Rational and Semi-Rational Solutions to the (2 + 1)-Dimensional Maccari System

Abstract

The KP hierarchy reduction method is one of the most reliable and efficient techniques for determining exact solitary wave solutions to nonlinear partial differential equations. In this paper, according to the KP hierarchy reduction technique, rational and some other semi-rational solutions to the (2 + 1)-dimensional Maccari system are investigated. It is shown that two different types of breathers can be derived, and under appropriate parameter constraints, they can be reduced to some well known solutions, involving the homoclinic orbits, dark soliton or anti-dark soliton solution. For the dark and anti-dark solution, its interaction is similar to a resonance soliton. Furthermore, by using a limiting technique, we derive two kinds of rational solutions, one is the lump and the other one is the rogue wave. After constructing these solutions, we further discuss the interactions between the obtained solutions. It is interesting that we obtain a parallel breather and a intersectional breather, which seems very surprising. Finally, we also provide a new three-state interaction, which is composed by the dark-soliton, rogue wave and breather and has never been provided for the Maccari system.

1. Introduction

Within nonlinear science, soliton theory is very important. Since this concept was introduced, much work on integrable systems has been performed. In recent years, some interesting localized waves were obtained, such as soliton [1,2,3,4], traveling wave [5,6,7,8,9], lump solution [10,11,12], rogue wave [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20] and breather [21,22,23,24]. Due to the balance between the nonlinear term and the dispersion, we know that a solitary wave is a stable wave [2,3]. The travelling wave solution is the group-invariant solution of the space-time translation group, which is suitable for a physical system whose space-time translation is invariant. The lump in the (2 + 1)-dimensional system is similar to the rogue wave in the (1 + 1)-dimensional system [11]. On the other hand, the rogue wave for the (2 + 1)-dimensional system contains the localized type and the line rogue wave, and was observed in the deep ocean firstly and appears from nowhere and disappears without trace [13,14]. The Kuznetsov–Ma breather is periodic in time, and decreases exponentially in space [4,21]. The Akhmediev breather behaves very differently, as it is localized in time and periodic in space [23]. The so called Peregrine breather is actually a rogue wave, and it is localized in both time and space [22]. There are differences between the three kinds of breathers, but they are related in some modes of symmetry reduction. That is, the Peregrine breather can be considered as a limit solution of the Kuznetsov–Ma breather or the Akhmediev breather. Specifically, homoclinic orbits have attracted much attention in deterministic nonlinear dynamics [25,26], and can also be regarded as special breathers. Ablowitz et al. provided some research on the homoclinic structure of the nonlinear Schrödinger (NLS) equation, which is closely related to the N-soliton solutions of Hirota. It is astounding that the homoclinic orbits of the focusing NLS equation are associated with the dark solitons of the defocusing NLS equation [26]. Thus, we can say that the breather is very important in the integrable system and the homoclinic orbits solution, as the lump solution and rogue are all related to it.

In this paper, we pay attention to the Maccari system [27]

$$\begin{array}{cc}\hfill & L_y=A_x{A}^{*}+A{A}_x^{*},\hfill \\ \hfill & \mathrm{i}{A}_t+LA+A_{xx}=0\hfill \end{array}$$

(1)

where the superscript ${}^{*}$ in $A^{*}$ indicates the conjugate. Like to the Yajima-Oikawa system [28], this system also describes the interaction between the long wave and the short wave. Additionally, this system is usually used to describe the motion of the solitary wave, localized in a small part of space, in some fields such as hydrodynamics, plasma physics and nonlinear optics. Lai et al. obtained its two-dromion solutions using the technique of the coalescence of wavenumbers [29]. Based on singularity structure analysis, Uthayakumar et al. studied the integrability property of this system [30]. It is well known that there is much research on the Maccari system; however, to our knowledge, there are less systematic studies on the breather as well as the corresponding interactions to this system. Therefore, based on the KP reduction method, we provide a systematic study on the breathers of the Maccari system and then further analyze the interactions between some localized waves.

As to these two classical breathers, the Akhmediev breather and Kuznetsov–Ma breather, their solutions can interconvert with each other by using a wave number transformation ($k_{\mathrm{i}}\to \mathrm{i}{k}_{\mathrm{i}}$). The Maccari system also has two corresponding breather solutions with the wave number transformation (${\mu }_{2k-1}\to \mathrm{i}{\mu }_{2k-1},{\mu }_{2k}\to -\mathrm{i}{\mu }_{2k},{\omega }_{2k-1}\to \mathrm{i}{\omega }_{2k-1},{\omega }_{2k}\to -\mathrm{i}{\omega }_{2k}$). However, the dynamics of these two breathers are different, as one is localized in the x-direction and periodic in the y-direction and the other one has an opposite characteristic. Furthermore, under some special parameter constraints, we can derive some other localized waves, involving the homoclinic orbits solution, dark soliton solution, anti-dark soliton solution, lump solution and rogue wave. After that, we also provide some interactions for these obtained solutions.

The structure of this paper is as follows. Section 2 provides the bilinear form and Gram determinant solution of the Maccari system. Section 3 discusses one type of breather solution, which is localized in one spatial variable and periodic in the other one. Moreover, we also obtain two rational solutions, the lump solution and rogue wave. Then, some combination solutions between them are provided. Section 4 discusses the other type of breather solution, which has an opposite dynamic to the one in Section 3. Under this condition, the dark soliton, anti-dark soliton, rogue wave as well as some interactions are provided. Finally, we present the conclusions in last section.

2. Gram Determinant Solution of Maccari System

We first obtain the bilinear form of Equation (1) as

$$\begin{array}{cc}\hfill & D_x{D}_{y}f·f+{\varrho }^2(f^2-g{g}^{*})=0,\hfill \\ \hfill & (D_x^2+\mathrm{i}{D}_t)g·f=0,\hfill \end{array}$$

(2)

by introducing a new variables transformation

$$\begin{array}{cc}\hfill & A=\frac{\varrho exp\left(-\mathrm{i}bt\right)g}{f},\hfill \\ \hfill & L=2{(lnf)}_{xx}-b,\hfill \end{array}$$

(3)

where f is a real variable, g is a complex one, and the D is the Hirota bilinear operator is defined as

$$D_t^m{D}_x^n(a,b)=\frac{{\partial }^m}{\partial s^m}\frac{{\partial }^n}{\partial r^n}a(t+s,x+r)b(t-s,x-r){|}_{s = 0,r = 0}.$$

In Ref. [31], the authors provide a detailed calculation for the regularity of f and in Ref. [32], the authors prove its regularity systematically.

Our primary goal is to construct the localized wave solutions for the Maccari system. Additionally, we use the classical KP reduction technique. To realize this, we try to use the bilinear equations from the KP hierarchy as follows

$$\begin{array}{cc}\hfill & (D_{x_1}^2-D_{x_2})\upsilon (k+1)\upsilon \left(k\right)=0,\hfill \\ \hfill & (D_{x_1}{D}_{x_{-1}}-2)\upsilon \left(k\right)\upsilon \left(k\right)=-2\upsilon (k+1)\upsilon (k-1),\hfill \end{array}$$

(4)

which has been proved to have the Gram determinant solutions

$$\upsilon \left(k\right)=|{\widehat{m}}_{ij}{\left(k\right)|}_{1\le i,j\le N}$$

(5)

and the entries of the determinant are the following formulas,

$$\begin{array}{cc}\hfill {\widehat{m}}_{ij}\left(k\right)& =c_{ij}+\frac{1}{{\mu }_i+{\omega }_j}{\widehat{\varphi }}_i\left(k\right){\widehat{\psi }}_j\left(k\right),\hfill \\ \hfill {\widehat{\varphi }}_i\left(k\right)& ={({\mu }_i-a)}^k({\mu }_i+{\omega }_i)exp\left(r_i\right),\hfill \\ \hfill {\widehat{\psi }}_j\left(k\right)& ={\left(\frac{-1}{{\omega }_j+a}\right)}^{k}exp\left(s_j\right)\hfill \end{array}$$

with

$$\begin{array}{cc}\hfill r_i& =\frac{1}{{\mu }_i-a}{x}_{-1}+{\mu }_i{x}_1+{\mu }_i^2{x}_2+r_{i0},\hfill \\ \hfill s_j& =\frac{1}{{\omega }_j+a}{x}_{-1}+{\omega }_j{x}_1-{\omega }_i^2{x}_2+s_{j0}\hfill \end{array}$$

where $c_{ij},{\mu }_i,{\omega }_j,r_{i0},s_{j0}$ are complex constant.

