1. Introduction
New technology of magnetic refrigeration (MR) that was recently developed has been an alternative to conventional gas compression (CGC). This shows that this new cooling technology is more effective and environmentally friendly. MR is based upon the magnetocaloric effect (MCE), where the adiabatic temperature changes the material upon the application of a magnetic field [
1]. Highly advanced industries require materials that come with a large MCE near to room temperature. Hence, immense efforts have been made to meet these rapidly growing requirements for the past few decades. Due to the structural behavior and strong magnetic coupling, it is clear that the magnetostructural transition (MST) of the first order produces a large MCE. A lot of the ongoing studies on magnetic refrigeration are mainly focused on perovskite manganites [
2], Gd
5(Si
xGe
1−x)
4 [
3], MnFeP
1−xAs
x [
4], La(Fe
1−xSi
x)
13 [
5], NiMn-based Heusler alloys [
1], and MM’X alloys (M and M’ denote 3D transition elements and X denotes main group elements) [
6,
7,
8]. The intermetallic MnCoGe-based compound is a typical member of the MM’X family that maintains sufficient physical contents and application prospects that are promising. It has a double crystalline structure, TiNiSi-type orthorhombic structure and Ni
2In-type hexagonal structure [
8]. It was previously found that MnCoGe
1−xSi
x offers the best affordable magnetic material compound while still providing a magnetic entropy change and decent refrigeration capacity [
9]. This finding is interesting as the compound can provide a pleasing magnetocaloric effect at a lower price for a magnetic refrigeration material.
This work has investigated the thermomechanical properties of MnCoGe1−xSix compounds to understand the essence of the magnetic transition in MnCoGe1−xSix. From the study, the structural change and magnetic phase transition were effectively shifted from a suitable Si concentration into the temperature region of interest. This led to achieving high addition of the GMCE. It is also found that the unit cell volume and lattice parameters of all alloys were found to reduce with the increase in Si content. In addition, the peaks shifted to a higher angle due to a lower atomic radius of Si, ~ 1.32 Å, whereas Ge, ~ 1.37 Å.
2. Experimental Details
In the preparation of a batch of MnCoGe1−xSix compounds (with x = 0–0.2), sufficient amounts of Mn (99.9%), Ge (99.999%) powder, Co (99.9%), and Si (99.999%) chips were arc melted in the vicinity of an argon atmosphere. Approximately 3% of Mn above the stoichiometric amount of the starting materials is needed. This is important for the evaporation that occurs in order to reimburse for the weight lost throughout the melting process. In order to attain a good homogeneity of the samples, the ingots were melted 5 times in a row. They were then closed in a quartz tube and hardened at a temperature of 900 °C for a duration of 120 h. The samples were then characterized by Philips X’Pert PW3040 Powder X-ray Diffractometer (XRD) (Malvern Panalytical, NSW, Australia) (Cu K5-007 radiation, 5-007 = 15,418 Å). They were then analyzed by Rietveld refinement analysis by using the Fullprof program. The phase transition temperatures were analyzed using TA instrument Q100 Differential Calorimeter (DSC) (TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA) at room temperature. A Quantum Model P650 14 T Physical Property Measurement System (PPMS) (Quantum Design, San Diego, CA, USA) was used to measure magnetization using the option of a vibrating sample magnetometer. This was achieved in a temperature range of 10–330 K and up to 0.01 T of the applied fields. The thermomechanical measurement was conducted in a Perkin Elmer 8000 dynamic mechanical analyzer (DMA) (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) in the tension mode. The heating rate for the measurement was set at 278 K/min.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Structure Properties
The X-ray diffraction patterns of the MnCoGe
1−xSi
x (x = 0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, and 0.2) alloys are shown in
Figure 1a. The XRD patterns show that the MnCoGe
1−xSi
x alloy has a major phase comprised of an orthorhombic TiNiSi-type structure with no reflection to a hexagonal Ni
2In-type structure. This is observed with an increase in the Si concentration up to x = 0.2. All diffraction angles (2θ) shifted to the higher angle with the increase in Si concentration. A gradual displacement to the right can be seen for each XRD result (see
Figure 1b).
