Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Next Article in Journal
Effect of Blade Geometry on γ′ Lattice Parameter and Primary Orientation of SX Cored Turbine Blades (II)
Next Article in Special Issue
Mechanical and Surface Characteristics of Selective Laser Melting-Manufactured Dental Prostheses in Different Processing Stages
Previous Article in Journal
State of the Art in Development of Heat Exchanger Geometry Optimization and Different Storage Bed Designs of a Metal Hydride Reactor
Previous Article in Special Issue
Recent Advances in Metal Powder-Based Additive Manufacturing
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Microstructural Evolution, Mechanical Properties and Tribological Behavior of B4C-Reinforced Ti In Situ Composites Produced by Laser Powder Bed Fusion

1
State Key Laboratory of Powder Metallurgy, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
2
Farsoon Technologies, Changsha 410205, China
3
Research Institute of Smart Manufacturing, China Railway Construction Heavy Industry Co., Ltd., Changsha 410100, China
4
School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798, Singapore
5
Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2023, 16(13), 4890; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16134890
Submission received: 21 April 2023 / Revised: 4 June 2023 / Accepted: 13 June 2023 / Published: 7 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Metal Powder Based Additive Manufacturing)

Abstract

:
Based on the advantage of rapid net-shape fabrication, laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) is utilized to process B4C-reinforced Ti composites. The effect of volumetric energy density (VED) on the relative density, microstructural evolution, tensile properties and wear behaviors of B4C-reinforced Ti composites were systematically investigated. The LPBF-ed samples with high relative density (>99%) can be achieved, while the pores and un-melted powders can be observed in the sample owing to the low energy input (33 J/mm3). The additive particulates B4C were transformed into needle-like TiB whiskers with nano-scale while C dissolved in the Ti matrix. Fine-scale grains (<10 μm) with random crystallographic orientation can be achieved and the residual stress shows a downtrend as the VED increases. Through the analysis of the tensile and wear tests, the sample at 61 J/mm3 VED showed a good combination of strength and wear performance, with an ultimate tensile strength of 951 MPa and a wear rate of 3.91 × 10−4 mm3·N−1m−1. The microstructural evolution in VED changes and the corresponding underlying strengthening mechanisms of LPBF-ed Ti + B4C composites are conducted in detail.

1. Introduction

Titanium and its alloys have the advantages of high specific strength and stiffness combined with superior corrosion resistance, suitable for many industries including aerospace, marine, and automotive. However, the wear resistance of Ti limits the application of the areas mentioned above. To date, much attention has been devoted to titanium matrix composites (TMCs), which utilizes particulate reinforcement technology for strengthening the tribological properties, such as TiB, TiC, and TiN [1,2,3]. Nevertheless, the limited bond strength between ex situ category reinforcements and the Ti matrix may cause premature failure. As one of the ceramic particulates used, B4C shows superior stability combined with low density (2.52 g/cm3) and high hardness (~3000 HV) [4,5]. The introduction of B4C can efficiently reduce the weight of TMCs and the in situ formed TiB and TiC ceramic-reinforcement phase in TMCs leads to good interfacial bonding, outstanding thermodynamic stability, and fine-scale distribution [6,7,8,9]. In addition, the in situ reinforcement phase can provide an improvement in the mechanical properties of TMCs. For instance, Zhang et al. [10] demonstrated that the strength and high-temperature creep behavior of the Ti matrix increased with in situ TiB formation. Yu et al. found that fine in situ TiC particles can be obtained in TiC/Ti coatings processed by induction cladding, which is beneficial to harden the Ti matrix [11].
Many traditional manufacturing processes, such as vacuum casting or powder metallurgy, have been utilized to prepare Ti + B4C composites [12,13,14]. However, several issues, e.g., poor wettability, inferior densification response, and cracks, restrict the application of TMCs traditional processes. Besides, coarse carbide and boride particles are formed in TMCs through conventional processing methods owing to the low cooling rate after processing. These brittle phases are the origin of crack initiation and propagation [12,15].
As a promising 3D printing method, laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) can produce complex-shaped parts with almost fully dense structure, which enables to reduce the cost and improves the efficiency of the TMCs process [16,17,18,19]. During the LPBF process, a high laser power melts individual layers of material. Transient high temperature (~105 K) and ultra-high cooling rate (104~106 K/s) can be obtained from a high beam scanning speed (500–1500 mm/s), leading to fine microstructures and superior mechanical properties [20,21,22,23]. These indicate that LPBF is likely to be an optimal process to produce TMCs with B4C addition.
Despite the benefits, LPBF fabrication of TMCs is limited by quality defects including pores and cracks due to its complex thermal history [24,25,26]. To obtain an in-depth understanding of the LPBF processing parameters–microstructure–properties relationship, manipulating the LPBF processing parameters, e.g., laser power and scanning speed, can be used to control the quality of LPBF processed components [27,28]. However, there are numerous LPBF processing parameters, which are interactive. To summarize, volumetric energy density (VED) has been used as an engineering parameter to predict the microstructure and properties of LPBF-ed alloys [29]. In the study of Wu et al. [30], the influence of VED on microstructural evolution and mechanical behaviors of LPBF-ed AlSi10Mg was investigated. They found that the relative density and yield strength of LPBF-ed AlSi10Mg decreased as VED increased from 40 to 90 J/mm3. Liu et al. systematically studied the effects of the VED on LPBF-ed Ti6Al4V and showed that the tensile strength increased and then dropped with increasing VED (32.7 to 132.4 J/mm3) [31]. This indicates that the effect of VED on different alloy systems is different. Currently, optimization of the LPBF processing parameters for Ti + B4C is rarely reported [32]. The influence of VED on the microstructure and properties of Ti + B4C composites needs further exploration. Thus, this paper aims to obtain an understanding of solidification microstructural evolution and the mechanical properties and tribological behavior of these composites.
In the present study, B4C-reinforced Ti in situ composites produced by LPBF were used as a model to investigate the effect of VED on the microstructural evolution, mechanical properties, and tribological behavior. As a parametric study, an optimal LPBF processing parameter was determined to produce Ti composites with high density and enhanced properties. In addition, the corresponding strengthening mechanisms of LPBF-ed Ti + B4C composites are studied.