Taking the variable transformation

$$\begin{array}{c}\hfill x_1=\mathrm{i}x,x_2=\mathrm{i}t,x_{-1}=\frac{{\varrho }^{2}y}{2},\end{array}$$

i.e.,

$$\begin{array}{c}\hfill {\partial }_{x_1}=-\mathrm{i}{\partial }_x,{\partial }_{x_2}=-\mathrm{i}{\partial }_t,{\partial }_{x_{-1}}=\frac{-2\mathrm{i}}{{\varrho }^2}{\partial }_y,\end{array}$$

and defining the function in Equation (4) as

$$f=\upsilon \left(0\right),g=\upsilon \left(1\right),\tilde{g}=\upsilon (-1),\tilde{g}=g^{*},$$

(6)

we can derive the bilinear equation in Equation (2) from the KP hierarchy in Equation (4).

Therefore, by replacing the function $g^{*}$ with $\tilde{g}$, the Gram determinants solution of Equation (3) can be obtained as

$$\begin{array}{cc}\hfill f& =\left|\begin{array}{c}{\delta }_{ij}+\frac{{\mu }_i+{\omega }_i}{{\mu }_i+{\omega }_j}exp({\zeta }_i+{\eta }_j)\end{array}\right|\hfill \\ \hfill g& =\left|\begin{array}{c}{\delta }_{ij}+(-\frac{{\mu }_i-a}{{\omega }_j+a})\frac{{\mu }_i+{\omega }_i}{{\mu }_i+{\omega }_j}exp({\zeta }_i+{\eta }_j)\end{array}\right|\hfill \\ \hfill \tilde{g}& =\left|\begin{array}{c}{\delta }_{ij}+(-\frac{{\omega }_j+a}{{\mu }_i-a})\frac{{\mu }_i+{\omega }_i}{{\mu }_i+{\omega }_j}exp({\zeta }_i+{\eta }_j)\end{array}\right|\hfill \end{array}$$

(7)

where

$$\begin{array}{cc}\hfill {\zeta }_i& =\frac{{\varrho }^2\mathrm{i}}{2({\mu }_i-a)}y+{\mu }_i\mathrm{i}x-{\mu }_i^2\mathrm{i}t+{\zeta }_{i,0},\hfill \\ \hfill {\eta }_j& =\frac{{\varrho }^2\mathrm{i}}{2({\omega }_i-a)}y+{\omega }_i\mathrm{i}x+{\omega }_i^2\mathrm{i}t+{\eta }_{j,0}.\hfill \end{array}$$

To satisfy our bilinear equation, we should implement the constraint condition $\tilde{g}=g^{*}$, which was verified in Ref. [24]. It should be noted that the integer N in Equation (5) should be even, namely, $N=2M$. Furthermore, we should also let it satisfy the complex conjugate condition, for which the detailed calculations are shown in the following sections.

3. Breather I

In Appendix A, the Breather I to the Maccari system is provided. It can be seen that the exact solutions are very complex, and for simplicity, we only list the first two types, that is, one-breather and two-breather.

(i) Take $M=1$ in Equation (A2), then the breather is

$$\begin{array}{cc}\hfill & A=\frac{\varrho exp(-\mathrm{i}bt)g}{f},\hfill \\ \hfill & L=2{(lnf)}_{xx}-b,\hfill \\ \hfill & f=1+exp\left({\mathrm{\Psi }}_1\right)+exp\left({\mathrm{\Psi }}_1^{*}\right)+A_{12}exp({\mathrm{\Psi }}_1+{\mathrm{\Psi }}_1^{*}),\hfill \\ \hfill & g=1+\frac{2{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1+2a-{\varphi }_1}{2{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1+2a+{\varphi }_1}exp\left({\mathrm{\Psi }}_1\right)+\frac{2{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}+2a+{\varphi }_1}{2{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}+2a-{\varphi }_1}exp\left({\mathrm{\Psi }}_1^{*}\right)+A_{12}\frac{2{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1+2a-{\varphi }_1}{2{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1+2a+{\varphi }_1}\frac{2{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}+2a+{\varphi }_1}{2{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}+2a-{\varphi }_1}exp({\mathrm{\Psi }}_1+{\mathrm{\Psi }}_1^{*})\hfill \end{array}$$

(8)

where $A_{12}=1-\frac{{\varphi }_1^2}{{({\mathrm{\Phi }}_1-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*})}^2},{\mathrm{\Psi }}_1=\mathrm{i}{\varphi }_{1}x+2\mathrm{i}{\varphi }_1{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1}t-\frac{2\mathrm{i}{\varphi }_1{\varrho }^2}{4{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^2-{\varphi }_1^2}y+{\mathrm{\Psi }}_{1,0}$.

Let ${\mathrm{\Phi }}_1={\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1R}+\mathrm{i}{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1I}$, then the corresponding ${\mathrm{\Psi }}_1$ can be written as ${\mathrm{\Psi }}_1={\mathrm{\Psi }}_{1R}+\mathrm{i}{\mathrm{\Psi }}_{1I}$, where

$$\begin{array}{cc}\hfill {\mathrm{\Psi }}_{1R}& =-2{\varphi }_1{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1I}\left[t+\frac{8{\varrho }^2{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1R}}{{[4({\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1R}^2-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1I}^2)-{\varphi }_1^2]}^2+64{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1R}{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1I}}y\right]+{\mathrm{\Psi }}_{1,0},\hfill \\ \hfill {\mathrm{\Psi }}_{1I}& ={\varphi }_1\left[x+2{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1R}t+\frac{2{\varrho }^2\left({\varphi }_1^2+4{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1I}^2-4{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1R}^2\right)}{{[4({\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1R}^2-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1I}^2)-{\varphi }_1^2]}^2+64{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1R}{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1I}}y\right].\hfill \end{array}$$

It is easy to find that when ${\mathrm{\Psi }}_{1R}\to -\infty$, $L\to -b,A\to \varrho exp(-\mathrm{i}bt)$ and when ${\mathrm{\Psi }}_{1R}\to +\infty ,L\to -b$, $A\to \varrho exp(-\mathrm{i}bt)\frac{\left(2{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1R}+2a-{\varphi }_1+2\mathrm{i}{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1I}\right)\left(2{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1R}+2a+{\varphi }_1-2\mathrm{i}{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1I}\right)}{\left(2{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1R}+2a+{\varphi }_1+2\mathrm{i}{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1I}\right)\left(2{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1R}+2a-{\varphi }_1-2\mathrm{i}{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1I}\right)},$; thus, we know that the line ${\mathrm{\Psi }}_{1R}$ will determine the localized property and line ${\mathrm{\Psi }}_{1I}$ will affect the periodic property. Moreover, these two properties are controlled by the common parameters ${\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1R},{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1I},{\varphi }_1,\varrho$. By setting the time $t=0$, we obtain the breather of Equation (3) in Figure 1.

Then, by choosing another different parameter, we provide the evolution progress of homoclinic orbits in Figure 2. We only provide a simple example for one-breather, and this character can also be seen in some multi-breathers.