The Rietveld refinement analysis indicated in
Figure 1c showed that the lattice parameter
b increases from 3.592 Å at x = 0 to 3.664 Å at x = 0.2. However, the lattice parameters
a and
c were found to decrease at
a (5.925 Å at x = 0 to 5.843 Å at x = 0.2) and
c (6.942 Å at x = 0 to 6.891 Å at x = 0.2), which resulted in the unit cell volume of all alloys decreasing at (147.62 Å
3 at x = 0 to 147.27 Å
3 at x = 0.2). As the Si content increases, the peaks seem to be shifted to the higher angle positions related to the lower atomic radius of Si, ~ 1.32 Å, compared to Ge, ~ 1.37 Å. Their unit cell volumes and lattice parameters are correlated by
a =
aortho =
chex,
b =
bortho =
ahex,
c =
cortho = √3
ahex, and
V =
Vortho = 2
Vhex [
10]. With the increasing Si concentration, the lattice shrinks along the
a ortho axis and expands along the
b ortho axis, inducing a decrease in volume of the orth. These phenomena are also related to the rule of the valence electron. According to this, the main-group atoms (Si/Ge) occupy the 2c sites. In contrast, the transition-metal atoms with significantly less (Mn) and higher (Ni) valence electrons tend to occupy the 2a and 2d sites, respectively [
11].
3.2. Magnetic Phase Transitions
The change in the distance between the magnetic atoms is well known to directly alter the coupling exchange, resulting in a shift in the temperature transition [
12]. The Curie temperature increases and decreases in accordance with variations in the lattice parameter
b, suggesting that the interaction of the Mn–Mn moments along this axis is significant in defining the Curie temperature.
Figure 2a presents the temperature dependence of the magnetization of MnCoGe
1−xSi
x alloys measured in the field of 0.01 T from 10–600 K. In the case of compositions x = 0.00 to 0.2, it was found that the Curie temperature slightly increases (340 K–360 K) with the increase in the Si concentration, as indicated in the inset in
Figure 2a. These have shown the same pattern with the previous report on these materials with a different composition, where the maximum Curie temperature reported is
Tc = 374 K [
9]. In addition, the transition for compounds x > 0.05 was deemed to be incomplete and not reaching the zero moment, as demonstrated by the fact that the structural transition temperatures were higher than 430 K. Consequently, this behavior is thought to be related to the necessity for a lower Si atomic radius in order to change the symmetry of the TiNiSi-type orthorhombic structure to the hexagonal Ni
2In-type structure at a higher temperature.
In addition, the temperature dependence of the magnetization of MnCoGe
1−xSi
x was measured for heating and cooling in order to determine the thermal hysteresis characteristic of the first-order transition [
13,
14]. The cooling and heating curves overlap completely, indicating that there is no thermal hysteresis, and it is shown that the transition is the second-order type.
The magnetic moment, structural transition temperature
Tstr, cell volume, and Curie temperature are all strongly dependent on the concentration of Co vacancy rather than on Ge vacancy [
15]. However,
Figure 2b shows that the structural transition
Tstr determined by the DSC measurements decreased from 450 K for x = 0 to 360 K for x = 0.2. This indicates that substituting Ge with a minor percentage of Si (20%) led to a drop in the structural transition temperature and a slight increase in the Curie temperature.
3.3. The Magnetocaloric Effect
Figure 3a,b show the magnetization curves of MnCoGe
0.95Si
0.05 and MnCoGe
0.85Si
0.15 for fields within the range B = 0–5 T near the Curie temperatures with 4 K interval steps. It is apparent that the results are overlapped for increasing and decreasing fields of the compounds. This finding suggests that there are no observable magnetic hysteresis loss effects for the increase in Si content in MnCoGe
1−xSi
x compounds. In addition,
Figure 3c,d represent the Arrott plots (M
2 versus
B/M) for MnCoGe
0.95Si
0.05 and MnCoGe
0.85Si
0.15, which were found to exhibit features by the Banerjee criterion of a second-order transition for all samples. Thus, the results show that the ferromagnetic transition at
TC in MnCoGe
1−xSi
x is a second-order transition to the substitution of Si for Ge for Si content up to x = 0.2.
