Article

Free access

Selecting the “right” programming language

Author:

Alan L. TharpAuthors Info & Claims

SIGCSE '82: Proceedings of the thirteenth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education

February 1982

Pages 151 - 155

https://doi.org/10.1145/800066.801358

Published: 01 February 1982 Publication History

PDF eReader

Abstract

With the diversity of high-level programming languages available, selecting the “right” one for a computer science curriculum or course can be a befuddling process. For a multitude of reasons, such as the manner in which students approach problems to the utilization of scarce computing resources, the ramifications of a decision on the choice of a programming language are significant throughout a computer science curriculum. The purpose of this paper is to provide information relevant to the selection process. Particular attention is given to COBOL, FORTRAN, Pascal, PL-1, and Snobol; both qualitative and quantitative factors are considered. The quantitative results were obtained from processing a binary tree insertion and retrieval algorithm in each language. The machine resources used for this algorithm are given for both interpreter and compiler versions of translators for each language.

References

[1]

J. W. Atwood and E. Regener, "Teaching Subsets of Pascal", Proceedings Twelfth SIGCSE Technical Symposium, pp. 96-103 (1981).

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[2]

Austing et al, "Curriculum '78: Recommendations for the Undergraduate Program in Computer Science", CACM, 22, pp. 147-166 (1979).

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[3]

H. J. Boom and E. D. Jong, "A Critical Comparison of Several Programming Language Implementations", Software-Practice and Experience, 10, pp. 435-473 (1980).

Crossref

Google Scholar

[4]

R. L. Ernst and P. S. Wang, "Experimental Measurement of Program Efficiency", ACM 1977 CSC Conference (1977).

Google Scholar

[5]

W. A. Harrison and K. I. Magel, "A Suggested Course in Introductory Computer Programming", Proceedings Twelfth SIGCSE Technical Symposium, pp. 50-56 (1981).

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[6]

D. E. Knuth, The Art of Computer Programming, 3, Sorting and Searching, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA (1973).

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[7]

J. G. Meinke and J. A. Beidler, "Alternatives to the Traditional First Course in Computing", Proceedings Twelfth SIGCSE Technical Symposium, pp. 57-60 (1981).

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[8]

M. Shaw, G. T. Almes, J. M. Newcomer, B. K. Reid and W. Wulf, "A Comparison of Programming Languages for Software Engineering", Software-Practice and Experience, 11, pp. 1-52 (1981).

Crossref

Google Scholar

[9]

A. L. Tharp, "A Comparison of COBOL, FORTRAN, PL-1 and SPITBOL", Computer Languages, 2, pp. 171-178 (1977).

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[10]

R. L. Wexelblat, "The Consequences of One's First Programming Language", Software-Practice and Experience, 11, pp. 733-740 (1981).

Crossref

Google Scholar

Cited By

View all

Sobral S(2021)The Old Question: Which Programming Language Should We Choose to Teach to Program?Advances in Digital Science10.1007/978-3-030-71782-7_31(351-364)Online publication date: 15-Mar-2021
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71782-7_31
Blanchard JGardner-McCune CAnthony LZhang JSherriff MHeckman SCutter PMonge A(2020)Dual-Modality Instruction and LearningProceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education10.1145/3328778.3366865(818-824)Online publication date: 26-Feb-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3328778.3366865
Sobral S(2020)The First Programming Language and Freshman Year in Computer Science: Characterization and Tips for Better Decision MakingTrends and Innovations in Information Systems and Technologies10.1007/978-3-030-45697-9_16(162-174)Online publication date: 18-May-2020
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45697-9_16
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Selecting the “right” programming language
1. Social and professional topics
  1. Professional topics
    1. Computing education
      1. Computing education programs
        Computer science education
      2. Model curricula
2. Software and its engineering
  1. Software notations and tools
    1. General programming languages

Recommendations

Selecting the “right” programming language
Proceedings of the 13th SIGCSE symposium on Computer science education

With the diversity of high-level programming languages available, selecting the “right” one for a computer science curriculum or course can be a befuddling process. For a multitude of reasons, such as the manner in which students approach problems to ...
Read More
A comparison of Cobol, Fortran, PL-I and Spitbol

Spitbol, the compiler version of the symbol manipulation language Snobol 4, is compared with the well-known higher-level languages of Cobol, Fortran and PL-I. An algorithm for searching and insertion into a binary tree was chosen for a comparison ...
Read More
From Babbage to Babel and beyond: a brief history of programming languages
Read More

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

SIGCSE '82: Proceedings of the thirteenth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education

February 1982

271 pages

ISBN:0897910672

DOI:10.1145/800066

ACM SIGCSE Bulletin Volume 14, Issue 1
Proceedings of the 13th SIGCSE symposium on Computer science education
February 1982
278 pages
ISSN:0097-8418
DOI:10.1145/953051
Issue’s Table of Contents

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 February 1982

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Article

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,595 of 4,542 submissions, 35%

Upcoming Conference

SIGCSE Virtual 2024

Sponsor:
sigcse

1st ACM Virtual Global Computing Education Conference

December 5 - 8, 2024

Virtual Event , NC , USA

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

14
Total Citations
View Citations
605
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)77
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)9

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

Sobral S(2021)The Old Question: Which Programming Language Should We Choose to Teach to Program?Advances in Digital Science10.1007/978-3-030-71782-7_31(351-364)Online publication date: 15-Mar-2021
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71782-7_31
Blanchard JGardner-McCune CAnthony LZhang JSherriff MHeckman SCutter PMonge A(2020)Dual-Modality Instruction and LearningProceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education10.1145/3328778.3366865(818-824)Online publication date: 26-Feb-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3328778.3366865
Sobral S(2020)The First Programming Language and Freshman Year in Computer Science: Characterization and Tips for Better Decision MakingTrends and Innovations in Information Systems and Technologies10.1007/978-3-030-45697-9_16(162-174)Online publication date: 18-May-2020
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45697-9_16
Parker KBeard DDavey B(2020)Teaching Computer Languages in UniversitiesEncyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies10.1007/978-3-030-10576-1_49(1664-1668)Online publication date: 14-Jun-2020
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10576-1_49
Parker KBeard DDavey B(2020)Programming Language Selection for University CoursesEncyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies10.1007/978-3-030-10576-1_131(1356-1367)Online publication date: 14-Jun-2020
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10576-1_131
Blanchard JGardner-McCune CAnthony L(2019)Effects of Code Representation on Student Perceptions and Attitudes Toward Programming2019 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC)10.1109/VLHCC.2019.8818762(127-131)Online publication date: Oct-2019
https://doi.org/10.1109/VLHCC.2019.8818762
Parker KBeard DDavey B(2019)Teaching Computer Languages in UniversitiesEncyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies10.1007/978-3-319-60013-0_49-1(1-5)Online publication date: 6-Jun-2019
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60013-0_49-1
Parker KBeard DDavey B(2019)Programming Language Selection for University CoursesEncyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies10.1007/978-3-319-60013-0_131-1(1-12)Online publication date: 13-Apr-2019
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60013-0_131-1
Graham PWeingart T(2009)Processing language in introduction to computer science honors (CS110h)Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges10.5555/1629036.162904725:2(72-78)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2009
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/1629036.1629047
Goosen L(2008)A Brief History of Choosing First Programming LanguagesHistory of Computing and Education 3 (HCE3)10.1007/978-0-387-09657-5_11(167-170)Online publication date: 2008
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09657-5_11
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Cited By

Index Terms

Recommendations

Selecting the “right” programming language

A comparison of Cobol, Fortran, PL-I and Spitbol

From Babbage to Babel and beyond: a brief history of programming languages