Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/860575.860785acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaamasConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Implementing responsibility for states and events

Published: 14 July 2003 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    Contracts in the real world often rest upon a notion of responsibility, by which parties commit to the fulfilment of particular imperatives embedded in the contract. Responsibility is not the same as direct action, nor commitment to such action: a canonical example is where imperatives are issued, in a particular context, to effect the delegation of responsibility. Furthermore, responsibility can range not only over particular activities, but also over particular states of the world. This paper first explains the problem of state-based and event-based responsibility, and then illustrates how this is operationalised in the NoA system through the use of an example.

    References

    [1]
    P. R. Cohen and H. J. Levesque. Teamwork. Nous, 25(4):487--512, 1991.]]
    [2]
    C. L. Hamblin. Imperatives. Basil Blackwell, 1987.]]
    [3]
    M. J. Kollingbaum and T. J. Norman. Supervised interaction. In AAMAS-02, pp. 272--279, 2002.]]
    [4]
    J.-J. C. Meyer and R. J. Wieringa, editors. Deontic Logic in Computer Science. Wiley, 1993.]]
    [5]
    T. J. Norman and C. A. Reed. Delegation and responsibility. Intelligent Agents VII, pp. 136--149, 2001.]]

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2003)Norm adoption in the NoA agent architectureProceedings of the second international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems10.1145/860575.860784(1038-1039)Online publication date: 14-Jul-2003

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    AAMAS '03: Proceedings of the second international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems
    July 2003
    1200 pages
    ISBN:1581136838
    DOI:10.1145/860575
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 14 July 2003

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Conference

    AAMAS03
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,155 of 5,036 submissions, 23%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 10 Aug 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2003)Norm adoption in the NoA agent architectureProceedings of the second international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems10.1145/860575.860784(1038-1039)Online publication date: 14-Jul-2003

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media