For the whole range of MnCoGe
1−xSi
x compounds (x = 0–0.2) of their magnetization curves, the magnetic entropy change, −ΔS
M, has been calculated to increase and decrease field values as a function of the temperature and magnetic field (ΔB = 0–5 T). The increase in magnetic entropy was obtained by applying the standard Maxwell relation [
16]:
Figure 4a shows that the −ΔSM peak moderately widens towards the higher temperatures with an increase in the magnetic field. As a result, it is observed that the compounds hold a behavior of a field-induced transition from a paramagnetic to a ferromagnetic state. The variations in magnetic entropy for MnCoGe
1−xSi
x alloys (
x = 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, and 2.0) around the ferromagnetic temperatures have been presented from increasing and decreasing applied fields (with slightly no hysteresis loss). This is to indicate the feasibility of different experimental and correlated analytical approaches to establish the isothermal entropy change [
17]. The values of the entropy at the corresponding Curie temperatures indicated in
Figure 4b are slightly decreased, with ΔB = 0–5 T : −ΔS
M~8.36 J kg
−1 K
−1 at T
C = 340 K at MnCoGe; −ΔS
M ~ 6.92 J kg
−1 K
−1 at T
C = 342 K at MnCoGe
0.95Si
0.05; −ΔS
M~6.33 J kg
−1 K
−1 at T
C = 348 K at MnCoGe
0.90Si
0.10; −ΔS
M ~ 6.04 J kg
−1 K
−1 at T
C = 352 K at MnCoGe
0.85Si
0.15; −ΔS
M~5.49 J kg
−1 K
−1 at T
C = 360 K at MnCoGe
0.80Si
0.20. The peak |ΔS
M| value of MnCoGe
0.95Si
0.05 is higher than the |ΔS
M| value reported in Mn
0.9Ti
0.1CoGe (−ΔS
M~4.2 J kg
−1 K
−1) [
18] and MnCoGe
0.97Al
0.03 (−ΔS
M~3.5 J kg
−1 K
−1) [
19]. Decreased magnetization on the replacement of Si for Ge similarly decreases the value of −ΔS
M, which is associated with the interaction between Mn–Mn moments.
Moreover, the fundamental requirement for magnetic refrigeration does not only rely on a large magnetic entropy change, but also refrigeration efficiency evaluation such as the refrigeration capacity (RC) also needs to be considered [
20]. The RC indicates the amount of heat transmitted during one thermodynamic cycle. Substituting Ge with Si leads to a decrease in RC from 325 at x = 0 to 278 at x−0.2. This behavior related to replacing Si on Ge leads to a change in the interplanar crystal distance. The generated 3D-band can occasionally minimize the electron splitting exchange interactions such that it decreases the value of ΔS
M and RC values.
3.4. Thermomechanical Testing
Figure 5 depicts the behavior of the storage modulus (E′) and the loss modulus (E″), which are the real and imaginary elements of the complex modulus during tension mode testing. The elastic and viscous behavior of a viscoelastic sample is represented by the storage and loss moduli [
21]. It was found that the values of E′ for all samples exhibited a gradual decrease. The value of E′ for MnCoGe undergoes a considerable decrease after 437 K. However, in the case of MnCoGe
1−xSi
x (x = 0.05), the values of E′ exhibited this nature after 375 K, which is the point of the magnetostructural transformation of this compound. The transition is due to the glass transition that occurred at the glass transition temperature (Tg). The glass transition temperature is when amorphous polymers transform from a glassy to a rubbery form due to the increased mobility of molecular segments and an increase in the free volume. The values of E″ against T also revealed a similar pattern, with the E″ peak recorded at 462 K at the magnetostructural transition region for MnCoGe. In contrast, the E″ peak is observed at 400 K for the case of MnCoGe
1−xSi
x (x = 0.05).
The loss ratio (tangent) tanδ, which quantifies the phase angle between the sample strain and the stress throughout the periodic excitation of the samples, is shown in
Figure 6. The values of tanδ are to measure the energy dissipative abilities of a material [
22]. It is observed that the values of tanδ gradually increase until ~375 K for MnCoGe
1−xSi
x (x = 0.05) and ~450 K for MnCoGe. These values of tanδ increase to 375 K and 450 K related to the two dissipative mechanisms, which are the dissipative effect due to the twin boundary movement inside the alloy particles and the dissipative effects at the alloy interface. A substantial increase in the value of tan δ for MnCoGe
1−xSi
x (x = 0.05) is visible at a temperature above 375 K. Having stated that the value of tanδ corresponds to the magnetostructural transition, it overcomes the values arising from the glass transition event of the matrix [
21]. This behavior also shows the same scenario as DSC curves, where the substitution of Ge with Si leads to a drop in the structural transition temperature.
4. Conclusions
To conclude, the Si substitution for Ge atoms in MnCoGe1−xSix compounds demonstrated the major structure as orthorhombic TiNiSi-type with no reflection on the hexagonal Ni2In-type structure with an increase in Si content up to x = 0.2. Furthermore, the Rietveld refinement analysis revealed that the lattice parameters (a and c) and unit cell volume of the compounds were identified to decrease with the increase in Si content, which is related to the small atomic radius of Si compared to Ge.
The magnetization and DSC measurements specified that with the increase in Si content, the TC value is slightly increased, even though the structural transition temperature, Tstr, is reduced. In addition, the structural transition temperatures for all compounds were significantly higher than 430 K, indicating that the transition was incomplete and did not achieve the zero moment.
The magnetic entropy change, −∆SM, shows decrement behavior with increasing Si concentration up to x = 0.2 (ΔB = 0–5 T: −ΔSM ~ 8.36 J kg−1 K−1 at MnCoGe; −ΔSM ~ 6.92 J kg−1 K−1 at MnCoGe0.95Si0.05; −ΔSM ~ 6.33 J kg−1 K−1 at MnCoGe0.90Si0.10; −ΔSM ~ 6.04 J kg−1 K−1 at MnCoGe0.85Si0.15; −ΔSM ~ 5.49 J kg−1 K−1 at MnCoGe0.80Si0.20) followed by the absence of any magnetic hysteresis loss, which is a second-order magnetic transition behavior and particularly advantageous to the magnetic refrigerator application. Moreover, substituting Ge with Si leads to a decrease in RC from 325 at x = 0 to 278 at x–0.2 as related to the replacement of Si on Ge, leading to a change in the interplanar crystal distance and the resulting 3d-band minimizing the electron splitting exchange interactions.
On top of that, the thermomechanical measurement shows that the values of tanδ increase to 375 K and 450 K with the increases in Si content related to the two dissipative mechanisms, which are the dissipative effect due to the twin boundary movement inside the alloy particles and the dissipative effects at the alloy interface.
Author Contributions
A.R.A.R.: Writing—Original Draft, Visualization. M.F.M.D.: Writing—Review and Editing, Data Curation. J.W.: Conceptualization, Supervision. N.S.S.: Visualization. N.H.I.: Project administration. M.I.: Validation. M.Z.H.: Resources. S.X.D.: Resources. M.T.J.: Funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work is supported in part by the Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS/1/2019/STG07/UPNM/02/7) from the Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia. The authors thank the National Defence University of Malaysia for the financial support of this research.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the National Defence University of Malaysia for the financial support of this research.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Din, M.F.M.; Wang, J.L.; Zeng, R.; Shamba, P.; Debnath, J.C.; Dou, S.X. Effects of Cu substitution on structural and magnetic properties of La0.7Pr0.3Fe11.4Si1.6 compounds. Intermetallics 2013, 36, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Md Din, M.F.; Wang, J.L.; Studer, A.J.; Gu, Q.F.; Zeng, R.; Debnath, J.C.; Shamba, P.; Kennedy, S.J.; Dou, S.X. Effects of Cr substitution on structural and magnetic properties in La0.7Pr0.3Fe11.4Si1.6 compound. J. Appl. Phys. 2014, 115, 17A942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wang, J.L.; Campbell, S.J.; Tegus, O.; Brück, E.; Dou, S.X. Magnetic phase transition in MnFeP0.5As0.4Si0.1. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2010, 217, 12132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Din, M.F.M.; Wang, J.L.; Cheng, Z.X.; Dou, S.X.; Kennedy, S.J.; Avdeev, M.; Campbell, S.J. Tuneable Magnetic Phase Transitions in Layered CeMn2Ge2−xSix Compounds. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 11288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wang, J.L.; Caron, L.; Campbell, S.J.; Kennedy, S.J.; Hofmann, M.; Cheng, Z.X.; Din, M.F.M.; Studer, A.J.; Brück, E.; Dou, S.X. Driving magnetostructural transitions in layered intermetallic compounds. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013, 110, 217211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hu, F.; Shen, B.; Sun, J. Magnetic entropy change in Ni51.5Mn22.7Ga25.8 alloy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2000, 76, 3460–3462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, S.; Song, Y.; Han, X.; Ma, S.; Yu, K.; Liu, K.; Zhang, Z.; Hou, D.; Yuan, M.; Luo, X.; et al. Tuning the magnetostructural transformation in slightly Ni-substituted MnCoGe ferromagnet. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 773, 1114–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trung, N.T.; Ou, Z.Q.; Gortenmulder, T.J.; Tegus, O.; Buschow, K.H.J.; Brück, E. Tunable thermal hysteresis in MnFe (P, Ge) compounds. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 94, 102513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lai, J.W.; Zheng, Z.G.; Montemayor, R.; Zhong, X.C.; Liu, Z.W.; Zeng, D.C. Magnetic phase transitions and magnetocaloric effect of MnCoGe1−xSix. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2014, 372, 86–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trung, N.T.; Zhang, L.; Caron, L.; Buschow, K.H.J.J.; Brück, E. Giant magnetocaloric effects by tailoring the phase transitions. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010, 96, 172504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, J.Q.; Zhang, C.L.; Nie, Y.G.; Shi, H.F.; Ye, E.J.; Han, Z.D.; Wang, D.H. Tunable magnetostructural phase transition and magnetocaloric effect in Mn1−xNi1−xCo2xSi1−xGex system. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 698, 7–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trung, N.T.; Klaasse, J.C.P.; Tegus, O.; Thanh, D.T.C.; Buschow, K.H.J.; Brück, E. Determination of adiabatic temperature change in MnFe (P, Ge) compounds with pulse-field method. J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 2009, 43, 15002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, J.; Ling, L.; Hong, B.; Zhang, L.; Pi, L.; Zhang, Y. Critical properties of the perovskite manganite La0.1Nd0.6Sr0.3MnO3. Phys. Rev. B 2010, 81, 144426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gschneidner, K.A., Jr. VK Pecharsky, and AO Tsokal. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2005, 68, 1479. [Google Scholar]
- Sandeman, K.G.; Daou, R.; Özcan, S.; Durrell, J.H.; Mathur, N.D.; Fray, D.J. Negative magnetocaloric effect from highly sensitive metamagnetism in CoMnSi1−xGex. Phys. Rev. B 2006, 74, 224436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hu, F.; Shen, B.; Sun, J.; Cheng, Z.; Zhang, X. Magnetic entropy change in La(Fe0.98Co0.02)11.7Al1.3. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2000, 12, L691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caron, L.; Ou, Z.Q.; Nguyen, T.T.; Thanh, D.T.C.; Tegus, O.; Brück, E.; Cam Thanh, D.T.; Tegus, O.; Brück, E. On the determination of the magnetic entropy change in materials with first-order transitions. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2009, 321, 3559–3566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.L.; Shamba, P.; Hutchison, W.D.; Din, M.F.M.; Debnath, J.C.; Avdeev, M.; Zeng, R.; Kennedy, S.J.; Campbell, S.J.; Dou, S.X. Ti substitution for Mn in MnCoGe—The magnetism of Mn0.9Ti0.1CoGe. J. Alloys Compd. 2013, 577, 475–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bao, L.F.; Hu, F.X.; Wu, R.R.; Wang, J.; Chen, L.; Sun, J.R.; Shen, B.G.; Li, L.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, X.X. Evolution of magnetostructural transition and magnetocaloric effect with Al doping in MnCoGe1−xAlx compounds. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2014, 47, 055003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wood, M.E.; Potter, W.H. General analysis of magnetic refrigeration and its optimization using a new concept: Maximization of refrigerant capacity. Cryogenics 1985, 25, 667–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goswami, D.; Anand, K.S.; Jana, P.P.; Ghorai, S.K.; Chattopadhyay, S.; Das, J. Synthesis of a robust multifunctional composite with concurrent magnetocaloric effect and enhanced energy absorption capabilities through a tailored processing route. Mater. Des. 2020, 187, 108399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Obande, W.; Mamalis, D.; Ray, D.; Yang, L.; Brádaigh, C.M.Ó. Mechanical and thermomechanical characterization of vacuum-infused thermoplastic-and thermoset-based composites. Mater. Des. 2019, 175, 107828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
| Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).