Figure 1.
The apparent absorption of zinc (AbsZn) and its daily faecal (FEZn) and urinary excretion (UEZn) in particular experimental groups. The rats received cadmium (Cd) in their diet at the concentration of 0, 1, and 5 mg/kg and/or 0.1% extract from the berries of Aronia melanocarpa (AE; “+”, received; “-”, not received). Data represent mean ± SE for eight rats (except for seven animals in the AE, Cd1, and Cd5 groups after 24 months). Statistically significant differences (ANOVA, Duncan’s multiple range test): * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. control group; † p < 0.05, †† p < 0.01, ††† p < 0.001 vs. respective group receiving Cd alone; ‡ p < 0.05, ‡‡ p < 0.01, ‡‡‡ p < 0.001 vs. respective group receiving the 1 mg Cd/kg diet (alone or with AE) are marked. Numerical values in bars indicate percentage changes compared to the control group (↓, decrease; ↑, increase) or the respective group receiving Cd alone (↘, decrease; ↗, increase).
Figure 1.
The apparent absorption of zinc (AbsZn) and its daily faecal (FEZn) and urinary excretion (UEZn) in particular experimental groups. The rats received cadmium (Cd) in their diet at the concentration of 0, 1, and 5 mg/kg and/or 0.1% extract from the berries of Aronia melanocarpa (AE; “+”, received; “-”, not received). Data represent mean ± SE for eight rats (except for seven animals in the AE, Cd1, and Cd5 groups after 24 months). Statistically significant differences (ANOVA, Duncan’s multiple range test): * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. control group; † p < 0.05, †† p < 0.01, ††† p < 0.001 vs. respective group receiving Cd alone; ‡ p < 0.05, ‡‡ p < 0.01, ‡‡‡ p < 0.001 vs. respective group receiving the 1 mg Cd/kg diet (alone or with AE) are marked. Numerical values in bars indicate percentage changes compared to the control group (↓, decrease; ↑, increase) or the respective group receiving Cd alone (↘, decrease; ↗, increase).
Figure 2.
Zinc (Zn) concentration in the liver, kidney, and spleen in particular experimental groups. The rats received cadmium (Cd) in their diet at the concentration of 0, 1, and 5 mg/kg and/or 0.1% extract from the berries of Aronia melanocarpa (AE; “+”, received; “-”, not received). Data represent mean ± SE for eight rats (except for seven animals in the AE, Cd1, and Cd5 groups after 24 months). Statistically significant differences (ANOVA, Duncan’s multiple range test): * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. control group; † p < 0.05, †† p < 0.01, ††† p < 0.001 vs. respective group receiving Cd alone; ‡ p < 0.05, ‡‡ p < 0.01, ‡‡‡ p < 0.001 vs. respective group receiving the 1 mg Cd/kg diet (alone or with AE) are marked. Numerical values in bars indicate percentage changes compared to the control group (↓, decrease; ↑, increase) or the respective group receiving Cd alone (↘, decrease; ↗, increase).
Figure 2.
Zinc (Zn) concentration in the liver, kidney, and spleen in particular experimental groups. The rats received cadmium (Cd) in their diet at the concentration of 0, 1, and 5 mg/kg and/or 0.1% extract from the berries of Aronia melanocarpa (AE; “+”, received; “-”, not received). Data represent mean ± SE for eight rats (except for seven animals in the AE, Cd1, and Cd5 groups after 24 months). Statistically significant differences (ANOVA, Duncan’s multiple range test): * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. control group; † p < 0.05, †† p < 0.01, ††† p < 0.001 vs. respective group receiving Cd alone; ‡ p < 0.05, ‡‡ p < 0.01, ‡‡‡ p < 0.001 vs. respective group receiving the 1 mg Cd/kg diet (alone or with AE) are marked. Numerical values in bars indicate percentage changes compared to the control group (↓, decrease; ↑, increase) or the respective group receiving Cd alone (↘, decrease; ↗, increase).
Figure 3.
Zinc (Zn) concentration in the brain, heart, and stomach in particular experimental groups. The rats received cadmium (Cd) in their diet at the concentration of 0, 1, and 5 mg/kg and/or 0.1% extract from the berries of Aronia melanocarpa (AE; “+”, received; “-”, not received). Data represent mean ± SE for eight rats (except for seven animals in the AE, Cd1, and Cd5 groups after 24 months). Statistically significant differences (ANOVA, Duncan’s multiple range test): * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. control group; † p < 0.05, †† p < 0.01, ††† p < 0.001 vs. respective group receiving Cd alone; ‡ p < 0.05, ‡‡ p < 0.01, ‡‡‡ p < 0.001 vs. respective group receiving the 1 mg Cd/kg diet (alone or with AE) are marked. Numerical values in bars indicate percentage changes compared to the control group (↓, decrease; ↑, increase) or the respective group receiving Cd alone (↘, decrease; ↗, increase).
Figure 3.
Zinc (Zn) concentration in the brain, heart, and stomach in particular experimental groups. The rats received cadmium (Cd) in their diet at the concentration of 0, 1, and 5 mg/kg and/or 0.1% extract from the berries of Aronia melanocarpa (AE; “+”, received; “-”, not received). Data represent mean ± SE for eight rats (except for seven animals in the AE, Cd1, and Cd5 groups after 24 months). Statistically significant differences (ANOVA, Duncan’s multiple range test): * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. control group; † p < 0.05, †† p < 0.01, ††† p < 0.001 vs. respective group receiving Cd alone; ‡ p < 0.05, ‡‡ p < 0.01, ‡‡‡ p < 0.001 vs. respective group receiving the 1 mg Cd/kg diet (alone or with AE) are marked. Numerical values in bars indicate percentage changes compared to the control group (↓, decrease; ↑, increase) or the respective group receiving Cd alone (↘, decrease; ↗, increase).
Figure 4.
Zinc (Zn) concentration in the bone tissue and femoral muscle in particular experimental groups. The rats received cadmium (Cd) in their diet at the concentration of 0, 1, and 5 mg/kg and/or 0.1% extract from the berries of Aronia melanocarpa (AE; “+”, received; “-”, not received). Data represent mean ± SE for eight rats (except for seven animals in the AE, Cd1, and Cd5 groups after 24 months). Statistically significant differences (ANOVA, Duncan’s multiple range test): * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. control group; † p < 0.05, †† p < 0.01, ††† p < 0.001 vs. respective group receiving Cd alone; ‡ p < 0.05, ‡‡ p < 0.01, ‡‡‡ p < 0.001 vs. respective group receiving the 1 mg Cd/kg diet (alone or with AE) are marked. Numerical values in bars indicate percentage changes compared to the control group (↓, decrease; ↑, increase) or the respective group receiving Cd alone (↘, decrease; ↗, increase).
Figure 4.
Zinc (Zn) concentration in the bone tissue and femoral muscle in particular experimental groups. The rats received cadmium (Cd) in their diet at the concentration of 0, 1, and 5 mg/kg and/or 0.1% extract from the berries of Aronia melanocarpa (AE; “+”, received; “-”, not received). Data represent mean ± SE for eight rats (except for seven animals in the AE, Cd1, and Cd5 groups after 24 months). Statistically significant differences (ANOVA, Duncan’s multiple range test): * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. control group; † p < 0.05, †† p < 0.01, ††† p < 0.001 vs. respective group receiving Cd alone; ‡ p < 0.05, ‡‡ p < 0.01, ‡‡‡ p < 0.001 vs. respective group receiving the 1 mg Cd/kg diet (alone or with AE) are marked. Numerical values in bars indicate percentage changes compared to the control group (↓, decrease; ↑, increase) or the respective group receiving Cd alone (↘, decrease; ↗, increase).
Figure 5.
Zinc (Zn), copper (Cu), and cadmium (Cd) concentrations in the duodenum in particular experimental groups. The rats received Cd in their diet at the concentration of 0, 1, and 5 mg/kg and/or 0.1% extract from the berries of Aronia melanocarpa (AE; “+”, received; “-”, not received). Data represent mean ± SE for eight rats (except for seven animals in the AE, Cd1, and Cd5 groups after 24 months). Statistically significant differences (ANOVA, Duncan’s multiple range test): * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. control group; † p < 0.05, †† p < 0.01, ††† p < 0.001 vs. respective group receiving Cd alone; ‡ p < 0.05, ‡‡ p < 0.01, ‡‡‡ p < 0.001 vs. respective group receiving the 1 mg Cd/kg diet (alone or with AE) are marked. Numerical values in bars (or above the bars) indicate percentage changes or factors of changes compared to the control group (↓, decrease; ↑, increase) or the respective group receiving Cd alone (↘, decrease; ↗, increase).
Figure 5.
Zinc (Zn), copper (Cu), and cadmium (Cd) concentrations in the duodenum in particular experimental groups. The rats received Cd in their diet at the concentration of 0, 1, and 5 mg/kg and/or 0.1% extract from the berries of Aronia melanocarpa (AE; “+”, received; “-”, not received). Data represent mean ± SE for eight rats (except for seven animals in the AE, Cd1, and Cd5 groups after 24 months). Statistically significant differences (ANOVA, Duncan’s multiple range test): * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. control group; † p < 0.05, †† p < 0.01, ††† p < 0.001 vs. respective group receiving Cd alone; ‡ p < 0.05, ‡‡ p < 0.01, ‡‡‡ p < 0.001 vs. respective group receiving the 1 mg Cd/kg diet (alone or with AE) are marked. Numerical values in bars (or above the bars) indicate percentage changes or factors of changes compared to the control group (↓, decrease; ↑, increase) or the respective group receiving Cd alone (↘, decrease; ↗, increase).
Figure 6.
Zinc (Zn) content in the liver and kidneys and its total pool in internal organs, as well as the serum concentration of this element in particular experimental groups. The rats received cadmium (Cd) in their diet at the concentration of 0, 1, and 5 mg/kg and/or 0.1% extract from the berries of Aronia melanocarpa (AE; “+”, received; “−”, not received). Data represent mean ± SE for eight rats (except for seven animals in the AE, Cd1, and Cd5 groups after 24 months). Statistically significant differences (ANOVA, Duncan’s multiple range test): * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. control group; † p < 0.05, †† p < 0.01 vs. respective group receiving Cd alone; ‡‡ p < 0.01 vs. respective group receiving the 1 mg Cd/kg diet (alone or with AE) are marked. Numerical values in bars indicate percentage changes compared to the control group (↓, decrease; ↑, increase) or the respective group receiving Cd alone (↘, decrease; ↗, increase).
Figure 6.
Zinc (Zn) content in the liver and kidneys and its total pool in internal organs, as well as the serum concentration of this element in particular experimental groups. The rats received cadmium (Cd) in their diet at the concentration of 0, 1, and 5 mg/kg and/or 0.1% extract from the berries of Aronia melanocarpa (AE; “+”, received; “−”, not received). Data represent mean ± SE for eight rats (except for seven animals in the AE, Cd1, and Cd5 groups after 24 months). Statistically significant differences (ANOVA, Duncan’s multiple range test): * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. control group; † p < 0.05, †† p < 0.01 vs. respective group receiving Cd alone; ‡‡ p < 0.01 vs. respective group receiving the 1 mg Cd/kg diet (alone or with AE) are marked. Numerical values in bars indicate percentage changes compared to the control group (↓, decrease; ↑, increase) or the respective group receiving Cd alone (↘, decrease; ↗, increase).
Figure 7.
The apparent absorption of copper (AbsCu) and its daily faecal (FECu) and urinary excretion (UECu) in particular experimental groups. The rats received cadmium (Cd) in their diet at the concentration of 0, 1, and 5 mg/kg and/or 0.1% extract from the berries of Aronia melanocarpa (AE; “+”, received; “-”, not received). Data represent mean ± SE for eight rats (except for seven animals in the AE, Cd1, and Cd5 groups after 24 months). Statistically significant differences (ANOVA, Duncan’s multiple range test): * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. control group; † p < 0.05, †† p < 0.01, ††† p < 0.001 vs. respective group receiving Cd alone; ‡ p < 0.05, ‡‡ p < 0.01, ‡‡‡ p < 0.001 vs. respective group receiving the 1 mg Cd/kg diet (alone or with AE) are marked. Numerical values in bars indicate percentage changes compared to the control group (↓, decrease; ↑, increase) or the respective group receiving Cd alone (↘, decrease; ↗, increase).
Figure 7.
The apparent absorption of copper (AbsCu) and its daily faecal (FECu) and urinary excretion (UECu) in particular experimental groups. The rats received cadmium (Cd) in their diet at the concentration of 0, 1, and 5 mg/kg and/or 0.1% extract from the berries of Aronia melanocarpa (AE; “+”, received; “-”, not received). Data represent mean ± SE for eight rats (except for seven animals in the AE, Cd1, and Cd5 groups after 24 months). Statistically significant differences (ANOVA, Duncan’s multiple range test): * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. control group; † p < 0.05, †† p < 0.01, ††† p < 0.001 vs. respective group receiving Cd alone; ‡ p < 0.05, ‡‡ p < 0.01, ‡‡‡ p < 0.001 vs. respective group receiving the 1 mg Cd/kg diet (alone or with AE) are marked. Numerical values in bars indicate percentage changes compared to the control group (↓, decrease; ↑, increase) or the respective group receiving Cd alone (↘, decrease; ↗, increase).
Figure 8.
Copper (Cu) concentration in the liver, kidney, and spleen in particular experimental groups. The rats received cadmium (Cd) in their diet at the concentration of 0, 1, and 5 mg/kg and/or 0.1% extract from the berries of Aronia melanocarpa (AE; “+”, received; “-”, not received). Data represent mean ± SE for eight rats (except for seven animals in the AE, Cd1, and Cd5 groups after 24 months). Statistically significant differences (ANOVA, Duncan’s multiple range test): * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. control group; † p < 0.05, †† p < 0.01, ††† p < 0.001 vs. respective group receiving Cd alone; ‡‡ p < 0.01, ‡‡‡ p < 0.001 vs. respective group receiving the 1 mg Cd/kg diet (alone or with AE) are marked. Numerical values in bars indicate percentage changes or factors of changes compared to the control group (↓, decrease; ↑, increase) or the respective group receiving Cd alone (↘, decrease; ↗, increase).
Figure 8.
Copper (Cu) concentration in the liver, kidney, and spleen in particular experimental groups. The rats received cadmium (Cd) in their diet at the concentration of 0, 1, and 5 mg/kg and/or 0.1% extract from the berries of Aronia melanocarpa (AE; “+”, received; “-”, not received). Data represent mean ± SE for eight rats (except for seven animals in the AE, Cd1, and Cd5 groups after 24 months). Statistically significant differences (ANOVA, Duncan’s multiple range test): * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. control group; † p < 0.05, †† p < 0.01, ††† p < 0.001 vs. respective group receiving Cd alone; ‡‡ p < 0.01, ‡‡‡ p < 0.001 vs. respective group receiving the 1 mg Cd/kg diet (alone or with AE) are marked. Numerical values in bars indicate percentage changes or factors of changes compared to the control group (↓, decrease; ↑, increase) or the respective group receiving Cd alone (↘, decrease; ↗, increase).
Figure 9.
Copper (Cu) concentration in the brain, heart, and stomach in particular experimental groups. The rats received cadmium (Cd) in their diet at the concentration of 0, 1, and 5 mg/kg and/or 0.1% extract from the berries of Aronia melanocarpa (AE; “+”, received; “-”, not received). Data represent mean ± SE for eight rats (except for seven animals in the AE, Cd1, and Cd5 groups after 24 months). Statistically significant differences (ANOVA, Duncan’s multiple range test): * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. control group; † p < 0.05, †† p < 0.01, ††† p < 0.001 vs. respective group receiving Cd alone; ‡ p < 0.05, ‡‡ p < 0.01, ‡‡‡ p < 0.001 vs. respective group receiving the 1 mg Cd/kg diet (alone or with AE) are marked. Numerical values in bars (or above the bars) indicate percentage changes compared to the control group (↓, decrease; ↑, increase) or the respective group receiving Cd alone (↘, decrease; ↗, increase).
Figure 9.
Copper (Cu) concentration in the brain, heart, and stomach in particular experimental groups. The rats received cadmium (Cd) in their diet at the concentration of 0, 1, and 5 mg/kg and/or 0.1% extract from the berries of Aronia melanocarpa (AE; “+”, received; “-”, not received). Data represent mean ± SE for eight rats (except for seven animals in the AE, Cd1, and Cd5 groups after 24 months). Statistically significant differences (ANOVA, Duncan’s multiple range test): * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. control group; † p < 0.05, †† p < 0.01, ††† p < 0.001 vs. respective group receiving Cd alone; ‡ p < 0.05, ‡‡ p < 0.01, ‡‡‡ p < 0.001 vs. respective group receiving the 1 mg Cd/kg diet (alone or with AE) are marked. Numerical values in bars (or above the bars) indicate percentage changes compared to the control group (↓, decrease; ↑, increase) or the respective group receiving Cd alone (↘, decrease; ↗, increase).
Figure 10.
Copper (Cu) concentration in the bone tissue and femoral muscle in particular experimental groups. The rats received cadmium (Cd) in their diet at the concentration of 0, 1, and 5 mg/kg and/or 0.1% extract from the berries of Aronia melanocarpa (AE; “+”, received; “-”, not received). Data represent mean ± SE for eight rats (except for seven animals in the AE, Cd1 and Cd5 groups after 24 months). Statistically significant differences (ANOVA, Duncan’s multiple range test): * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001 vs. control group; † p < 0.05, ††† p < 0.001 vs. respective group receiving Cd alone; ‡ p < 0.05, ‡‡ p < 0.01, ‡‡‡ p < 0.001 vs. respective group receiving the 1 mg Cd/kg diet (alone or with AE) are marked. Numerical values in bars indicate percentage changes compared to the control group (↓, decrease; ↑, increase) or the respective group receiving Cd alone (↘, decrease; ↗, increase).
Figure 10.
Copper (Cu) concentration in the bone tissue and femoral muscle in particular experimental groups. The rats received cadmium (Cd) in their diet at the concentration of 0, 1, and 5 mg/kg and/or 0.1% extract from the berries of Aronia melanocarpa (AE; “+”, received; “-”, not received). Data represent mean ± SE for eight rats (except for seven animals in the AE, Cd1 and Cd5 groups after 24 months). Statistically significant differences (ANOVA, Duncan’s multiple range test): * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001 vs. control group; † p < 0.05, ††† p < 0.001 vs. respective group receiving Cd alone; ‡ p < 0.05, ‡‡ p < 0.01, ‡‡‡ p < 0.001 vs. respective group receiving the 1 mg Cd/kg diet (alone or with AE) are marked. Numerical values in bars indicate percentage changes compared to the control group (↓, decrease; ↑, increase) or the respective group receiving Cd alone (↘, decrease; ↗, increase).
Figure 11.
Copper (Cu) content in the liver and kidneys and its total pool in internal organs, as well as the serum concentration of this element in particular experimental groups. The rats received cadmium (Cd) in their diet at the concentration of 0, 1, and 5 mg/kg and/or 0.1% extract from the berries of Aronia melanocarpa (AE; “+”, received; “-”, not received). Data represent mean ± SE for eight rats (except for seven animals in the AE, Cd1 and Cd5 groups after 24 months). Statistically significant differences (ANOVA, Duncan’s multiple range test): * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. control group; † p < 0.05, †† p < 0.01, ††† p < 0.001 vs. respective group receiving Cd alone; ‡ p < 0.05, ‡‡ p < 0.01, ‡‡‡ p < 0.001 vs. respective group receiving the 1 mg Cd/kg diet (alone or with AE) are marked. Numerical values in bars indicate percentage changes compared to the control group (↓, decrease; ↑, increase) or the respective group receiving Cd alone (↘, decrease; ↗, increase).
Figure 11.
Copper (Cu) content in the liver and kidneys and its total pool in internal organs, as well as the serum concentration of this element in particular experimental groups. The rats received cadmium (Cd) in their diet at the concentration of 0, 1, and 5 mg/kg and/or 0.1% extract from the berries of Aronia melanocarpa (AE; “+”, received; “-”, not received). Data represent mean ± SE for eight rats (except for seven animals in the AE, Cd1 and Cd5 groups after 24 months). Statistically significant differences (ANOVA, Duncan’s multiple range test): * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. control group; † p < 0.05, †† p < 0.01, ††† p < 0.001 vs. respective group receiving Cd alone; ‡ p < 0.05, ‡‡ p < 0.01, ‡‡‡ p < 0.001 vs. respective group receiving the 1 mg Cd/kg diet (alone or with AE) are marked. Numerical values in bars indicate percentage changes compared to the control group (↓, decrease; ↑, increase) or the respective group receiving Cd alone (↘, decrease; ↗, increase).
Figure 12.
Metallothionein (MT) concentration in the liver, kidney, and duodenum in particular experimental groups. The rats received cadmium (Cd) in their diet at the concentration of 0, 1, and 5 mg/kg and/or 0.1% extract from the berries of Aronia melanocarpa (AE; “+”, received; “-”, not received). Data represent mean ± SE for eight rats (except for seven animals in the AE, Cd1, and Cd5 groups after 24 months). Statistically significant differences (ANOVA, Duncan’s multiple range test): * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. control group; † p < 0.05, †† p < 0.01, ††† p < 0.001 vs. respective group receiving Cd alone; ‡ p < 0.05 vs. respective group receiving the 1 mg Cd/kg diet (alone or with AE) are marked. Numerical values in bars indicate percentage changes or factors of changes compared to the control group (↑, increase) or the respective group receiving Cd alone (↘, decrease).
Figure 12.
Metallothionein (MT) concentration in the liver, kidney, and duodenum in particular experimental groups. The rats received cadmium (Cd) in their diet at the concentration of 0, 1, and 5 mg/kg and/or 0.1% extract from the berries of Aronia melanocarpa (AE; “+”, received; “-”, not received). Data represent mean ± SE for eight rats (except for seven animals in the AE, Cd1, and Cd5 groups after 24 months). Statistically significant differences (ANOVA, Duncan’s multiple range test): * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. control group; † p < 0.05, †† p < 0.01, ††† p < 0.001 vs. respective group receiving Cd alone; ‡ p < 0.05 vs. respective group receiving the 1 mg Cd/kg diet (alone or with AE) are marked. Numerical values in bars indicate percentage changes or factors of changes compared to the control group (↑, increase) or the respective group receiving Cd alone (↘, decrease).
Table 1.
Experimental model.
Table 1.
Experimental model.
Group | Administration | Range of the Daily Intake During the 24-Month Administration |
---|
AE 1 | Cd (1 or 5 mg Cd/kg) 2 | AE (PF) (mg/kg b.w.) 3 | Cd (μg/kg/b.w.) 4 |
---|
Control | − | - | | 2.30–4.98 |
AE | + | - | 67.4–146.6 (44.3–96.4) | 2.25–4.95 |
Cd1 | − | +(1 mg Cd/kg) | | 39.2–83.8 |
Cd1 + AE | + | +(1 mg Cd/kg) | 67.2–154.7 (44.2–101.7) | 37.5–84.9 |
Cd5 | − | +(5 mg Cd/kg) | | 210.1–403.2 |
Cd5 + AE | + | +(5 mg Cd/kg) | 63.1–150.3 (41.5–98.8) | 200.2–401.9 |
Table 2.
The intake of zinc (Zn) and copper (Cu) with diet in particular experimental groups 1,2.
Table 2.
The intake of zinc (Zn) and copper (Cu) with diet in particular experimental groups 1,2.
Group | Experiment Duration |
---|
3 Months | 10 Months | 17 Months | 24 Months |
---|
Zn Intake (mg/kg b.w./24 h) |
Control | 16.596 ± 0.097 | 6.931 ± 0.201 ** | 6.345 ± 0.064 ** | 7.149 ± 0.069 ** |
AE | 16.710 ± 0.265 | 7.037 ± 0.063 ** | 6.191 ± 0.117 ** | 7.138 ± 0.126 ** |
Cd1 | 16.282 ± 0.336 | 7.001 ± 0.015 ** | 6.361 ± 0.027 ** | 7.290 ± 0.143 ** |
Cd1 + AE | 16.656 ± 0.039 | 7.060 ± 0.159 ** | 6.231 ± 0.036 ** | 7.408 ± 0.219 ** |
Cd5 | 16.175 ± 0.213 | 7.043 ± 0.076 ** | 6.176 ± 0.041 ** | 7.612 ± 0.259 ** |
Cd5 + AE | 16.415 ± 0.144 | 7.191 ± 0.054 ** | 6.227 ± 0.019 ** | 7.557 ± 0.241 ** |
Cu Intake (mg/kg b.w./24 h) |
Control | 2.678 ± 0.038 | 1.155 ± 0.033 ** | 1.026 ± 0.006 ** | 1.194 ± 0.004 ** |
AE | 2.626 ± 0.042 | 1.186 ± 0.012 ** | 1.032 ± 0.019 ** | 1.190 ± 0.021 ** |
Cd1 | 2.638 ± 0.021 | 1.159 ± 0.003 ** | 1.032 ± 0.001 ** | 1.215 ± 0.024 ** |
Cd1 + AE | 2.702 ± 0.032 | 1.177 ± 0.026 ** | 1.004 ± 0.019 ** | 1.235 ± 0.036 ** |
Cd5 | 2.616 ± 0.011 | 1.174 ± 0.013 ** | 1.026 ± 0.006 ** | 1.269 ± 0.043 ** |
Cd5 + AE | 2.614 ± 0.008 | 1.198 ± 0.009 ** | 1.019 ± 0.008 ** | 1.260 ± 0.040 ** |
Table 3.
Effect of the extract from the berries of Aronia melanocarpa (AE) and/or cadmium (Cd) on the degree of zinc (Zn), copper (Cu), and Cd binding to metallothionein (MT) in the liver 1,2,3.
Table 3.
Effect of the extract from the berries of Aronia melanocarpa (AE) and/or cadmium (Cd) on the degree of zinc (Zn), copper (Cu), and Cd binding to metallothionein (MT) in the liver 1,2,3.
Metals Binding to MT in the Liver | Effect of AE Alone | 1 mg Cd/kg Diet + AE | 5 mg Cd/kg Diet + AE |
---|
Effect of Cd Alone | Cd + AE | Effect of Cd Alone | Cd + AE |
---|
Effect of Cd + AE | Effect of AE | Effect of Cd + AE | Effect of AE |
---|
| 3 months |
Zn/(MT × 7) | ↔ | ↓ 48% | ↔ | ↗ 2.1-fold | ↓ 53% | ↔ | ↗ 2.2-fold |
Cu/(MT × 12) | ↔ | ↓ 47% | ↔ | ↗ 2.1-fold | ↓ 57% | ↔ | ↗ 2.2-fold |
Cd/(MT × 7) | ↔ | ↔ | ↔ | ↔ | ↑ 11.6-fold | ↑ 21.3-fold | ↗ 84% |
Me/(Me-MT) | ↔ | ↓ 48% | ↔ | ↗ 2.1-fold | ↓ 53% | ↔ | ↗ 2.2-fold |
| 10 months |
Zn/(MT × 7) | ↔ | ↓ 55% | ↔ | ↗ 2.7-fold | ↓ 58% | ↔ | ↗ 81% |
Cu/(MT × 12) | ↔ | ↓ 55% | ↔ | ↗ 2.8-fold | ↓ 61% | ↓ 29% | ↗ 85% |
Cd/(MT × 7) | ↔ | ↔ | ↑ 9.4-fold | ↗ 2.4-fold | ↑ 25.8-fold | ↑ 42.4-fold | ↗ 64% |
Me/(Me-MT) | ↔ | ↓ 55% | ↔ | ↗ 2.7-fold | ↓ 57% | ↔ | ↗ 81% |
| 17 months |
Zn/(MT × 7) | ↓ 30% | ↓ 57% | ↓ 36% | ↔ | ↓ 63% | ↔ | ↗ 2.6-fold |
Cu/(MT × 12) | ↓ 27% | ↓ 60% | ↓ 18% | ↗ 2.0-fold | ↓ 58% | ↔ | ↗ 2.5-fold |
Cd/(MT × 7) | ↔ | ↔ | ↔ | ↔ | ↑ 68.7-fold | ↑ 136-fold | ↗ 98% |
Me/(Me-MT) | ↓ 30% | ↓ 57% | ↓ 35% | ↗ 52% | ↓ 61% | ↔ | ↗ 2.6-fold |
| 24 months |
Zn/(MT × 7) | ↓ 34% | ↓ 52% | ↓ 24% | ↗ 57% | ↓ 69% | ↔ | ↗ 3.1-fold |
Cu/(MT × 12) | ↓ 32% | ↓ 54% | ↓ 26% | ↗ 59% | ↓ 71% | ↔ | ↗ 3.1-fold |
Cd/(MT × 7) | ↔ | ↔ | ↔ | ↔ | ↑ 66-fold | ↑ 165-fold | ↗ 2.5-fold |
Me/(Me-MT) | ↓ 34% | ↓ 52% | ↓ 24% | ↗ 57% | ↓ 68% | ↔ | ↗ 3.1-fold |
Table 4.
Effect of the extract from the berries of Aronia melanocarpa (AE) and/or cadmium (Cd) on the degree of zinc (Zn), copper (Cu), and Cd binding to metallothionein (MT) in the kidney 1,2,3.
Table 4.
Effect of the extract from the berries of Aronia melanocarpa (AE) and/or cadmium (Cd) on the degree of zinc (Zn), copper (Cu), and Cd binding to metallothionein (MT) in the kidney 1,2,3.
Metals Binding to MT in the Kidney | Effect of AE Alone | 1 mg Cd/kg Diet + AE | 5 mg Cd/kg Diet + AE |
---|
Effect of Cd Alone | Cd + AE | Effect of Cd Alone | Cd + AE |
---|
Effect of Cd + AE | Effect of AE | Effect of Cd + AE | Effect of AE |
---|
| 3 months |
Zn/(MT × 7) | ↔ | ↔ | ↔ | ↗ 57% | ↔ | ↓ 33% | ↗ 73% |
Cu/(MT × 12) | ↔ | ↓ 40% | ↔ | ↗ 2.1-fold | ↔ | ↔ | ↔ |
Cd/(MT × 7) | ↔ | ↑ 7.4-fold | ↑ 8.5-fold | ↔ | ↑ 25.2-fold | ↑ 39.1-fold | ↗ 55% |
Me/(Me-MT) | ↔ | ↔ | ↔ | ↗ 65% | ↔ | ↔ | ↗ 56% |
| 10 months |
Zn/(MT × 7) | ↓ 22% | ↓ 41% | ↓ 24% | ↗ 29% | ↓ 47% | ↓ 35% | ↔ |
Cu/(MT × 12) | ↓ 20% | ↓ 53% | ↓ 29% | ↗ 50% | ↓ 28% | ↓ 45% | ↔ |
Cd/(MT × 7) | ↔ | ↑ 13.3-fold | ↑ 33.6-fold | ↔ | ↑ 47.9-fold | ↑ 51.3-fold | ↔ |
Me/(Me-MT) | ↓ 20% | ↓ 42% | ↓ 23% | ↗ 32% | ↓ 39% | ↓ 31% | ↔ |
| 17 months |
Zn/(MT × 7) | ↔ | ↓ 26% | ↓ 24% | ↗ 67% | ↑ 48% | ↑ 29% | ↘ 13% |
Cu/(MT × 12) | ↔ | ↓ 53% | ↔ | ↗ 2.2-fold | ↓ 46% | ↔ | ↗ 91% |
Cd/(MT × 7) | ↔ | ↔ | ↑ 33.6-fold | ↔ | ↑ 139-fold | ↑ 223-fold | ↗ 61% |
Me/(Me-MT) | ↔ | ↓ 29% | ↑ 23% | ↗ 26% | ↓ 21% | ↑ 42% | ↗ 81% |
| 24 months |
Zn/(MT × 7) | ↔ | ↓ 42% | ↓ 29% | ↔ | ↓ 56% | ↓ 30% | ↗ 90% |
Cu/(MT × 12) | ↔ | ↓ 34% | ↔ | ↔ | ↓ 58% | ↓ 32% | ↗ 62% |
Cd/(MT × 7) | ↔ | ↑ 12.1-fold | ↑ 17.1-fold | ↔ | ↑ 41.1-fold | ↑ 51.3-fold | ↗ 25% |
Me/(Me-MT) | ↔ | ↓ 39% | ↓ 26% | ↔ | ↓ 50% | ↓ 24% | ↗ 54% |
Table 5.
Effect of the extract from the berries of Aronia melanocarpa (AE) and/or cadmium (Cd) on the degree of zinc (Zn), copper (Cu), and Cd binding to metallothionein (MT) in the duodenum 1,2,3.
Table 5.
Effect of the extract from the berries of Aronia melanocarpa (AE) and/or cadmium (Cd) on the degree of zinc (Zn), copper (Cu), and Cd binding to metallothionein (MT) in the duodenum 1,2,3.
Metals Binding to MT in the Duodenum | Effect of AE Alone | 1 mg Cd/kg Diet + AE | 5 mg Cd/kg Diet + AE |
---|
Effect of Cd Alone | Cd + AE | Effect of Cd Alone | Cd + AE |
---|
Effect of Cd + AE | Effect of AE | Effect of Cd + AE | Effect of AE |
---|
| 3 months |
Zn/(MT × 7) | ↔ | ↑ 64% | ↔ | ↗ 81% | ↑ 81% | ↔ | ↗ 62% |
Cu/(MT × 12) | ↔ | ↓ 39% | ↔ | ↗ 66% | ↓ 41% | ↔ | ↗ 42% |
Cd/(MT × 7) | ↔ | ↑ 2.1-fold | ↑ 3.8-fold | ↗ 78% | ↑ 7.2-fold | ↑ 10.7-fold | ↗ 50% |
Me/(Me-MT) | ↔ | ↔ | ↔ | ↗ 65% | ↔ | ↔ | ↗ 56% |
| 10 months |
Zn/(MT × 7) | ↔ | ↓ 43% | ↓ 28% | ↔ | ↓ 55% | ↓ 26% | ↗ 64% |
Cu/(MT × 12) | ↔ | ↓ 47% | ↓ 32% | ↔ | ↓ 58% | ↓ 34% | ↗ 57% |
Cd/(MT × 7) | ↔ | ↑ 6.2-fold | ↑ 9.7-fold | ↗ 57% | ↑ 11.6-fold | ↑ 19.9-fold | ↗ 72% |
Me/(Me-MT) | ↓ 22% | ↓ 42% | ↓ 23% | ↗ 32% | ↓ 39% | ↓ 31% | ↔ |
| 17 months |
Zn/(MT × 7) | ↓ 28% | ↓ 55% | ↔ | ↗ 2.4-fold | ↓ 62% | ↓ 29% | ↗ 88% |
Cu/(MT × 12) | ↓ 23% | ↓ 48% | ↔ | ↗ 2.1-fold | ↓ 58% | ↓ 24% | ↗ 80% |
Cd/(MT × 7) | ↔ | ↑ 5.3-fold | ↑ 12.5-fold | ↗ 2.4-fold | ↑16.5-fold | ↑ 22.6-fold | ↗ 37% |
Me/(Me-MT) | ↔ | ↓ 29% | ↑ 23% | ↗ 74% | ↓ 21% | ↓ 42% | ↗ 81% |
| 24 months |
Zn/(MT × 7) | ↓ 22% | ↓ 52% | ↓ 49% | ↔ | ↓ 58% | ↓ 20% | ↗ 90% |
Cu/(MT × 12) | ↓ 20% | ↓ 48% | ↓ 46% | ↔ | ↓ 56% | ↔ | ↗ 95% |
Cd/(MT × 7) | ↔ | ↔ | ↑ 3.9-fold | ↔ | ↑7.5-fold | ↑ 15.4-fold | ↗ 2-fold |
Me/(Me-MT) | ↔ | ↓ 39% | ↓ 26% | ↔ | ↓ 50% | ↓ 24% | ↗ 54% |