The radiometric stability of TIRS depends on the stability of the background and dark signals during Earth imaging. As mentioned in
Section 1.2, the background-subtraction step of the radiometric calibration process depends on the background and dark signals remaining constant between the collections of space/OBC data. To monitor this on-orbit, special collects are obtained in which deep space port data is recorded continuously for 36 min (151,200 frames in total). This time interval is a typical length of time between the space/OBC collects. The variation of the space (
i.e., background) signal and of the dark band (
i.e., dark current) signal over this time would be an indication of the induced radiometric error added to an Earth collection due to background and dark current drift.
2.2.1. Dark Band Variation over 36 Min
The dark band for TIRS serves as an indication for the variation of dark current during an Earth image collection interval. The standard deviation of the dark band counts over the field-of-view for the 36 min deep space collection is shown in
Figure 4. The 1
σ variation of the dark band is approximately 0.55 counts, which implies a stable dark current.
Figure 5 illustrates the deviation of the average dark count over time. Each data point represents the difference between the average dark count for the frame versus the average dark count for the first frame and indicates that there is no discernable trend in the dark counts over the 36 minutes. As mentioned previously (Section 1.2), a trend in the dark band counts over an Earth collection interval would imply a trend in the dark current that similarly affects the illuminated bands in which case the dark band information may be used to adjust the counts in band10 and band11. The dark data seen during the on-orbit operation of TIRS thus far indicate that this correction is not necessary.
Figure 4.
Standard deviation for all detectors in the dark band in terms of counts over continuous 36 minutes of image collection.
Figure 4.
Standard deviation for all detectors in the dark band in terms of counts over continuous 36 minutes of image collection.
Figure 5.
Average counts for the entire dark band over continuous 36 minutes of image collection (151,200 frames).
Figure 5.
Average counts for the entire dark band over continuous 36 minutes of image collection (151,200 frames).
2.2.2. Background Variation over 36 Minutes
Whereas the dark band serves as an indication of dark current variation, the image data from the 36 min deep space collect serve as an indication of the stability of the instrument response to low background signals.
Figure 6 illustrates the variation of the background in band10 and band11 expressed as a radiance change at 300 K. Similarly, this variation can be expressed as a change in brightness temperature at 300 K. The data indicate that the background variation during the time interval between typical space/OBC collects is about 0.005
W/m2/sr/µm for the worst case. This value is roughly the same as the calculated value of the NEdL.
Figure 6.
The variation of radiance (1σ) in both bands while viewing deep space continuously for 36 minutes of image collection. The approximate change in brightness temperature is shown on the right hand axis.
Figure 6.
The variation of radiance (1σ) in both bands while viewing deep space continuously for 36 minutes of image collection. The approximate change in brightness temperature is shown on the right hand axis.
2.2.4. Orbital Stability
Another special collect performed routinely deals with examining the variation of the background and of the response to the OBC over 1.5 orbits (approximately 150 min). Characterizing the amount of background variation is important to the radiometric accuracy of TIRS since any variation of the background signal during the Earth interval will cause the derived radiance of the Earth to vary by the same amount. Since image data of the deep space port cannot be collected simultaneously with the Earth data, this special collect allows for the characterization of the background through multiple Earth intervals.
Figure 7.
The variation of radiance (1σ) in both bands while viewing the OBC at a temperature of 270 K continuously for 36 minutes of image collection. The approximate variation in brightness temperature is shown on the right hand axis.
Figure 7.
The variation of radiance (1σ) in both bands while viewing the OBC at a temperature of 270 K continuously for 36 minutes of image collection. The approximate variation in brightness temperature is shown on the right hand axis.
For this collection, a standard space/OBC collect is obtained roughly every eight minutes for 1.5 orbits, which yields 18 space datasets along with 18 OBC datasets. The OBC temperature is held at approximately 295 K over the 1.5 orbits. The variation of the background over the 1.5 orbits was found by taking the mean count (over the one minute of data collection) for each of the 18 space collects. The minimum and the maximum variation of these 18 collects relative to the mean of the 18 collects is calculated in terms of the equivalent change in radiance at 300 K. This variation represents the maximum change of the background for an orbit and is illustrated in
Figure 8 for band10 and band11. The variation of the background over the 1.5 orbits is approximately
±0.015
W/m2/sr/µm or
±0.13 K or
±0.2% for the worst case. Since the background signal can be expected to vary by this amount, the calibrated radiance from the Earth scene can be expected to vary over this range between the collection of background frames (recall
Section 1.2).
The variation of the background signal is due to the solar heating and cooling of the instrument over the course of an orbit.
Figure 9 demonstrates the average background error for each band as a function of the WRS2 row. In general for this dataset, WRS2 rows 1 through 124 are roughly on the daytime side of the orbit, and rows 125 through 248 are roughly on the nighttime side of the orbit. The data in the graph indicate that the background signal is higher than the average during the day pass of the orbit and is lower on the night pass. This effect is correlated with the temperature of the structure assembly that secures the SSM mirror in place. The solar loading heats the structure, which causes an increase in the optical background signal since the structure is in the optical path and is viewed by the detectors. This increased signal is detected differently by the three focal plane arrays due to their geometry relative to the optical boresight and the SSM structure. This non-uniform background signal variation is evident in the across-track variation seen in
Figure 8. Additionally, the magnitude of the variation is greater in band11, again due to the geometry of the detectors viewing the optical system and structure.
Figure 8.
The minimum and maximum variation of the band10 (top) and band11 (bottom) background response of 18 space collects over 1.5 orbits expressed as a difference in radiance from the mean. The approximate change in brightness temperature is shown on the right hand axis.
Figure 8.
The minimum and maximum variation of the band10 (top) and band11 (bottom) background response of 18 space collects over 1.5 orbits expressed as a difference in radiance from the mean. The approximate change in brightness temperature is shown on the right hand axis.
Figure 9.
Variation from the average background signal for both bands as a function of WRS row. Orbital day is approximately rows 1–124 while orbital night is approximately rows 125–248. The effect is correlated with the temperature of the SSM structure assembly. An increase in structure temperature produces a higher optical background signal that is detected on the focal plane.
Figure 9.
Variation from the average background signal for both bands as a function of WRS row. Orbital day is approximately rows 1–124 while orbital night is approximately rows 125–248. The effect is correlated with the temperature of the SSM structure assembly. An increase in structure temperature produces a higher optical background signal that is detected on the focal plane.
The OBC data from the space/OBC 1.5 orbit collects provide an indication of the stability of the radiometric response of TIRS over the course of an orbit. The variation of the instrument response to the OBC over the 1.5 orbits was found by subtracting the associated space data from the OBC data and converting the mean of each background-subtracted OBC collect into radiance. The minimum and the maximum variation of these 18 collects relative to the mean of the 18 collect were then calculated. The variation is illustrated in
Figure 10 for band10 and band11. The variation is approximately
±0.015
W/m2/sr/µm or
±0.13 K or
±0.2% for the worst case and represents the total change of the response of TIRS due to changes in the electronics temperatures, power voltage,
etc., caused by the environmental conditions as TIRS travels in orbit.
Figure 10.
The minimum and maximum variation of the band10 (top) and band11 (bottom) response of 18 OBC collects over 1.5 orbits expressed as a difference in radiance from the mean. The approximate change in brightness temperature is shown on the right hand axis.
Figure 10.
The minimum and maximum variation of the band10 (top) and band11 (bottom) response of 18 OBC collects over 1.5 orbits expressed as a difference in radiance from the mean. The approximate change in brightness temperature is shown on the right hand axis.
2.2.5. Long Term Stability and Trends
The long term stability of the instrument response is also important to characterize. An overall trend in the TIRS response might necessitate an update to the radiometric calibration in order to compensate for the trend. Since a space/OBC collect is obtained before and after every Earth interval, a large dataset of these collects exists, which allows for the long term trending of the radiometric response.
For each space/OBC collect, the background-subtracted counts from the OBC (at a set point temperature of 295 K) are converted to radiance using the standard radiometric calibration process. The average observed radiance of the OBC over time is shown in
Figure 11 for band10 and band11. The jumps and discontinuities in the data are due to several factors: temperature fluctuations of the OBC; observatory safehold events in which the instrument was turned off and no data was taken; and day/night heating of the SSM baffle assembly causing a fluctuation in background signal levels (see
Section 2.2.4). In general, a very slight downward trend is noticed in the data. Over the course of a year, the band10 response to the OBC has dropped by approximately 0.018
W/m2/sr/µm and the band11 response has dropped by approximately 0.009
W/m2/sr/µm. The apparent trend may be due to either an actual change in the sensitivity of the detectors, or due to a degradation of the output radiance of the blackbody. In either case, the effect is so far negligible.
Figure 11.
The average instrument response of band10 (top) and band11 (bottom) to the OBC at a set point temperature of 295 K over the course of one year. The discontinuities are due to factors such as temperature fluctuations of the OBC, suspension of imaging activities, and day/night fluctuations in background signal levels. In general there is a 0.2% per year trend in band10 and a 0.1% per year trend in band11.
Figure 11.
The average instrument response of band10 (top) and band11 (bottom) to the OBC at a set point temperature of 295 K over the course of one year. The discontinuities are due to factors such as temperature fluctuations of the OBC, suspension of imaging activities, and day/night fluctuations in background signal levels. In general there is a 0.2% per year trend in band10 and a 0.1% per year trend in band11.
Vicarious absolute radiometric data is used in addition to the trending of the blackbody data to determine if the TIRS response is indeed changing. However, due to the stray light effects (see
Section 2.3 and
Section 2.4), the radiometric errors induced by the stray light must be compensated for before it can be determined with reasonable accuracy whether the instrument response is degrading [
1]. If so, a calibration update will be applied to the ground processing system to compensate for the degradation in the final image product. These datasets will be continuously monitored throughout the lifetime of the instrument to determine future calibration updates as necessary.