Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
Advertisement

< Back to Article

A physicochemical model of odor sampling

Fig 7

Effects of increasing Q-space dimensionality compared with increasing the size of a two-dimensional Q-space.

Receptor activation and receptor occupancy curves are separately depicted (center panels). A. Effects of increasing Q-space dimensionality. Each dimension spanned a range of four q-units, such that the three-dimensional Q-space had a range of [4,4,4], the four-dimensional Q-space was [4,4,4,4], etcetera. B. Effects of increasing the range of a two-dimensional Q-space. Most of the observed effects of higher dimensionality resembled the effects of simple increases in the size of the space, with subtle differences in curvature (compare leftmost three panels). However, Q-space dimensionality, but not range, affected the relationship between activation or occupancy and the discrimination capacity. Most significantly, increased dimensionality clearly reduced peak discrimination capacity, all else being equal, rather than simply moving the curve to the right so as to track receptor activation. This suggests that the larger number of factors contributing to net receptor activation changes based on any single ligand point’s transition dN tends to strengthen a regression to the mean effect, thereby reducing the likelihood of substantial changes in net receptor activation on which discrimination capacity depends.

Fig 7

doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009054.g007