1989). "Minding Matters: The Consequences of Mindlessness-Mindfulness," in L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 22, San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 137-173.
[30]
Leonard-Barton, D., and Deschamps, I. (1988). "Managerial Influence in the Implementation of New Technology," Management Science, Vol. 34, No. 10, pp. 1252-1265.
[31]
Markus, M. L., and Robey, D. (1988). "Information Technology and Organizational Change," Management Science, Vol. 34, No. 5, pp. 583-598.
[32]
Mathieson, K. (1991). "Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior," Information Systems Research, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 173-191.
[33]
McIntyre, S. H. (1982). "Experimental Study of the Impact of Judgment Based Marketing Models," Management Science, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 17-33.
[34]
Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to Authority, New York: Harper and Row.
[35]
Moore, G. C., and Benbasat, I. (1991). "Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation," Information Systems Research, Vol. 2 No. 3, pp. 192-222.
[36]
Nilakant, V., and Rao, H. (1994). "Agency Theory and Uncertainty in Organizations: An Evaluation," Organization Studies, Vol. 15, No. 5, pp. 649-672.
[37]
Rockart, J. F., Earl, M. J., and Ross, J. W. (1996). "Eight Imperatives for the New IT Organization," Sloan Management Review, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 43-55.
[38]
SAS Institute, Inc. (1990). SAS/Stat Users Guide, Vol. 1 and 2, Cary, NC.
[39]
Sappington, D. E. M. (1991). "Incentives in Principal-Agent Relationships," Journal of Economic Review, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 45-66.
[40]
Schwarz, N. (1984). "When Reactance Effects Persist Despite Restoration of Freedom: Investigations of Time Delay and Vicarious Control," European Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 14, pp. 405-419.
[41]
Subramanian, A., and Nilakanta, S. (1994). "Measurement: A Blueprint for Theory-Building in MIS," Information and Management, Vol. 26, pp. 13-20.
[42]
Szajna, B. A., and Scamell, R. W. (1993). "The Effects of Information System User Expectations on Their Performance and Perceptions," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 17, No. 4, p. 493.
[43]
Taylor, S., and Todd, P. A. (1995). "Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models," Information Systems Research, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 144-176.
[44]
Trafimow, David (1996). "The Importance of Attitudes in the Prediction of College Students' Intentions to Drink," Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 26, pp. 2167-2188.
[45]
Triandis, H. C. (1980). "Values, Attitudes, and Interpersonal Behavior", in H. E. Howe, Jr. and M. M. Page (Eds.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation --- 1979, Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, Vol. 27, pp. 195-259.

Cited By

View all
  • (2015)Pre-negotiated influences on business-IT alignment in a project setting2015 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET)10.1109/PICMET.2015.7273214(1736-1747)Online publication date: Aug-2015
  • (2015)Planned behaviour of tourism students’ entrepreneurial intentions in ChinaApplied Economics10.1080/00036846.2015.109600648:13(1240-1254)Online publication date: 9-Oct-2015
  • (2015)B2B relationship calculus: quantifying resource effects in service-dominant logicJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science10.1007/s11747-015-0467-045:3(402-427)Online publication date: 10-Dec-2015
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 July 2001
Published in SIGMIS Volume 32, Issue 3

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. IT diffusion
  2. IT use
  3. agency theory
  4. automatic response
  5. controls
  6. deference to authority
  7. incentives
  8. nonrational
  9. principal-agent
  10. unthinking response

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 15 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2015)Pre-negotiated influences on business-IT alignment in a project setting2015 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET)10.1109/PICMET.2015.7273214(1736-1747)Online publication date: Aug-2015
  • (2015)Planned behaviour of tourism students’ entrepreneurial intentions in ChinaApplied Economics10.1080/00036846.2015.109600648:13(1240-1254)Online publication date: 9-Oct-2015
  • (2015)B2B relationship calculus: quantifying resource effects in service-dominant logicJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science10.1007/s11747-015-0467-045:3(402-427)Online publication date: 10-Dec-2015
  • (2014)Indian Consumer Attitudes Toward Food Safety: An Exploratory StudyJournal of Food Products Marketing10.1080/10454446.2013.85599220:3(229-243)Online publication date: 21-Apr-2014
  • (2008)Segmentation of US consumers based on food safety attitudesBritish Food Journal10.1108/00070700810887167110:7(691-705)Online publication date: 4-Jul-2008
  • (2006)Group Creativity: The Effects of Extrinsic, Intrinsic, and Obligation MotivationsCreativity Research Journal10.1207/s15326934crj1802_318:2(153-172)Online publication date: Apr-2006
  • (2005)Competitive intelligence systemsACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems10.1145/1066149.106615436:2(43-57)Online publication date: 7-Jun-2005
  • (2004)An exploratory study of alignment issues of IT acceptance with professionals in a project setting37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the10.1109/HICSS.2004.1265507(10 pp.)Online publication date: 2004

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media