Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/777005.777017acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesihmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Interfaces procédurales

Published: 26 November 2002 Publication History

Abstract

A procedural interface enables users to concentrate on the task they are performing and to avoid any inappropriate overload coming from the use of desktop interfaces (where procedures are implicitly office-oriented). It automatically reconfigure itself depending its context of use, taking into account three types of cognitive functions: anticipation, interaction and recovery. A procedural interface involves several concepts such as simplicity, redundancy, cognitive stability and cognitive support. An example is provided in the domain of computer-supported meetings.

References

[1]
1. Apple. Human Interface Guidelines: The Apple Desktop Interface. Addison-Wesley.]]
[2]
2. Boy, G.A. (1996). The Group Elicitation Method for Participatory Design and Usability Testing. Companion Proceedings of CHI'96, ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM Press, New York.]]
[3]
3. Boy, G.A. (1998a). Cognitive Function Analysis for Human-Centered Automation of Safety-Critical Systems in Proceedings of CHI'98 (May 1998), ACM Press, 265-272.]]
[4]
4. Boy, G.A. (1998b). Cognitive Function Analysis. Ablex. Distributed by Greenwood Publishing Group, Westport, CT.]]
[5]
5. Boy, G.A. (1998c). L'interaction homme-machine: une approche de l'ingénierie cognitive pour la conception centrée sur l'homme. Sécurité et cognition. Colloque du GIS Sciences de la Cognition, Ministère de la Recherche. HERMES Science, Paris.]]
[6]
6. Boy, G.A. & De Brito, G. (2000). Toward a Categorization of Factors related to Procedure Following and Situation Awareness. Proceedings of the HCI-Aero 2000 Conference, In Cooperation with ACM-SIGCHI. Cepadues, Toulouse, France.]]
[7]
7. Boy, G.A. & Ferro, D. (to appear in 2001). Using Cognitive Function Analysis to Prevent Controlled Flight Into Terrain. Chapter for the Human Factors and Flight Deck Design Book, Don Harris (Ed.), Ashgate, Aldershot, UK.]]
[8]
8. Gibson, J.J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R.E. Shaw & J. Bradshaw (Eds.) Perceiving, Acting and Knowing. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.]]
[9]
9. Hollnagel, E. (1993). The phenotype of erroneous action. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 39, pp. 1-32.]]
[10]
10. Jordan, M.I. & Rosenbaum, D.A. (1989). Action. In Foundations of Cognitive Science, Michael I. Posner (Ed.). The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.]]
[11]
11. Moran, T.P. (1994). Sepcial issue on context in design. HCI Journal. Volume 9, pp. 1-149.]]
[12]
12. Moran, T.P. & Dourish P. (2001). Introduction to the special issue on Context-Aware Computing. HCI Journal, Volume 16.]]
[13]
13. Nielsen, J. (1999). Designing Web Usability. The Practice of Simplicity. New Riders Publishing, Indiana.]]
[14]
14. Norman, D.A. (1986). Cognitive Engineering. In User-Centered System Design., D. Norman & S. Draper (Eds.), Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate, pp. 31-61.]]
[15]
15. Norman, D.A. (1998). The invisible computer. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.]]
[16]
16. Norman, D.A. (1999). Affordances, conventions and design. Interactions, 6, 3, pp. 38-43.]]
[17]
17. Rasmussen, J. (1986). Information Processing and Human-Machine Interaction - An Approach to Cognitive Engineering. North Holland Series in System Science and Engineering, A.P. Sage, Ed.]]
[18]
18. Reason, J. (1990). Human error. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]]
[19]
19. Salber, D., Dey, A.K. & Abowd, G.D. (1999). The Context Toolkit: Aiding the Development of Context-Enabled Applications. Proceedings of CHI'99, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, pp. 434-441.]]
[20]
20. Smith, D. (1982). Designing the Star User Interface. Byte, April, pp. 242-282.]]

Cited By

View all
  • (2016)FlexibilityTangible Interactive Systems10.1007/978-3-319-30270-6_6(107-129)Online publication date: 22-Apr-2016
  • (2007)Perceived complexity and cognitive stability in human-centered designProceedings of the 7th international conference on Engineering psychology and cognitive ergonomics10.5555/1784197.1784200(10-21)Online publication date: 22-Jul-2007
  • (2005)Maturité, automation et expérience des utilisateursProceedings of the 17th Conference on l'Interaction Homme-Machine10.1145/1148550.1148602(313-320)Online publication date: 27-Sep-2005

Index Terms

  1. Interfaces procédurales

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    IHM '02: Proceedings of the 14th Conference on l'Interaction Homme-Machine
    November 2002
    307 pages
    ISBN:1581136153
    DOI:10.1145/777005
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
    • AFIHM: Ass. Francophone d'Interaction Homme-Machine
    • Laboratoire d'Informatique Scientifique et Industrielle
    • GDR-PRC Information Interaction Intelligence
    • SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
    • Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Télécommunications
    • INRIA: Institut Natl de Recherche en Info et en Automatique
    • Association Française des Sciences et Technologies de I'Information

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 26 November 2002

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 103 of 199 submissions, 52%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 11 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2016)FlexibilityTangible Interactive Systems10.1007/978-3-319-30270-6_6(107-129)Online publication date: 22-Apr-2016
    • (2007)Perceived complexity and cognitive stability in human-centered designProceedings of the 7th international conference on Engineering psychology and cognitive ergonomics10.5555/1784197.1784200(10-21)Online publication date: 22-Jul-2007
    • (2005)Maturité, automation et expérience des utilisateursProceedings of the 17th Conference on l'Interaction Homme-Machine10.1145/1148550.1148602(313-320)Online publication date: 27-Sep-2005

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media