Now, we provide a brief description of this homoclinic orbit. From the expression of ${\mathrm{\Psi }}_{1R}$ and its figures, we know that it involves two variables, y and t. Thus, it is easy to know that if the spatial variable y vanishes, the localized behavior can only be determined by the time variable. Then, this solution will be different from the general breather. When t is large, it will approach a constant background, and then it will appear as periodic waves, but when t is large, it will revert to the same constant background. Thus, we call them homoclinic orbits.

(ii) When $M=2$, the two-breather solution to Equation (3) is

$$\begin{array}{cc}\hfill & A=\frac{\varrho exp(-\mathrm{i}bt)g}{f},\hfill \\ \hfill & L=2{(lnf)}_{xx}-b,\hfill \\ \hfill & f=B\left|\begin{array}{cccc}\frac{1}{{\varphi }_{1}exp\left({\mathrm{\Psi }}_1\right)}+\frac{1}{{\varphi }_1}& \frac{1}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1}& \frac{1}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1+\frac{{\varphi }_1+{\varphi }_2}{2}}& \frac{1}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1+\frac{{\varphi }_1-{\varphi }_2}{2}}\\ \frac{1}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1}& \frac{1}{{\varphi }_{1}exp\left({\mathrm{\Psi }}_1^{*}\right)}+\frac{1}{{\varphi }_1}& \frac{1}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2+\frac{{\varphi }_1-{\varphi }_2}{2}}& \frac{1}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}+\frac{{\varphi }_1+{\varphi }_2}{2}}\\ \frac{1}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2+\frac{{\varphi }_1+{\varphi }_2}{2}}& \frac{1}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2-\frac{{\varphi }_1-{\varphi }_2}{2}}& \frac{1}{{\varphi }_{2}exp\left({\mathrm{\Psi }}_2\right)}+\frac{1}{{\varphi }_2}& \frac{1}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2}\\ \frac{1}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1-\frac{{\varphi }_1-{\varphi }_2}{2}}& \frac{1}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}+\frac{{\varphi }_1+{\varphi }_2}{2}}& \frac{1}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2}& \frac{1}{{\varphi }_{2}exp{\mathrm{\Psi }}_2^{*}}+\frac{1}{{\varphi }_2}\end{array}\right|\hfill \end{array}$$

(9)

$$\begin{array}{cc}\hfill g& =B\left|\begin{array}{cccc}\frac{1}{{\varphi }_{1}exp\left({\mathrm{\Psi }}_1\right)}+\frac{1}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1+a-\frac{{\varphi }_1}{2}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1+a+\frac{{\varphi }_1}{2}}& \frac{1}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1+a-\frac{{\varphi }_1}{2}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}+a-\frac{{\varphi }_1}{2}}& \frac{1}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1+\frac{{\varphi }_1+{\varphi }_2}{2}}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1+a-\frac{{\varphi }_1}{2}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2+a+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}& \frac{1}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1+\frac{{\varphi }_1-{\varphi }_2}{2}}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1+a-\frac{{\varphi }_1}{2}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}+a-\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}\\ \frac{1}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}+a+\frac{{\varphi }_1}{2}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1+a+\frac{{\varphi }_1}{2}}& \frac{1}{{\varphi }_{1}exp\left({\mathrm{\Psi }}_1^{*}\right)}+\frac{1}{{\varphi }_1}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}+a+\frac{{\varphi }_1}{2}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}+a-\frac{{\varphi }_1}{2}}& \frac{1}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2+\frac{{\varphi }_1-{\varphi }_2}{2}}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}+a+\frac{{\varphi }_1}{2}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2+a+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}& \frac{1}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}+\frac{{\varphi }_1+{\varphi }_2}{2}}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}+a+\frac{{\varphi }_1}{2}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}+a-\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}\\ \frac{1}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2+\frac{{\varphi }_1+{\varphi }_2}{2}}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2+a-\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1+a+\frac{{\varphi }_1}{2}}& \frac{1}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2-\frac{{\varphi }_1-{\varphi }_2}{2}}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2+a-\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}+a-\frac{{\varphi }_1}{2}}& \frac{1}{{\varphi }_{2}exp\left({\mathrm{\Psi }}_2\right)}+\frac{1}{{\varphi }_2}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2+a-\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2+a+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}& \frac{1}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2+a-\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}+a-\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}\\ \frac{1}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1-\frac{{\varphi }_1-{\varphi }_2}{2}}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}+a+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1+a+\frac{{\varphi }_1}{2}}& \frac{1}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}+\frac{{\varphi }_1+{\varphi }_2}{2}}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}+a+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}+a-\frac{{\varphi }_1}{2}}& \frac{1}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}+a+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2+a+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}& \frac{1}{{\varphi }_{2}exp{\mathrm{\Psi }}_2^{*}}+\frac{1}{{\varphi }_2}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}+a+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}+a-\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}\end{array}\right|\hfill \end{array}$$

where

$$\begin{array}{cc}\hfill {\mathrm{\Psi }}_1& =\mathrm{i}{\varphi }_{1}x+2\mathrm{i}{\varphi }_1{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1}t-\frac{2\mathrm{i}{\varphi }_1{\varrho }^2}{4{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^2-{\varphi }_1^2}y+{\mathrm{\Psi }}_{1,0},\hfill \\ \hfill {\mathrm{\Psi }}_2& =\mathrm{i}{\varphi }_{2}x+2\mathrm{i}{\varphi }_2{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{2}t-\frac{2\mathrm{i}{\varphi }_2{\varrho }^2}{4{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^2-{\varphi }_2^2}y+{\mathrm{\Psi }}_{2,0},\hfill \\ \hfill B& =exp({\mathrm{\Psi }}_1+{\mathrm{\Psi }}_1^{*}+{\mathrm{\Psi }}_2+{\mathrm{\Psi }}_2^{*}){\varphi }_1^2{\varphi }_2^2.\hfill \end{array}$$

Since there are two different types of breathers for one-breather, it is easy to know that three types of interactions will exist between the two-breather. One is the interaction between two different kinds of one-breather, and the other two are the same types. To demonstrate this clearly, we provide the dynamics in Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5.

In Figure 3 we can see that since the periodicity only occurs in the x-direction, the two general breather solutions must be parallel, as time goes on, they go through a similar elastic collision and then they will separate from each other. Figure 4 shows the dynamics of two homoclinic orbits. When t is large, they approach a constant background, and when t gets smaller, it appears a beautiful interaction, and then they will go back to the constant background. The interaction between the breather and the homoclinic orbit is more interesting, they have their own inherent characteristics and they also affect the other ones. Especially, this interaction is the strongest at $t=0$. In addition, the amplitudes of the long wave and the short wave are also different. As to the long wave component L, the maximum amplitude of the homoclinic orbit can equal to the general breather, but the amplitude of homoclinic orbit is shorter than the general breather all the time for the short wave.

We have discussed the breather solutions of Equation (1) above, and then we derive its rational solution. By using a limit skill, we gain the rational solution to the Maccari system in Appendix B.

