Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access September 30, 2017

Crop residue recycling for economic and environmental sustainability: The case of India

  • Saroj Devi , Charu Gupta , Shankar Lal Jat EMAIL logo and M.S. Parmar
From the journal Open Agriculture

Abstract

India is one of the key producers of food grain, oilseed, sugarcane and other agricultural products. Agricultural crops generate considerable amounts of leftover residues, with increases in food production crop residues also increasing. These leftover residues exhibit not only resource loss but also a missed opportunity to improve a farmer’s income. The use of crop residues in various fields are being explored by researchers across the world in areas such as textile composite non-woven making processes, power generation, biogas production, animal feed, compost and manures, etc. The increasing trend in addition of bio-energy cogeneration plants, increasing demand for animal feedstock and increasing trend for organic agriculture indicates a competitive opportunity forcrop residue in Agriculture. It is to be noted that the use of this left over residue isoften not mutually exclusive which makes measurement of its economic value more difficult.For example, straw can be used as animal bedding and thereafter as a crop fertilizer. In view of this, the main aim of this paper envisaged to know about how much crop residue is left unutilized and how best they can be utilized for alternative purposes for environmental stewardship and sustainability. In this context, an attempt has been made to estimate the total crop residue across the states and its economic value though data available from various government sources and a SWOT analysis performed for possible alternative uses of residue in India. This paper also discusses the successful case studies of India and global level of use of crop residues in economic activities. Over all 516 Mtonnes of crop residue was produced in 2014-15 in India among which cereals were the largest producer of crop residue followed by sugarcane. The energy potential from paddy rice straw crop residue was estimated as 486,955 megawatt for 2014-15 and similarly for coarse cereals it was 226,200megawatt.

References

AndreaeM.O., Merlet P., Emission of Trace Gases and Aerosols from Biomass Burning. Global Biogeochem. Cycles,2001, 15, 955-6610.1029/2000GB001382Search in Google Scholar

BadarinathK.V.S., Chand Kiran T.R., Agriculture crop residue burning in the Indo-Gangetic Plains-A study using IRSP6 WiFS satellite data. Current Science, 2006, 91(8),1085-1089Search in Google Scholar

Chang D., Song Y., Estimates of Biomass Burning Emissions in Tropical Asia Based on Satellite Derived Data. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics,2010, 10, 2335-5110.5194/acp-10-2335-2010Search in Google Scholar

CrutzenP.J., AndreaeM.O., Biomass Burning In the Tropics: Impact on Atmospheric Chemistry and Biogeochemical Cycles. Science,1990, 250, 1669-167810.1126/science.250.4988.1669Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Dia M.,Plant Stand and Nitrogen Management for Maximisation of Yield and Quality of Baby Corn, M.S thesis, Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University,Rajendranagar, Hyderabad., 2005Search in Google Scholar

Dia M., Weindorf D., Thompson C., Cummings H., Cacovean H., Rusu T., Spatial distribution of heavy metals in the soils of Erath county, Texas. StudiaUniversitatis Babes-Bolyai, Geographia, 2009, 2 99-114Search in Google Scholar

Doraiswamy I., Chellamani P., Pineapple-leaf fibers. Textile Progress,1993, 24(1), 1-2510.1080/00405169308688859Search in Google Scholar

EURACHEM 2000. EURACHEM/ CITAC Guide CG 4. Quantifying uncertainty in analytical measurement. In: Ellison SLR, Rosslein M, Williams A (eds) Second edition, 2000Search in Google Scholar

GoI, Annual Report 2016, Ministry of New and Renewable Energy, New Delhi, 2016, (http://mnre.gov.in).http://www.erewise.com/current-affairs/biomass-resources-inindia_art52cbbb9bcd5df.html#.Vd9atPmqqkoSearch in Google Scholar

IEA, Technology Roadmap Bioenergy for Heat and Power, International Energy Agency, Paris, France, 2011Search in Google Scholar

Jain N., Bhatia A., Pathak H., Emission of air pollutants from crop residue burning in India. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 2014, 14(1), 422-3010.4209/aaqr.2013.01.0031Search in Google Scholar

Kim S., Dale B.E., Cumulative energy and global warming impacts from the production of biomass for biobased products. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2004, 7(3-4), 147-16210.1162/108819803323059442Search in Google Scholar

Kumar P., Kumar S., Joshi L.,Socioeconomic and Environmental Implications of Agricultural Residue Burning A Case Study of Punjab, India.Springer New Delhi Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London, 2015Search in Google Scholar

MeshramJ.R., Biomass resources assessment programme and prospects of biomass as an energy resource in India. IREDA News,2002, 13(4), 21-29Search in Google Scholar

MNRE, Ministry of New and Renewable Energy Resources, Government of India, New Delhi, 2009, www.mnre.gov.in/biomassrsourcesSearch in Google Scholar

MOSPI, 2013-14, http://www.mospi.gov.in/announcements/asi-2013-14-vol-iSearch in Google Scholar

Pathak B.S., Crop Residue to Energy. In: Environment and Agriculture (Eds. KL Chadha and MS Swaminathan), Malhotra Publishing House, New Delhi, 2004, pp. 854-869Search in Google Scholar

Pathak H., Bhatia A., Jain N., Aggarwal P.K., Greenhouse gas emission and mitigation in Indian agriculture - A review, In ING Bulletins on Regional Assessment of Reactive Nitrogen, Bulletin No. 19 (Ed. Bijay-Singh), SCON-ING, New Delhi, 2010,p. 34Search in Google Scholar

Pathak H., SaharawatY.S., Gathala M., LadhaJ.K., Impact of resourceconserving technologies in the rice-wheat system. Greenhouse Gas Science & Technology, 2011,1, 261-27710.1002/ghg.27Search in Google Scholar

Reddy N., Yang Y.,Biofibers from agricultural byproducts for industrial applications. USA TRENDS in Biotechnology, 2005, 23(1), 22-2710.1016/j.tibtech.2004.11.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Sarkar A., Yadav R.L., Gangwar B., Bhatia P.C.,Crop residues in India.Modipuram: Project Directorate for Cropping System Research. Technical Bulletin, 1999Search in Google Scholar

Sidhu B.S., BeriV., Experience with managing rice residues in intensive rice-wheat cropping system in Punjab. In I. P. Abrol, R. K. Gupta and R. K. Malik (Eds.), Conservation agriculture: Status and prospects. New Delhi: Centre for Advancement of Sustainable Agriculture, National Agriculture Science Centre,2005, pp. 55-63Search in Google Scholar

Sinha M.K., The use of banana-plant fiber as a substitute for jute. The Journal of The Textile Institute, 1974, 65(27), 27-3310.1080/00405007408630342Search in Google Scholar

Sinha M.K., Ghosh S.K., Processing of pineapple leaf fibers in jute machine. Indian Textile Journal, 1977, 88(10), 105-110Search in Google Scholar

TIFAC, Technology Information Forcasting and Assessment Council, Techno market survey on ‘‘Utilization of agriculture residue (farms and processes)’’. Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi, 1991Search in Google Scholar

TyagiP.D., Fuel from wastes and weeds, Batra book service, New Delhi, 1989,pp. 42-131, www.mospi.nic.in/Mospi_New/site/inner.aspx?status=2&menu_id=92.Search in Google Scholar

VenkataramanC., Habib G., Kadamba D., ShrivastavaM., LeonJ.F., Crouzille B., Boucher O., Streets D.G., Emissions from open biomass burning in India: Integrating the inven- tory approach with high-resolution Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) active-fire and land cover data. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 2006,20(2), 1-1210.1029/2005GB002547Search in Google Scholar

Weindorf D.C., Sarkar R., Dia M., Wang H., Chang Q., Haggard B., McWhirt A., Wooten A., Correlation of X-ray fluorescence spectrometry and inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy for elemental determination in composted products. Compost Sci. Utilization, 2008, 16(2), 79-82, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1065657X.2008.1070236110.1080/1065657X.2008.10702361Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-12-28
Accepted: 2017-7-24
Published Online: 2017-9-30
Published in Print: 2017-9-26

© 2017

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Downloaded on 10.2.2025 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/opag-2017-0053/html
Scroll to top button