2. Experiments

2.1. Powder Preparation

Spherical unalloyed titanium powders (TA1, D10 = 18.4 μm, D50 = 30.6 μm, D90 = 47.1 μm, purchased from TIJO Inc., Changsha, China) and nano-sized B4C powders (TIJO Inc., Changsha, China) with an average diameter~500 nm was used in this study. The chemical composition of unalloyed Ti powder was detected using an inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometer (ICP-AES), seen in Table 1. The powders were blended under argon in a mixer at room temperature for 12 h with a rotation rate of 20 rpm, and its distribution of particle size was seen in Figure 1a. The B4C content was 0.5 wt.%. A secondary electron (SE) image of the as-mixed powders is shown in Figure 1b.

2.2. LPBF Process

Both cubic (10 × 10 × 10 mm3) and dogbone-shaped tensile samples (gauge length 9.525 mm, gauge width 2 mm and thickness 2 mm) of the titanium-based composite were produced using an FS121 M LPBF machine equipped with a 500 W fiber laser (Farsoon Inc., Changsha, China). Several samples were built on Ti base plates with area dimensions of 110 mm × 110 mm. Stripes in subsequent layers were rotated by 67° with respect to the previous layer, and sample borders were outlined with a separate perimeter scan. A schematic of the laser scanning strategy is shown in Figure 1c. During the LPBF processing, high-purity argon was used to fill the processing chamber, resulting in less than 100 ppm oxygen present. The VED can be calculated using equation (1) from the LPBF parameters used, i.e., the laser power (P, 160–280 W), the scanning speed (v, 1000–2000 mm/s), the hatch distance (h, 80 μm), and the layer thickness (t, 30 μm).
VED = P   v ht

2.3. Microstructural Characterization

For microstructural characterization, specimens were mirror polished using SiC paper and 0.25 μm SiO2 suspension successively, which are etched using Kroll’s reagent (2 mL HF, 6 mL HNO3, and 92 mL H2O) for ~10 s. Optical microscopy (OM, LEICA DM4500P, LEICA, Deerfield, IL, USA) was used to characterize the microstructure at low magnification. Phase identification was performed using an X-ray diffractometer (XRD, Advance D8, Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) with Cu-Kα radiation and a step size of 0.02°. Further microstructural characterization was performed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM, MAIA3 TESCAN, Brno, Czechia) at an accelerating voltage of 20 kV. Texture analysis of the samples was performed using electron backscattered diffraction (EBSD) at a step size of 0.7 μm. Transmission electron microscope (TEM, FEI Titan G2, FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA) analysis was performed at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV, and the compositions were determined using energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS).

2.4. Mechanical and Tribological Tests

The physical and mechanical properties of the LPBF-ed specimens were investigated via density measurements, nanoindentation measurements, tensile tests, and tribological studies. The density (ρ) was determined using the Archimedes method from:
ρ = W a   ×   ρ w W a     W
where Wa and W are the weights of the sample in air and water, respectively, and ρ w is the density of the water. The density machine is Sartorius MSA324S-000-DU and each reported value is the average of three measurements. The theoretical density of Ti composite is 4.486 g/cm3. After analyzing the relative density results (Figure 2), the three specimens (named S1, S2, and S3) with VED values ranging from 33 to 117 J/mm3 are selected and discussed in this paper: the processing parameters associated with these specimens are listed in Table 2.
The nanoindentation measurements were undertaken using a MCT + UNHT machine (CSM Company, Kaisten, Switzerland) at room temperature. The load was set at 30 mN load with a loading time of 15 s and a Berkvoich indenter was used. Each specimen was measured at least 3 times. The reduced Young’s modulus is defined as:
1 E r = 1     v 2 E + 1     v i 2 E i
where E and v are the elastic modulus and Poisson’s ratio for the specimen, while Ei and vi are the corresponding values for the indenter.
Tensile tests were performed at room temperature at an initial strain rate of 1 × 10−3s−1 on specimens cut using a wire electrical discharge machine perpendicular to the building direction and ground to a surface finish using 3000 grid SiC paper. The strain was measured with a video probe. Dry sliding wear tests were performed on specimens’ flat ground. A 4 mm diameter Si3Ni4 ball was used as the counter-material. The load, rotation speed, rotation radius, and time were at 10 N, 10 Hz, 1 mm, and 30 min, respectively. The tensile fracture surfaces and worn surfaces were examined using the secondary electron mode in the SEM.

3. Results

3.1. Microstructure

Figure 3 shows typical OM images of S1, S2 and S3 viewed in the x–y plane. The melt track, also known as the melt pool, can be clearly observed. It is evident that the rotation angle between melt tracks is about 67°, as expected. Micropores were presented in S1 resulting in lower relative density (~96%), which may be attributed to insufficient energy penetration at the lowest VED. The morphology of S2 was similar to that of S3. The excellent track-to-track bonding suggested that the alloys with a near-dense structure show good mechanical properties.
Figure 4 shows the surface morphologies of S1, S2 and S3. There were both un-melted powders and island-shape phenomenon on the surface of S1 (Figure 4a), arising from the limited energy penetration at a VED of 33 J/mm3. As the VED increased to 61 J/mm3 (specimen S2), both the number of un-melted powders and the surface island-shape phenomenon decreased substantially. When the VED further increased to 117 J/mm3 (specimen S3), the surface became smoother and free of any evident defects, a result that can be attributed to the greater laser power penetrating the powder-bed [33].
Figure 4d–f show typical microstructures of LPBF-ed samples in the x–y plane. The VED exerts a significant influence on the microstructure of the Ti + B4C composites. Unlike the other specimens, S1 exhibited cellular microstructure. As the VED increased from 61 J/mm3 to 117 J/mm3, a change to a columnar structure can be observed. The difference in microstructure is dependent on the complex solidification behaviors in the molten pool caused by various VED, which is discussed in Section 4.1. In addition, needle-like TiB whiskers of different sizes can be seen in all three samples. Clusters composed of TiB whiskers were present in the LPBF-ed microstructure, where parallel whiskers were stuck to each other. The TiB whiskers grew into this morphology due to the faster growth rate in the [010] axis than that in other directions [34].

3.2. EBSD Characterization

The effect of VED on the grain size and crystallographic orientations of the LPBF-ed B4C-reinforced Ti in situ composites was studied using EBSD. Inverse pole figures (IPF) viewed perpendicular to the building direction (BD) of S1, S2, and S3 are shown in Figure 5. The grains in the three samples were mostly smaller than 10 μm, while a few more coarse grains were observed in S3. The average α lath width of three samples was determined to be 0.67 μm, 0.75 μm, and 0.89 μm, respectively. The small increase in lath width can be attributed to the greater heat input from the increased VED. Besides, the top-viewed crystallographic orientations of three specimens in Figure 5 show crystallographic directions were random.

3.3. TEM Analysis

To further clarify the microstructure of the LPBF-ed Ti + B4C composites, specimen S2 was examined in the TEM. Figure 6a shows that the needle-like whiskers with sizes ranging from 50 to 100 nm were randomly distributed in the matrix. However, TiC and TiB are hardly observed in TEM-EDS maps. In α-Ti alloys, the solid solubility of C is 0.458 wt.% at 1173K and drops to 0.126 wt.% at 873K [35]. During the LPBF process, 0.104 wt.% of C dissolved into S2, where the carbon content is below the maximum carbon solubility. This is the reason that TiC particles are not observed at room temperature.
High-resolution TEM (HRTEM) was performed to examine the interface between the TiB whisker and the α-Ti matrix. Figure 7a shows a clean interface between the matrix and the reinforcing phase, illustrating good bonding between the TiB whisker and the α-Ti. The α-Ti matrix and TiB whiskers were identified via determining the lattice parameters to be 0.159 nm and 0.250 nm, respectively. However, the theoretical lattice spacing of α-Tid{110} is known to be 0.147 nm, which is smaller than the experimental results. Kværndrup et al. reported that the interstitial atoms (O, N, or H) dissolution into α-Ti leads to the increase of lattice parameter [36]. The results indicated that C is dissolved into Ti, leading to lattice spacing expansion. The corresponding fast Fourier transform (FFT) patterns of the LPBF-ed Ti + B4C composite are shown in Figure 7b,c, which further confirms the existence of the TiB whisker and the α-Ti phase. In addition, intense streaking in the direction of TiB (110) was observed, demonstrating the existence of stacking faults (SF) in the TiB (110) plane. Kooi et al. reported a similar structure in laser-clad Ti-TiB [34].

3.4. Phase Identification

XRD patterns from S1, S2 and S3 are shown in Figure 8. Strong diffraction peaks from hexagonal Ti (HCP) and weak diffraction peaks from the small volume fraction of TiB were found. According to the Ti-B-C ternary phase diagram [37], an in situ reaction occurred during the solidification processing of LPBF-ed samples:
Ti + B 4 C     β-Ti + TiB     α-Ti + TiB

3.5. Mechanical Properties

Tensile tests were conducted to evaluate the LPBF-ed B4C-reinforced Ti in situ composites and their representative engineering stress-engineering strain responses are displayed in Figure 9: values for the yield strength (YS), ultimate tensile strength (UTS), elongation (ε) is summarized in Table 3. S1 had the lowest relative density (95.6%) and exhibited the lowest ε, but had the highest YS at 768 ± 10 MPa. Compared with S1, the YS value of S2 was ~30 MPa less at 738 ± 6 MPa, but its ε increased from 1.7 ± 0.4% to 6.3 ± 1.1%, presumably due to a lower number of defects. Compared with S2, S3 had the similar ε at 7.4 ± 1.9%. However, S3 had a lower YS value (664 ± 9 MPa) than those of the other two specimens. As increasing VED, the pore morphology in Ti alloys changed from irregular shape to near-spherical shapes [31]. During tensile test, samples with spherical pores have a more uniform distribution of strain, which may lead to better ductility performance than that of samples with irregular pores. The decrease of YS can be attributed to the coarse grain in S3 caused by large energy input. As shown in Table 3, the introduction of B4C to pure Ti can achieve high tensile strength and reasonable elongation with comparison of pure Ti produced by LPBF, wrought or cast [38,39,40,41,42].
Nanoindentation tests were conducted on the three specimens and the smooth load-displacement curves obtained are shown in Figure 10a. It can be observed that the indentation depth of the LPBF-ed Ti + B4C composites becomes slightly deeper with increasing VED. Figure 10b is a histogram of the hardness (H) and reduced Young’s modulus, (Er) for the three samples. The increasing VED led to a slight decrease in H from 4.6 GPa to 3.8 GPa. The reduced Young’s moduli of S1 and S2 were similar (~128 GPa) but were ~8% greater than that of S3.

3.6. Tribological Behavior

Figure 11 presents the friction coefficient and wear rate from wear tests of the LPBF-ed Ti + B4C composites. The wear rate coefficient (Kc) was calculated from (5):
K c = 2 π rA FS  
where r and A are the radius and area of wear tracks, respectively, and F and S are the load and sliding distance, respectively. The friction coefficient curves of the three samples experienced a short fluctuation within an unstable period (about 3 min) and then became more stable. The average friction coefficients of S1, S2, and S3 were calculated during the steady period (3-30 min). S1 exhibited both a high friction coefficient (0.25 ± 0.01) and a high Kc (6.2 ± 2.1 × 10−4 mm3·N−1m−1). A similar friction coefficient (0.25 ± 0.01), but the lowest Kc (3.9 ± 0.6 × 10−4 mm3·N−1m−1) was obtained for S2. Interestingly, S3 exhibited the lowest friction coefficient (0.22 ± 0.01) but the highest Kc (12.4 ± 1.5 mm3·N−1m−1).
The worn surfaces (typical morphologies and 3D surface profiles) and corresponding EDS mapping of S1, S2, and S3 are presented in Figure 12. The shallower grooves along the sliding distance on S1 and S2 surfaces were clear while the severer grooved scratches and more debris can be observed on the S3 surface. Based on the EDS mapping result, it was demonstrated that wear debris were tribological oxides and the tribological layers were composed of oxides. In addition, white debris detected in Figure 12 were considered an oxidative wear character because of the exposure to the air during the dry sliding wear test [43,44].

4. Discussion

4.1. Microstructural Evolution

When the laser penetrates the powder-bed, the Ti powders first melted and then reacted with the B4C particles in the molten pool. However, inadequate penetration led to un-melted powder and island-shape phenomenon, which produced a rough surface, as observed in specimen S1. With increasing VED, the composite powders could be fully melted and the surface became smooth. In general, the viscosity of the fluid is strongly determined by the temperature in the molten pool, which has a significant influence on surface quality. According to Takamichi [45], the viscosity of fluid (μ) in the molten pool can be calculated from (6):
μ = α m k T γ
where α is a constant, m is the atomic mass, k is the Boltzmann constant, γ is the surface tension of fluid and T is fluid temperature. The surface tension of fluid dropped with increasing fluid temperature [46]. Therefore, the viscosity of fluid decreased caused by a higher VED. The fluid in the molten pool spreads easily and a high-quality surface without defects was obtained for higher VEDs.
Characteristic solidification microstructures in Figure 4 were formed in the LPBF process. When the laser interacted with the powder bed, B4C is prone to react with Ti and transforms into in situ formed TiB whiskers. TiB whiskers are melted into the liquid over its melting point (2473 K) or partially dissolved in the region below 2473 K. During the solidification process, the solute atoms were ejected at the solid/liquid interface front, which led to a higher concentration of solute. The retained TiB whisker was captured to act as grain boundaries and eutectic TiB whiskers solidified between the Ti grains. Besides, the length of TiB whiskers became larger, which may be caused by longer solidification time as VED increased. The solidification morphology is determined by the ratio of the temperature gradient (G) to solidification rate (R) while G×R governs the microstructural scale. G is given by the temperature field caused by the laser and R is related to beam velocity and the melt pool shape. A change from cellular to columnar structures occurred due to differences in G and R in the molten pool caused by different VEDs. The metastable cell structure of S1 formed in the LPBF process can be attributed to the moderate G/R. At the higher VED in S3, a lower G/R was obtained, which led to columnar dendrites [47]. Therefore, it was seen that increasing VED may lead to a reduced G/R, which changes the microstructure.

4.2. Mechanical Properties Analysis

The increment in the strength of LPBF-ed Ti + B4C in situ composites can be attributed to three strengthening mechanisms: (1) grain refinement caused by the heterogeneous nucleation on TiB; (2) TiB whiskers acting as reinforcements; and (3) solid-solution strengthening from dissolved carbon. For a better understanding of the strengthening mechanisms, S2 was chosen to quantitatively estimate these effects.
Upon the addition of the B4C powders, the grain size decreased compared to LPBF-ed Ti [41]. Based on the Hall–Petch relationship, the increase in yield strength by grain size reduction is expressed as:
  Δ σ H-P = K d 1 1 2     d 2 1 2
where K is a constant as 328 MPa μm1/2 [48], d1 and d2 are α-Ti grain size of the Ti + B4C composite and the titanium matrix, respectively.
Because of the limited solid solubility in the matrix (~0.02 wt.%), most of the boron was presented in the TiB whiskers. The fiber strengthening effect from the TiB whiskers can be calculated from:
  Δ σ TiB = 0 . 5 σ YSm V TiB l d ω 0
where σYSm is the yield strength of the Ti matrix, VTiB, l/d, and ω0 are the volume fraction, aspect ratio, and whisker orientation factor for the TiB whiskers, respectively. The orientation of TiB whiskers is random and hence ω0 = 0.27 [49,50,51].
The solid solution strengthening from carbon in the Ti matrix can be expressed as [49]:
Δ σ S = 1 3 m T 1 2 1 + υ E r η 3 2   c 1 2
where mT, υ, Er are the Taylor factor, Poisson׳s ratio, and elastic modulus of the Ti alloy, respectively. η is related to the change in the lattice constants with carbon concentration in the Ti matrix [52] and c is the atom fraction of carbon (~0.43 wt.%).
Therefore, the theoretical YS of S2 can be calculated from:
σ YS = σ YSm + Δ σ H-P + Δ σ TiB + Δ σ S
Using the Equations (7)–(10), the YS of S2 was calculated to be 698 MPa with parameters listed in Table 4, which agreed relatively well with the experimental value of 712 MPa. Notably, ∆ σ H-P , Δ σ TiB , and Δ σ S are 134 MPa, 22 MPa, and 136 MPa, respectively. The largest increase in strength was from solution strengthening, accounting for 48%. Note that the tensile strength of S3 was significantly lower than that of others, which may be attributed to higher energy penetration resulting in coarser grains.
Secondary electron images of the fracture surfaces of the LPBF-ed Ti + B4C composites are shown in Figure 13. There were several pores and cleavage steps evident in S1 caused by insufficient VED (Figure 13a). During tensile testing, crack propagation may begin at such defects, leading to worse ductile performance [54,55]. Such pores were not evident for S2 and S3, which explained the higher ductility for these two specimens. A combination of cleavage steps and dimples can be observed in Figure 13b, which demonstrated that the fracture mechanism was a mixture of brittle fracture and plastic deformation. However, the dimples were small and shallow, compared with that in Figure 13c. This phenomenon explained the plastic deformation in S2 was limited. The main fracture mechanism of S3 was plastic deformation because of the full dimples. In summary, the mechanism of fracture changed from brittleness to ductile failure with the enhanced VED.

4.3. Tribological Behavior Analysis

Different wear mechanisms of the LPBF-ed samples led to different tribological behavior. The shallow grooves along the sliding distance and tribological layers of S1 and S2 indicated that adhesive and abrasive wear mechanisms predominate during the wear test. The dominant wear mechanism of S3 was abrasive wear, demonstrated by severer grooved scratches and more white debris. The contact and relative sliding between materials and Si3N4 generated high tribological heat and local pressure, leading to the formation of tribological oxides and layers on the composite surface. During a long period of high-stress contact, cracks and delamination occurred on the tribological layers. In S1 and S2, tribological layers composed of wear debris were formed due to the applied stress during the wear test. Layers composed of tribological oxide existing on the sample surface can efficiently reduce wear rate and improve wear resistance [44]. In addition, the hardness and strength of materials were considered important indices judging wear resistance [56]. It can be inferred that tribological layers composed of oxide and better strength of S1 and S2 led to better tribological performance than that of S3 (12.4 ± 1.5 mm3·N−1m−1). While the lower relative density of S1 led to an unstable tribological performance (6.2 ± 2.1×10−4 mm3·N−1m−1), which may be due to un-melted powders and pores acting as crack initiation [57].

5. Conclusions

In situ Ti composites reinforced by B4C were successfully processed by LPBF. The effect of VED on relative density, microstructure, tensile properties, and wear behaviors have been investigated. The following conclusions are:
(1) A relative density higher than 99% was achieved in S2 and S3. The island-shape phenomenon and un-melted powders in S1 can be attributed to the lower viscosity of fluid caused by inadequate lower energy input.
(2) The microstructural evolution was influenced by VED. The cellular microstructure changes gradually to columnar morphology with VED increment. A small increase of grain size due to more heat input by VED and the crystallographic orientations are random
(3) A superior UTS of 951 ± 21 MPa combined with reasonable ductility (6.3 ± 1.1%) was achieved in the S2. The improved strength was attributed to grain refinement strengthening caused by TiB whiskers, TiB reinforcement mechanism, and solution strengthening of carbon in the Ti matrix. The fracture mechanism changed gradually from brittleness to ductile failure with the VED increases.
(4) A low wear rate and friction coefficient of S2 were reached 3.91 × 10−4 mm3·N−1m−1 and 0.252, respectively. Owing to tribological layers on the sample surface and better strength, S1 and S2 had a better wear behavior than that of S3.