(i) Set $M=1$ in Equation (A5), then the rational solution can be given as

$$\begin{array}{cc}\hfill f& ={\left|{\varpi }_1\right|}^2-\frac{1}{{\left({\mathrm{\Phi }}_1-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}\right)}^2},\hfill \\ \hfill g& =\left({\varpi }_1-\frac{1}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1+a}\right)\left({\varpi }_1^{*}+\frac{1}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}+a}\right)-\frac{1}{{\left({\mathrm{\Phi }}_1-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}\right)}^2}\hfill \end{array}$$

(10)

with

$${\varpi }_1=\mathrm{i}x+2\mathrm{i}{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1}t-\frac{2\mathrm{i}{\varrho }^2}{4{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^2}y.$$

By letting ${\mathrm{\Phi }}_1={\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1R}+\mathrm{i}{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1I}$, the rational solution can be equal to the following formula

$$\begin{array}{cc}\hfill f& ={\left|{\varpi }_1\right|}^2+\frac{1}{4{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1I}^2},\hfill \\ \hfill g& =\left({\varpi }_1+m_1+\mathrm{i}{m}_2\right)\left({\varpi }_1^{*}-m_1+\mathrm{i}{m}_2\right)+\frac{1}{4{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1I}^2},\hfill \end{array}$$

(11)

where ${\varpi }_1=\mathrm{i}x+(2\mathrm{i}{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1R}-2{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1I})t-(\mathrm{i}{n}_1+n_2)y$, with

$$\begin{array}{cc}\hfill m_1& =-\frac{a+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1R}}{{\left(a+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1R}\right)}^2+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1I}^2},\hfill \\ \hfill m_2& =\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1I}}{{\left(a+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1R}\right)}^2+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1I}^2},\hfill \\ \hfill n_1& =\frac{{\varrho }^2({\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1R}^2-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1I}^2)}{2{({\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1R}^2-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1I}^2)}^2+8{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1R}{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1I}},\hfill \\ \hfill n_2& =\frac{2{\varrho }^2{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1R}{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1I}}{2{({\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1R}^2-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1I}^2)}^2+8{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1R}{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1I}}.\hfill \end{array}$$

Substituting it to Equation (3), we can get the rational solution of A and L as

$$\begin{array}{cc}\hfill A& =\varrho exp(-\mathrm{i}bt)\left[1-\frac{2\mathrm{i}{m}_1\left(x+2{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1R}t-n_{1}y\right)+2\mathrm{i}{m}_2\left(2{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1I}t+n_{2}y\right)+m_1^2+m_2^2}{{\left(x+2{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1R}t-n_{1}y\right)}^2+{\left(2{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1I}t+n_{2}y\right)}^2+\frac{1}{4{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1I}^2}}\right],\hfill \\ \hfill L& =-4\frac{{\left(x+2{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1R}t-n_{1}y\right)}^2-{\left(2{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1I}t+n_{2}y\right)}^2-\frac{1}{4{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1I}^2}}{{\left[{\left(x+2{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1R}t-n_{1}y\right)}^2+{\left(2{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1I}t+n_{2}y\right)}^2+\frac{1}{4{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1I}^2}\right]}^2}-b.\hfill \end{array}$$

(12)

Next, we give a detailed analysis for the lump solution and the rogue wave, whose figures are shown in Figure 6 and Figure 7.

(1) Lump solution. By a simple calculation, we easily see that when

$$\begin{array}{cc}\hfill & x+2{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1R}t-n_{1}y=0,\hfill \\ \hfill & 2{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1I}t+n_{2}y=0,\hfill \end{array}$$

we have $\left[A,L\right]\to [\varrho exp(-\mathrm{i}bt)\left(1-4{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1I}^2\left(m_1^2+m_2^2\right)\right),16{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1I}^2-b]$.

In Figure 6, if we choose a fixed time t, we can see that $\left(A,L\right)\to \left(\varrho exp(-\mathrm{i}bt),-b\right)$ when $(x,y)\to \infty$. So the lump solution will go back to the constant background.

(2) Rogue wave. By setting $n_2=0$, then the dynamics of A and L will be different, which are called the line rogue waves.

It is clear that the amplitudes of line rogue wave vary sharply. With a direct calculation, when $t=0$ and $x,y$ satisfies $x-n_{1}y=0$, the maximum amplitude of $\left|A\right|$ can reach $\varrho \left(1-4{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1I}^2\left(m_1^2+m_2^2\right)\right)$ and L is $(16{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1I}^2-b)$. Precisely, we can also calculate the orientation of this line rogue wave, which is equal to $\alpha ={tan}^{-1}\left(n_1\right)$. And its width is direct proportional to $\frac{1}{\sqrt{1+n_1^2}}$. Obviously, these characters can also be observed for the multi-rational solution.

(ii) Set $M=2,$ then the two rational solution can be rewritten as

$$\begin{array}{cc}\hfill A& =\frac{\varrho exp(-\mathrm{i}bt)g}{f},\hfill \\ \hfill u& =2{(lnf)}_{xx}-b,\hfill \\ \hfill f& =\left|\begin{array}{cccc}{\varpi }_1& \frac{-1}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}}& \frac{1}{-({\mathrm{\Phi }}_1-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2)}& \frac{1}{-({\mathrm{\Phi }}_1-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*})}\\ \frac{-1}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}}& {\varpi }_1^{*}& \frac{1}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2}& \frac{1}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}}\\ \frac{1}{-({\mathrm{\Phi }}_2-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1)}& \frac{1}{-({\mathrm{\Phi }}_2-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*})}& {\varpi }_2& \frac{-1}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}}\\ \frac{1}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1}& \frac{1}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}}& \frac{-1}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}}& {\varpi }_2^{*}\end{array}\right|\hfill \\ \hfill g& =\left|\begin{array}{cccc}{\varpi }_1-\frac{1}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1+a}& \frac{-1}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1+a}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}+a}& \frac{1}{-({\mathrm{\Phi }}_1-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2)}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1+a}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2+a}& \frac{1}{-({\mathrm{\Phi }}_1-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*})}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1+a}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}+a}\\ \frac{-1}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}+a}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1+a}& {\varpi }_1^{*}+\frac{1}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}+a}& \frac{1}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}+a}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2+a}& \frac{1}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}+a}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}+a}\\ \frac{1}{-({\mathrm{\Phi }}_2-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1)}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2+a}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1+a}& \frac{1}{-({\mathrm{\Phi }}_2-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*})}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2+a}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}+a}& {\varpi }_2-\frac{1}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2+a}& \frac{-1}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2+a}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}+a}\\ \frac{1}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}+a}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1+a}& \frac{1}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}+a}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}+a}& \frac{-1}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}+a}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2+a}& {\varpi }_2^{*}+\frac{1}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}+a}\end{array}\right|\hfill \end{array}$$

(13)

where

$${\varpi }_k=\mathrm{i}x+2\mathrm{i}{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{k}t-\frac{2\mathrm{i}{\varrho }^2}{4{\mathrm{\Phi }}_k^2}y(k=1,2)$$

Transparently, for the two rational solutions, we can also get three different kinds of interactions, two lump solutions, two rogue waves and the mixed of one lump solution and one rogue wave. By choosing some proper parameters, we give some dynamics behaviors are in Figure 8, Figure 9 and Figure 10.

In Figure 8, we can see that there are two lump solutions fusion together, which is similar to the collision behavior between two general breather. Figure 9 present the interactions of two rogue waves. Both of them keep their own characters, they arise from a constant background, as the time moves, there are two different line rogue waves, when $t=0$, the interaction is the strongest. When t is large, they will go back to the constant background again. It is interesting that at the beginning time when these two rogue waves appear, they are intersected, but when $t=0$, there appears an amazing phenomenon, one rogue wave is split up by the other one, which seems very unbelievable. In Figure 10, we give the interaction of one lump soliton and one rogue wave. When t is large, we only see the lump solution, when t becomes smaller, the line rogue wave appears. Although the appearing time of rogue wave is transient, the maximal amplitude of rogue wave is much higher than the lump soliton. When t is large, the line rogue wave disappears again.

Visibly, we construct the breather and rational solution in Appendix A and Appendix B. Then we can easily get the combination between these two kinds of solutions, which is given in Appendix C. Now we can give some examples from the exact solution. Setting Ñ = 1, $\widehat{\mathrm{N}}$ = 1 in Equation (A7), the one-rational-one-exp solution is equal to

$$\begin{array}{cc}\hfill A& =\frac{\varrho exp(-\mathrm{i}bt)g}{f},\hfill \\ \hfill u& =2{(ln\left(exp({\mathrm{\Psi }}_2+{\mathrm{\Psi }}_2^{*}){\varphi }_2^2\right)·f)}_{xx}-b,\hfill \\ \hfill f& =\left|\begin{array}{cccc}{\varpi }_1& \frac{-1}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}}& \frac{1}{-({\mathrm{\Phi }}_1-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2)+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}& \frac{1}{-({\mathrm{\Phi }}_1-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*})-\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}\\ \frac{-1}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}}& {\varpi }_1^{*}& \frac{1}{({\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2)-\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}& \frac{1}{({\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*})+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}\\ \frac{1}{-({\mathrm{\Phi }}_2-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1)+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}& \frac{1}{-({\mathrm{\Phi }}_2-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*})+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}& \frac{1}{{\varphi }_{2}exp\left({\mathrm{\Psi }}_2\right)}+\frac{1}{{\varphi }_2}& \frac{-1}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}}\\ \frac{1}{({\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1)+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}& \frac{1}{({\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*})+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}& \frac{-1}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}}& \frac{1}{{\varphi }_{2}exp\left({\mathrm{\Psi }}_2^{*}\right)}+\frac{1}{{\varphi }_2}\end{array}\right|\hfill \\ \hfill g& =\left|\begin{array}{cccc}{\varpi }_1-\frac{1}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1+a}& \frac{-1}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1+a}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}+a}& \frac{1}{-({\mathrm{\Phi }}_1-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2)+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1+a}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2+a+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}& \frac{1}{-({\mathrm{\Phi }}_1-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*})-\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1+a}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}+a-\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}\\ \frac{-1}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}+a}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1+a}& {\varpi }_1^{*}+\frac{1}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}+a}& \frac{1}{({\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2)-\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}+a}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2+a+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}& \frac{1}{({\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*})+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}+a}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}+a-\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}\\ \frac{1}{-({\mathrm{\Phi }}_2-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1)+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}\frac{{\varphi }_2+a-\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1+a}& \frac{1}{-({\mathrm{\Phi }}_2-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*})+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2+a-\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}+a}& \frac{1}{{\varphi }_{2}exp\left({\mathrm{\Psi }}_2\right)}+\frac{1}{{\varphi }_2}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2+a-\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2+a+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}& \frac{-1}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2+a-\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}+a-\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}\\ \frac{1}{({\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1)+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}\frac{{\varphi }_2^{*}+a+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1+a}& \frac{1}{({\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*})+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}+a+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}+a}& \frac{-1}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}+a+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2+a+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}& \frac{1}{{\varphi }_{2}exp\left({\mathrm{\Psi }}_2^{*}\right)}+\frac{1}{{\varphi }_2}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2+a+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2+a-\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}\end{array}\right|\hfill \end{array}$$

(14)

where

$$\begin{array}{cc}\hfill {\varpi }_1& =\mathrm{i}x+2\mathrm{i}{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1}t-\frac{2\mathrm{i}{\varrho }^2}{4{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^2}y,\hfill \\ \hfill {\mathrm{\Psi }}_2& =\mathrm{i}{\varphi }_{2}x+2\mathrm{i}{\varphi }_2{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{2}t-\frac{2\mathrm{i}{\varphi }_2{\varrho }^2}{4{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^2-{\varphi }_2^2}y+{\mathrm{\Psi }}_{2,0}\hfill \end{array}$$

Since the exp-solution involves two different cases, the breather and homoclinic orbit soliton, and the rational solution also involves two types, the lump solution and the rogue wave. Based on the permutation and combination rule, we know that the one-rational-one-exp solution will include four mixed types between exp-solution and rational solution. By choosing some proper parameters, we give the figures for the mixed type in Figure 11, Figure 12, Figure 13 and Figure 14. It is easily to see that all of these solution will keep their own characters.

From these figures, we can see that the homoclinic orbits and the rogue wave have some common property, they all arise from the constant background, and they will appear at some time and then disappear. For both the long wave component L and short wave component A, the appearing time of rogue wave is longer than the homoclinic orbits. However, there are some differences, for example, the amplitude of rogue wave is higher than the homoclinic orbits to the short wave component A, but the long wave component L is inverse.

4. Breather II

In Section 3, the choices to parameters ${\mu }_{2k-1},{\mu }_{2k},{\omega }_{2k-1},{\omega }_{2k}$ is Equation (A1), if taking ${\mu }_{2k-1}\to \mathrm{i}{\mu }_{2k-1},{\mu }_{2k}\to -\mathrm{i}{\mu }_{2k},{\omega }_{2k-1}\to \mathrm{i}{\omega }_{2k-1},{\omega }_{2k}\to -\mathrm{i}{\omega }_{2k}$, we can get a quite different exp-solution. Compared to the homoclinic orbits, in this case, we get the dark-soliton or anti-dark soliton under some constraints. Meanwhile, the corresponding semi-rational solution will also be different.

Similar to the calculation in Appendix A, we give another Breather II in Appendix D. Still, we give the one breather by setting $M=1$ in Equation (A12), that is

$$\begin{array}{cc}\hfill A=& \frac{\varrho exp(-\mathrm{i}bt)g}{f},\hfill \\ \hfill u=& 2{(lnf)}_{xx}-b,\hfill \\ \hfill f=& 1+exp\left({\mathrm{\Psi }}_1\right)+exp\left({\mathrm{\Psi }}_1^{*}\right)+A_{12}exp({\mathrm{\Psi }}_1+{\mathrm{\Psi }}_1^{*}),\hfill \\ \hfill g=& 1+\frac{2\mathrm{i}{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1+2a-\mathrm{i}{\varphi }_1}{2\mathrm{i}{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1+2a+\mathrm{i}{\varphi }_1}exp\left({\mathrm{\Psi }}_1\right)+\frac{2\mathrm{i}{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}-2a+\mathrm{i}{\varphi }_1}{2\mathrm{i}{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}-2a-\mathrm{i}{\varphi }_1}exp\left({\mathrm{\Psi }}_1^{*}\right)\hfill \\ \hfill & +A_{12}\frac{2\mathrm{i}{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1+2a-\mathrm{i}{\varphi }_1}{2\mathrm{i}{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1+2a+\mathrm{i}{\varphi }_1}\frac{2\mathrm{i}{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}-2a+\mathrm{i}{\varphi }_1}{2\mathrm{i}{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}-2a-\mathrm{i}{\varphi }_1}exp({\mathrm{\Psi }}_1+{\mathrm{\Psi }}_1^{*})\hfill \end{array}$$

where

$$\begin{array}{cc}\hfill A_{12}& =\frac{-({\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^2+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*2})}{{\varphi }_1^2-({\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^2+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*2})},\hfill \\ \hfill {\mathrm{\Psi }}_1& =-{\varphi }_{1}x-2\mathrm{i}{\varphi }_1{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1}t-\frac{2{\varphi }_1{\varrho }^2}{{\varphi }_1^2-4{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^2}y+{\mathrm{\Psi }}_{1,0}.\hfill \end{array}$$

Similarly, let ${\mathrm{\Phi }}_1={\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1R}+\mathrm{i}{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1I}$, then ${\mathrm{\Psi }}_1={\mathrm{\Psi }}_{1R}+\mathrm{i}{\mathrm{\Psi }}_{1I}$, where

$$\begin{array}{cc}\hfill {\mathrm{\Psi }}_{1R}& ={\varphi }_1\left[2{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1I}t-x-\frac{2{\varrho }^2\left({\varphi }_1^2+4{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1I}^2-4{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1R}^2\right)}{{[4({\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1I}^2-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1R}^2)+{\varphi }_1^2]}^2+64{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1R}{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1I}}y\right]+\mathrm{Re}\left({\mathrm{\Psi }}_{1,0}\right),\hfill \\ \hfill {\mathrm{\Psi }}_{1I}& =-2{\varphi }_1{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1R}\left[t+\frac{8{\varrho }^2{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1I}}{{[4({\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1I}^2-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1R}^2)+{\varphi }_1^2]}^2+64{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1R}{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1I}}y\right]+\mathrm{Im}\left({\mathrm{\Psi }}_{1,0}\right).\hfill \end{array}$$

From this exact expression, we can say that the breather II is similar to the breather I, but the periodicity and the localization behave quite differently, it present an opposite view. But moreover, we find some differences. In the first case, ${\mathrm{\Psi }}_{1I}$ involves two spatial variables $x,y$ and one time variable t, while ${\mathrm{\Psi }}_{1R}$ involves one spatial variable y and one time variable t. Therefore, if the spatial variable y in ${\mathrm{\Psi }}_{1R}$ vanished, this breather will reduce to the homoclinic orbits. However, in this case, the dynamics is very different, that is, ${\mathrm{\Psi }}_{1R}$ involves two spatial variables and one time variable and ${\mathrm{\Psi }}_{1I}$ contains one spatial variable y and one time variable t. If ${\mathrm{\Psi }}_{1I}$ vanishes, this breather will reduce to the dark soliton or anti-dark solution. Next, we give Figure 15 and Figure 16 to present this dynamics clearly reduced into dark soliton or anti-dark soliton.

