Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Next Article in Journal
YOLOv5s-Based Image Identification of Stripe Rust and Leaf Rust on Wheat at Different Growth Stages
Previous Article in Journal
Establishment of a Genetic Transformation and Gene Editing Method by Floral Dipping in Descurainia sophia
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Chemical Composition, Enantiomeric Distribution, and Physical Properties of the Fruit Essential Oil from Zanthoxylum lepidopteriphilum (Reynel) Rutaceae from Ecuador

1
Departamento de Química, Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja, Loja 110150, Ecuador
2
Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias, Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja (UTPL), San Cayetano s/n, Loja 1101608, Ecuador
3
Instituto Universitario de Bio-Orgánica Antonio González (IUBO AG), Universidad de La Laguna (ULL), Avda. Astrofísico F. Sánchez 2, 38206 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2024, 13(20), 2834; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13202834
Submission received: 20 September 2024 / Revised: 2 October 2024 / Accepted: 9 October 2024 / Published: 10 October 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Phytochemistry)

Abstract

:
The essential oil was obtained by steam distillation, using a Clevenger apparatus, from the pericarp of the fruit of Zanthoxylum lepidopteriphilum from Ecuador. The qualitative and quantitative analyses were performed by gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and flame ionization detection (GC-FID) on two capillary columns with non-polar DB-5ms and a polar HP-INNOWax stationary phase. Thirty-three components were identified, accounting for 99.62% and 99.30% total essential oil. The essential oil was dominated by oxygenated monoterpenes (90.21–89.21%), respectively. The main constituents of the essential oil were α-thujone (70.26–70.38%), β-thujone (10.78–10.90%), terpinen-4-ol (4.15–4.06%), and sabinene (3.60–4.02%). Enantioselective analysis by GC was realized on a β-cyclodextrin-based chiral column (2,3-diethyl-6-tert-butyldimethylsilyl-β-cyclodextrin) in this analysis, determining three couples of enantiomers, which exhibited the compound (1R,4S,5S)-(+)-α-thujone with an enantiomeric excess of 84.40%.

1. Introduction

Since ancient times, plants have been used to treat, prevent, and cure diseases. In recent years, the use of plants with medicinal potential has increased significantly, driving research focused on the characterization, identification, and isolation of new natural products with therapeutic properties. Among these natural products, essential oils, commonly known as flavorings or essences, have found wide application in various fields [1].
Plants play a therapeutic and pharmaceutical role in protecting human beings from the effects of diseases and other complications, thus considered to have a significant role in the healthcare system. A progressive increase in medicinal plant usage has been recorded continuously, both for traditional users and the pharmaceutical industry [2].
Members of the Rutaceae family are characterized by distinct oil glands in their aromatic leaves, and while their flowers are predominantly perfect, they can occasionally be unisexual. This family is well-known for its rich phytochemical composition and associated medicinal properties [3].
Zanthoxylum is the largest and most widespread genus in the family Rutaceae [4]. It is distributed worldwide in the tropics and in temperate zones of the new and old worlds [5] and is composed of 666 species. The genus ranges from shrubs to tall trees, with most of the Zanthoxylum species being timber trees [6].
It has great importance due to its ethnobotanics, phytochemistry, and biological activity, and it is a promising source of various secondary metabolites, including benzophenanthridine alkaloids, in addition to accumulating volatile oils in its leaves, fruits, and inflorescences [7,8].
The richness of Zanthoxylum is found in essential oils, mainly from leaves, flowers, seeds, and fruits [9]. Most of the plants are dioic; in the fruits of different species, it has been found that these oils are complex mixes of terpene compounds [10].
In Ecuador, the genus Zanthoxylum comprises around 20 species [11,12,13]. Numerous studies at the agronomic, economic, and market level, as well as a detailed investigation of the chemical, physical, and biological composition of the oils obtained from the cultivated, introduced, or native plants, allow the development of the essential oils industry [14].
Approximately 90% of global essential oil (EO) production is consumed by the flavor and fragrance industries, primarily in the form of perfumes, flavorings, and condiments. [15,16]. Zanthoxylum lepidopteriphilum is a native shrub found in the Andean region of Ecuador. It is located in the Loja Province at 2220 m a.s.l. Previous reports have not been found regarding Z. lepidopteriphilum. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the chemical composition and enantiomeric profile of the essential oil from Z. lepidopteriphilum, providing valuable insights into its potential as a source for novel pharmaceutical, cosmetic, and food products.

2. Results

2.1. Obtention the Essential Oil and Physical Properties

The essential oil of Z. lepidopteriphilum fruits was obtained by steam distillation for 4 h. The essential oil yield was 1.38% ± 0.29 (w/w). Three physical properties were determined: refractive index 1.45 ± 0.00008, relative density 0.87 ± 0.001 g/mL, and optical rotation, with an α = +1.86 in CH2Cl2, c = 0.1.

2.2. Chemical Composition of Essential Oil

Thirty-three compounds were identified by GC-MS and GC-FID in the essential oil of Z. lepidopteriphilum fruits, which represented 99.62% (DB-5ms) and 99.30% (HP-INNOWax) of the total composition of essential oil (Figure 1). The main compounds were the monoterpenes α-thujone (70.26%) and β-thujone, (10.78%). The major constituents found in the essential oil were monoterpenes (76.63%), predominately composed of oxygenated monoterpenes (90.21%), and monoterpene hydrocarbons (8.50%). The results of GC-MS and GC-FID analyses are reported in Table 1.

2.3. Enantioselective Analysis

Analysis by GC-MS with two columns MEGA-DEX DET Beta (2,3-diethyl-6-tert-butyldimethylsilyl-β-cyclodextrin) and MEGA-DEX DAC Beta (2,3-diacetyl-6-tert-butyldimethylsilyl-β-cyclodextrin) allowed the separation of four pairs of enantiomers. The results are shown in Table 2.

3. Discussion

The essential oil yield from fresh plant material was 1.38% (w/w). This result is similar to those obtained from the essential oil of Z. leprieurii fruits (Cameroon), with a yield of 1.1% [31]. Studies conducted in Venezuela on the essential oil of Zanthoxylum sp. fruits reported a yield of 0.5% based on fresh plant material, with the oil being pale yellow in color and highly fragrant [32].
In other studies on Z. armatum, the essential oil from the seeds yielded 1.2% (Singh et al., 2013). The yield of essential oil can be influenced by environmental conditions such as temperature, precipitation, soil conditions, and altitude [33].
The density of the essential oil from Z. lepidopteriphilum was 0.87 g/mL, which is similar to the 0.98 g/mL reported for Z. purpureum [34]. The optical activity value of the oil was +1.86. This property is useful for detecting adulterations, such as the addition of synthetic compounds or components from different botanical origins, which can alter the biological or olfactory properties related to the stereochemical nature of the oil [35].
A total of thirty-three compounds were identified, accounting for 99.62% of the essential oil’s composition on the DB-5ms column and 99.30% on the HP-INNOWax column. The most abundant constituents were oxygenated monoterpenes (90.21%) and hydrocarbon monoterpenes (8.50%), with similar values observed across both polar and nonpolar columns. Among the oxygenated monoterpenes, the primary components were α-thujone (70.26%) and β-thujone (10.78%), with smaller amounts of sabinene and terpinen-4-ol.
The results obtained were compared with those reported in the literature. Research investigations conducted in Colombia on various species of Zanthoxylum have primarily reported high concentrations of monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes, which constitute 89% to 99% of the essential oil composition. In Z. rhoifolium, monoterpenes account for 80.5%, while in Z. monophyllum they represent 71.6%, and in Z. fagara, 6.16%. The predominant compounds in the essential oil of Z. rhoifolium include β-myrcene, β-phellandrene, and germacrene D. In contrast, Z. monophyllum oil is characterized by sabinene, 1,8-cineole, and cis-4-thujanol, while the essential oil from the fruits of Z. fagara predominantly contains germacrene D-4-ol, elemol, and α-cineole [8].
In Venezuela, studies on the fruits of a newly identified species of Zanthoxylum revealed a high content of oxygenated monoterpenes (59.15%) and hydrocarbon monoterpenes (38.65%) [32]. Similarly, research in China on Z. acanthopodium essential oil found 24.24% oxygenated monoterpenes and 13.98% hydrocarbon monoterpenes [36]. Further studies in northeastern China on Z. schinifolium reported 94.33% monoterpenoid compounds in the essential oil from the fruit, while the oil from the leaves contained 50.62% monoterpenoids, 4.23% sesquiterpenoids, and the remainder being sesquiterpenes [37].
Research on the volatile oil from Z. limonella fruits identified 88.34% hydrocarbon monoterpenes and 8.26% oxygenated monoterpenes, with a smaller percentage of sesquiterpenes. The main constituents were sabinene (42.73%), limonene (39.05%), and terpinen-4-ol (5.40%) [38]. Additionally, the essential oil from the leaves, stems, and seeds of Z. alatum was found to contain 41.58% oxygenated monoterpenes and 31.1% hydrocarbon monoterpenes [39].
Enantiomers exhibit the same chemical properties, as their enantiomeric distribution is not typically altered by the distillation process, unlike the overall chemical composition of the oil.
Thujone is a bicyclic monoterpene ketone naturally found in the essential oils of various plants. Biosynthetically, thujone is believed to be produced through an enzyme-mediated reduction of sabinone. The known diastereomers of thujone exhibit different toxicities, with (−)-α-thujone reported to be more toxic than the (+)-β diastereomer. Animal studies have demonstrated that (−)-α-thujone is more potent than (+)-β-thujone. Additionally, (−)-α-thujone has been explored for its potential in treating nausea associated with chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and withdrawal from drug addiction. Regarding health effects, the presence of α-thujone or β-thujone in foods and beverages is regulated in various countries [40,41,42].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. General Information

The chemical analysis of Z. lepidopteriphilum essential oil (EO) was performed using a gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) system, consisting of an Agilent Technologies 6890 N gas chromatograph equipped with an autoinjector (Model 7683) and coupled to a simple quadrupole mass spectrometry detector (MSD) (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Both qualitative and quantitative analyses were conducted using non-polar- and polar stationary-phase capillary columns from Agilent Technologies. Enantioselective analysis was performed on a chiral stationary-phase column containing 30% diethyl-tert-butyldimethylsilyl-β-cyclodextrin in PS-086, purchased from Mega (Milan, Italy). For all analyses, GC-purity-grade helium (Indura, Guayaquil, Ecuador) was used as the carrier gas. Analytical-grade solvents, a mixture of n-alkanes (C9–C25), and dichloromethane were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).

4.2. Plant Material

The re-collection of the plan material of Zanthoxylum lepidopteriphilum was at the fructifying stage on December 2022, in Celica, Loja Province, southern Ecuador (4°05′58″ S y 79°57′08″ W, 2110 m above the sea level, under permission of the Ministry of Environment, Water, and Ecological Transition of Ecuador, with MAATE registry number MAE-DNB-CM-2016-0048). The taxonomical identification was carried out by one of the authors (N.C.), and a botanical specimen is conserved at the herbarium of the Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja with voucher HUTPL 15151. The fresh plant material was steam distilled the same day of collection.

4.3. Extraction of Essential Oil

The fruit pericarp (200 g) was subjected to hydro-distillation immediately after harvesting in a Clevenger-type apparatus for four hours [37,38]. The EO collected was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and stored in vials protected at 4 °C until further analysis. The procedure was performed three times.

4.4. Physical Properties

Physical characterization of Z. lepidopteriphilum essential oil was determined by triplicate at 20 °C. A pycnometer of 1 mL and an analytical balance (Radwag AS 310/C/2, ±0.0001 g) were used to determine the density according to standard ANFOR NF T75-111 [43]. Refractive index was measured on a refractometer model ABBE based on standard ANFOR NF 75-112 [44]. The standard ISO 592-1998 was used for optical activity measurement by means of a polarimeter (model AUTOPOL 880 Automatic Saccharimeter, ±0.03, 10 °C–30 °C) [45].

4.5. Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS)

The GC-MS analysis of the essential oil composition was performed using an Agilent Chromatograph (6890N series), coupled to a mass spectrometer detector (Agilent series 5973 inert); the spectrometer was controlled by the data system MSD-Chemstation D.01.00 SP1. Two capillary columns were used: a non-polar DB-5ms 5%-phenyl-methylpolyxilosane and polar HP-INNOWax (polyethyleneglycol) Agilent 19091N-133, capillary columns 30 m × 0.25 mm, thicknesses 0.25 µm. The mass spectrometer was operated in electron impact ionization mode at 70 eV, with a mass range of m/z 40–350 in full scan mode. The ion source temperature was set at 220 °C and the transfer line at 230 °C.
The initial oven temperature was held at 50 °C for 5 min with a ramp of 3 °C/minute until reaching 180 °C and a second ramp of 15 °C/minute until reaching finally the temperature of 230 °C; the injector temperature was 250 °C; the split ratio was adjusted at 20:1; and helium was used as a carrier gas (0.9 mL/minute) in constant flow mode and a mass range of 40–350 m/z. Essential oil samples were diluted in ciclohexane, ratio 1:100 (v/v), and 1 μL of the solution was injected.

4.6. Gas Chromatography-Coupled Flame Ionization Detector Analysis (GC-FID)

Quantitative analysis of the essential oil was performed on an Agilent Technologies chromatograph (model 6890N series) using a flame ionization detector (FID). The same capillary columns and analytical parameters as those used in the GC-MS measurement were also used in the GC-FID analysis.

4.7. Identification and Quantification of Compounds

Identification of the volatile constituents was archived by comparison of their retention indices (RI) with a mass spectrum with retention indices and mass spectra reported in Adams (2009). The experiment retention indices were calculated according to the literature [39] in reference to a homologous series of n-alkanes C9–C20 under identical experimental conditions. Quantification of volatile components was performed using data integration by GC-FID in areas of each peak.

4.8. Enantioselective Distribution

Enantioselective analysis of the essential oil was carried out by GC-MS and performed using the same Agilent Technologies instrument described previously. The helium flow was 1 mL/min. The injector was operated in 40:1 split mode at 220 °C. The oven thermal program was as follows: 50 °C, with an initial time of 5 min and a maximum temperature of 230 °C, with an initial temperature ramp of 2 °C/min until reaching 220 °C. The chiral capillary columns used were diethyl tert-butyl silyl-Beta-cyclodextrin (25 m × 0.25 mm, 0.25 µm film thickness).
A homologous series of n-alkanes (C9–C25) was also injected to calculate the linear retention indices of the stereoisomers. The enantiomers were identified based on their mass spectra and elution order, which was determined through the injection of enantiomerically pure standards.

5. Conclusions

The EO of Zanthoxylum lepidopteriphilum was obtained from the fruits of the plant, with a very high extraction yield of 1.38%. The chemical composition of the EO included 33 compounds, of which α-thujone, β-thujone, terpinen-4-ol, and sabinene were the most heavily represented. The enantioselective analysis revealed the presence of four pairs of optical isomers, which were (+)-α-pinene, (−) sabinene, (+) α-thujone, and (+)-terpinen-4-ol.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.M.; investigation, Y.A., C.C., M.M. and N.C.; data curation, Y.A., J.M.A. and V.M.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.A., C.C., V.M., M.M. and N.C; supervision, V.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja (UTPL) for supporting this investigation and the open access publication.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Rezende, D.; Souza, R.; Magalhães, M.; Silva Caetano, A.; Sousa Carvalho, M.; de Souza, E.; de Lima Guimarães, L.; Nelson, D.; Batista, L.; das Graças Cardoso, M. Characterization of the Biological Potential of the Essential Oils from Five Species of Medicinal Plants. Am. J. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 154–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Paul, A.; Kumar, A.; Singh, G.; Choudhary, A. Medicinal, pharmaceutical and pharmacological properties of Zanthoxylum armatum: A Review. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 2018, 7, 892–900. [Google Scholar]
  3. Rauf, A.; Rasul Suleria, H.A.; Mukarram Shah, S.M. Phytochemical and Pharmacological Investigation of the Family Rutaceae, 1st ed.; Apple Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhang, W.J.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, Z.-Y.; Liang, J.-Y.; Geng, Z.-F.; Guo, S.-S.; Du, S.-S.; Deng, Z.-W. Chemical Composition of Essential Oils from Six Zanthoxylum Species and Their Repellent Activities against Two Stored-Product Insects. J. Chem. 2017, 2017, 1287362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Groppo, M.; Pirani, J.R. A new species of Zanthoxylum (Rutaceae) with a key to the species from Northeastern Brazil. Phytotaxa 2017, 314, 259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. The Plant List. Available online: http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl1.1/search?q=zanthoxylum (accessed on 15 September 2024).
  7. Patiño, L.O.J.; Prieto, R.J.A.; Cuca, S.L.E. Zanthoxylum Genus as Potential Source of Bioactive Compounds. In Bioactive Compounds in Phytomedicine; InTech: London, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  8. Prieto, J.A.; Patiño, O.J.; Delgado, O.J.; Moreno, J.P.; Cuca, L.E. Chemical composition, insecticidal, and antifungal activities of fruit essential oils of three Colombian Zanthoxylum species. Chil. J. Agric. Res. 2011, 71, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Heredia, Y.; Heredia-Díaz, Y.; González-Fernández, R.; Escalona-Arranz, J.C.; García-Díaz, J.; de la Vega-Acosta, J. Influencia del medio de extracción en la composición de sustancias volátiles de las hojas de Zanthoxylum pistacifolium Griseb. Rev. Cubana Quím. 2016, 28, 490–506. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ngassoum, M.B.; Essia-Ngang, J.J.; Tatsadjieu, L.N.; Jirovetz, L.; Buchbauer, G.; Adjoudji, O. Antimicrobial study of essential oils of Ocimum gratissimum leaves and Zanthoxylum xanthoxyloides fruits from Cameroon. Fitoterapia 2003, 74, 284–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jorgensen, P.; León, S. Catalogue of the Vascular Plants of Ecuador; Missouri Botanical Garden Press: St. Louis, MO, USA, 1999; pp. 880–881. Available online: http://www.mobot.org/mobot/research/ecuador/resultssp.shtml (accessed on 15 September 2024).
  12. De la Torre, L.; Navarrete, H.; Muriel, M.P.; Macía, M.; Balslev, H. Enciclopedia de las Plantas Útiles del Ecuador; Herbario QCA de la Escuela de Ciencias Biológicas de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador & Herbario AAU del Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas de la Universidad de Aarhus: Quito, Ecuador, 2008; ISBN 9789978771358. [Google Scholar]
  13. Grandtner, M.M.; Chevrette, J. Dictionary of South American Trees; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Stashenko, E.E.; Martínez, J.R.; Durán, D.C.; Córdoba, Y.; Caballero, D. Estudio comparativo de la composición química y la actividad antioxidante de los aceites esenciales de algunas plantas del género Lippia (Verbenaceae) cultivadas en Colombia. Rev. Acad. Colomb. Cienc. Exactas Fís. Nat. 2014, 38, 89–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lubbe, A.; Verpoorte, R. Cultivation of medicinal and aromatic plants for specialty industrial materials. Ind. Crops Prod. 2011, 34, 785–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Fattahi, B.; Nazeri, V.; Kalantari, S.; Bonfill, M.; Fattahi, M. Essential oil variation in wild-growing populations of Salvia reuterana Boiss. collected from Iran: Using GC–MS and multivariate analysis. Ind. Crops Prod. 2016, 81, 180–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Adams, R.P. Identification of Essential Oil Components by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry, 4th ed.; Allured Publishing Corporation: Carol Stream, IL, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  18. Morocho, V.; Toro, M.L.; Cartuche, L.; Guaya, D.; Valarezo, E.; Malagón, O.; Ramírez, J. Chemical Composition and Antimicrobial Activity of Essential Oil of Lepechinia radula Benth Epling. Rec. Nat. Prod. 2017, 11, 57–62. Available online: www.acgpubs.org/RNP (accessed on 16 December 2018).
  19. Valarezo, E.; Rosillo, M.; Cartuche, L.; Malagón, O.; Meneses, M.; Morocho, V. Chemical composition, antifungal and antibacterial activity of the essential oil from Baccharis latifolia (Ruiz & Pav.) Pers. (Asteraceae) from Loja, Ecuador. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2013, 25, 233–238. [Google Scholar]
  20. El Asbahani, A.; Jilale, A.; Voisin, S.N.; Aït Addi, E.; Casabianca, H.; El Mousadik, A.; Hartmann, D.J.; Renaud, F.N.R. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of nine essential oils obtained by steam distillation of plants from the Souss-Massa Region (Morocco). J. Essent. Oil Res. 2015, 27, 34–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mighr, H.; Mighri, H.; Akrout, A.; El-jeni, H.; Zaidi, S.; Tomi, F.; Casanova, J.; Neffati, M. Composition and Intraspecific Chemical Variability of the Essential Oil from Artemisia herba-alba Growing Wild in Tunisia. Chem. Biodivers. 2010, 7, 2709–2717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Noumi, E.; Snoussi, M.; Alreshidi, M.M.; Rekha, P.-D.; Saptami, K.; Caputo, L.; De Martino, L.; Souza, L.F.; Msaada, K.; Mancini, E.; et al. Chemical and Biological Evaluation of Essential Oils from Cardamom Species. Molecules 2018, 23, 2818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Tzakou, O.; Loukis, A. Chemical composition of the essential oil of Achillea umbellata growing in Greece. Nat. Prod. Res. 2009, 23, 264–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Fan, S.; Chang, J.; Zong, Y.; Hu, G.; Jia, J. GC-MS Analysis of the Composition of the Essential Oil from Dendranthema indicum Var. Aromaticum Using Three Extraction Methods and Two Columns. Molecules 2018, 23, 576. [Google Scholar]
  25. Başer, K.H.C.; Başer, K.H.C.; Demirci, B.; Kirimer, N.; Satil, F.; Tümen, G. The essential oils of Thymus migricus and T. fedtschenkoi var. handelii from Turkey. Flavour Fragr. J. 2002, 17, 41–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Maggio, A.; Rosselli, S.; Bruno, M.; Spadaro, V.; Raimondo, F.M.; Senatore, F. Chemical composition of essential oil from Italian populations of Artemisia alba Turra (Asteraceae). Molecules 2012, 17, 10232–10241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hua, C.X.; Wang, G.R.; Lei, Y. Evaluation of essential oil composition and DNA diversity of mint resources from China. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2011, 10, 16740–16745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tenore, G.C.; Ciampaglia, R.; Arnold, N.A.; Piozzi, F.; Napolitano, F.; Rigano, D.; Senatore, F. Antimicrobial and antioxidant properties of the essential oil of Salvia lanigera from Cyprus. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2011, 49, 238–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Pulido, A.; Riveros, L.; Rodriguez, J. Identificación de componentes químicos del aceite esencial de romero (Rosmarinus officinalis L.) proveniente de cultivos orgánicos en la zona alta andina. Rev. Colomb. Investig. Agroind. 2018, 5, 6–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Özek, G.; Özek, G.; Suleimen, Y.; Tabanca, N.; Doudkin, R.; Gorovoy, P.G.; Göger, F.; Wedge, D.E.; Ali, A.; Khan, I.A.; et al. Chemical Diversity and Biological Activity of the Volatiles of Five Artemisia Species from Far East Russia. Rec. Nat. Prod. 2014, 8, 242–261. [Google Scholar]
  31. Tatsadjieu, L.N.; Essia Ngang, J.J.; Ngassoum, M.B.; Etoa, F.X. Antibacterial and antifungal activity of Xylopia aethiopica, Monodora myristica, Zanthoxylum xanthoxyloïdes and Zanthoxylum leprieurii from Cameroon. Fitoterapia 2003, 74, 469–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. González, N.; Aparicio, R.; Araque, C.; Velasco, J.; Usubillaga, A. Composición química y actividad antibacteriana del aceite esencial de los frutos de una nueva especie del género Zanthoxylum (Sección Tobinia-Rutaceae) de Venezuela. Rev. Fac. Agron. 2017, 34, 158–174. [Google Scholar]
  33. Benyelles, B.; Allali, H.; Dib, M.E.A.; Djabou, N.; Paolini, J.; Costa, J. Chemical Composition Variability of Essential Oils of Daucus gracilis Steinh. from Algeria. Chem. Biodivers. 2017, 14, e1600490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, Y.; You, C.X.; Yang, K.; Wu, Y.; Chen, R.; Zhang, W.J.; Liu, L.; Du, S.S.; Deng, Z.W.; Geng, Z.F.; et al. Bioactivity of Essential Oil of Zingiber purpureum Rhizomes and Its Main Compounds against Two Stored Product Insects. J. Econ. Entomol. 2015, 108, 925–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zambón, S.N.; Chamorro, E.R.; Casuscelli, S.C. Estudio de la Pureza Óptica de Citronelal presente en los Aceites Esenciales obtenidos de Citronela y de Eucalipto Citriodora. Inf. Tecnol. 2015, 26, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. He, Q.; Wang, W.; Zhu, L. Larvicidal activity of Zanthoxylum acanthopodium essential oil against the malaria mosquitoes, Anopheles anthropophagus and Anopheles sinensis. Malar. J. 2018, 17, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wang, C.F.; Yang, K.; Zhang, H.M.; Cao, J.; Fang, R.; Liu, Z.L.; Du, S.S.; Wang, Y.Y.; Deng, Z.W.; Zhou, L. Components and Insecticidal Activity against the Maize Weevils of Zanthoxylum schinifolium Fruits and Leaves. Molecules 2011, 16, 3077–3088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tangjitjaroenkun, J.; Chavasiri, W.; Thunyaharn, S.; Yompakdee, C. Bactericidal effects and time–kill studies of the essential oil from the fruits of Zanthoxylum limonella on multi-drug resistant bacteria. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2012, 24, 363–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jammu, A.; Muhammad Irshad, P.; Aziz, S.; Naeem Ahmed, M.; Asghar, G.; Akram, M.; Muzaffarabad Pakistan, K. Comparisons of Chemical and Biological Studies of Essential Oils of Stem, Leaves and Seeds of Zanthoxylum alatum Roxb Growing Wild in the State of. Nat. Prod. 2018, 12, 638–642. [Google Scholar]
  40. Weeks, K.L.; Williams, J.D.; Boyce, G.R. A three-step enantioselective synthesis of (+)- and (-)-α-thujone. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2021, 19, 8018–8020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Williams, J.D.; Yazarians, J.A.; Almeyda, C.C.; Anderson, K.A.; Boyce, G.R. Detection of the Previously Unobserved Stereoisomers of Thujone in the Essential Oil and Consumable Products of Sage (Salvia officinalis L.) Using Headspace Solid-Phase Microextraction–Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 64, 4319–4326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Tamer, C.E.; Suna, S.; Özcan-Sinir, G. Toxicological Aspects of Ingredients Used in Nonalcoholic Beverages. In Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Grumezescu, A.M., Holban, A.M., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2019; pp. 441–481. [Google Scholar]
  43. ISO 279:1998; NFT 75-111: Determination de la Densité Relative à 20 °C—Méthode de Référence (Standard: Determination of Relative Density at 20 °C—Reference Method). Association Française de Normalisation: La Plaine Saint Denis, France, 1998.
  44. ISO 280:1998; NF 75-112: Indice de Réfraction à 20 °C—Méthode de Référence (Standard: Refractive Index at 20 °C—Reference Method). Association Française de Normalisation: La Plaine Saint Denis, France, 1998.
  45. ISO 592:1998; Huiles Essentielles—Détermination du Pouvoir Rotatoire. Association Française de Normalisation: La Plaine Saint Denis, France, 1998.
Figure 1. Chromatogram of essential oil from Zanthoxylum lepidopteriphilum fruits in DB-5ms column.
Figure 1. Chromatogram of essential oil from Zanthoxylum lepidopteriphilum fruits in DB-5ms column.
Plants 13 02834 g001
Table 1. Chemical composition of the essential oil from Zanthoxylum lepidopteriphilum fruits.
Table 1. Chemical composition of the essential oil from Zanthoxylum lepidopteriphilum fruits.
CompoundDB-5msHP-INNOWax
LRIcalLRIref [17]%LRIcalLRIref%
1α-thujene9259240.10 ± 0.0110191020 [18]0.12 ± 0.01
2α-pinene9319320.23 ± 0.0310141116 [18]0.26 ± 0.03
3Sabinene9719693.60 ± 0.3011171112 [18]4.02 ± 0.34
4β-pinene9769740.22 ± 0.0111031100 [18]0.22 ± 0.02
5Myrcene9899880.48 ± 0.0311631161 [19]0.51 ± 0.04
6α-phellandrene100510020.68 ± 0.0411601168 [20]0.72 ± 0.06
7α-terpinene101510140.48 ± 0.0511751166 [18]0.52 ± 0.06
8p-cymene102310200.11 ± 0.0112681269 [20]0.12 ± 0.02
9Limonene102810241.12 ± 0.0711951194 [19]0.92 ± 0.07
10Eucalyptol103110260.64 ± 0.0212021202 [21]0.65 ± 0.03
11(E)-β-ocimene104610440.42 ± 0.0312531252 [19]0.42 ± 0.03
12Terpinene <γ-> 105710540.87 ± 0.0912421238 [19]0.91 ± 0.10
13Trans-4-thujanol106910650.43 ± 0.0614641458 [20]0.44 ± 0.05
14Terpinolene 108410860.21 ± 0.0212791265 [22]0.22 ± 0.02
15Cis-4-thujanol110110980.35 ± 0.0415481555 [23]0.36 ± 0.18
16α-thujone1107110170.26 ± 1.8114171403 [24]70.38 ± 1.72
17β-thujone1118111210.78 ± 1.4614341421 [24]10.90 ± 1.45
18Cis-p-2-menthen-1-ol112411180.33 ± 0.0515561638 [25]0.13 ± 0.01
19Trans-p-2-menthen-1-ol 114211360.21 ± 0.0215621571 [26]0.32 ± 0.02
20Trans-verbenol 114511400.15 ± 0.01---
21Neo-thujol115311490.24 ± 0.03---
223-thujanol116911640.24 ± 0.01---
23Pinocamphone <cis->117511721.44 ± 0.0815361565 [26]1.63 ± 0.09
24Terpinen-4-ol 118011744.15 ± 0.5216011602 [19]4.06 ± 0.49
25Myrtenol119211940.23 ± 0.0418051805 [26]0.00
26γ-terpineol 119411990.37 ± 0.0216281685 [27]0.20 ± 0.02
27Carvotanacetone 124812440.25 ± 0.0216701697 [25]0.15 ± 0.02
28Thujanol acetate <iso-3-> 126912670.20 ± 0.02---
29Sabinyl acetate <trans->128812890.43 ± 0.0816521658 [28]0.30 ± 0.01
30Carvacrol 129812980.14 ± 0.01---
31Myrtenyl acetate131613240.28 ± 0.02---
32α-terpinolene---16981297 [29]0.42 ± 0.10
33Camphene---16791076 [30]0.43 ± 0.04
Monoterpenes hydrocarbons8.508.94
Oxygenated monoterpenes 90.2189.21
Others0.91 0.30
TOTAL99.62 99.30
Notes: LRIcal: linear retention index calculated; LRIref [17]: linear retention index of the literature, Adams (2009); IRLref.: linear retention indices references [18] (Morocho et al., 2017); [19] (Valarezo et al., 2013), [20] (El Asbahani et al., 2015); [21] (Mighr et al., 2010); [22] (Noumi et al., 2018); [23] (Tzakou and Loukis, 2009); [24] (Fan et al., 2018); [25] (Başer, Demirci, Kirimer, Satil, and Tümen, 2002); [26] (Maggio et al., 2012); [27] (Hua, Wang, and Lei, 2011); [28] (Tenore et al., 2011); [29] (Pulido, Riveros, and Rodriguez, 2018); [30] (Özek et al., 2014).
Table 2. Enantiomeric analysis of the components of Z. lepidopteriphilum essential oil.
Table 2. Enantiomeric analysis of the components of Z. lepidopteriphilum essential oil.
Compound RT LRIcal Enantiomeric
Distribution %
e.e. (%)
(1R,5R)-(+)-α-pinene9.2992450.330.65
(1S,5S)-(−)-α-pinene9.7193249.67
(1R,5R)-(+)-sabinene12.599864.7890.44
(1S,5S)-(−)-sabinene13.2099895.22
(1R,4S,5S)-(+)-α-thujone 21.91114796.9884.40
(1S,4R,5R)-(−)-α-thujone24.7611958.21
(4S)-(+)-terpinen-4-ol28.97126968.7818.50
(4R)-(−)-terpinen-4-ol29.07127031.22
Notes: RT: retention time (minutes); LRIcal: linear retention indices calculated in reference to a homologous series of n-alkanes on MEGA-DEX DET beta capillary column; e.e.: enantiomeric excess.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Morocho, V.; Aguilar, Y.; Cruz, C.; Cumbicus, N.; Andrade, J.M.; Montalvan, M. Chemical Composition, Enantiomeric Distribution, and Physical Properties of the Fruit Essential Oil from Zanthoxylum lepidopteriphilum (Reynel) Rutaceae from Ecuador. Plants 2024, 13, 2834. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13202834

AMA Style

Morocho V, Aguilar Y, Cruz C, Cumbicus N, Andrade JM, Montalvan M. Chemical Composition, Enantiomeric Distribution, and Physical Properties of the Fruit Essential Oil from Zanthoxylum lepidopteriphilum (Reynel) Rutaceae from Ecuador. Plants. 2024; 13(20):2834. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13202834

Chicago/Turabian Style

Morocho, Vladimir, Yolanda Aguilar, Claudia Cruz, Nixon Cumbicus, Jose Miguel Andrade, and Mayra Montalvan. 2024. "Chemical Composition, Enantiomeric Distribution, and Physical Properties of the Fruit Essential Oil from Zanthoxylum lepidopteriphilum (Reynel) Rutaceae from Ecuador" Plants 13, no. 20: 2834. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13202834

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop