Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/988772.988807acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesecConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

A game tree strategy for automated negotiation

Published: 17 May 2004 Publication History

Abstract

Chess playing programs running on small computers, such as PocketPCs,can beat most human players. This paper reports a feasibility studyto determine if the techniques programs use to play chess can beapplied to the more economically interesting problem of negotiation.This study allowed us to identify the essential differences betweenplaying chess and negotiating and to demonstrate possible solutions tothe problems we encountered.

Reference

[1]
A. H. Karp, R. Wu, K.-Y. Chen, and A. Zhang. A game tree strategy for automated negotiation. http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2003/HPL-2003-154.html.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
EC '04: Proceedings of the 5th ACM conference on Electronic commerce
May 2004
278 pages
ISBN:1581137710
DOI:10.1145/988772
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 17 May 2004

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tag

  1. automated negotiation

Qualifiers

  • Article

Conference

EC04
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

EC '04 Paper Acceptance Rate 24 of 146 submissions, 16%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 664 of 2,389 submissions, 28%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 12 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2016)Learning about the opponent in automated bilateral negotiationAutonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems10.1007/s10458-015-9309-130:5(849-898)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2016
  • (2016)BackgroundExploring the Strategy Space of Negotiating Agents10.1007/978-3-319-28243-5_2(15-52)Online publication date: 22-Jan-2016
  • (2016)IntroductionExploring the Strategy Space of Negotiating Agents10.1007/978-3-319-28243-5_1(1-14)Online publication date: 22-Jan-2016
  • (2014)GENIUSComputational Intelligence10.1111/j.1467-8640.2012.00463.x30:1(48-70)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2014
  • (2010)Supporting the Design of General Automated NegotiatorsInnovations in Agent-Based Complex Automated Negotiations10.1007/978-3-642-15612-0_4(69-87)Online publication date: 2010
  • (2008)Towards Automated Service TradingE-Business and Telecommunication Networks10.1007/978-3-540-70760-8_1(3-14)Online publication date: 2008
  • (2006)A conceptual framework for automated negotiation systemsProceedings of the 7th international conference on Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning10.1007/11875581_148(1250-1258)Online publication date: 20-Sep-2006
  • (2004)Rules of engagement for automated negotiationProceedings. First IEEE International Workshop on Electronic Contracting, 2004.10.1109/WEC.2004.1319506(32-39)Online publication date: 2004

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media