In Figure 15, we give the dark soliton by choosing $a=0,b=1,\varrho =1,{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1R}=0,$${\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1I}=0,{\varphi }_1=1,{\mathrm{\Psi }}_{1,0}=0,t=0$, then the corresponding solution of $\left|A\right|$ is

$$\left|A\right|=\left|\frac{2e^{-x+2y}-1}{2e^{-x+2y}+1}\right|,$$

obviously, $\left|A\right|$ is equal to zero along the line $-x+2y=-ln\left(2\right)$. When $-x+2y\to \pm \infty ,\left|A\right|\to 1$, thus we see A is a dark soliton. While Figure 16 is the anti-dark soliton by choosing $a=0,b=1,\varrho =1,{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1R}=1,{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1I}=0,{\varphi }_1=1,{\mathrm{\Psi }}_{1,0}=0,$ then the corresponding $\left|A\right|$ is

$$\left|A\right|=\left|\frac{4e^{-2x-\frac{4}{3}y}+10e^{-x-\frac{2}{3}y}+3}{4e^{-2x-\frac{4}{3}y}+6e^{-x-\frac{2}{3}y}+3}\right|$$

$\frac{\partial \left|A\right|}{\partial x}=\left|\frac{4e^{-x-\frac{2y}{3}}\left(4e^{-2x-\frac{4y}{3}}-3\right)}{{\left(4e^{-2x-\frac{4}{3}y}+6e^{-x-\frac{2}{3}y}+3\right)}^2}\right|,\frac{\partial \left|A\right|}{\partial y}=\left|\frac{8}{3}\frac{e^{-x-\frac{2y}{3}}\left(4e^{-2x-\frac{4y}{3}}-3\right)}{{\left(4e^{-2x-\frac{4}{3}y}+6e^{-x-\frac{2}{3}y}+3\right)}^2}\right|.$ By a direct calculation, we know that the maximum of of $\left|A\right|$ is $\frac{6+5\sqrt{3}}{3(2+\sqrt{3})}>1$ along the line $(-x-\frac{2}{3}y)=ln\left(\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}\right)$. And when $(-x-\frac{2}{3}y)\to \pm \infty$, we have $\left|A\right|\to 1$, thus we call it the anti-dark soliton.

Furthermore, we also present the interactions for the two-breather in Figure 17, Figure 18, Figure 19, Figure 20 and Figure 21. From the characters of one-breather, we know that the dynamics of the second-breather in this case becomes more diverse. It only not contains the same kind of wave but also two different kinds of waves. For the mixed waves, we only give two different cases, the breather and dark soliton, dark soliton and anti-dark soliton, others are omit. From these figures, we find a interesting phenomenon, compared to the breather, the amplitude of the soliton is much smaller, so the soliton is inconspicuous. Moreover, for the two-breather case, the dynamics in this case is different from the first case, one is two parallel breather and the other one is inter-sectional types.

Similar to the first breather, we can also construct the rational solution basing on the same limiting skill. By a simple calculation, we give the rational solution to Maccari system,

$$\begin{array}{cc}\hfill & A=\frac{\varrho exp(-\mathrm{i}bt)g}{f},\hfill \\ \hfill & u=2{(lnf)}_{xx}-b,\hfill \end{array}$$

(15)

where $f=\left|F_{k,l}\right|,g=\left|G_{k,l}\right|$, the entries of these matrices are as follows:

$$\begin{array}{cc}\hfill F_{k,k}& =\left[\begin{array}{cc}{\varpi }_k& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_k+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_k^{*}}\\ \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_k+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_k^{*}}& {\varpi }_k^{*}\end{array}\right]\hfill \\ \hfill G_{k,k}& =\left[\begin{array}{cc}{\varpi }_k-\frac{1}{\mathrm{i}{\mathrm{\Phi }}_k+a}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_k+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_k^{*}}\frac{-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_k+\mathrm{i}a}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_k^{*}+\mathrm{i}a}\\ \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_k+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_k^{*}}\frac{-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_k^{*}-\mathrm{i}a}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_k-\mathrm{i}a}& {\varpi }_k^{*}-\frac{1}{\mathrm{i}{\mathrm{\Phi }}_k^{*}-a}\end{array}\right]\hfill \\ \hfill F_{k,l}& =\left[\begin{array}{cc}\frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_k-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_l}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_k+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_l^{*}}\\ \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_k^{*}+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_l}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_k^{*}-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_l^{*}}\end{array}\right]\hfill \\ \hfill G_{k,l}& =\left[\begin{array}{cc}\frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_k-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_l}\frac{\mathrm{i}{\mathrm{\Phi }}_k+a}{\mathrm{i}{\mathrm{\Phi }}_l+a}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_k+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_l^{*}}\frac{\mathrm{i}{\mathrm{\Phi }}_k+a}{-\mathrm{i}{\mathrm{\Phi }}_l^{*}+a}\\ \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_k^{*}-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_l}\frac{-\mathrm{i}{\mathrm{\Phi }}_k^{*}+a}{\mathrm{i}{\mathrm{\Phi }}_l+a}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_k^{*}-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_l^{*}}\frac{-\mathrm{i}{\mathrm{\Phi }}_k^{*}+a}{-\mathrm{i}{\mathrm{\Phi }}_l^{*}+a}\end{array}\right]\hfill \end{array}$$

(16)

where

$${\varpi }_k=\mathrm{i}x-2{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{k}t+\frac{2\mathrm{i}{\varrho }^2}{4{\mathrm{\Phi }}_k^2}y.$$

Since the rational solutions are given with the same skill, so their expressions and the dynamics are also the same as the first case, we do not give it anymore.

Although the rational solutions are the same, the breathers in the second case are different from the first case, thus the semi-rational solution will also be different. The detailed calculations are given in Appendix E. By setting Ñ = $\widehat{\mathrm{N}}$ = 1 in Equation (A14), we get the semi-rational solution as

$$\begin{array}{cc}\hfill A& =\frac{\varrho exp(-\mathrm{i}bt)g}{f},\hfill \\ \hfill u& =2{(ln\left(exp({\mathrm{\Psi }}_2+{\mathrm{\Psi }}_2^{*}){\varphi }_2^2\right)·f)}_{xx}-b,\hfill \\ \hfill f& =\left|\begin{array}{cccc}{\varpi }_1& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2-\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}-\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}\\ \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}}& {\varpi }_1^{*}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{({\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2)+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{({\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*})+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}\\ \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1-\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}-\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}& \frac{-\mathrm{i}}{{\varphi }_{2}exp\left({\mathrm{\Psi }}_2\right)}+\frac{-\mathrm{i}}{{\varphi }_2}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}-{\varphi }_2}\\ \frac{\mathrm{i}}{({\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1)+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{({\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*})+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}+{\varphi }_2}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\varphi }_{2}exp\left({\mathrm{\Psi }}_2^{*}\right)}+\frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\varphi }_2}\end{array}\right|,\hfill \\ \hfill g& =\left|\begin{array}{cccc}{\varpi }_1-\frac{1}{\mathrm{i}{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1+a}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}}\frac{-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1+\mathrm{i}a}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}+\mathrm{i}a}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2-\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1-\mathrm{i}a}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2-\mathrm{i}a+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}-\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1-\mathrm{i}a}{-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}-\mathrm{i}a+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}\\ \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}}\frac{-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}-\mathrm{i}a}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1-\mathrm{i}a}& {\varpi }_1^{*}-\frac{1}{\mathrm{i}{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}-a}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{({\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2)+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}+\mathrm{i}a}{-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2+\mathrm{i}a-\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{({\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*})+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}+\mathrm{i}a}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}+\mathrm{i}a-\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}\\ \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1-\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2-\mathrm{i}a-\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1-\mathrm{i}a}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}-\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2-\mathrm{i}a-\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}{-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}-\mathrm{i}a}& \frac{-\mathrm{i}}{{\varphi }_{2}exp\left({\mathrm{\Psi }}_2\right)}+\frac{-\mathrm{i}}{{\varphi }_2}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2-\mathrm{i}a-\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2-\mathrm{i}a+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}-{\varphi }_2}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2-\mathrm{i}a-\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}{-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}-\mathrm{i}a+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}\\ \frac{\mathrm{i}}{({\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1)+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}+\mathrm{i}a+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}{-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1+\mathrm{i}a}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{({\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*})+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}+\mathrm{i}a+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}+\mathrm{i}a}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}+{\varphi }_2}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}+\mathrm{i}a+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}{-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2+\mathrm{i}a-\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\varphi }_{2}exp\left({\mathrm{\Psi }}_2^{*}\right)}+\frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}+\mathrm{i}a+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}+\mathrm{i}a-\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}\end{array}\right|\hfill \end{array}$$

(17)

with

$$\begin{array}{cc}\hfill {\varpi }_1& =\mathrm{i}x-2{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1}t+\frac{2\mathrm{i}{\varrho }^2}{4{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^2}y,\hfill \\ \hfill {\mathrm{\Psi }}_2& =-{\varphi }_{2}x-2\mathrm{i}{\varphi }_2{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{2}t-\frac{2{\varphi }_2{\varrho }^2}{{\varphi }_2^2-4{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^2}y+{\mathrm{\Psi }}_{2,0}.\hfill \end{array}$$

It is easily to see that the semi-rational solutions will involve six types, one is from one kind of these three different breathers and the other one is from one of the two kinds of rational solutions. Here, we only give two examples to describe the semi-rational solutions, which are shown in Figure 22 and Figure 23.

In this case, the dynamics of breather is very attracting, thus we also give the interactions between two kinds of breather and one kind of rational solution, the corresponding exact expression is given as

$$\begin{array}{cc}\hfill A& =\frac{\varrho exp(-\mathrm{i}bt)g}{f},\hfill \\ \hfill u& =2{(ln\left(exp({\mathrm{\Psi }}_2+{\mathrm{\Psi }}_2^{*}+{\mathrm{\Psi }}_3+{\mathrm{\Psi }}_3^{*}){\varphi }_2^2{\varphi }_3^2\right)·f)}_{xx}-b,\hfill \end{array}$$

(18)

$$\begin{array}{cc}\hfill f& =\left|\begin{array}{cccccc}{\varpi }_1& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2-\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}-\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_3-\frac{{\varphi }_3}{2}}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_3^{*}-\frac{{\varphi }_3}{2}}\\ \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}}& {\varpi }_1^{*}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{({\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2)+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{({\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*})+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{({\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_3)+\frac{{\varphi }_3}{2}}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{({\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_3^{*})+\frac{{\varphi }_3}{2}}\\ \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1-\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}-\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}& \frac{-\mathrm{i}}{{\varphi }_{2}exp\left({\mathrm{\Psi }}_2\right)}+\frac{-\mathrm{i}}{{\varphi }_2}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}-{\varphi }_2}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_3-\frac{{\varphi }_2+{\varphi }_3}{2}}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_3^{*}-\frac{{\varphi }_2+{\varphi }_3}{2}}\\ \frac{\mathrm{i}}{({\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1)+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{({\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*})+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}+{\varphi }_2}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\varphi }_{2}exp\left({\mathrm{\Psi }}_2^{*}\right)}+\frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\varphi }_2}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_3+\frac{{\varphi }_2+{\varphi }_3}{2}}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_3^{*}+\frac{{\varphi }_2+{\varphi }_3}{2}}\\ \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_3-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1-\frac{{\varphi }_3}{2}}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_3-\frac{{\varphi }_3}{2}}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_3-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2-\frac{{\varphi }_2+{\varphi }_3}{2}}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_3+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}-\frac{{\varphi }_2+{\varphi }_3}{2}}& \frac{-\mathrm{i}}{{\varphi }_{2}exp\left({\mathrm{\Psi }}_3\right)}+\frac{-\mathrm{i}}{{\varphi }_3}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}-{\varphi }_3}\\ \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_3^{*}+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1+\frac{{\varphi }_3}{2}}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_3^{*}-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}+\frac{{\varphi }_3}{2}}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_3^{*}+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2+\frac{{\varphi }_2+{\varphi }_3}{2}}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_3^{*}-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}+\frac{{\varphi }_2+{\varphi }_3}{2}}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_3+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_3^{*}+{\varphi }_3}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\varphi }_{3}exp\left({\mathrm{\Psi }}_3^{*}\right)}+\frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\varphi }_3}\end{array}\right|,\hfill \\ \hfill g& =\left|\begin{array}{cccccc}{\varpi }_1-\frac{1}{\mathrm{i}{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1+a}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}}\frac{-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1+\mathrm{i}a}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}+\mathrm{i}a}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2-\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1-\mathrm{i}a}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2-\mathrm{i}a+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}-\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1-\mathrm{i}a}{-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}-\mathrm{i}a+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}& g_{15}& g_{16}\\ \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}}\frac{-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}-\mathrm{i}a}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1-\mathrm{i}a}& {\varpi }_1^{*}-\frac{1}{\mathrm{i}{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}-a}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{({\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2)+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}+\mathrm{i}a}{-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2+\mathrm{i}a-\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{({\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*})+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}+\mathrm{i}a}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}+\mathrm{i}a-\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}& g_{25}& g_{26}\\ \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1-\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2-\mathrm{i}a-\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1-\mathrm{i}a}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}-\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2-\mathrm{i}a-\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}{-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}-\mathrm{i}a}& \frac{-\mathrm{i}}{{\varphi }_{2}exp\left({\mathrm{\Psi }}_2\right)}+\frac{-\mathrm{i}}{{\varphi }_2}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2-\mathrm{i}a-\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2-\mathrm{i}a+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}-{\varphi }_2}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2-\mathrm{i}a-\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}{-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}-\mathrm{i}a+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}& g_{35}& g_{36}\\ \frac{\mathrm{i}}{({\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1)+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}+\mathrm{i}a+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}{-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1+\mathrm{i}a}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{({\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*})+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}+\mathrm{i}a+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}+\mathrm{i}a}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}+{\varphi }_2}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}+\mathrm{i}a+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}{-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2+\mathrm{i}a-\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\varphi }_{2}exp\left({\mathrm{\Psi }}_2^{*}\right)}+\frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\varphi }_2}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}+\mathrm{i}a+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}+\mathrm{i}a-\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}& g_{45}& g_{46}\\ \frac{\mathrm{i}}{({\mathrm{\Phi }}_3^{*}+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1)+\frac{{\varphi }_3}{2}}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_3^{*}+\mathrm{i}a+\frac{{\varphi }_3}{2}}{-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1+\mathrm{i}a}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{({\mathrm{\Phi }}_3^{*}-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*})+\frac{{\varphi }_3}{2}}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_3^{*}+\mathrm{i}a+\frac{{\varphi }_3}{2}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}+\mathrm{i}a}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_3-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2-\frac{{\varphi }_2+{\varphi }_3}{2}}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_3-\mathrm{i}a-\frac{{\varphi }_3}{2}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2-\mathrm{i}a+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_3+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}-\frac{{\varphi }_2+{\varphi }_3}{2}}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_3-\mathrm{i}a-\frac{{\varphi }_3}{2}}{-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}-\mathrm{i}a+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}& g_{55}& g_{56}\\ \frac{\mathrm{i}}{({\mathrm{\Phi }}_3^{*}+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1)+\frac{{\varphi }_3}{2}}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_3^{*}+\mathrm{i}a+\frac{{\varphi }_3}{2}}{-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1+\mathrm{i}a}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{({\mathrm{\Phi }}_3^{*}-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*})+\frac{{\varphi }_3}{2}}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_3^{*}+\mathrm{i}a+\frac{{\varphi }_3}{2}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}+\mathrm{i}a}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_3^{*}+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2+\frac{{\varphi }_2+{\varphi }_3}{2}}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_3^{*}+\mathrm{i}a+\frac{{\varphi }_3}{2}}{-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2+\mathrm{i}a-\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}& \frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_3^{*}-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}+\frac{{\varphi }_2+{\varphi }_3}{2}}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_3^{*}+\mathrm{i}a+\frac{{\varphi }_3}{2}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}+\mathrm{i}a-\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}& g_{65}& g_{66}\end{array}\right|\hfill \end{array}$$

(19)

where

$$\begin{array}{cc}\hfill g_{15}& =\frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_3-\frac{{\varphi }_3}{2}}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1-\mathrm{i}a}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_3-\mathrm{i}a+\frac{{\varphi }_3}{2}}\hfill \\ \hfill g_{16}& =\frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_3^{*}-\frac{{\varphi }_3}{2}}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1-\mathrm{i}a}{-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_3^{*}-\mathrm{i}a+\frac{{\varphi }_3}{2}}\hfill \end{array}$$

$$\begin{array}{cc}\hfill g_{25}& =\frac{\mathrm{i}}{({\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_3)+\frac{{\varphi }_3}{2}}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}+\mathrm{i}a}{-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_3+\mathrm{i}a-\frac{{\varphi }_3}{2}}\hfill \\ \hfill g_{26}& =\frac{\mathrm{i}}{({\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_3^{*})+\frac{{\varphi }_3}{2}}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^{*}+\mathrm{i}a}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_3^{*}+\mathrm{i}a-\frac{{\varphi }_3}{2}}\hfill \\ \hfill g_{35}& =\frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_3-\frac{{\varphi }_2+{\varphi }_3}{2}}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2-\mathrm{i}a-\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_3-\mathrm{i}a+\frac{{\varphi }_3}{2}}\hfill \\ \hfill g_{36}& =\frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_3^{*}-\frac{{\varphi }_2+{\varphi }_3}{2}}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2-\mathrm{i}a-\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}{-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_3^{*}-\mathrm{i}a+\frac{{\varphi }_3}{2}}\hfill \\ \hfill g_{45}& =\frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_3+\frac{{\varphi }_2+{\varphi }_3}{2}}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}+\mathrm{i}a+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}{-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_3+\mathrm{i}a-\frac{{\varphi }_3}{2}}\hfill \\ \hfill g_{46}& =\frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_3^{*}+\frac{{\varphi }_2+{\varphi }_3}{2}}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^{*}+\mathrm{i}a+\frac{{\varphi }_2}{2}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_3^{*}+\mathrm{i}a-\frac{{\varphi }_3}{2}}\hfill \\ \hfill g_{55}& =\frac{-\mathrm{i}}{{\varphi }_{3}exp\left({\mathrm{\Psi }}_3\right)}+\frac{-\mathrm{i}}{{\varphi }_3}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_3-\mathrm{i}a-\frac{{\varphi }_3}{2}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_3-\mathrm{i}a+\frac{{\varphi }_3}{2}}\hfill \\ \hfill g_{56}& =\frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_3+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_3^{*}-{\varphi }_3}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_3-\mathrm{i}a-\frac{{\varphi }_3}{2}}{-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_3^{*}-\mathrm{i}a+\frac{{\varphi }_3}{2}}\hfill \\ \hfill g_{65}& =\frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_3+{\mathrm{\Phi }}_3^{*}+{\varphi }_3}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_3^{*}+\mathrm{i}a+\frac{{\varphi }_3}{2}}{-{\mathrm{\Phi }}_3+\mathrm{i}a-\frac{{\varphi }_3}{2}}\hfill \end{array}$$

$$\begin{array}{cc}\hfill g_{66}& =\frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\varphi }_{3}exp\left({\mathrm{\Psi }}_3^{*}\right)}+\frac{\mathrm{i}}{{\varphi }_3}\frac{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_3^{*}+\mathrm{i}a+\frac{{\varphi }_3}{2}}{{\mathrm{\Phi }}_3^{*}+\mathrm{i}a-\frac{{\varphi }_3}{2}}\hfill \\ \hfill {\varpi }_1& =\mathrm{i}x-2{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{1}t+\frac{2\mathrm{i}{\varrho }^2}{4{\mathrm{\Phi }}_1^2}y,\hfill \\ \hfill {\mathrm{\Psi }}_2& =-{\varphi }_{2}x-2\mathrm{i}{\varphi }_2{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{2}t-\frac{2{\varphi }_2{\varrho }^2}{{\varphi }_2^2-4{\mathrm{\Phi }}_2^2}y+{\mathrm{\Psi }}_{2,0},\hfill \\ \hfill {\mathrm{\Psi }}_3& =-{\varphi }_{3}x-2\mathrm{i}{\varphi }_3{\mathrm{\Phi }}_{3}t-\frac{2{\varphi }_3{\varrho }^2}{{\varphi }_3^2-4{\mathrm{\Phi }}_3^2}y+{\mathrm{\Psi }}_{3,0}.\hfill \end{array}$$

As the dynamics for this case becomes richer, we only give one example composed by the breather, dark soliton and rogue wave in Figure 24

This evolution progress is very supernatural. The dark soliton and the breather exist all the time, they are crossed each other in the beginning. When the rogue wave appears, it is affected by the dark soliton and the breather heavily. A typical feature can be seen from the variation of amplitude. The amplitude of one half of the wave was significantly higher than that of the other. Thus we can say that the energy of rogue wave will be weakened by the dark soliton and the breather. As time moves, the amplitude of rogue wave will reach the maximum. This phenomenon also verifies a fact that the energy of dark is strong. Then the rogue wave will disappear and there will left the dark soliton and the breather.

5. Summary and Conclusions

In this paper, by using the KP hierarchy method, we construct some localized waves and the interactions between them. We start with two different kinds of breather and derive some interesting solutions. Since these two kinds of breathers have different periodicities and localities, they will reduce to some very different types of solutions. For example, the first breather will reduce to the homoclinic orbits solution and the second type of breather will reduce the solitons. For these solutions, we give some figures to exhibit the dynamics of these dynamics. And we find some very interesting interactions about them. The interaction between the dark soliton and the anti-dark soliton looks like a resonance soliton at a fixed time.

Moreover, by using the long wave limit skill, we can derive the lump solution and the rogue wave from these two kinds of breathers. Due to the difference of breathers, the corresponding semi-rational solutions will also be quite different. In the Appendixes, we present all kinds of solutions. By choosing different orders, we can get different solutions. Especially, we give an amazing phenomenon composed by the rogue wave, breather and dark soliton and we give a detailed analysis for it.

In our paper, we only give the multi-solitons with the KP reduction method. Another high-order solutions are also important in the integrable system. But it is difficult to construct the interaction between the high-order rogue waves and breather solutions since these two kinds of waves are obtained under two different reduction conditions. In addition, there are some integrable fractional equation, we can try to study these topics in the next work.