Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.3115/1071958.1071998dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmucConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free access

Computational aspects of discourse in the context of MUC-3

Published: 21 May 1991 Publication History

Abstract

Discourse comprises those phenomena that usually do not arise when processing a single sentence. It appears to be the most difficult and probably the least understood aspect of automated message understanding. Five out of fifteen sites on a MUC-3 survey listed discourse as their main weakness and an area in which to concentrate future research. Virtually all systems presented here take a sentence-by-sentence approach to text understanding. Parsing and domain-dependent interpretation of sentences or sentence fragments (usually the latter) are followed by modules that attempt to connect these interpretations into a coherent whole. This paper gives an overview of the modules that make the transition from the interpretation of sentences to the interpretation of the text that contains these sentences. Systems presented in this paper exhibit various degrees of the following discourse understanding capabilities:• identifying portions of text that describe different domain events; this includes the capability of recognizing a single event and the capability of distinguishing multiple events;• resolving references:- pronoun references, e.g., finding the referent of It in the sentence It took place this morning,- proper name references, e.g., understanding that Luis Galan may be referred to as Senator Galan;- definite references, e.g., deciding what is the referent for The attack in the sentence The attack look us by surprise.• discourse representation : representation at the message level.

References

[1]
N. Asher. A typology for attitude verbs and their anaphoric properties. Linguistics and Philosophy, 10:125--198, 1987.
[2]
D. Ayuso. Discourse entities in Janus. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of the ACL, pages 243--250, 1989.
[3]
D. Ayuso, G. Donlon, R. Bobrow, D. MacLaughlin, L. Ramshaw, V. Shaked, and R. Weischedel. Research and development in natural language understanding as part of the Strategic Computing Program-Final Report. Vol. 3: A guide to IRUS-II application development. BBN Report 7191, BBN Systems and Technologies Corp., Cambridge, MA, 1990.
[4]
R. Bobrow, R. Ingria, and D. Stallard. Syntactic and semantic knowledge in the Delphi unification grammar. In Proceedings of the DARPA Speech and Natural Language Workshop, pages 230--236, June 1990.
[5]
R. Bobrow, R. Ingria, and D. Stallard. The mapping unit approach to subcategorization. In Proceedings of the DARPA Speech and Natural Language Workshop, February 1991.
[6]
Michael Brady and Robert C. Berwick (editors). Computational models of discourse. MIT Press, Cambridge, 1986.
[7]
S. Brennan, Friedman M., and C. Pollard. A centering approach to pronouns. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the ACL, pages 155--162. ACL, 1987.
[8]
K. Dahlgren. Coherence relation assignment. In Proceedings of Cognitive Science Society, pages 588--596, 1989.
[9]
T. A. Dijk. Some aspects of text grammar. Mouton, the Hague, 1972.
[10]
T. A. Dijk. Macrostructures. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1980.
[11]
Ralph Grishman and Tomasz Ksiezyk. Causal and temporal text analysis: the role of the domain model. In Proceedings of COLING-90, pages 126--131, 1990.
[12]
B. Grosz, A. Joshi, and S. Weinstein. Providing a unified account of definite noun phrases in discourse. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Meeting of the ACL, pages 44--50. ACL, 1983.
[13]
B. Grosz and C. Sidner. Attention, intentions and the structure of discourse. a review. Computational Linguistics, 7:85--98, 1986.
[14]
B. Grosz and C. Sidner. Attention, intentions and the structure of discourse. a review. Computational Linguistics, 12:175--204, 1986.
[15]
Erhard Hinrichs. Tense, quantifiers, and contexts. Computational Linguistics, 14:3--14, 1988.
[16]
J. Hobbs, M. Stickel, P. Martin, and D. Edwards. Interpretation as abduction. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the ACL, pages 95--103, 1988.
[17]
Jerry R. Hobbs. Resolving pronoun references. Lingua, 44:311--338, 1978.
[18]
Jerry R. Hobbs. Coherence and coreference. Cognitive Science, 3:67--90, 1979.
[19]
R. Ingria and D. Stallard. A computational mechanism for pronominal reference. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of the ACL, pages 262--271. ACL, 1989.
[20]
Lucja Iwańska. Discourse processing module. Technical Report forthcoming, GE Research and Development Center, Schenectady, NY, 1991.
[21]
H. Kamp. A theory of truth and semantic representation. In T. Groenendijk, Janssen, and M. Stokhof, editors, Formal Methods in the Study of Language. Mathematisch Centrum, Amsterdam, 1981.
[22]
Alex Lascarides and Nicholas Asher. Discourse relations and defeasible knowledge. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Meeting of the ACL, pages 55--62, 1991.
[23]
W. Lehnert. Symbolic/Subsymbolic Sentence Analysis: Exploiting the Best of Two Worlds. In J. Barnden and J. Pollack, editors, Advances in Connectionist and Neural Computation Theory, Vol. 1. Ablex Publishers, Norwood, NJ, 1990.
[24]
W. Lehnert, C. Cardie, D. Fisher, E. Riloff, and R. Williams. The CIRCUS System as Used in MUC-3. Technical Report forthcoming, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, 1991.
[25]
C. A. Montgomery and B. C. Glover. A sublanguage for reporting and analysis of space events. In Analyzing language in restricted domains. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1986.
[26]
Rebecca J. Passonneau. A computational model of the semantics of tense and aspect. Computational Linguistics, 14:44--60, 1988.
[27]
V. Propp. Morphology of the folktale. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 1958.
[28]
Lisa Rau and Paul Jacobs. Integrating top-down and bottom-up strategies in a text processing system. In Proceedings of Second Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing, pages 129--135, Morristown, NJ, Feb 1988. ACL.
[29]
B. G. Stalls, R. E. Stumberger, and C. A. Montgomery. Long range air (lra) data base generator (dbg). Technical Report RADC-TR-89-366, Rome Air Development Center, Griffiss AFB, NY, 1990.

Cited By

View all
  • (2010)Using temporal cues for segmenting texts into eventsProceedings of the 7th international conference on Advances in natural language processing10.5555/1884371.1884391(150-161)Online publication date: 16-Aug-2010
  • (1997)Recovering nonlinearly distributed knowledge: Computing discourse structure in factual reportsNatural Language Engineering10.1017/S13513249970017703:2(191-213)Online publication date: 1-Sep-1997
  • (1996)A prosodic analysis of discourse segments in direction-giving monologuesProceedings of the 34th annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics10.3115/981863.981901(286-293)Online publication date: 24-Jun-1996
  • Show More Cited By
  1. Computational aspects of discourse in the context of MUC-3

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image DL Hosted proceedings
    MUC3 '91: Proceedings of the 3rd conference on Message understanding
    May 1991
    357 pages
    ISBN:1558602364

    Publisher

    Association for Computational Linguistics

    United States

    Publication History

    Published: 21 May 1991

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)154
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7
    Reflects downloads up to 25 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2010)Using temporal cues for segmenting texts into eventsProceedings of the 7th international conference on Advances in natural language processing10.5555/1884371.1884391(150-161)Online publication date: 16-Aug-2010
    • (1997)Recovering nonlinearly distributed knowledge: Computing discourse structure in factual reportsNatural Language Engineering10.1017/S13513249970017703:2(191-213)Online publication date: 1-Sep-1997
    • (1996)A prosodic analysis of discourse segments in direction-giving monologuesProceedings of the 34th annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics10.3115/981863.981901(286-293)Online publication date: 24-Jun-1996
    • (1996)Progress in information extractionProceedings of a workshop on held at Vienna, Virginia: May 6-8, 199610.3115/1119018.1119050(127-138)Online publication date: 6-May-1996
    • (1995)Constraint-based event recognition for information extractionProceedings of the 33rd annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics10.3115/981658.981701(296-298)Online publication date: 26-Jun-1995
    • (1995)BENProceedings of the 6th conference on Message understanding10.3115/1072399.1072407(55-69)Online publication date: 6-Nov-1995
    • (1993)BBN's PLUM Probabilistic Language Understanding systemProceedings of a workshop on held at Fredericksburg, Virginia: September 19-23, 199310.3115/1119149.1119171(195-207)Online publication date: 23-Sep-1993
    • (1993)Survey of the Message Understanding ConferencesProceedings of the workshop on Human Language Technology10.3115/1075671.1075684(56-60)Online publication date: 21-Mar-1993
    • (1993)BBNProceedings of the 5th conference on Message understanding10.3115/1072017.1072030(93-107)Online publication date: 25-Aug-1993
    • (1992)BBNProceedings of the 4th conference on Message understanding10.3115/1072064.1072091(169-176)Online publication date: 16-Jun-1992

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media