Author Contributions

J.D., conceptualization, data curation, methodology, and writing—original draft. Y.R., conceptualization, formal analysis, investigation, and methodology. X.L., conceptualization and writing—review and editing. F.X., conceptualization. X.W., writing—review and editing. R.Z., conceptualization and methodology. I.B., conceptualization and methodology. H.W., funding acquisition and writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 52071346), the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province for Distinguished Young Scholars (No. 2023JJ10075), and Central South University Research Programme of Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies (No. 2023QYJC038).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors would thank Sinoma Institute of Materials Research (Guang Zhou) Co., Ltd. for the assistance with the TEM characterization.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, J.; Song, B.; Cai, C.; Zhang, L.; Shi, Y. Tailorable microstructure and mechanical properties of selective laser melted TiB/Ti–6Al–4V composite by heat treatment. Adv. Powder Mater. 2022, 1, 100010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhang, Z.; Chen, J.; He, G.; Yang, G. Fatigue and Mechanical Behavior of Ti-6Al-4V Alloy with CrN and TiN Coating Deposited by Magnetic Filtered Cathodic Vacuum Arc Process. Coatings 2019, 9, 689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Ali, T.; Wang, L.; Cheng, X.; Gu, D.; Zhou, Z.; Min, X. The effect of TiC on microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti-5553 beta phase titanium alloy. Mater. Des. 2022, 214, 110395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhang, W. A review of tribological properties for boron carbide ceramics. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2021, 116, 100718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chand, S.; Chandrasekhar, P.; Sarangi, R.; Nayak, R. Influence of B4C particles on processing and strengthening mechanisms in aluminum metal matrix composites-a review. Mater. Today Proc. 2019, 18, 5356–5363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Soy, U.; Demir, A.; Findik, F. Friction and wear behaviors of Al-SiC-B4C composites produced by pressure infiltration method. Ind. Lubr. Tribol. 2011, 63, 387–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sousa, L.; Alves, A.; Guedes, A.; Toptan, F. Corrosion and tribocorrosion behaviour of Ti-B4C composites processed by conventional sintering and hot-pressing technique. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 885, 161109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Han, C.; Babicheva, R.; Chua, J.D.Q.; Ramamurty, U.; Tor, S.B.; Sun, C.-N.; Zhou, K. Microstructure and mechanical properties of (TiB+ TiC)/Ti composites fabricated in situ via selective laser melting of Ti and B4C powders. Addit. Manuf. 2020, 36, 101466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ren, Y.; Wu, H.; Agbedor, S.-O.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Fang, Q.; Li, J.; Tian, Y.; Baker, I. Microstructure, mechanical and tribological properties of a Ti-5Cu alloy and a B4C/Ti-5Cu in situ composite fabricated by laser powder bed fusion. Mater. Charact. 2022, 192, 112217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, Z.; Qin, J.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, Y.; Lu, W.; Zhang, D. Microstructure effect on mechanical properties of in situ synthesized titanium matrix composites reinforced with TiB and La2O3. Mater. Lett. 2010, 64, 361–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yu, H.L.; Zhang, W.; Wang, H.M.; Ji, X.C.; Song, Z.Y.; Li, X.Y.; Xu, B.S. In-situ synthesis of TiC/Ti composite coating by high frequency induction cladding. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 701, 244–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Li, S.; Kondoh, K.; Imai, H.; Chen, B.; Jia, L.; Umeda, J.; Fu, Y. Strengthening behavior of in situ-synthesized (TiC–TiB)/Ti composites by powder metallurgy and hot extrusion. Mater. Des. 2016, 95, 127–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhang, M.; Yuan, T.; Li, R. Effect of spark plasma sintering on microstructure and friction characteristics of boron carbide. J. Micromechanics Mol. Phys. 2018, 3, 1750014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sabahi Namini, A.; Delbari, S.A.; Nayebi, B.; Shahedi Asl, M.; Parvizi, S. Effect of B4C content on sintering behavior, microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti-based composites fabricated via spark plasma sintering. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2020, 251, 123087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Banoth, R.; Sarkar, R.; Bhattacharjee, A.; Nandy, T.K.; Nageswara Rao, G.V.S. Effect of boron and carbon addition on microstructure and mechanical properties of metastable beta titanium alloys. Mater. Des. 2015, 67, 50–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sun, J.E.; Zhang, B.; Qu, X. High strength Al alloy development for laser powder bed fusion. J. Micromechanics Mol. Phys. 2021, 6, 2141001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, T.; Liu, C.-T. Design of titanium alloys by additive manufacturing: A critical review. Adv. Powder Mater. 2021, 1, 100014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chowdhury, S.; Yadaiah, N.; Prakash, C.; Ramakrishna, S.; Dixit, S.; Gupta, L.R.; Buddhi, D. Laser powder bed fusion: A state-of-the-art review of the technology, materials, properties & defects, and numerical modelling. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2022, 20, 2109–2172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Luo, X.; Song, T.; Wang, F.; Lu, H.; Kang, L.; Ma, H.; Li, D.; Gebert, A.; Yang, C. Phase selection-oriented mechanical properties tailoring for β-type TiNbZrTaSi alloy fabricated by laser powder bed fusion. Adv. Powder Mater. 2023, 2, 100118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gu, D.; Shi, X.; Poprawe, R.; Bourell, D.L.; Setchi, R.; Zhu, J. Material-structure-performance integrated laser-metal additive manufacturing. Science 2021, 372, eabg1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, D.; Qiu, D.; Gibson, M.A.; Zheng, Y.; Fraser, H.L.; StJohn, D.H.; Easton, M.A. Additive manufacturing of ultrafine-grained high-strength titanium alloys. Nature 2019, 576, 91–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Yadroitsev, I.; Krakhmalev, P.; Yadroitsava, I. Titanium alloys manufactured by in situ alloying during laser powder bed fusion. JOM 2017, 69, 2725–2730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tan, C.; Ma, W.; Deng, C.; Zhang, D.; Zhou, K. Additive manufacturing SiC-reinforced maraging steel: Parameter optimisation, microstructure and properties. Adv. Powder Mater. 2023, 2, 100076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yavari, R.; Smoqi, Z.; Riensche, A.; Bevans, B.; Kobir, H.; Mendoza, H.; Song, H.; Cole, K.; Rao, P. Part-scale thermal simulation of laser powder bed fusion using graph theory: Effect of thermal history on porosity, microstructure evolution, and recoater crash. Mater. Des. 2021, 204, 109685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhang, J.; Yuan, W.; Song, B.; Yin, S.; Wang, X.; Wei, Q.; Shi, Y. Towards understanding metallurgical defect formation of selective laser melted wrought aluminum alloys. Adv. Powder Mater. 2022, 1, 100035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, D.; Yang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Yang, L.; Wang, H.; Yang, S. Introduction to the Special Issue on Design and Simulation in AdditiveManufacturing. Comput. Model. Eng. Sci. 2021, 126, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Huang, S.; Narayan, R.L.; Tan, J.H.K.; Sing, S.L.; Yeong, W.Y. Resolving the porosity-unmelted inclusion dilemma during in-situ alloying of Ti34Nb via laser powder bed fusion. Acta Mater. 2021, 204, 116522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wu, H.; Ren, J.; Huang, Q.; Zai, X.; Liu, L.; Chen, C.; Liu, S.; Yang, X.; Li, R. Effect of laser parameters on microstructure, metallurgical defects and property of AlSi10Mg printed by selective laser melting. J. Micromechanics Mol. Phys. 2017, 2, 1750017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Buhairi, M.A.; Foudzi, F.M.; Jamhari, F.I.; Sulong, A.B.; Radzuan, N.A.M.; Muhamad, N.; Mohamed, I.F.; Azman, A.H.; Harun, W.S.W.; Al-Furjan, M.S.H. Review on volumetric energy density: Influence on morphology and mechanical properties of Ti6Al4V manufactured via laser powder bed fusion. Prog. Addit. Manuf. 2023, 8, 265–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wu, H.; Ren, Y.; Ren, J.; Liang, L.; Li, R.; Fang, Q.; Cai, A.; Shan, Q.; Tian, Y.; Baker, I. Selective laser melted AlSi10Mg alloy under melting mode transition: Microstructure evolution, nanomechanical behaviors and tensile properties. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 873, 159823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, W.; Chen, C.; Shuai, S.; Zhao, R.; Liu, L.; Wang, X.; Hu, T.; Xuan, W.; Li, C.; Yu, J.; et al. Study of pore defect and mechanical properties in selective laser melted Ti6Al4V alloy based on X-ray computed tomography. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2020, 797, 139981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Traxel, K.D.; Bandyopadhyay, A. Selective laser melting of Ti6Al4V-B4C-BN in situ reactive composites. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2022, 18, 2654–2671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, J.; Zhu, R.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, L. Understanding melt pool characteristics in laser powder bed fusion: An overview of single- and multi-track melt pools for process optimization. Adv. Powder Mater. 2023, 2, 100137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kooi, B.J.; Pei, Y.T.; De Hosson, J.T.M. The evolution of microstructure in a laser clad TiB–Ti composite coating. Acta Mater. 2003, 51, 831–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. De Barros, M.I.; Rats, D.; Vandenbulcke, L.; Farges, G. Influence of internal diffusion barriers on carbon diffusion in pure titanium and Ti–6Al–4V during diamond deposition. Diamond Relat. Mater. 1999, 8, 1022–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kværndrup, F.B.; Somers, M.A.J.; Christiansen, T.L. Extreme Expansion and Reversible Hydrogen Solubility in h.c.p. Titanium Stabilized by Colossal Interstitial Alloying. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2021, 52, 4997–5003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Peter Rogl, H.B.; Duschanek, H. Materials Science International Team. Calculated Isopleth from Ti to ‘B4C’: Datasheet from MSI Eureka in SpringerMaterials; MSI, Materials Science International Services GmbH: Stuttgart, Germany, 2004; Available online: https://materials.springer.com/msi/phase-diagram/docs/sm_msi_r_10_011050_03_full_LnkDia11 (accessed on 19 June 2022).
  38. Hasib, M.T.; Ostergaard, H.E.; Liu, Q.; Li, X.; Kruzic, J.J. Tensile and fatigue crack growth behavior of commercially pure titanium produced by laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. Addit. Manuf. 2021, 45, 102027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liu, H.; Wang, H.; Ren, L.; Qiu, D.; Yang, K. Antibacterial copper-bearing titanium alloy prepared by laser powder bed fusion for superior mechanical performance. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2023, 132, 100–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Issariyapat, A.; Kariya, S.; Shitara, K.; Umeda, J.; Kondoh, K. Solute-induced near-isotropic performance of laser powder bed fusion manufactured pure titanium. Addit. Manuf. 2022, 56, 102907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Attar, H.; Bermingham, M.J.; Ehtemam-Haghighi, S.; Dehghan-Manshadi, A.; Kent, D.; Dargusch, M.S. Evaluation of the mechanical and wear properties of titanium produced by three different additive manufacturing methods for biomedical application. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2019, 760, 339–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Okazaki, Y.; Ishino, A. Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of Laser-Sintered Commercially Pure Ti and Ti-6Al-4V Alloy for Dental Applications. Materials 2020, 13, 609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Wei, M.; Yu, H.; Song, Z.; Yin, Y.; Zhou, X.; Wang, H.; Ji, X.; Li, X.; Shi, P.; Zhang, W. Microstructural evolution, mechanical properties and wear behavior of in-situ TiC-reinforced Ti matrix composite coating by induction cladding. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2021, 412, 127048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zheng, B.; Dong, F.; Yuan, X.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, H.; Zuo, X.; Luo, L.; Wang, L.; Su, Y.; Wang, X.; et al. Evaluation on tribological characteristics of (TiC+TiB)/Ti–6Al–4V composite in the range from 25 °C to 600 °C. Wear 2020, 450–451, 203256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Miller, R. Physical properties of liquid metals. In Liquid Metals Handbook; U.S. Government Publishing Office: Washington, DC, USA, 1952; Volume 38. [Google Scholar]
  46. Nogi, K.; Ogino, K.; McLean, A.; Miller, W.A. The temperature coefficient of the surface tension of pure liquid metals. Metall. Trans. B 1986, 17, 163–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Gäumann, M.; Bezençon, C.; Canalis, P.; Kurz, W. Single-crystal laser deposition of superalloys: Processing–microstructure maps. Acta Mater. 2001, 49, 1051–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hu, Y.; Cong, W.; Wang, X.; Li, Y.; Ning, F.; Wang, H. Laser deposition-additive manufacturing of TiB-Ti composites with novel three-dimensional quasi-continuous network microstructure: Effects on strengthening and toughening. Compos. Part B 2018, 133, 91–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, J.; Guo, X.; Qin, J.; Zhang, D.; Lu, W. Microstructure and mechanical properties of investment casted titanium matrix composites with B4C additions. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2015, 628, 366–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Huang, L.; Kong, F.; Chen, Y.; Xiao, S. Microstructure and tensile properties of Ti–6Al–4V–0.1B alloys of direct rolling in the near β phase region. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2013, 560, 140–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ren, Y.; Wu, H.; Liu, B.; Shan, Q.; Guo, S.; Jiao, Z.; Baker, I. A novel L12-strengthened AlCoCuFeNi high-entropy alloy with both high hardness and good corrosion resistance. Mater. Lett. 2023, 331, 133339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Scheu, C.; Stergar, E.; Schober, M.; Cha, L.; Clemens, H.; Bartels, A.; Schimansky, F.P.; Cerezo, A. High carbon solubility in a γ-TiAl-based Ti–45Al–5Nb–0.5C alloy and its effect on hardening. Acta Mater. 2009, 57, 1504–1511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Fan, Z.; Miodownik, A.P.; Chandrasekaran, L.; Ward-Close, M. The Young’s moduli of in situ Ti/TiB composites obtained by rapid solidification processing. J. Mater. Sci. 1994, 29, 1127–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Liu, J.; Sun, Q.; Zhou, C.a.; Wang, X.; Li, H.; Guo, K.; Sun, J. Achieving Ti6Al4V alloys with both high strength and ductility via selective laser melting. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2019, 766, 138319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Sarkar, S.; Kumar, C.S.; Nath, A.K. Effects of heat treatment and build orientations on the fatigue life of selective laser melted 15-5 PH stainless steel. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2019, 755, 235–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Yang, Y.; Ren, Y.; Tian, Y.; Li, K.; Zhang, W.; Shan, Q.; Tian, Y.; Huang, Q.; Wu, H. Microstructure and properties of FeCoCrNiMoSix high-entropy alloys fabricated by spark plasma sintering. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 884, 161070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Deshpande, P.K.; Lin, R.Y. Wear resistance of WC particle reinforced copper matrix composites and the effect of porosity. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2006, 418, 137–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Distribution of particle size for the Ti + B4C mixture, (b) SE image of the Ti + B4C mixture, and (c) schematic illustration of the laser scanning strategy.
Figure 1. (a) Distribution of particle size for the Ti + B4C mixture, (b) SE image of the Ti + B4C mixture, and (c) schematic illustration of the laser scanning strategy.
Materials 16 04890 g001
Figure 2. Relative density of LPBF-ed Ti + B4C composite.
Figure 2. Relative density of LPBF-ed Ti + B4C composite.
Materials 16 04890 g002
Figure 3. OM images of (a) S1, (b) S2, and (c) S3.
Figure 3. OM images of (a) S1, (b) S2, and (c) S3.
Materials 16 04890 g003
Figure 4. SE images of surface and microstructure of LPBF-ed Ti + B4C in situ composites: (a,d) S1; (b,e) S2; (c,f) S3.
Figure 4. SE images of surface and microstructure of LPBF-ed Ti + B4C in situ composites: (a,d) S1; (b,e) S2; (c,f) S3.
Materials 16 04890 g004
Figure 5. IPFs perpendicular to BD of samples with different VED: (a) S1; (b) S2; (c) S3.
Figure 5. IPFs perpendicular to BD of samples with different VED: (a) S1; (b) S2; (c) S3.
Materials 16 04890 g005
Figure 6. (a) BFTEM images of LPBF-ed S2; (b,c) corresponding EDS map showing the Ti and B/C distribution.
Figure 6. (a) BFTEM images of LPBF-ed S2; (b,c) corresponding EDS map showing the Ti and B/C distribution.
Materials 16 04890 g006
Figure 7. (a) HRTEM images of TiB whisker and the Ti matrix; (b,c) FFT patterns of α-Ti and TiB whisker, respectively.
Figure 7. (a) HRTEM images of TiB whisker and the Ti matrix; (b,c) FFT patterns of α-Ti and TiB whisker, respectively.
Materials 16 04890 g007
Figure 8. XRD results of three LPBF-ed samples with various VEDs.
Figure 8. XRD results of three LPBF-ed samples with various VEDs.
Materials 16 04890 g008
Figure 9. Engineering strain-stress curves of LPBF-ed B4C-reinforced Ti in situ composites.
Figure 9. Engineering strain-stress curves of LPBF-ed B4C-reinforced Ti in situ composites.
Materials 16 04890 g009
Figure 10. (a) Displacement-load response and (b) hardness and reduced Young’s modulus results of three samples.
Figure 10. (a) Displacement-load response and (b) hardness and reduced Young’s modulus results of three samples.
Materials 16 04890 g010
Figure 11. (a) Friction coefficient versus time, and (b) Kc for the three samples.
Figure 11. (a) Friction coefficient versus time, and (b) Kc for the three samples.
Materials 16 04890 g011
Figure 12. SE images of worn surfaces, corresponding EDS maps and 3D surface profiles: (a) S1, (b) S2, and (c) S3.
Figure 12. SE images of worn surfaces, corresponding EDS maps and 3D surface profiles: (a) S1, (b) S2, and (c) S3.
Materials 16 04890 g012
Figure 13. SE images of the fracture surfaces of (a) S1, (b) S2, and (c) S3.
Figure 13. SE images of the fracture surfaces of (a) S1, (b) S2, and (c) S3.
Materials 16 04890 g013
Table 1. The chemical composition of unalloyed Ti powder.
Table 1. The chemical composition of unalloyed Ti powder.
Unalloyed Ti PowderHCNOTi
Chemical composition (wt.%)0.0060.0070.0230.098Bal.
Table 2. LPBF processing parameters for Ti + B4C composite specimens.
Table 2. LPBF processing parameters for Ti + B4C composite specimens.
SpecimenP (W)v (mm/s)h (μm)t (μm)VED (J/mm3)
S11602000308033
S22201500308061
S328010003080117
Table 3. Summary of the relative density and average mechanical properties.
Table 3. Summary of the relative density and average mechanical properties.
SampleConditionYS (MPa)UTS (MPa)ε (%)Reference
S1LPBF7688211.7This work
S2LPBF7389516.3This work
S3LPBF6647717.4This work
TiLPBF52160710.4[38]
TiLPBF59066519[39]
TiLPBF40746914.7[40]
TiLPBF42051018[41]
TiWrought31748128.9[38]
TiCast 35146630[42]
Table 4. Parameters value for calculation.
Table 4. Parameters value for calculation.
ParameterValueReference
K328 MPa μm1/2[48]
d10.75 μmMeasured
d21.8 μm[41]
σ YSm 420 MPa[41]
l/d20Measured
mT3.16Measured
ω00.27[53]
Er128 GPaMeasured
η 0.08[49]
υ0.27[49]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Du, J.; Ren, Y.; Liu, X.; Xu, F.; Wang, X.; Zhou, R.; Baker, I.; Wu, H. Microstructural Evolution, Mechanical Properties and Tribological Behavior of B4C-Reinforced Ti In Situ Composites Produced by Laser Powder Bed Fusion. Materials 2023, 16, 4890. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16134890

AMA Style

Du J, Ren Y, Liu X, Xu F, Wang X, Zhou R, Baker I, Wu H. Microstructural Evolution, Mechanical Properties and Tribological Behavior of B4C-Reinforced Ti In Situ Composites Produced by Laser Powder Bed Fusion. Materials. 2023; 16(13):4890. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16134890

Chicago/Turabian Style

Du, Jingguang, Yaojia Ren, Xinyan Liu, Feng Xu, Xiaoteng Wang, Runhua Zhou, Ian Baker, and Hong Wu. 2023. "Microstructural Evolution, Mechanical Properties and Tribological Behavior of B4C-Reinforced Ti In Situ Composites Produced by Laser Powder Bed Fusion" Materials 16, no. 13: 4890. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16134890

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop