Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Next Article in Journal
How Do Different Image Modules Impact the Accuracy of Working Length Measurements in Digital Periapical Radiography? An In Vitro Study
Previous Article in Journal
Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Model for Early Prediction of Sepsis Onset in Hospital Inpatients from All Departments
Previous Article in Special Issue
Anatomic Variations Important for Dental Implantation in the Mandible—A Systematic Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Anatomical Study of the Palmaris Longus Muscle and Its Clinical Importance

Department of Human & Clinical Anatomy, College of Medicine & Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Al Khoud, Muscat 123, Oman
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2025, 15(3), 304; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15030304
Submission received: 5 December 2024 / Revised: 1 January 2025 / Accepted: 25 January 2025 / Published: 27 January 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Anatomy—Third Edition)

Abstract

Background: The palmaris longus (PL) is a long, thin muscle in the forearm’s flexor compartment, known for its variations. The present study aimed to study the PL muscle in Omani medical students and its correlation with grip strength. Methods: A cross-sectional prospective study was conducted among 240 medical students (120 males, 120 females) at Sultan Qaboos University, comprising 480 upper limbs. Participants were between 18 and 25 years old and had no history of forearm surgery. We considered 480 upper limbs irrespective of left or right side, and our main aim was to compare the grip strength according to the presence or absence of PL. We assessed the presence of the PL muscle using Schaeffer’s Test and Pushpakumar’s test and measured the grip strength using the CAMRY digital hand dynamometer. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Chi-square tests, and independent t-tests. Results: The PL was present in 92.50% of the subjects (irrespective of side), with a higher prevalence in the females. The PL was absent in 24 (10.00%) males and 12 (5.00%) females, respectively. Average grip strength was 21.4 ± 5.25 kg in females and 40.92 ± 7.79 kg in males without considering PL presence or absence. If PL was present, then the mean grip strength was 30.84 ± 11.71 kg, and if the PL was absent, then the mean grip strength was 35.05 ± 12.44 kg. However, the p-value did not show any significant differences (p = 0.057). Conclusions: The PL is highly prevalent, especially in females, and its absence does not significantly affect grip strength. Hence, PL may be used for successful reconstructive surgeries without affecting hand function.
Keywords: anatomy; grip strength; muscle; Oman; palmaris longus; variation anatomy; grip strength; muscle; Oman; palmaris longus; variation

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Al Risi, A.-M.; Al Busaidi, S.; Al Aufi, H.; Al Hashmi, L.; Sirasanagandla, S.R.; Das, S. Anatomical Study of the Palmaris Longus Muscle and Its Clinical Importance. Diagnostics 2025, 15, 304. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15030304

AMA Style

Al Risi A-M, Al Busaidi S, Al Aufi H, Al Hashmi L, Sirasanagandla SR, Das S. Anatomical Study of the Palmaris Longus Muscle and Its Clinical Importance. Diagnostics. 2025; 15(3):304. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15030304

Chicago/Turabian Style

Al Risi, Abdul-Malik, Sara Al Busaidi, Hamood Al Aufi, Lubna Al Hashmi, Srinivasa Rao Sirasanagandla, and Srijit Das. 2025. "Anatomical Study of the Palmaris Longus Muscle and Its Clinical Importance" Diagnostics 15, no. 3: 304. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15030304

APA Style

Al Risi, A.-M., Al Busaidi, S., Al Aufi, H., Al Hashmi, L., Sirasanagandla, S. R., & Das, S. (2025). Anatomical Study of the Palmaris Longus Muscle and Its Clinical Importance. Diagnostics, 15(3), 304. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15030304

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop